Intravenous Acetaminophen (Paracetamol): Comparable Analgesic Efficacy, but Better Local Safety than Its Prodrug, Propacetamol, for Postoperative Pain After Third Molar Surgery

We compared an acetaminophen (paracetamol) 1 g (n = 51) formulation for infusion with propacetamol 2 g (n = 51) and placebo (n = 50) in a randomized, controlled, double-blind, parallel group trial in patients with moderate-to-severe pain after third molar surgery. Treatment efficacy was assessed in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Anesthesia and analgesia 2005-07, Vol.101 (1), p.90-96
Hauptverfasser: Moller, Philip Lange, Juhl, Gitte Irene, Payen-Champenois, Catherine, Skoglund, Lasse Ansgar
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 96
container_issue 1
container_start_page 90
container_title Anesthesia and analgesia
container_volume 101
creator Moller, Philip Lange
Juhl, Gitte Irene
Payen-Champenois, Catherine
Skoglund, Lasse Ansgar
description We compared an acetaminophen (paracetamol) 1 g (n = 51) formulation for infusion with propacetamol 2 g (n = 51) and placebo (n = 50) in a randomized, controlled, double-blind, parallel group trial in patients with moderate-to-severe pain after third molar surgery. Treatment efficacy was assessed in house for 6 h after starting the 15-min infusion. Significant effects versus placebo (P < 0.01) were obtained with both active treatments on pain relief, pain intensity difference on a 100-mm visual analog scale, and on a categorical scale (except for propacetamol at 6 h). No significant differences were noted between active groups except at 1 h. Six-hour weighted sums of primary assessments showed significantly better efficacy than placebo (P < 0.0001) and no difference between active treatments. Median stopwatch time to onset of pain relief for active treatment was 6–8 min after infusion start. Active treatments showed comparable efficacy with a significantly longer duration of analgesia and better patients’ global evaluation compared with placebo. The incidence of patients reporting local pain at the infusion site was significantly less frequent after IV acetaminophen or placebo (0%) in comparison with propacetamol (49%). In conclusion, acetaminophen 1 g and propacetamol 2 g were superior to placebo regarding analgesic efficacy, with a more frequent incidence of local pain at the infusion site for propacetamol.
doi_str_mv 10.1213/01.ANE.0000155297.47955.D6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_wolte</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_15976212</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>15976212</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p1847-ff4f0a81f46871e01bc1468578e57b54c2efe4b5bfc65eb809efaa6ac28b7b463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1UdFu1DAQ9AOIlsIvVCueQLqkdhLHCW_pcbQnHXBS2-fT2re-BHJx5Dit7q_4RBLa7svMjkaj1SxjnwSPRSLSKy7i6ucq5tMIKZNSxZkqpYy_5W_Y-SSmUVKW5Rl7Pwy_Zw8v8nfsTMhS5YlIztnfdRc8PlLnxgEqQwGPTef6mjr4vEWP_xXXfvkKS3fsJ0G3BFWH7YGGxsDK2sagOS1AjwGuKQTysHEGW7hDS-EEocYO1mGArXd7Px4WM-lfcxdgnYetG4LryWNoHgm22HRQ2Tnpvm78Hn64Fj3cjf5A_vSBvbXYDvTxBS_Yw_fV_fI22vy6WS-rTdSLIlORtZnlWAib5YUSxIU2YqJSFSSVlplJyFKmpbYml6QLXpJFzNEkhVY6y9MLdvmc24_6SPtd75sj-tPutbrJkD0bnlw73Tr8accn8ruasA31bn4Il2kZJRNwNS3RXL9K_wG6OIP6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intravenous Acetaminophen (Paracetamol): Comparable Analgesic Efficacy, but Better Local Safety than Its Prodrug, Propacetamol, for Postoperative Pain After Third Molar Surgery</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Moller, Philip Lange ; Juhl, Gitte Irene ; Payen-Champenois, Catherine ; Skoglund, Lasse Ansgar</creator><creatorcontrib>Moller, Philip Lange ; Juhl, Gitte Irene ; Payen-Champenois, Catherine ; Skoglund, Lasse Ansgar</creatorcontrib><description>We compared an acetaminophen (paracetamol) 1 g (n = 51) formulation for infusion with propacetamol 2 g (n = 51) and placebo (n = 50) in a randomized, controlled, double-blind, parallel group trial in patients with moderate-to-severe pain after third molar surgery. Treatment efficacy was assessed in house for 6 h after starting the 15-min infusion. Significant effects versus placebo (P &lt; 0.01) were obtained with both active treatments on pain relief, pain intensity difference on a 100-mm visual analog scale, and on a categorical scale (except for propacetamol at 6 h). No significant differences were noted between active groups except at 1 h. Six-hour weighted sums of primary assessments showed significantly better efficacy than placebo (P &lt; 0.0001) and no difference between active treatments. Median stopwatch time to onset of pain relief for active treatment was 6–8 min after infusion start. Active treatments showed comparable efficacy with a significantly longer duration of analgesia and better patients’ global evaluation compared with placebo. The incidence of patients reporting local pain at the infusion site was significantly less frequent after IV acetaminophen or placebo (0%) in comparison with propacetamol (49%). In conclusion, acetaminophen 1 g and propacetamol 2 g were superior to placebo regarding analgesic efficacy, with a more frequent incidence of local pain at the infusion site for propacetamol.