Calculation of a Gallbladder Ejection Fraction: Advantage of Continuous Sincalide Infusion over the Three-Minute Infusion Method

The purpose of this study was to investigate alternative methods of infusing sincalide for calculation of a gallbladder ejection fraction (GBEF) during cholescintigraphy (5 mCi 99mTc-mebrofenin). After gallbladder filling, three methods of infusion were compared in 23 normal volunteers: (1) 0.02 mic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978) 1992-04, Vol.33 (4), p.537
Hauptverfasser: Ziessman, Harvey A, Fahey, Frederic H, Hixson, Donald J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 4
container_start_page 537
container_title The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978)
container_volume 33
creator Ziessman, Harvey A
Fahey, Frederic H
Hixson, Donald J
description The purpose of this study was to investigate alternative methods of infusing sincalide for calculation of a gallbladder ejection fraction (GBEF) during cholescintigraphy (5 mCi 99mTc-mebrofenin). After gallbladder filling, three methods of infusion were compared in 23 normal volunteers: (1) 0.02 microgram/kg as a 3-min infusion, (2) 0.02 microgram/kg as a 30-min infusion, and (3) 0.01 microgram/kg as a 30-min infusion (14 subjects), all performed on separate days. With the 3-min infusion, the emptying pattern was usually exponential and completed in 15 min. The mean (GBEF) was 52% +/- 26% at 20 min and 56% +/- 27% at 30 min (range 0%-100%). GBEFs were less than 35% in six subjects and 35%-38% in four. Side effects were noted by 11/23 subjects. With the slow infusions, emptying was linear; no side effects were noted. With 0.02 microgram/kg, the mean GBEF was 50% +/- 27% at 20 min and 70% +/- 22% at 30 min (range 26%-95%). Similar results were seen with 0.01 microgram/kg, but the data were more limited. The 30-min infusion had a higher normalcy rate than the 3-min method (91% versus 74%). Females had significantly lower GBEFs than males (p less than 0.05%). We conclude that the slow infusion method is preferable; it is more physiological, results in more complete emptying, has no side effects, has less normal variability, and should improve the specificity of this test. The lower mean female GBEF may have pathophysiological significance.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_highw</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_1552338</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1552338</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-h121t-fa692ba2d5000f81077d72db455a7684e4afec679925fe9913b7a43b00eacfbf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkD1rwzAQQEVpSdO0P6GgqZtBsizL7hZMkgYSOjSdzdk6xQqKHPyR0q0_Pc7H0OkO3uPB3R0ZcylkIONY3ZMx4zEPpGTykTy17Y4xFidJMiIjLmUoRDImfxm4snfQ2drT2lCgC3CucKA1NnS2w_JC5g1clnc61UfwHWzxbGe176zv676lX9aX4KxGuvSmby-545DoKqSbqkEM1oPZ_cNr7KpaP5MHA67Fl9uckO_5bJN9BKvPxTKbroKKh7wLDMRpWECo5XCESThTSqtQF5GUoOIkwggMlrFK01AaTFMuCgWRKBhDKE1hxIS8XruHvtijzg-N3UPzm98-MfC3K6_stvqxDea-Lx1Cc5Z3fi9EHuVSKHECHL9quw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Calculation of a Gallbladder Ejection Fraction: Advantage of Continuous Sincalide Infusion over the Three-Minute Infusion Method</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Ziessman, Harvey A ; Fahey, Frederic H ; Hixson, Donald J</creator><creatorcontrib>Ziessman, Harvey A ; Fahey, Frederic H ; Hixson, Donald J</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to investigate alternative methods of infusing sincalide for calculation of a gallbladder ejection fraction (GBEF) during cholescintigraphy (5 mCi 99mTc-mebrofenin). After gallbladder filling, three methods of infusion were compared in 23 normal volunteers: (1) 0.02 microgram/kg as a 3-min infusion, (2) 0.02 microgram/kg as a 30-min infusion, and (3) 0.01 microgram/kg as a 30-min infusion (14 subjects), all performed on separate days. With the 3-min infusion, the emptying pattern was usually exponential and completed in 15 min. The mean (GBEF) was 52% +/- 26% at 20 min and 56% +/- 27% at 30 min (range 0%-100%). GBEFs were less than 35% in six subjects and 35%-38% in four. Side effects were noted by 11/23 subjects. With the slow infusions, emptying was linear; no side effects were noted. With 0.02 microgram/kg, the mean GBEF was 50% +/- 27% at 20 min and 70% +/- 22% at 30 min (range 26%-95%). Similar results were seen with 0.01 