Dosimetric accuracy of Kodak EDR2 film for IMRT verifications
Patient-specific intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) verifications require an accurate two-dimensional dosimeter that is not labor-intensive. We assessed the precision and reproducibility of film calibrations over time, measured the elemental composition of the film, measured the intermittency e...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Medical physics (Lancaster) 2005-02, Vol.32 (2), p.539-548 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 548 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 539 |
container_title | Medical physics (Lancaster) |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Childress, Nathan L. Salehpour, Mohammad Dong, Lei Bloch, Charles White, R. Allen Rosen, Isaac I. |
description | Patient-specific intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) verifications require an accurate two-dimensional dosimeter that is not labor-intensive. We assessed the precision and reproducibility of film calibrations over time, measured the elemental composition of the film, measured the intermittency effect, and measured the dosimetric accuracy and reproducibility of calibrated Kodak EDR2 film for single-beam verifications in a solid water phantom and for full-plan verifications in a Rexolite® phantom. Repeated measurements of the film sensitometric curve in a single experiment yielded overall uncertainties in dose of 2.1% local and 0.8% relative to
300
cGy
. 547 film calibrations over an 18-month period, exposed to a range of doses from 0 to a maximum of
240
MU
or
360
MU
and using
6
MV
or
18
MV
energies, had optical density (OD) standard deviations that were 7%–15% of their average values. This indicates that daily film calibrations are essential when EDR2 film is used to obtain absolute dose results. An elemental analysis of EDR2 film revealed that it contains 60% as much silver and 20% as much bromine as Kodak XV2 film. EDR2 film also has an unusual 1.69:1 silver:halide molar ratio, compared with the XV2 film’s 1.02:1 ratio, which may affect its chemical reactions. To test EDR2’s intermittency effect, the OD generated by a single
300
MU
exposure was compared to the ODs generated by exposing the film
1
MU
,
2
MU
, and
4
MU
at a time to a total of
300
MU
. An ion chamber recorded the relative dose of all intermittency measurements to account for machine output variations. Using small MU bursts to expose the film resulted in delivery times of 4 to 14 minutes and lowered the film’s OD by approximately 2% for both 6 and
18
MV
beams. This effect may result in EDR2 film underestimating absolute doses for patient verifications that require long delivery times. After using a calibration to convert EDR2 film’s OD to dose values, film measurements agreed within 2% relative difference and
2
mm
criteria to ion chamber measurements for both sliding window and step-and-shoot fluence map verifications. Calibrated film results agreed with ion chamber measurements to within
5
%
∕
2
mm
criteria for transverse-plane full-plan verifications, but were consistently low. When properly calibrated, EDR2 film can be an adequate two-dimensional dosimeter for IMRT verifications, although it may underestimate doses in regions with long exposure times. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1118/1.1852791 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>wiley_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_15789600</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>MP2791</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4771-831563e083e953e8638e65a38b7482693796f64b19b63dae687fb1076f6407f03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEtPAjEUhRujEUQX_gHTtcng7fS9YGEAlQjREFw3nZk2qTIO6fAI_14QCG40rk5y73du7jkIXRNoE0LUHWkTxVOpyQlqpkzShKWgT1ETQLMkZcAb6KKu3wFAUA7nqEG4VFoANFGnV9WhdPMYcmzzfBFtvsaVx89VYT9wvzdOsQ_TEvsq4sFoPMFLF4MPuZ2H6rO-RGfeTmt3tdcWenvoT7pPyfDlcdC9HyY5k5IkihIuqANFnebUKUGVE9xSlUmmUqGp1MILlhGdCVpYJ5T0GQG5HYL0QFvoZnd3tshKV5hZDKWNa3PIsQGSHbAKU7c-7sFsCzLE7Asyo9etbPjOjq_zMP_O8rvn2JA5NLTx3_7b_xe8rOKP52aFp1_UOITZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dosimetric accuracy of Kodak EDR2 film for IMRT verifications</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Childress, Nathan L. ; Salehpour, Mohammad ; Dong, Lei ; Bloch, Charles ; White, R. Allen ; Rosen, Isaac I.</creator><creatorcontrib>Childress, Nathan L. ; Salehpour, Mohammad ; Dong, Lei ; Bloch, Charles ; White, R. Allen ; Rosen, Isaac I.</creatorcontrib><description>Patient-specific intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) verifications require an accurate two-dimensional dosimeter that is not labor-intensive. We assessed the precision and reproducibility of film calibrations over time, measured the elemental composition of the film, measured the intermittency effect, and measured the dosimetric accuracy and reproducibility of calibrated Kodak EDR2 film for single-beam verifications in a solid water phantom and for full-plan verifications in a Rexolite® phantom. Repeated measurements of the film sensitometric curve in a single experiment yielded overall uncertainties in dose of 2.1% local and 0.8% relative to