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-2999</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000155297.47955.D6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15976212</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: International Anesthesia Research Society</publisher><subject>Acetaminophen - administration &amp; dosage ; Acetaminophen - adverse effects ; Acetaminophen - analogs &amp; derivatives ; Acetaminophen - therapeutic use ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Analgesics, Non-Narcotic - administration &amp; dosage ; Analgesics, Non-Narcotic - adverse effects ; Analgesics, Non-Narcotic - therapeutic use ; Double-Blind Method ; Female ; Humans ; Infusions, Intravenous ; Male ; Molar, Third - surgery ; Pain Measurement - drug effects ; Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy ; Prodrugs - administration &amp; dosage ; Prodrugs - adverse effects ; Prodrugs - therapeutic use ; Tooth Extraction</subject><ispartof>Anesthesia and analgesia, 2005-07, Vol.101 (1), p.90-96</ispartof><rights>International Anesthesia Research Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&amp;NEWS=n&amp;CSC=Y&amp;PAGE=fulltext&amp;D=ovft&amp;AN=00000539-200507000-00017$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwolterskluwer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4594,27903,27904,65209</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15976212$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moller, Philip Lange</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juhl, Gitte Irene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Payen-Champenois, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skoglund, Lasse Ansgar</creatorcontrib><title>Intravenous Acetaminophen (Paracetamol): Comparable Analgesic Efficacy, but Better Local Safety than Its Prodrug, Propacetamol, for Postoperative Pain After Third Molar Surgery</title><title>Anesthesia and analgesia</title><addtitle>Anesth Analg</addtitle><description>We compared an acetaminophen (paracetamol) 1 g (n = 51) formulation for infusion with propacetamol 2 g (n = 51) and placebo (n = 50) in a randomized, controlled, double-blind, parallel group trial in patients with moderate-to-severe pain after third molar surgery. Treatment efficacy was assessed in house for 6 h after starting the 15-min infusion. Significant effects versus placebo (P &lt; 0.01) were obtained with both active treatments on pain relief, pain intensity difference on a 100-mm visual analog scale, and on a categorical scale (except for propacetamol at 6 h). No significant differences were noted between active groups except at 1 h. Six-hour weighted sums of primary assessments showed significantly better efficacy than placebo (P &lt; 0.0001) and no difference between active treatments. Median stopwatch time to onset of pain relief for active treatment was 6–8 min after infusion start. Active treatments showed comparable efficacy with a significantly longer duration of analgesia and better patients’ global evaluation compared with placebo. The incidence of patients reporting local pain at the infusion site was significantly less frequent after IV acetaminophen or placebo (0%) in comparison with propacetamol (49%). In conclusion, acetaminophen 1 g and propacetamol 2 g were superior to placebo regarding analgesic efficacy, with a more frequent incidence of local pain at the infusion site for propacetamol.</description><subject>Acetaminophen - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Acetaminophen - adverse effects</subject><subject>Acetaminophen - analogs &amp; derivatives</subject><subject>Acetaminophen - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analgesics, Non-Narcotic - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Analgesics, Non-Narcotic - adverse effects</subject><subject>Analgesics, Non-Narcotic - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infusions, Intravenous</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Molar, Third - surgery</subject><subject>Pain Measurement - drug effects</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy</subject><subject>Prodrugs - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Prodrugs - adverse effects</subject><subject>Prodrugs - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Tooth Extraction</subject><issn>0003-2999</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1UdFu1DAQ9AOIlsIvVCueQLqkdhLHCW_pcbQnHXBS2-fT2re-BHJx5Dit7q_4RBLa7svMjkaj1SxjnwSPRSLSKy7i6ucq5tMIKZNSxZkqpYy_5W_Y-SSmUVKW5Rl7Pwy_Zw8v8nfsTMhS5YlIztnfdRc8PlLnxgEqQwGPTef6mjr4vEWP_xXXfvkKS3fsJ0G3BFWH7YGGxsDK2sagOS1AjwGuKQTysHEGW7hDS-EEocYO1mGArXd7Px4WM-lfcxdgnYetG4LryWNoHgm22HRQ2Tnpvm78Hn64Fj3cjf5A_vSBvbXYDvTxBS_Yw_fV_fI22vy6WS-rTdSLIlORtZnlWAib5YUSxIU2YqJSFSSVlplJyFKmpbYml6QLXpJFzNEkhVY6y9MLdvmc24_6SPtd75sj-tPutbrJkD0bnlw73Tr8accn8ruasA31bn4Il2kZJRNwNS3RXL9K_wG6OIP6</recordid><startdate>20050701</startdate><enddate>20050701</enddate><creator>Moller, Philip Lange</creator><creator>Juhl, Gitte Irene</creator><creator>Payen-Champenois, Catherine</creator><creator>Skoglund, Lasse Ansgar</creator><general>International Anesthesia Research Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050701</creationdate><title>Intravenous Acetaminophen (Paracetamol): Comparable Analgesic Efficacy, but Better Local Safety than Its Prodrug, Propacetamol, for Postoperative Pain After Third Molar Surgery</title><author>Moller, Philip Lange ; Juhl, Gitte Irene ; Payen-Champenois, Catherine ; Skoglund, Lasse