Intravenous Acetaminophen (Paracetamol): Comparable Analgesic Efficacy, but Better Local Safety than Its Prodrug, Propacetamol, for Postoperative Pain After Third Molar Surgery
We compared an acetaminophen (paracetamol) 1 g (n = 51) formulation for infusion with propacetamol 2 g (n = 51) and placebo (n = 50) in a randomized, controlled, double-blind, parallel group trial in patients with moderate-to-severe pain after third molar surgery. Treatment efficacy was assessed in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Anesthesia and analgesia 2005-07, Vol.101 (1), p.90-96 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 96 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 90 |
container_title | Anesthesia and analgesia |
container_volume | 101 |
creator | Moller, Philip Lange Juhl, Gitte Irene Payen-Champenois, Catherine Skoglund, Lasse Ansgar |
description | We compared an acetaminophen (paracetamol) 1 g (n = 51) formulation for infusion with propacetamol 2 g (n = 51) and placebo (n = 50) in a randomized, controlled, double-blind, parallel group trial in patients with moderate-to-severe pain after third molar surgery. Treatment efficacy was assessed in house for 6 h after starting the 15-min infusion. Significant effects versus placebo (P < 0.01) were obtained with both active treatments on pain relief, pain intensity difference on a 100-mm visual analog scale, and on a categorical scale (except for propacetamol at 6 h). No significant differences were noted between active groups except at 1 h. Six-hour weighted sums of primary assessments showed significantly better efficacy than placebo (P < 0.0001) and no difference between active treatments. Median stopwatch time to onset of pain relief for active treatment was 6–8 min after infusion start. Active treatments showed comparable efficacy with a significantly longer duration of analgesia and better patients’ global evaluation compared with placebo. The incidence of patients reporting local pain at the infusion site was significantly less frequent after IV acetaminophen or placebo (0%) in comparison with propacetamol (49%). In conclusion, acetaminophen 1 g and propacetamol 2 g were superior to placebo regarding analgesic efficacy, with a more frequent incidence of local pain at the infusion site for propacetamol. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1213/01.ANE.0000155297.47955.D6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_wolte</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_15976212</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>15976212</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p1847-ff4f0a81f46871e01bc1468578e57b54c2efe4b5bfc65eb809efaa6ac28b7b463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1UdFu1DAQ9AOIlsIvVCueQLqkdhLHCW_pcbQnHXBS2-fT2re-BHJx5Dit7q_4RBLa7svMjkaj1SxjnwSPRSLSKy7i6ucq5tMIKZNSxZkqpYy_5W_Y-SSmUVKW5Rl7Pwy_Zw8v8nfsTMhS5YlIztnfdRc8PlLnxgEqQwGPTef6mjr4vEWP_xXXfvkKS3fsJ0G3BFWH7YGGxsDK2sagOS1AjwGuKQTysHEGW7hDS-EEocYO1mGArXd7Px4WM-lfcxdgnYetG4LryWNoHgm22HRQ2Tnpvm78Hn64Fj3cjf5A_vSBvbXYDvTxBS_Yw_fV_fI22vy6WS-rTdSLIlORtZnlWAib5YUSxIU2YqJSFSSVlplJyFKmpbYml6QLXpJFzNEkhVY6y9MLdvmc24_6SPtd75sj-tPutbrJkD0bnlw73Tr8accn8ruasA31bn4Il2kZJRNwNS3RXL9K_wG6OIP6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intravenous Acetaminophen (Paracetamol): Comparable Analgesic Efficacy, but Better Local Safety than Its Prodrug, Propacetamol, for Postoperative Pain After Third Molar Surgery</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Moller, Philip Lange ; Juhl, Gitte Irene ; Payen-Champenois, Catherine ; Skoglund, Lasse Ansgar</creator><creatorcontrib>Moller, Philip Lange ; Juhl, Gitte Irene ; Payen-Champenois, Catherine ; Skoglund, Lasse Ansgar</creatorcontrib><description>We compared an acetaminophen (paracetamol) 1 g (n = 51) formulation for infusion with propacetamol 2 g (n = 51) and placebo (n = 50) in a randomized, controlled, double-blind, parallel group trial in patients with moderate-to-severe pain after third molar surgery. Treatment efficacy was assessed in house for 6 h after starting the 15-min infusion. Significant effects versus placebo (P < 0.01) were obtained with both active treatments on pain relief, pain intensity difference on a 100-mm visual analog scale, and on a categorical scale (except for propacetamol at 6 h). No significant differences were noted between active groups except at 1 h. Six-hour weighted sums of primary assessments showed significantly better efficacy than placebo (P < 0.0001) and no difference between active treatments. Median stopwatch time to onset of pain relief for active treatment was 6–8 min after infusion start. Active treatments showed comparable efficacy with a significantly longer duration of analgesia and better patients’ global evaluation compared with placebo. The incidence of patients reporting local pain at the infusion site was significantly less frequent after IV acetaminophen or placebo (0%) in comparison with propacetamol (49%). In conclusion, acetaminophen 1 g and propacetamol 2 g were superior to placebo regarding analgesic efficacy, with a more frequent incidence of local pain at the infusion site for propacetamol.