300
cGy
. 547 film calibrations over an 18-month period, exposed to a range of doses from 0 to a maximum of
240
MU
or
360
MU
and using
6
MV
or
18
MV
energies, had optical density (OD) standard deviations that were 7%–15% of their average values. This indicates that daily film calibrations are essential when EDR2 film is used to obtain absolute dose results. An elemental analysis of EDR2 film revealed that it contains 60% as much silver and 20% as much bromine as Kodak XV2 film. EDR2 film also has an unusual 1.69:1 silver:halide molar ratio, compared with the XV2 film’s 1.02:1 ratio, which may affect its chemical reactions. To test EDR2’s intermittency effect, the OD generated by a single
300
MU
exposure was compared to the ODs generated by exposing the film
1
MU
,
2
MU
, and
4
MU
at a time to a total of
300
MU
. An ion chamber recorded the relative dose of all intermittency measurements to account for machine output variations. Using small MU bursts to expose the film resulted in delivery times of 4 to 14 minutes and lowered the film’s OD by approximately 2% for both 6 and
18
MV
beams. This effect may result in EDR2 film underestimating absolute doses for patient verifications that require long delivery times. After using a calibration to convert EDR2 film’s OD to dose values, film measurements agreed within 2% relative difference and
2
mm
criteria to ion chamber measurements for both sliding window and step-and-shoot fluence map verifications. Calibrated film results agreed with ion chamber measurements to within
5
%
∕
2
mm
criteria for transverse-plane full-plan verifications, but were consistently low. When properly calibrated, EDR2 film can be an adequate two-dimensional dosimeter for IMRT verifications, although it may underestimate doses in regions with long exposure times.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1118/1.1852791</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15789600</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MPHYA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Association of Physicists in Medicine</publisher><subject>Ancillary equipment ; bromine ; Calibration ; Computer software ; Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation ; dosimeters ; dosimetry ; Electric measurements ; Equipment Failure Analysis ; film dosimetry ; Film Dosimetry - instrumentation ; Film Dosimetry - methods ; IMRT treatment plan verification ; Intensity modulated radiation therapy ; intensity modulation ; Intermittency ; Ionization chambers ; Linear accelerators ; Multileaf collimators ; phantoms ; quality assurance ; Quality assurance in radiotherapy ; Quality Assurance, Health Care - methods ; radiation therapy ; Radiotherapy Dosage ; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation ; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Radiotherapy, Conformal - methods ; Record and verify systems and applications ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; silver ; Treatment strategy</subject><ispartof>Medical physics (Lancaster), 2005-02, Vol.32 (2), p.539-548</ispartof><rights>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><rights>2005 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4771-831563e083e953e8638e65a38b7482693796f64b19b63dae687fb1076f6407f03</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1118%2F1.1852791$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1118%2F1.1852791$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27922,27923,45572,45573</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15789600$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Childress, Nathan L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salehpour, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Lei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bloch, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, R. Allen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosen, Isaac I.</creatorcontrib><title>Dosimetric accuracy of Kodak EDR2 film for IMRT verifications</title><title>Medical physics (Lancaster)</title><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><description>Patient-specific intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) verifications require an accurate two-dimensional dosimeter that is not labor-intensive. We assessed the precision and reproducibility of film calibrations over time, measured the elemental composition of the film, measured the intermittency effect, and measured the dosimetric accuracy and reproducibility of calibrated Kodak EDR2 film for single-beam verifications in a solid water phantom and for full-plan verifications in a Rexolite® phantom. Repeated measurements of the film sensitometric curve in a single experiment yielded overall uncertainties in dose of 2.1% local and 0.8% relative to
300
cGy
. 547 film calibrations over an 18-month period, exposed to a range of doses from 0 to a maximum of
240
MU
or
360
MU
and using
6
MV
or
18
MV