microgram/kg, but the data were more limited. The 30-min infusion had a higher normalcy rate than the 3-min method (91% versus 74%). Females had significantly lower GBEFs than males (p less than 0.05%). We conclude that the slow infusion method is preferable; it is more physiological, results in more complete emptying, has no side effects, has less normal variability, and should improve the specificity of this test. The lower mean female GBEF may have pathophysiological significance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0161-5505</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-5667</identifier><identifier>PMID: 1552338</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Soc Nuclear Med</publisher><subject>Adult ; Female ; Gallbladder - diagnostic imaging ; Gallbladder Emptying - physiology ; Humans ; Imino Acids ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Organotechnetium Compounds ; Radionuclide Imaging ; Reference Values ; Sincalide - administration &amp; dosage ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978), 1992-04, Vol.33 (4), p.537</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1552338$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ziessman, Harvey A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fahey, Frederic H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hixson, Donald J</creatorcontrib><title>Calculation of a Gallbladder Ejection Fraction: Advantage of Continuous Sincalide Infusion over the Three-Minute Infusion Method</title><title>The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978)</title><addtitle>J Nucl Med</addtitle><description>The purpose of this study was to investigate alternative methods of infusing sincalide for calculation of a gallbladder ejection fraction (GBEF) during cholescintigraphy (5 mCi 99mTc-mebrofenin). After gallbladder filling, three methods of infusion were compared in 23 normal volunteers: (1) 0.02 microgram/kg as a 3-min infusion, (2) 0.02 microgram/kg as a 30-min infusion, and (3) 0.01 microgram/kg as a 30-min infusion (14 subjects), all performed on separate days. With the 3-min infusion, the emptying pattern was usually exponential and completed in 15 min. The mean (GBEF) was 52% +/- 26% at 20 min and 56% +/- 27% at 30 min (range 0%-100%). GBEFs were less than 35% in six subjects and 35%-38% in four. Side effects were noted by 11/23 subjects. With the slow infusions, emptying was linear; no side effects were noted. With 0.02 microgram/kg, the mean GBEF was 50% +/- 27% at 20 min and 70% +/- 22% at 30 min (range 26%-95%). Similar results were seen with 0.01 microgram/kg, but the data were more limited. The 30-min infusion had a higher normalcy rate than the 3-min method (91% versus 74%). Females had significantly lower GBEFs than males (p less than 0.05%). We conclude that the slow infusion method is preferable; it is more physiological, results in more complete emptying, has no side effects, has less normal variability, and should improve the specificity of this test. The lower mean female GBEF may have pathophysiological significance.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gallbladder - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Gallbladder Emptying - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imino Acids</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Organotechnetium Compounds</subject><subject>Radionuclide Imaging</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Sincalide - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0161-5505</issn><issn>1535-5667</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkD1rwzAQQEVpSdO0P6GgqZtBsizL7hZMkgYSOjSdzdk6xQqKHPyR0q0_Pc7H0OkO3uPB3R0ZcylkIONY3ZMx4zEPpGTykTy17Y4xFidJMiIjLmUoRDImfxm4snfQ2drT2lCgC3CucKA1NnS2w_JC5g1clnc61UfwHWzxbGe176zv676lX9aX4KxGuvSmby-545DoKqSbqkEM1oPZ_cNr7KpaP5MHA67Fl9uckO_5bJN9BKvPxTKbroKKh7wLDMRpWECo5XCESThTSqtQF5GUoOIkwggMlrFK01AaTFMuCgWRKBhDKE1hxIS8XruHvtijzg-N3UPzm98-MfC3K6_stvqxDea-Lx1Cc5Z3fi9EHuVSKHECHL9quw</recordid><startdate>199204</startdate><enddate>199204</enddate><creator>Ziessman, Harvey A</creator><creator>Fahey, Frederic H</creator><creator>Hixson, Donald J</creator><general>Soc Nuclear Med</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199204</creationdate><title>Calculation of a Gallbladder Ejection Fraction: Advantage of Continuous Sincalide Infusion over the Three-Minute