Calculation of a Gallbladder Ejection Fraction: Advantage of Continuous Sincalide Infusion over the Three-Minute Infusion Method
The purpose of this study was to investigate alternative methods of infusing sincalide for calculation of a gallbladder ejection fraction (GBEF) during cholescintigraphy (5 mCi 99mTc-mebrofenin). After gallbladder filling, three methods of infusion were compared in 23 normal volunteers: (1) 0.02 mic...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978) 1992-04, Vol.33 (4), p.537 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 537 |
container_title | The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978) |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Ziessman, Harvey A Fahey, Frederic H Hixson, Donald J |
description | The purpose of this study was to investigate alternative methods of infusing sincalide for calculation of a gallbladder ejection fraction (GBEF) during cholescintigraphy (5 mCi 99mTc-mebrofenin). After gallbladder filling, three methods of infusion were compared in 23 normal volunteers: (1) 0.02 microgram/kg as a 3-min infusion, (2) 0.02 microgram/kg as a 30-min infusion, and (3) 0.01 microgram/kg as a 30-min infusion (14 subjects), all performed on separate days. With the 3-min infusion, the emptying pattern was usually exponential and completed in 15 min. The mean (GBEF) was 52% +/- 26% at 20 min and 56% +/- 27% at 30 min (range 0%-100%). GBEFs were less than 35% in six subjects and 35%-38% in four. Side effects were noted by 11/23 subjects. With the slow infusions, emptying was linear; no side effects were noted. With 0.02 microgram/kg, the mean GBEF was 50% +/- 27% at 20 min and 70% +/- 22% at 30 min (range 26%-95%). Similar results were seen with 0.01 microgram/kg, but the data were more limited. The 30-min infusion had a higher normalcy rate than the 3-min method (91% versus 74%). Females had significantly lower GBEFs than males (p less than 0.05%). We conclude that the slow infusion method is preferable; it is more physiological, results in more complete emptying, has no side effects, has less normal variability, and should improve the specificity of this test. The lower mean female GBEF may have pathophysiological significance. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_highw</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_1552338</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1552338</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-h121t-fa692ba2d5000f81077d72db455a7684e4afec679925fe9913b7a43b00eacfbf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkD1rwzAQQEVpSdO0P6GgqZtBsizL7hZMkgYSOjSdzdk6xQqKHPyR0q0_Pc7H0OkO3uPB3R0ZcylkIONY3ZMx4zEPpGTykTy17Y4xFidJMiIjLmUoRDImfxm4snfQ2drT2lCgC3CucKA1NnS2w_JC5g1clnc61UfwHWzxbGe176zv676lX9aX4KxGuvSmby-545DoKqSbqkEM1oPZ_cNr7KpaP5MHA67Fl9uckO_5bJN9BKvPxTKbroKKh7wLDMRpWECo5XCESThTSqtQF5GUoOIkwggMlrFK01AaTFMuCgWRKBhDKE1hxIS8XruHvtijzg-N3UPzm98-MfC3K6_stvqxDea-Lx1Cc5Z3fi9EHuVSKHECHL9quw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Calculation of a Gallbladder Ejection Fraction: Advantage of Continuous Sincalide Infusion over the Three-Minute Infusion Method</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Ziessman, Harvey A ; Fahey, Frederic H ; Hixson, Donald J</creator><creatorcontrib>Ziessman, Harvey A ; Fahey, Frederic H ; Hixson, Donald J</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to investigate alternative methods of infusing sincalide for calculation of a gallbladder ejection fraction (GBEF) during cholescintigraphy (5 mCi 99mTc-mebrofenin). After gallbladder filling, three methods of infusion were compared in 23 normal volunteers: (1) 0.02 microgram/kg as a 3-min infusion, (2) 0.02 microgram/kg as a 30-min infusion, and (3) 0.01 microgram/kg as a 30-min infusion (14 subjects), all performed on separate days. With the 3-min infusion, the emptying pattern was usually exponential and completed in 15 min. The mean (GBEF) was 52% +/- 26% at 20 min and 56% +/- 27% at 30 min (range 0%-100%). GBEFs were less than 35% in six subjects and 35%-38% in four. Side effects were noted by 11/23 subjects. With the slow infusions, emptying was linear; no side effects were noted. With 0.02 microgram/kg, the mean GBEF was 50% +/- 27% at 20 min and 70% +/- 22% at 30 min (range 26%-95%). Similar results were seen with 0.01 microgram/kg, but the data were more