NOEMIE: an epidemiological study of migraine at work: results from 17 occupational health centres

A survey (NOEMIE, Nouvel Observatoire Epidemiologique de la Migraine en Entreprise) was carried out in France in 17 occupational healthcare units in order to identify subjects suffering from migraine headache with the aim of guiding them towards a healthcare program. The data collected in the partic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Revue neurologique 2004-10, Vol.160 (10), p.928
Hauptverfasser: Lantéri-Minet, M, Allain, H, Nachit-Ouinekh, F, Bentué-Ferrer, D, Gilbert, P, Schück, S, El Hasnaoui, A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:fre
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 10
container_start_page 928
container_title Revue neurologique
container_volume 160
creator Lantéri-Minet, M
Allain, H
Nachit-Ouinekh, F
Bentué-Ferrer, D
Gilbert, P
Schück, S
El Hasnaoui, A
description A survey (NOEMIE, Nouvel Observatoire Epidemiologique de la Migraine en Entreprise) was carried out in France in 17 occupational healthcare units in order to identify subjects suffering from migraine headache with the aim of guiding them towards a healthcare program. The data collected in the participating units are presented. and patients. NOEMIE was a national cross-sectional, observational, multicentric study with a 6-month follow-up. Two groups of migraine sufferers (according to IHS criteria) were included and divided into two groups: subjects already managed for their migraine (group A) and subjects who had not sought healthcare for migraine for more than 12 months (group B). The main objective was to evaluate changes in the quality-of-life score (QVM) 6 months later. At inclusion, the two groups were comparable for demographic features, history of migraine, and disease severity. A significant difference was observed between the two groups for frequency of attacks, disease management, and evaluation of treatment efficacy and of quality-of-life. At 6 months, patient satisfaction and quality-of-life were significantly improved (6 to 10 point improvement). For the 4753 reported attacks, 12.4 percent of the patients in group A required sick leave versus 10.9 percent in group B. Frequency of sick leave was considerably improved in both groups. By identifying subjects suffering from migraine headache who had not sought specific medical care and advising them to seek medical management, the employee healthcare units improved the subjects' quality-of-life, promoted adequate medical management and reduced occupational consequences of migraine headache.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_15492719</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>15492719</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p139t-931bf07b267e7a0bec1a25db789392abc1780cce930589e2b1898daac94760ad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1j81KAzEURrNQbK2-guQFBvLTaZLupIxaqHaj63KT3GmjM5MhySB9ewvq6tucc-C7InPGZF1JpdWM3Ob8yZjgiskbMuP10gjFzZzA27553TZrCgPFMXjsQ-ziMTjoaC6TP9PY0j4cE4QBKRT6HdPXmibMU1cybVPsKVc0OjeNUEIcLt4JoSsn6nAoF-6OXLfQZbz_2wX5eGreNy_Vbv-83TzuqpFLUyojuW2ZsmKlUAGz6DiI2luljTQCrONKM-fQSFZrg8JybbQHcGapVgy8XJCH3-442R79YUyhh3Q-_H-VPwesT9U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>NOEMIE: an epidemiological study of migraine at work: results from 17 occupational health centres</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Lantéri-Minet, M ; Allain, H ; Nachit-Ouinekh, F ; Bentué-Ferrer, D ; Gilbert, P ; Schück, S ; El Hasnaoui, A</creator><creatorcontrib>Lantéri-Minet, M ; Allain, H ; Nachit-Ouinekh, F ; Bentué-Ferrer, D ; Gilbert, P ; Schück, S ; El Hasnaoui, A ; Comité d'Orientation National</creatorcontrib><description>A survey (NOEMIE, Nouvel Observatoire Epidemiologique de la Migraine en Entreprise) was carried out in France in 17 occupational healthcare units in order to identify subjects suffering from migraine headache with the aim of guiding them towards a healthcare program. The data collected in the participating units are presented. and patients. NOEMIE was a national cross-sectional, observational, multicentric study with a 6-month follow-up. Two groups of migraine sufferers (according to IHS criteria) were included and divided into two groups: subjects already managed for their migraine (group A) and subjects who had not sought healthcare for migraine for more than 12 months (group B). The main objective was to evaluate changes in the quality-of-life score (QVM) 6 months later. At inclusion, the two groups were comparable for demographic features, history of migraine, and disease severity. A significant difference was observed between the two groups for frequency of attacks, disease management, and evaluation of treatment efficacy and of quality-of-life. At 6 months, patient satisfaction and quality-of-life were significantly improved (6 to 10 point improvement). For the 4753 reported attacks, 12.4 percent of the patients in group A required sick leave versus 10.9 percent in group B. Frequency of sick leave was considerably improved in both groups. By identifying subjects suffering from migraine headache who had not sought specific medical care and advising them to seek medical management, the employee healthcare units improved the subjects' quality-of-life, promoted adequate medical management and reduced occupational consequences of migraine headache.