Infusion Method</title><author>Ziessman, Harvey A ; Fahey, Frederic H ; Hixson, Donald J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-h121t-fa692ba2d5000f81077d72db455a7684e4afec679925fe9913b7a43b00eacfbf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gallbladder - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Gallbladder Emptying - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imino Acids</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Organotechnetium Compounds</topic><topic>Radionuclide Imaging</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Sincalide - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ziessman, Harvey A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fahey, Frederic H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hixson, Donald J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><jtitle>The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ziessman, Harvey A</au><au>Fahey, Frederic H</au><au>Hixson, Donald J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Calculation of a Gallbladder Ejection Fraction: Advantage of Continuous Sincalide Infusion over the Three-Minute Infusion Method</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978)</jtitle><addtitle>J Nucl Med</addtitle><date>1992-04</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>537</spage><pages>537-</pages><issn>0161-5505</issn><eissn>1535-5667</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this study was to investigate alternative methods of infusing sincalide for calculation of a gallbladder ejection fraction (GBEF) during cholescintigraphy (5 mCi 99mTc-mebrofenin). After gallbladder filling, three methods of infusion were compared in 23 normal volunteers: (1) 0.02 microgram/kg as a 3-min infusion, (2) 0.02 microgram/kg as a 30-min infusion, and (3) 0.01 microgram/kg as a 30-min infusion (14 subjects), all performed on separate days. With the 3-min infusion, the emptying pattern was usually exponential and completed in 15 min. The mean (GBEF) was 52% +/- 26% at 20 min and 56% +/- 27% at 30 min (range 0%-100%). GBEFs were less than 35% in six subjects and 35%-38% in four. Side effects were noted by 11/23 subjects. With the slow infusions, emptying was linear; no side effects were noted. With 0.02 microgram/kg, the mean GBEF was 50% +/- 27% at 20 min and 70% +/- 22% at 30 min (range 26%-95%). Similar results were seen with 0.01 microgram/kg, but the data were more limited. The 30-min infusion had a higher normalcy rate than the 3-min method (91% versus 74%). Females had significantly lower GBEFs than males (p less than 0.05%). We conclude that the slow infusion method is preferable; it is more physiological, results in more complete emptying, has no side effects, has less normal variability, and should improve the specificity of this test. The lower mean female GBEF may have pathophysiological significance.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Soc Nuclear Med</pub><pmid>1552338</pmid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0161-5505
ispartof The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978), 1992-04, Vol.33 (4), p.537
issn 0161-5505
1535-5667
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_1552338
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Adult
Female
Gallbladder - diagnostic imaging
Gallbladder Emptying - physiology
Humans
Imino Acids
Male
Middle Aged
Organotechnetium Compounds
Radionuclide Imaging
Reference Values
Sincalide - administration & dosage
Time Factors
title Calculation of a Gallbladder Ejection Fraction: Advantage of Continuous Sincalide Infusion over the Three-Minute Infusion Method
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T23%3A51%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_highw&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Calculation%20of%20a%20Gallbladder%20Ejection%20Fraction:%20Advantage%20of%20Continuous%20Sincalide%20Infusion%20over%20the%20Three-Minute%20Infusion%20Method&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20nuclear%20medicine%20(1978)&rft.au=Ziessman,%20Harvey%20A&rft.date=1992-04&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=537&rft.pages=537-&rft.issn=0161-5505&rft.eissn=1535-5667&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_highw%3E1552338%3C/pubmed_highw%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/1552338&rfr_iscdi=true