limited. The 30-min infusion had a higher normalcy rate than the 3-min method (91% versus 74%). Females had significantly lower GBEFs than males (p less than 0.05%). We conclude that the slow infusion method is preferable; it is more physiological, results in more complete emptying, has no side effects, has less normal variability, and should improve the specificity of this test. The lower mean female GBEF may have pathophysiological significance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0161-5505</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-5667</identifier><identifier>PMID: 1552338</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Soc Nuclear Med</publisher><subject>Adult ; Female ; Gallbladder - diagnostic imaging ; Gallbladder Emptying - physiology ; Humans ; Imino Acids ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Organotechnetium Compounds ; Radionuclide Imaging ; Reference Values ; Sincalide - administration & dosage ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978), 1992-04, Vol.33 (4), p.537</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1552338$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ziessman, Harvey A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fahey, Frederic H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hixson, Donald J</creatorcontrib><title>Calculation of a Gallbladder Ejection Fraction: Advantage of Continuous Sincalide Infusion over the Three-Minute Infusion Method</title><title>The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978)</title><addtitle>J Nucl Med</addtitle><description>The purpose of this study was to investigate alternative methods of infusing sincalide for calculation of a gallbladder ejection fraction (GBEF) during cholescintigraphy (5 mCi 99mTc-mebrofenin). After gallbladder filling, three methods of infusion were compared in 23 normal volunteers: (1) 0.02 microgram/kg as a 3-min infusion, (2) 0.02 microgram/kg as a 30-min infusion, and (3) 0.01 microgram/kg as a 30-min infusion (14 subjects), all performed on separate days. With the 3-min infusion, the emptying pattern was usually exponential and completed in 15 min. The mean (GBEF) was 52% +/- 26% at 20 min and 56% +/- 27% at 30 min (range 0%-100%). GBEFs were less than 35% in six subjects and 35%-38% in four. Side effects were noted by 11/23 subjects. With the slow infusions, emptying was linear; no side effects were noted. With 0.02 microgram/kg, the mean GBEF was 50% +/- 27% at 20 min and 70% +/- 22% at 30 min (range 26%-95%). Similar results were seen with 0.01 microgram/kg, but the data were more limited. The 30-min infusion had a higher normalcy rate than the 3-min method (91% versus 74%). Females had significantly lower GBEFs than males (p less than 0.05%). We conclude that the slow infusion method is preferable; it is more physiological, results in more complete emptying, has no side effects, has less normal variability, and should improve the specificity of this test. The lower mean female GBEF may have pathophysiological significance.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gallbladder - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Gallbladder Emptying - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imino Acids</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Organotechnetium Compounds</subject><subject>Radionuclide Imaging</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Sincalide - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0161-5505</issn><issn>1535-5667</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkD1rwzAQQEVpSdO0P6GgqZtBsizL7hZMkgYSOjSdzdk6xQqKHPyR0q0_Pc7H0OkO3uPB3R0ZcylkIONY3ZMx4zEPpGTykTy17Y4xFidJMiIjLmUoRDImfxm4snfQ2drT2lCgC3CucKA1NnS2w_JC5g1clnc61UfwHWzxbGe176zv676lX9aX4KxGuvSmby-545DoKqSbqkEM1oPZ_cNr7KpaP5MHA67Fl9uckO_5bJN9BKvPxTKbroKKh7wLDMRpWECo5XCESThTSqtQF5GUoOIkwggMlrFK01AaTFMuCgWRKBhDKE1hxIS8XruHvtijzg-N3UPzm98-MfC3K6_stvqxDea-Lx1Cc5Z3fi9EHuVSKHECHL9quw</recordid><startdate>199204</startdate><enddate>199204</enddate><creator>Ziessman, Harvey A</creator><creator>Fahey, Frederic H</creator><creator>Hixson, Donald J</creator><general>Soc Nuclear Med</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199204</creationdate><title>Calculation of a Gallbladder Ejection Fraction: Advantage of Continuous Sincalide Infusion over the Three-Minute Infusion Method</title><author>Ziessman, Harvey