Dosimetric accuracy of Kodak EDR2 film for IMRT verifications

Patient-specific intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) verifications require an accurate two-dimensional dosimeter that is not labor-intensive. We assessed the precision and reproducibility of film calibrations over time, measured the elemental composition of the film, measured the intermittency e...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical physics (Lancaster) 2005-02, Vol.32 (2), p.539-548
Hauptverfasser: Childress, Nathan L., Salehpour, Mohammad, Dong, Lei, Bloch, Charles, White, R. Allen, Rosen, Isaac I.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 548
container_issue 2
container_start_page 539
container_title Medical physics (Lancaster)
container_volume 32
creator Childress, Nathan L.
Salehpour, Mohammad
Dong, Lei
Bloch, Charles
White, R. Allen
Rosen, Isaac I.
description Patient-specific intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) verifications require an accurate two-dimensional dosimeter that is not labor-intensive. We assessed the precision and reproducibility of film calibrations over time, measured the elemental composition of the film, measured the intermittency effect, and measured the dosimetric accuracy and reproducibility of calibrated Kodak EDR2 film for single-beam verifications in a solid water phantom and for full-plan verifications in a Rexolite® phantom. Repeated measurements of the film sensitometric curve in a single experiment yielded overall uncertainties in dose of 2.1% local and 0.8% relative to 300 cGy . 547 film calibrations over an 18-month period, exposed to a range of doses from 0 to a maximum of 240 MU or 360 MU and using 6 MV or 18 MV energies, had optical density (OD) standard deviations that were 7%–15% of their average values. This indicates that daily film calibrations are essential when EDR2 film is used to obtain absolute dose results. An elemental analysis of EDR2 film revealed that it contains 60% as much silver and 20% as much bromine as Kodak XV2 film. EDR2 film also has an unusual 1.69:1 silver:halide molar ratio, compared with the XV2 film’s 1.02:1 ratio, which may affect its chemical reactions. To test EDR2’s intermittency effect, the OD generated by a single 300 MU exposure was compared to the ODs generated by exposing the film 1 MU , 2 MU , and 4 MU at a time to a total of 300 MU . An ion chamber recorded the relative dose of all intermittency measurements to account for machine output variations. Using small MU bursts to expose the film resulted in delivery times of 4 to 14 minutes and lowered the film’s OD by approximately 2% for both 6 and 18 MV beams. This effect may result in EDR2 film underestimating absolute doses for patient verifications that require long delivery times. After using a calibration to convert EDR2 film’s OD to dose values, film measurements agreed within 2% relative difference and 2 mm criteria to ion chamber measurements for both sliding window and step-and-shoot fluence map verifications. Calibrated film results agreed with ion chamber measurements to within 5 % ∕ 2 mm criteria for transverse-plane full-plan verifications, but were consistently low. When properly calibrated, EDR2 film can be an adequate two-dimensional dosimeter for IMRT verifications, although it may underestimate doses in regions with long exposure times.
doi_str_mv 10.1118/1.1852791
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_15789600</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>MP2791</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4771-831563e083e953e8638e65a38b7482693796f64b19b63dae687fb1076f6407f03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEtPAjEUhRujEUQX_gHTtcng7fS9YGEAlQjREFw3nZk2qTIO6fAI_14QCG40rk5y73du7jkIXRNoE0LUHWkTxVOpyQlqpkzShKWgT1ETQLMkZcAb6KKu3wFAUA7nqEG4VFoANFGnV9WhdPMYcmzzfBFtvsaVx89VYT9wvzdOsQ_TEvsq4sFoPMFLF4MPuZ2H6rO-RGfeTmt3tdcWenvoT7pPyfDlcdC9HyY5k5IkihIuqANFnebUKUGVE9xSlUmmUqGp1MILlhGdCVpYJ5T0GQG5HYL0QFvoZnd3tshKV5hZDKWNa3PIsQGSHbAKU7c-7sFsCzLE7Asyo9etbPjOjq_zMP_O8rvn2JA5NLTx3_7b_xe8rOKP52aFp1_UOITZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dosimetric accuracy of Kodak EDR2 film for IMRT verifications</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Childress, Nathan L. ; Salehpour, Mohammad ; Dong, Lei ; Bloch, Charles ; White, R. Allen ; Rosen, Isaac I.</creator><creatorcontrib>Childress, Nathan L. ; Salehpour, Mohammad ; Dong, Lei ; Bloch, Charles ; White, R. Allen ; Rosen, Isaac I.</creatorcontrib><description>Patient-specific intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) verifications require an accurate two-dimensional dosimeter that is not labor-intensive. We assessed the precision and reproducibility of film calibrations over time, measured the elemental composition of the film, measured the intermittency effect, and measured the dosimetric accuracy and reproducibility of calibrated Kodak EDR2 film for single-beam verifications in a solid water phantom and for full-plan verifications in a Rexolite® phantom. Repeated measurements of the film sensitometric curve in a single experiment yielded overall uncertainties in dose of 2.1% local and 0.8% relative to 300 cGy . 