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0035-3787</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15492719</identifier><language>fre</language><publisher>France</publisher><subject>Adult ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Data Collection ; Female ; France - epidemiology ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Migraine Disorders - epidemiology ; Migraine Disorders - psychology ; Migraine Disorders - therapy ; Occupational Diseases - epidemiology ; Occupational Diseases - psychology ; Occupational Diseases - therapy ; Occupational Health Services - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Patient Satisfaction ; Quality of Life ; Sick Leave</subject><ispartof>Revue neurologique, 2004-10, Vol.160 (10), p.928</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15492719$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lantéri-Minet, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allain, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nachit-Ouinekh, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bentué-Ferrer, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilbert, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schück, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El Hasnaoui, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Comité d'Orientation National</creatorcontrib><title>NOEMIE: an epidemiological study of migraine at work: results from 17 occupational health centres</title><title>Revue neurologique</title><addtitle>Rev Neurol (Paris)</addtitle><description>A survey (NOEMIE, Nouvel Observatoire Epidemiologique de la Migraine en Entreprise) was carried out in France in 17 occupational healthcare units in order to identify subjects suffering from migraine headache with the aim of guiding them towards a healthcare program. The data collected in the participating units are presented. and patients. NOEMIE was a national cross-sectional, observational, multicentric study with a 6-month follow-up. Two groups of migraine sufferers (according to IHS criteria) were included and divided into two groups: subjects already managed for their migraine (group A) and subjects who had not sought healthcare for migraine for more than 12 months (group B). The main objective was to evaluate changes in the quality-of-life score (QVM) 6 months later. At inclusion, the two groups were comparable for demographic features, history of migraine, and disease severity. A significant difference was observed between the two groups for frequency of attacks, disease management, and evaluation of treatment efficacy and of quality-of-life. At 6 months, patient satisfaction and quality-of-life were significantly improved (6 to 10 point improvement). For the 4753 reported attacks, 12.4 percent of the patients in group A required sick leave versus 10.9 percent in group B. Frequency of sick leave was considerably improved in both groups. By identifying subjects suffering from migraine headache who had not sought specific medical care and advising them to seek medical management, the employee healthcare units improved the subjects' quality-of-life, promoted adequate medical management and reduced occupational consequences of migraine headache.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Data Collection</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>France - epidemiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Migraine Disorders - epidemiology</subject><subject>Migraine Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Migraine Disorders - therapy</subject><subject>Occupational Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Occupational Diseases - psychology</subject><subject>Occupational Diseases - therapy</subject><subject>Occupational Health Services - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Sick Leave</subject><issn>0035-3787</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1j81KAzEURrNQbK2-guQFBvLTaZLupIxaqHaj63KT3GmjM5MhySB9ewvq6tucc-C7InPGZF1JpdWM3Ob8yZjgiskbMuP10gjFzZzA27553TZrCgPFMXjsQ-ziMTjoaC6TP9PY0j4cE4QBKRT6HdPXmibMU1cybVPsKVc0OjeNUEIcLt4JoSsn6nAoF-6OXLfQZbz_2wX5eGreNy_Vbv-83TzuqpFLUyojuW2ZsmKlUAGz6DiI2luljTQCrONKM-fQSFZrg8JybbQHcGapVgy8XJCH3-442R79YUyhh3Q-_H-VPwesT9U</recordid><startdate>200410</startdate><enddate>200410</enddate><creator>Lantéri-Minet, M</creator><creator>Allain, H</creator><creator>Nachit-Ouinekh, F</creator><creator>Bentué-Ferrer, D</creator><creator>Gilbert, P</creator><creator>Schück, S</creator><creator>El Hasnaoui, A</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200410</creationdate><title>NOEMIE: an epidemiological study of migraine at work: results from 17 occupational health centres</title><author>Lantéri-Minet, M ; Allain, H ; Nachit-Ouinekh, F ; Bentué-Ferrer, D ; Gilbert, P ; Schück, S ; El