energies, had optical density (OD) standard deviations that were 7%–15% of their average values. This indicates that daily film calibrations are essential when EDR2 film is used to obtain absolute dose results. An elemental analysis of EDR2 film revealed that it contains 60% as much silver and 20% as much bromine as Kodak XV2 film. EDR2 film also has an unusual 1.69:1 silver:halide molar ratio, compared with the XV2 film’s 1.02:1 ratio, which may affect its chemical reactions. To test EDR2’s intermittency effect, the OD generated by a single
300
MU
exposure was compared to the ODs generated by exposing the film
1
MU
,
2
MU
, and
4
MU
at a time to a total of
300
MU
. An ion chamber recorded the relative dose of all intermittency measurements to account for machine output variations. Using small MU bursts to expose the film resulted in delivery times of 4 to 14 minutes and lowered the film’s OD by approximately 2% for both 6 and
18
MV
beams. This effect may result in EDR2 film underestimating absolute doses for patient verifications that require long delivery times. After using a calibration to convert EDR2 film’s OD to dose values, film measurements agreed within 2% relative difference and
2
mm
criteria to ion chamber measurements for both sliding window and step-and-shoot fluence map verifications. Calibrated film results agreed with ion chamber measurements to within
5
%
∕
2
mm
criteria for transverse-plane full-plan verifications, but were consistently low. When properly calibrated, EDR2 film can be an adequate two-dimensional dosimeter for IMRT verifications, although it may underestimate doses in regions with long exposure times.</description><subject>Ancillary equipment</subject><subject>bromine</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Computer software</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation</subject><subject>dosimeters</subject><subject>dosimetry</subject><subject>Electric measurements</subject><subject>Equipment Failure Analysis</subject><subject>film dosimetry</subject><subject>Film Dosimetry - instrumentation</subject><subject>Film Dosimetry - methods</subject><subject>IMRT treatment plan verification</subject><subject>Intensity modulated radiation therapy</subject><subject>intensity modulation</subject><subject>Intermittency</subject><subject>Ionization chambers</subject><subject>Linear accelerators</subject><subject>Multileaf collimators</subject><subject>phantoms</subject><subject>quality assurance</subject><subject>Quality assurance in radiotherapy</subject><subject>Quality Assurance, Health Care - methods</subject><subject>radiation therapy</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Dosage</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Radiotherapy, Conformal - methods</subject><subject>Record and verify systems and applications</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>silver</subject><subject>Treatment strategy</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkEtPAjEUhRujEUQX_gHTtcng7fS9YGEAlQjREFw3nZk2qTIO6fAI_14QCG40rk5y73du7jkIXRNoE0LUHWkTxVOpyQlqpkzShKWgT1ETQLMkZcAb6KKu3wFAUA7nqEG4VFoANFGnV9WhdPMYcmzzfBFtvsaVx89VYT9wvzdOsQ_TEvsq4sFoPMFLF4MPuZ2H6rO-RGfeTmt3tdcWenvoT7pPyfDlcdC9HyY5k5IkihIuqANFnebUKUGVE9xSlUmmUqGp1MILlhGdCVpYJ5T0GQG5HYL0QFvoZnd3tshKV5hZDKWNa3PIsQGSHbAKU7c-7sFsCzLE7Asyo9etbPjOjq_zMP_O8rvn2JA5NLTx3_7b_xe8rOKP52aFp1_UOITZ</recordid><startdate>200502</startdate><enddate>200502</enddate><creator>Childress, Nathan L.</creator><creator>Salehpour, Mohammad</creator><creator>Dong, Lei</creator><creator>Bloch, Charles</creator><creator>White, R. Allen</creator><creator>Rosen, Isaac I.</creator><general>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200502</creationdate><title>Dosimetric accuracy of Kodak EDR2 film for IMRT verifications</title><author>Childress, Nathan L. ; Salehpour, Mohammad ; Dong, Lei ; Bloch, Charles ; White, R. Allen ; Rosen, Isaac I.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4771-831563e083e953e8638e65a38b7482693796f64b19b63dae687fb1076f6407f03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Ancillary equipment</topic><topic>bromine</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Computer software</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation</topic><topic>dosimeters</topic><topic>dosimetry</topic><topic>Electric measurements</topic><topic>Equipment Failure Analysis</topic><topic>film dosimetry</topic><topic>Film Dosimetry - instrumentation</topic><topic>Film Dosimetry - methods</topic><topic>IMRT treatment plan verification</topic><topic>Intensity modulated radiation therapy</topic><topic>intensity modulation</topic><topic>Intermittency</topic><topic>Ionization chambers</topic><topic>Linear accelerators</topic><topic>Multileaf collimators</topic><topic>phantoms</topic><topic>quality assurance</topic><topic>Quality assurance in radiotherapy</topic><topic>Quality Assurance, Health Care - methods</topic><topic>radiation therapy</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Dosage</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Radiotherapy, Conformal - methods</topic><topic>Record and verify systems and applications</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>silver</topic><topic>Treatment strategy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Childress, Nathan L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salehpour, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Lei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bloch, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, R. Allen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosen, Isaac I.