Ansgar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p1847-ff4f0a81f46871e01bc1468578e57b54c2efe4b5bfc65eb809efaa6ac28b7b463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Acetaminophen - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Acetaminophen - adverse effects</topic><topic>Acetaminophen - analogs &amp; derivatives</topic><topic>Acetaminophen - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analgesics, Non-Narcotic - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Analgesics, Non-Narcotic - adverse effects</topic><topic>Analgesics, Non-Narcotic - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infusions, Intravenous</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Molar, Third - surgery</topic><topic>Pain Measurement - drug effects</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy</topic><topic>Prodrugs - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Prodrugs - adverse effects</topic><topic>Prodrugs - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Tooth Extraction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moller, Philip Lange</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juhl, Gitte Irene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Payen-Champenois, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skoglund, Lasse Ansgar</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><jtitle>Anesthesia and analgesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moller, Philip Lange</au><au>Juhl, Gitte Irene</au><au>Payen-Champenois, Catherine</au><au>Skoglund, Lasse Ansgar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intravenous Acetaminophen (Paracetamol): Comparable Analgesic Efficacy, but Better Local Safety than Its Prodrug, Propacetamol, for Postoperative Pain After Third Molar Surgery</atitle><jtitle>Anesthesia and analgesia</jtitle><addtitle>Anesth Analg</addtitle><date>2005-07-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>101</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>90</spage><epage>96</epage><pages>90-96</pages><issn>0003-2999</issn><abstract>We compared an acetaminophen (paracetamol) 1 g (n = 51) formulation for infusion with propacetamol 2 g (n = 51) and placebo (n = 50) in a randomized, controlled, double-blind, parallel group trial in patients with moderate-to-severe pain after third molar surgery. Treatment efficacy was assessed in house for 6 h after starting the 15-min infusion. Significant effects versus placebo (P &lt; 0.01) were obtained with both active treatments on pain relief, pain intensity difference on a 100-mm visual analog scale, and on a categorical scale (except for propacetamol at 6 h). No significant differences were noted between active groups except at 1 h. Six-hour weighted sums of primary assessments showed significantly better efficacy than placebo (P &lt; 0.0001) and no difference between active treatments. Median stopwatch time to onset of pain relief for active treatment was 6–8 min after infusion start. Active treatments showed comparable efficacy with a significantly longer duration of analgesia and better patients’ global evaluation compared with placebo. The incidence of patients reporting local pain at the infusion site was significantly less frequent after IV acetaminophen or placebo (0%) in comparison with propacetamol (49%). In conclusion, acetaminophen 1 g and propacetamol 2 g were superior to placebo regarding analgesic efficacy, with a more frequent incidence of local pain at the infusion site for propacetamol.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>International Anesthesia Research Society</pub><pmid>15976212</pmid><doi>10.1213/01.ANE.0000155297.47955.D6</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-2999
ispartof Anesthesia and analgesia, 2005-07, Vol.101 (1), p.90-96
issn 0003-2999
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_15976212
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Acetaminophen - administration & dosage
Acetaminophen - adverse effects
Acetaminophen - analogs & derivatives
Acetaminophen - therapeutic use
Adolescent
Adult
Analgesics, Non-Narcotic - administration & dosage
Analgesics, Non-Narcotic - adverse effects
Analgesics, Non-Narcotic - therapeutic use
Double-Blind Method
Female
Humans
Infusions, Intravenous
Male
Molar, Third - surgery
Pain Measurement - drug effects
Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy
Prodrugs - administration & dosage
Prodrugs - adverse effects
Prodrugs - therapeutic use
Tooth Extraction
title Intravenous Acetaminophen (Paracetamol): Comparable Analgesic Efficacy, but Better Local Safety than Its Prodrug, Propacetamol, for Postoperative Pain After Third Molar Surgery
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T12%3A19%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_wolte&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intravenous%20Acetaminophen%20(Paracetamol):%20Comparable%20Analgesic%20Efficacy,%20but%20Better%20Local%20Safety%20than%20Its%20Prodrug,%20Propacetamol,%20for%20Postoperative%20Pain%20After%20Third%20Molar%20Surgery&rft.jtitle=Anesthesia%20and%20analgesia&rft.au=Moller,%20Philip%20Lange&rft.date=2005-07-01&rft.volume=101&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=90&rft.epage=96&rft.pages=90-96&rft.issn=0003-2999&rft_id=info:doi/10.1213/01.ANE.0000155297.47955.D6&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_wolte%3E15976212%3C/pubmed_wolte%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/15976212&rfr_iscdi=true