Hasnaoui, A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p139t-931bf07b267e7a0bec1a25db789392abc1780cce930589e2b1898daac94760ad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>fre</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Data Collection</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>France - epidemiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Migraine Disorders - epidemiology</topic><topic>Migraine Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Migraine Disorders - therapy</topic><topic>Occupational Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Occupational Diseases - psychology</topic><topic>Occupational Diseases - therapy</topic><topic>Occupational Health Services - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Sick Leave</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lantéri-Minet, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allain, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nachit-Ouinekh, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bentué-Ferrer, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilbert, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schück, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El Hasnaoui, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Comité d'Orientation National</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><jtitle>Revue neurologique</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lantéri-Minet, M</au><au>Allain, H</au><au>Nachit-Ouinekh, F</au><au>Bentué-Ferrer, D</au><au>Gilbert, P</au><au>Schück, S</au><au>El Hasnaoui, A</au><aucorp>Comité d'Orientation National</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>NOEMIE: an epidemiological study of migraine at work: results from 17 occupational health centres</atitle><jtitle>Revue neurologique</jtitle><addtitle>Rev Neurol (Paris)</addtitle><date>2004-10</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>160</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>928</spage><pages>928-</pages><issn>0035-3787</issn><abstract>A survey (NOEMIE, Nouvel Observatoire Epidemiologique de la Migraine en Entreprise) was carried out in France in 17 occupational healthcare units in order to identify subjects suffering from migraine headache with the aim of guiding them towards a healthcare program. The data collected in the participating units are presented. and patients. NOEMIE was a national cross-sectional, observational, multicentric study with a 6-month follow-up. Two groups of migraine sufferers (according to IHS criteria) were included and divided into two groups: subjects already managed for their migraine (group A) and subjects who had not sought healthcare for migraine for more than 12 months (group B). The main objective was to evaluate changes in the quality-of-life score (QVM) 6 months later. At inclusion, the two groups were comparable for demographic features, history of migraine, and disease severity. A significant difference was observed between the two groups for frequency of attacks, disease management, and evaluation of treatment efficacy and of quality-of-life. At 6 months, patient satisfaction and quality-of-life were significantly improved (6 to 10 point improvement). For the 4753 reported attacks, 12.4 percent of the patients in group A required sick leave versus 10.9 percent in group B. Frequency of sick leave was considerably improved in both groups. By identifying subjects suffering from migraine headache who had not sought specific medical care and advising them to seek medical management, the employee healthcare units improved the subjects' quality-of-life, promoted adequate medical management and reduced occupational consequences of migraine headache.</abstract><cop>France</cop><pmid>15492719</pmid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0035-3787
ispartof Revue neurologique, 2004-10, Vol.160 (10), p.928
issn 0035-3787
language fre
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_15492719
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Cross-Sectional Studies
Data Collection
Female
France - epidemiology
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Migraine Disorders - epidemiology
Migraine Disorders - psychology
Migraine Disorders - therapy
Occupational Diseases - epidemiology
Occupational Diseases - psychology
Occupational Diseases - therapy
Occupational Health Services - statistics & numerical data
Patient Satisfaction
Quality of Life
Sick Leave
title NOEMIE: an epidemiological study of migraine at work: results from 17 occupational health centres
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T14%3A39%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=NOEMIE:%20an%20epidemiological%20study%20of%20migraine%20at%20work:%20results%20from%2017%20occupational%20health%20centres&rft.jtitle=Revue%20neurologique&rft.au=Lant%C3%A9ri-Minet,%20M&rft.aucorp=Comit%C3%A9%20d'Orientation%20National&rft.date=2004-10&rft.volume=160&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=928&rft.pages=928-&rft.issn=0035-3787&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed%3E15492719%3C/pubmed%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/15492719&rfr_iscdi=true