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-2999</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000155297.47955.D6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15976212</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: International Anesthesia Research Society</publisher><subject>Acetaminophen - administration & dosage ; Acetaminophen - adverse effects ; Acetaminophen - analogs & derivatives ; Acetaminophen - therapeutic use ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Analgesics, Non-Narcotic - administration & dosage ; Analgesics, Non-Narcotic - adverse effects ; Analgesics, Non-Narcotic - therapeutic use ; Double-Blind Method ; Female ; Humans ; Infusions, Intravenous ; Male ; Molar, Third - surgery ; Pain Measurement - drug effects ; Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy ; Prodrugs - administration & dosage ; Prodrugs - adverse effects ; Prodrugs - therapeutic use ; Tooth Extraction</subject><ispartof>Anesthesia and analgesia, 2005-07, Vol.101 (1), p.90-96</ispartof><rights>International Anesthesia Research Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&NEWS=n&CSC=Y&PAGE=fulltext&D=ovft&AN=00000539-200507000-00017$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwolterskluwer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4594,27903,27904,65209</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15976212$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moller, Philip Lange</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juhl, Gitte Irene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Payen-Champenois, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skoglund, Lasse Ansgar</creatorcontrib><title>Intravenous Acetaminophen (Paracetamol): Comparable Analgesic Efficacy, but Better Local Safety than Its Prodrug, Propacetamol, for Postoperative Pain After Third Molar Surgery</title><title>Anesthesia and analgesia</title><addtitle>Anesth Analg</addtitle><description>We compared an acetaminophen (paracetamol) 1 g (n = 51) formulation for infusion with propacetamol 2 g (n = 51) and placebo (n = 50) in a randomized, controlled, double-blind, parallel group trial in patients with moderate-to-severe pain after third molar surgery. Treatment efficacy was assessed in house for 6 h after starting the 15-min infusion. Significant effects versus placebo (P < 0.01) were obtained with both active treatments on pain relief, pain intensity difference on a 100-mm visual analog scale, and on a categorical scale (except for propacetamol at 6 h). No significant differences were noted between active groups except at 1 h. Six-hour weighted sums of primary assessments showed significantly better efficacy than placebo (P < 0.0001) and no difference between active treatments. Median stopwatch time to onset of pain relief for active treatment was 6–8 min after infusion start. Active treatments showed comparable efficacy with a significantly longer duration of analgesia and better patients’ global evaluation compared with placebo. The incidence of patients reporting local pain at the infusion site was significantly less frequent after IV acetaminophen or placebo (0%) in comparison with propacetamol (49%). In conclusion, acetaminophen 1 g and propacetamol 2 g were superior to placebo regarding analgesic efficacy, with a more frequent incidence of local pain at the infusion site for propacetamol.</description><subject>Acetaminophen - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Acetaminophen - adverse effects</subject><subject>Acetaminophen - analogs & derivatives</subject><subject>Acetaminophen - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analgesics, Non-Narcotic - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Analgesics, Non-Narcotic - adverse effects</subject><subject>Analgesics, Non-Narcotic - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infusions, Intravenous</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Molar, Third - surgery</subject><subject>Pain Measurement - drug effects</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy</subject><subject>Prodrugs - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Prodrugs - adverse effects</subject><subject>Prodrugs - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Tooth Extraction</subject><issn>0003-2999</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1UdFu1DAQ9AOIlsIvVCueQLqkdhLHCW_pcbQnHXBS2-fT2re-BHJx5Dit7q_4RBLa7svMjkaj1SxjnwSPRSLSKy7i6ucq5tMIKZNSxZkqpYy_5W_Y-SSmUVKW5Rl7Pwy_Zw8v8nfsTMhS5YlIztnfdRc8PlLnxgEqQwGPTef6mjr4vEWP_xXXfvkKS3fsJ0G3BFWH7YGGxsDK2sagOS1AjwGuKQTysHEGW7hDS-EEocYO1mGArXd7Px4WM-lfcxdgnYetG4LryWNoHgm22HRQ2Tnpvm78Hn64Fj3cjf5A_vSBvbXYDvTxBS_Yw_fV_fI22vy6WS-rTdSLIlORtZnlWAib5YUSxIU2YqJSFSSVlplJyFKmpbYml6QLXpJFzNEkhVY6y9MLdvmc24_6SPtd75sj-tPutbrJkD0bnlw73Tr8accn8ruasA31bn4Il2kZJRNwNS3RXL9K_wG6OIP6</recordid><startdate>20050701</startdate><enddate>20050701</enddate><creator>Moller, Philip Lange</creator><creator>Juhl, Gitte Irene</creator><creator>Payen-Champenois, Catherine</creator><creator>Skoglund, Lasse Ansgar</creator><general>International Anesthesia Research Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050701</creationdate><title>Intravenous Acetaminophen (Paracetamol): Comparable Analgesic Efficacy, but Better Local Safety than Its Prodrug, Propacetamol, for Postoperative Pain After Third Molar Surgery</title><author>Moller, Philip Lange ; Juhl, Gitte Irene ; Payen-Champenois, Catherine ; Skoglund, Lasse Ansgar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p1847-ff4f0a81f46871e01bc1468578e57b54c2efe4b5bfc65eb809efaa6ac28b7b463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Acetaminophen - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Acetaminophen - adverse effects</topic><topic>Acetaminophen - analogs & derivatives</topic><topic>Acetaminophen - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analgesics, Non-Narcotic - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Analgesics, Non-Narcotic - adverse effects</topic><topic>Analgesics, Non-Narcotic - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infusions, Intravenous</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Molar, Third - surgery</topic><topic>Pain Measurement - drug effects</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy</topic><topic>Prodrugs - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Prodrugs - adverse effects</topic><topic>Prodrugs - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Tooth Extraction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moller, Philip Lange</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juhl, Gitte Irene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Payen-Champenois, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skoglund, Lasse Ansgar</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><jtitle>Anesthesia and analgesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moller, Philip Lange</au><au>Juhl, Gitte Irene</au><au>Payen-Champenois, Catherine</au><au>Skoglund, Lasse Ansgar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intravenous Acetaminophen (Paracetamol): Comparable Analgesic Efficacy, but Better Local Safety than Its Prodrug, Propacetamol, for Postoperative Pain After Third Molar Surgery</atitle><jtitle>Anesthesia and analgesia</jtitle><addtitle>Anesth Analg</addtitle><date>2005-07-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>101</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>90</spage><epage>96</epage><pages>90-96</pages><issn>0003-2999</issn><abstract>We compared an acetaminophen (paracetamol) 1 g (n = 51) formulation for infusion with propacetamol 2 g (n = 51) and placebo (n = 50) in a randomized, controlled, double-blind, parallel group trial in patients with moderate-to-severe pain after third molar surgery. Treatment efficacy was assessed in house for 6 h after starting the 15-min infusion. Significant effects versus placebo (P < 0.01) were obtained with both active treatments on pain relief, pain intensity difference on a 100-mm visual analog scale, and on a categorical scale (except for propacetamol at 6 h). No significant differences were noted between active groups except at 1 h. Six-hour weighted sums of primary assessments showed significantly better efficacy than placebo (P < 0.0001) and no difference between active treatments. Median stopwatch time to onset of pain relief for active treatment was 6–8 min after infusion start. Active treatments showed comparable efficacy with a significantly longer duration of analgesia and better patients’ global evaluation compared with placebo. The incidence of patients reporting local pain at the infusion site was significantly less frequent after IV acetaminophen or placebo (0%) in comparison with propacetamol (49%). In conclusion, acetaminophen 1 g and propacetamol 2 g were superior to placebo regarding analgesic efficacy, with a more frequent incidence of local pain at the infusion site for propacetamol.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>International Anesthesia Research Society</pub><pmid>15976212</pmid><doi>10.1213/01.ANE.0000155297.47955.D6</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-2999 |
ispartof | Anesthesia and analgesia, 2005-07, Vol.101 (1), p.90-96 |
issn | 0003-2999 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_15976212 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Acetaminophen - administration & dosage Acetaminophen - adverse effects Acetaminophen - analogs & derivatives Acetaminophen - therapeutic use Adolescent Adult Analgesics, Non-Narcotic - administration & dosage Analgesics, Non-Narcotic - adverse effects Analgesics, Non-Narcotic - therapeutic use Double-Blind Method Female Humans Infusions, Intravenous Male Molar, Third - surgery Pain Measurement - drug effects Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy Prodrugs - administration & dosage Prodrugs - adverse effects Prodrugs - therapeutic use Tooth Extraction |
title | Intravenous Acetaminophen (Paracetamol): Comparable Analgesic Efficacy, but Better Local Safety than Its Prodrug, Propacetamol, for Postoperative Pain After Third Molar Surgery |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T12%3A19%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_wolte&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intravenous%20Acetaminophen%20(Paracetamol):%20Comparable%20Analgesic%20Efficacy,%20but%20Better%20Local%20Safety%20than%20Its%20Prodrug,%20Propacetamol,%20for%20Postoperative%20Pain%20After%20Third%20Molar%20Surgery&rft.jtitle=Anesthesia%20and%20analgesia&rft.au=Moller,%20Philip%20Lange&rft.date=2005-07-01&rft.volume=101&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=90&rft.epage=96&rft.pages=90-96&rft.issn=0003-2999&rft_id=info:doi/10.1213/01.ANE.0000155297.47955.D6&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_wolte%3E15976212%3C/pubmed_wolte%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/15976212&rfr_iscdi=true |