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Childress, Nathan L.</au><au>Salehpour, Mohammad</au><au>Dong, Lei</au><au>Bloch, Charles</au><au>White, R. Allen</au><au>Rosen, Isaac I.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dosimetric accuracy of Kodak EDR2 film for IMRT verifications</atitle><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><date>2005-02</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>539</spage><epage>548</epage><pages>539-548</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><eissn>2473-4209</eissn><coden>MPHYA6</coden><abstract>Patient-specific intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) verifications require an accurate two-dimensional dosimeter that is not labor-intensive. We assessed the precision and reproducibility of film calibrations over time, measured the elemental composition of the film, measured the intermittency effect, and measured the dosimetric accuracy and reproducibility of calibrated Kodak EDR2 film for single-beam verifications in a solid water phantom and for full-plan verifications in a Rexolite® phantom. Repeated measurements of the film sensitometric curve in a single experiment yielded overall uncertainties in dose of 2.1% local and 0.8% relative to
300
cGy
. 547 film calibrations over an 18-month period, exposed to a range of doses from 0 to a maximum of
240
MU
or
360
MU
and using
6
MV
or
18
MV
energies, had optical density (OD) standard deviations that were 7%–15% of their average values. This indicates that daily film calibrations are essential when EDR2 film is used to obtain absolute dose results. An elemental analysis of EDR2 film revealed that it contains 60% as much silver and 20% as much bromine as Kodak XV2 film. EDR2 film also has an unusual 1.69:1 silver:halide molar ratio, compared with the XV2 film’s 1.02:1 ratio, which may affect its chemical reactions. To test EDR2’s intermittency effect, the OD generated by a single
300
MU
exposure was compared to the ODs generated by exposing the film
1
MU
,
2
MU
, and
4
MU
at a time to a total of
300
MU
. An ion chamber recorded the relative dose of all intermittency measurements to account for machine output variations. Using small MU bursts to expose the film resulted in delivery times of 4 to 14 minutes and lowered the film’s OD by approximately 2% for both 6 and
18
MV
beams. This effect may result in EDR2 film underestimating absolute doses for patient verifications that require long delivery times. After using a calibration to convert EDR2 film’s OD to dose values, film measurements agreed within 2% relative difference and
2
mm
criteria to ion chamber measurements for both sliding window and step-and-shoot fluence map verifications. Calibrated film results agreed with ion chamber measurements to within
5
%
∕
2
mm
criteria for transverse-plane full-plan verifications, but were consistently low. When properly calibrated, EDR2 film can be an adequate two-dimensional dosimeter for IMRT verifications, although it may underestimate doses in regions with long exposure times.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</pub><pmid>15789600</pmid><doi>10.1118/1.1852791</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0094-2405 |
ispartof | Medical physics (Lancaster), 2005-02, Vol.32 (2), p.539-548 |
issn | 0094-2405 2473-4209 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_15789600 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Ancillary equipment bromine Calibration Computer software Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation dosimeters dosimetry Electric measurements Equipment Failure Analysis film dosimetry Film Dosimetry - instrumentation Film Dosimetry - methods IMRT treatment plan verification Intensity modulated radiation therapy intensity modulation Intermittency Ionization chambers Linear accelerators Multileaf collimators phantoms quality assurance Quality assurance in radiotherapy Quality Assurance, Health Care - methods radiation therapy Radiotherapy Dosage Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods Radiotherapy, Conformal - methods Record and verify systems and applications Reproducibility of Results Sensitivity and Specificity silver Treatment strategy |
title | Dosimetric accuracy of Kodak EDR2 film for IMRT verifications |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T16%3A35%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dosimetric%20accuracy%20of%20Kodak%20EDR2%20film%20for%20IMRT%20verifications&rft.jtitle=Medical%20physics%20(Lancaster)&rft.au=Childress,%20Nathan%20L.&rft.date=2005-02&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=539&rft.epage=548&rft.pages=539-548&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft.coden=MPHYA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118/1.1852791&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_pubme%3EMP2791%3C/wiley_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/15789600&rfr_iscdi=true |