Efficacy of once-daily extended-release lovastatin as compared to immediate-release lovastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia

SUMMARY Objective: to compare the efficacy and safety of 20 mg of lovastatin when administered once daily as an extended-release (ER) tablet or as an immediate-release (IR) tablet. Research design and methods: Male or female patients aged 21-70 years with hypercholesterolemia who provided written in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Current medical research and opinion 2004, Vol.20 (1), p.13-18
Hauptverfasser: Lukacsko, P., Walters, E. J., Cullen, E. I., Niecestro, R., Friedhoff, L. T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:SUMMARY Objective: to compare the efficacy and safety of 20 mg of lovastatin when administered once daily as an extended-release (ER) tablet or as an immediate-release (IR) tablet. Research design and methods: Male or female patients aged 21-70 years with hypercholesterolemia who provided written informed consent and met the inclusion criteria were screened. A total of 179 patients were enrolled: 100 male and 79 female; 153 were Caucasian, eight Black and 18 other races; the mean age was 56 years. Patients were generally in good health as evidenced by medical history, physical and laboratory examination. Patients were required to not exceed specific low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels depending on their risk category. The trial was conducted as a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, positive-controlled, double-dummy, two-way crossover study. Patients were washed-out of any prior lipid-lowering medications (period 1) and then received one ER or one IR lovastatin tablet for 12 weeks (period 2) and then washed out with placebo for 6 weeks (period 3). They then received the alternate treatment for an additional 12 weeks (period 4). Main outcome measures: The primary efficacy variable was the combined mean percent change in LDL-C from baseline to endpoint for periods 2 and 4. Secondary variables included the mean percent change from baseline in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), total cholesterol (TC), and triglycerides (TG) for periods 2 and 4 combined. Least-square mean differences between ER and IR treated groups were estimated at both treatments. All tests were two-sided and a p-value of
ISSN:0300-7995
1473-4877
DOI:10.1185/030079903125002612