547 film calibrations over an 18-month period, exposed to a range of doses from 0 to a maximum of 240 MU or 360 MU and using 6 MV or 18 MV energies, had optical density (OD) standard deviations that were 7%–15% of their average values. This indicates that daily film calibrations are essential when EDR2 film is used to obtain absolute dose results. An elemental analysis of EDR2 film revealed that it contains 60% as much silver and 20% as much bromine as Kodak XV2 film. EDR2 film also has an unusual 1.69:1 silver:halide molar ratio, compared with the XV2 film’s 1.02:1 ratio, which may affect its chemical reactions. To test EDR2’s intermittency effect, the OD generated by a single 300 MU exposure was compared to the ODs generated by exposing the film 1 MU , 2 MU , and 4 MU at a time to a total of 300 MU . An ion chamber recorded the relative dose of all intermittency measurements to account for machine output variations. Using small MU bursts to expose the film resulted in delivery times of 4 to 14 minutes and lowered the film’s OD by approximately 2% for both 6 and 18 MV beams. This effect may result in EDR2 film underestimating absolute doses for patient verifications that require long delivery times. After using a calibration to convert EDR2 film’s OD to dose values, film measurements agreed within 2% relative difference and 2 mm criteria to ion chamber measurements for both sliding window and step-and-shoot fluence map verifications. Calibrated film results agreed with ion chamber measurements to within 5 % ∕ 2 mm criteria for transverse-plane full-plan verifications, but were consistently low. When properly calibrated, EDR2 film can be an adequate two-dimensional dosimeter for IMRT verifications, although it may underestimate doses in regions with long exposure times.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1118/1.1852791</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15789600</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MPHYA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Association of Physicists in Medicine</publisher><subject>Ancillary equipment ; bromine ; Calibration ; Computer software ; Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation ; dosimeters ; dosimetry ; Electric measurements ; Equipment Failure Analysis ; film dosimetry ; Film Dosimetry - instrumentation ; Film Dosimetry - methods ; IMRT treatment plan verification ; Intensity modulated radiation therapy ; intensity modulation ; Intermittency ; Ionization chambers ; Linear accelerators ; Multileaf collimators ; phantoms ; quality assurance ; Quality assurance in radiotherapy ; Quality Assurance, Health Care - methods ; radiation therapy ; Radiotherapy Dosage ; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation ; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Radiotherapy, Conformal - methods ; Record and verify systems and applications ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; silver ; Treatment strategy</subject><ispartof>Medical physics (Lancaster), 2005-02, Vol.32 (2), p.539-548</ispartof><rights>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><rights>2005 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4771-831563e083e953e8638e65a38b7482693796f64b19b63dae687fb1076f6407f03</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1118%2F1.1852791$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1118%2F1.1852791$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27922,27923,45572,45573</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15789600$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Childress, Nathan L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salehpour, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Lei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bloch, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, R. Allen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosen, Isaac I.</creatorcontrib><title>Dosimetric accuracy of Kodak EDR2 film for IMRT verifications</title><title>Medical physics (Lancaster)</title><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><description>Patient-specific intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) verifications require an accurate two-dimensional dosimeter that is not labor-intensive. We assessed the precision and reproducibility of film calibrations over time, measured the elemental composition of the film, measured the intermittency effect, and measured the dosimetric accuracy and reproducibility of calibrated Kodak EDR2 film for single-beam verifications in a solid water phantom and for full-plan verifications in a Rexolite® phantom. Repeated measurements of the film sensitometric curve in a single experiment yielded overall uncertainties in dose of 2.1% local and 0.8% relative to 300 cGy . 