A ; Fahey, Frederic H ; Hixson, Donald J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-h121t-fa692ba2d5000f81077d72db455a7684e4afec679925fe9913b7a43b00eacfbf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gallbladder - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Gallbladder Emptying - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imino Acids</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Organotechnetium Compounds</topic><topic>Radionuclide Imaging</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Sincalide - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ziessman, Harvey A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fahey, Frederic H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hixson, Donald J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><jtitle>The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ziessman, Harvey A</au><au>Fahey, Frederic H</au><au>Hixson, Donald J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Calculation of a Gallbladder Ejection Fraction: Advantage of Continuous Sincalide Infusion over the Three-Minute Infusion Method</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978)</jtitle><addtitle>J Nucl Med</addtitle><date>1992-04</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>537</spage><pages>537-</pages><issn>0161-5505</issn><eissn>1535-5667</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this study was to investigate alternative methods of infusing sincalide for calculation of a gallbladder ejection fraction (GBEF) during cholescintigraphy (5 mCi 99mTc-mebrofenin). After gallbladder filling, three methods of infusion were compared in 23 normal volunteers: (1) 0.02 microgram/kg as a 3-min infusion, (2) 0.02 microgram/kg as a 30-min infusion, and (3) 0.01 microgram/kg as a 30-min infusion (14 subjects), all performed on separate days. With the 3-min infusion, the emptying pattern was usually exponential and completed in 15 min. The mean (GBEF) was 52% +/- 26% at 20 min and 56% +/- 27% at 30 min (range 0%-100%). GBEFs were less than 35% in six subjects and 35%-38% in four. Side effects were noted by 11/23 subjects. With the slow infusions, emptying was linear; no side effects were noted. With 0.02 microgram/kg, the mean GBEF was 50% +/- 27% at 20 min and 70% +/- 22% at 30 min (range 26%-95%). Similar results were seen with 0.01 microgram/kg, but the data were more limited. The 30-min infusion had a higher normalcy rate than the 3-min method (91% versus 74%). Females had significantly lower GBEFs than males (p less than 0.05%). We conclude that the slow infusion method is preferable; it is more physiological, results in more complete emptying, has no side effects, has less normal variability, and should improve the specificity of this test. The lower mean female GBEF may have pathophysiological significance.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Soc Nuclear Med</pub><pmid>1552338</pmid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0161-5505 |
ispartof | The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978), 1992-04, Vol.33 (4), p.537 |
issn | 0161-5505 1535-5667 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_1552338 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Adult Female Gallbladder - diagnostic imaging Gallbladder Emptying - physiology Humans Imino Acids Male Middle Aged Organotechnetium Compounds Radionuclide Imaging Reference Values Sincalide - administration & dosage Time Factors |
title | Calculation of a Gallbladder Ejection Fraction: Advantage of Continuous Sincalide Infusion over the Three-Minute Infusion Method |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T23%3A51%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_highw&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Calculation%20of%20a%20Gallbladder%20Ejection%20Fraction:%20Advantage%20of%20Continuous%20Sincalide%20Infusion%20over%20the%20Three-Minute%20Infusion%20Method&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20nuclear%20medicine%20(1978)&rft.au=Ziessman,%20Harvey%20A&rft.date=1992-04&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=537&rft.pages=537-&rft.issn=0161-5505&rft.eissn=1535-5667&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_highw%3E1552338%3C/pubmed_highw%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/1552338&rfr_iscdi=true |