547 film calibrations over an 18-month period, exposed to a range of doses from 0 to a maximum of 240 MU or 360 MU and using 6 MV or 18 MV energies, had optical density (OD) standard deviations that were 7%–15% of their average values. This indicates that daily film calibrations are essential when EDR2 film is used to obtain absolute dose results. An elemental analysis of EDR2 film revealed that it contains 60% as much silver and 20% as much bromine as Kodak XV2 film. EDR2 film also has an unusual 1.69:1 silver:halide molar ratio, compared with the XV2 film’s 1.02:1 ratio, which may affect its chemical reactions. To test EDR2’s intermittency effect, the OD generated by a single 300 MU exposure was compared to the ODs generated by exposing the film 1 MU , 2 MU , and 4 MU at a time to a total of 300 MU . An ion chamber recorded the relative dose of all intermittency measurements to account for machine output variations. Using small MU bursts to expose the film resulted in delivery times of 4 to 14 minutes and lowered the film’s OD by approximately 2% for both 6 and 18 MV beams. This effect may result in EDR2 film underestimating absolute doses for patient verifications that require long delivery times. After using a calibration to convert EDR2 film’s OD to dose values, film measurements agreed within 2% relative difference and 2 mm criteria to ion chamber measurements for both sliding window and step-and-shoot fluence map verifications. Calibrated film results agreed with ion chamber measurements to within 5 % ∕ 2 mm criteria for transverse-plane full-plan verifications, but were consistently low. When properly calibrated, EDR2 film can be an adequate two-dimensional dosimeter for IMRT verifications, although it may underestimate doses in regions with long exposure times.</description><subject>Ancillary equipment</subject><subject>bromine</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Computer software</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation</subject><subject>dosimeters</subject><subject>dosimetry</subject><subject>Electric measurements</subject><subject>Equipment Failure Analysis</subject><subject>film dosimetry</subject><subject>Film Dosimetry - instrumentation</subject><subject>Film Dosimetry - methods</subject><subject>IMRT treatment plan verification</subject><subject>Intensity modulated radiation therapy</subject><subject>intensity modulation</subject><subject>Intermittency</subject><subject>Ionization chambers</subject><subject>Linear accelerators</subject><subject>Multileaf collimators</subject><subject>phantoms</subject><subject>quality assurance</subject><subject>Quality assurance in radiotherapy</subject><subject>Quality Assurance, Health Care - methods</subject><subject>radiation therapy</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Dosage</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Radiotherapy, Conformal - methods</subject><subject>Record and verify systems and applications</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>silver</subject><subject>Treatment strategy</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkEtPAjEUhRujEUQX_gHTtcng7fS9YGEAlQjREFw3nZk2qTIO6fAI_14QCG40rk5y73du7jkIXRNoE0LUHWkTxVOpyQlqpkzShKWgT1ETQLMkZcAb6KKu3wFAUA7nqEG4VFoANFGnV9WhdPMYcmzzfBFtvsaVx89VYT9wvzdOsQ_TEvsq4sFoPMFLF4MPuZ2H6rO-RGfeTmt3tdcWenvoT7pPyfDlcdC9HyY5k5IkihIuqANFnebUKUGVE9xSlUmmUqGp1MILlhGdCVpYJ5T0GQG5HYL0QFvoZnd3tshKV5hZDKWNa3PIsQGSHbAKU7c-7sFsCzLE7Asyo9etbPjOjq_zMP_O8rvn2JA5NLTx3_7b_xe8rOKP52aFp1_UOITZ</recordid><startdate>200502</startdate><enddate>200502</enddate><creator>Childress, Nathan L.</creator><creator>Salehpour, Mohammad</creator><creator>Dong, Lei</creator><creator>Bloch, Charles</creator><creator>White, R. Allen</creator><creator>Rosen, Isaac I.</creator><general>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200502</creationdate><title>Dosimetric accuracy of Kodak EDR2 film for IMRT verifications</title><author>Childress, Nathan L. ; Salehpour, Mohammad ; Dong, Lei ; Bloch, Charles ; White, R. Allen ; Rosen, Isaac I.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4771-831563e083e953e8638e65a38b7482693796f64b19b63dae687fb1076f6407f03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Ancillary equipment</topic><topic>bromine</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Computer software</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation</topic><topic>dosimeters</topic><topic>dosimetry</topic><topic>Electric measurements</topic><topic>Equipment Failure Analysis</topic><topic>film dosimetry</topic><topic>Film Dosimetry - instrumentation</topic><topic>Film Dosimetry - methods</topic><topic>IMRT treatment plan verification</topic><topic>Intensity modulated radiation therapy</topic><topic>intensity modulation</topic><topic>Intermittency</topic><topic>Ionization chambers</topic><topic>Linear accelerators</topic><topic>Multileaf collimators</topic><topic>phantoms</topic><topic>quality assurance</topic><topic>Quality assurance in radiotherapy</topic><topic>Quality Assurance, Health Care - methods</topic><topic>radiation therapy</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Dosage</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Radiotherapy, Conformal - methods</topic><topic>Record and verify systems and applications</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>silver</topic><topic>Treatment strategy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Childress, Nathan L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salehpour, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Lei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bloch, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, R. Allen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosen, Isaac I.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Childress, Nathan L.</au><au>Salehpour, Mohammad</au><au>Dong, Lei</au><au>Bloch, Charles</au><au>White, R. Allen</au><au>Rosen, Isaac I.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dosimetric accuracy of Kodak EDR2 film for IMRT verifications</atitle><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><date>2005-02</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>539</spage><epage>548</epage><pages>539-548</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><eissn>2473-4209</eissn><coden>MPHYA6</coden><abstract>Patient-specific intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) verifications require an accurate two-dimensional dosimeter that is not labor-intensive. We assessed the precision and reproducibility of film calibrations over time, measured the elemental composition of the film, measured the intermittency effect, and measured the dosimetric accuracy and reproducibility of calibrated Kodak EDR2 film for single-beam verifications in a solid water phantom and for full-plan verifications in a Rexolite® phantom. Repeated measurements of the film sensitometric curve in a single experiment yielded overall uncertainties in dose of 2.1% local and 0.8% relative to 300 cGy . 547 film calibrations over an 18-month period, exposed to a range of doses from 0 to a maximum of 240 MU or 360 MU and using 6 MV or 18 MV energies, had optical density (OD) standard deviations that were 7%–15% of their average values. This indicates that daily film calibrations are essential when EDR2 film is used to obtain absolute dose results. An elemental analysis of EDR2 film revealed that it contains 60% as much silver and 20% as much bromine as Kodak XV2 film. EDR2 film also has an unusual 1.69:1 silver:halide molar ratio, compared with the XV2 film’s 1.02:1 ratio, which may affect its chemical reactions. To test EDR2’s intermittency effect, the OD generated by a single 300 MU exposure was compared to the ODs generated by exposing the film 1 MU , 2 MU , and 4 MU at a time to a total of 300 MU . An ion chamber recorded the relative dose of all intermittency measurements to account for machine output variations. Using small MU bursts to expose the film resulted in delivery times of 4 to 14 minutes and lowered the film’s OD by approximately 2% for both 6 and 18 MV beams. This effect may result in EDR2 film underestimating absolute doses for patient verifications that require long delivery times. After using a calibration to convert EDR2 film’s OD to dose values, film measurements agreed within 2% relative difference and 2 mm criteria to ion chamber measurements for both sliding window and step-and-shoot fluence map verifications. Calibrated film results agreed with ion chamber measurements to within 5 % ∕ 2 mm criteria for transverse-plane full-plan verifications, but were consistently low. When properly calibrated, EDR2 film can be an adequate two-dimensional dosimeter for IMRT verifications, although it may underestimate doses in regions with long exposure times.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</pub><pmid>15789600</pmid><doi>10.1118/1.1852791</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-2405
ispartof Medical physics (Lancaster), 2005-02, Vol.32 (2), p.539-548
issn 0094-2405
2473-4209
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_15789600
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library
subjects Ancillary equipment
bromine
Calibration
Computer software
Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation
dosimeters
dosimetry
Electric measurements
Equipment Failure Analysis
film dosimetry
Film Dosimetry - instrumentation
Film Dosimetry - methods
IMRT treatment plan verification
Intensity modulated radiation therapy
intensity modulation
Intermittency
Ionization chambers
Linear accelerators
Multileaf collimators
phantoms
quality assurance
Quality assurance in radiotherapy
Quality Assurance, Health Care - methods
radiation therapy
Radiotherapy Dosage
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods
Radiotherapy, Conformal - methods
Record and verify systems and applications
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
silver
Treatment strategy
title Dosimetric accuracy of Kodak EDR2 film for IMRT verifications
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T16%3A35%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dosimetric%20accuracy%20of%20Kodak%20EDR2%20film%20for%20IMRT%20verifications&rft.jtitle=Medical%20physics%20(Lancaster)&rft.au=Childress,%20Nathan%20L.&rft.date=2005-02&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=539&rft.epage=548&rft.pages=539-548&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft.coden=MPHYA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118/1.1852791&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_pubme%3EMP2791%3C/wiley_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/15789600&rfr_iscdi=true