National Use of Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy: Annual Trends and Response to Recent Evidence

CONTEXT Postmenopausal hormone therapy use increased dramatically during the past 2 decades because of a prevailing belief in its health benefits. Recent evidence from randomized trials published in July 2002 demonstrated adverse cardiovascular disease events and other risks with hormone therapy in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association 2004-01, Vol.291 (1), p.47-53
Hauptverfasser: Hersh, Adam L, Stefanick, Marcia L, Stafford, Randall S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 53
container_issue 1
container_start_page 47
container_title JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association
container_volume 291
creator Hersh, Adam L
Stefanick, Marcia L
Stafford, Randall S
description CONTEXT Postmenopausal hormone therapy use increased dramatically during the past 2 decades because of a prevailing belief in its health benefits. Recent evidence from randomized trials published in July 2002 demonstrated adverse cardiovascular disease events and other risks with hormone therapy in the form of oral estrogen combined with progestin. OBJECTIVE To describe patterns of hormone therapy use from 1995 until July 2003, including the impact of recent evidence. DESIGN, SETTING, AND POPULATION Two databases were used to describe national trends in hormone therapy use from January 1995 to July 2003. The National Prescription Audit database provided data on the number of hormone therapy prescriptions filled by retail pharmacies and the National Disease and Therapeutic Index database provided data on patient visits to office-based physicians during which hormone therapy was prescribed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Annual number of hormone therapy prescriptions and characteristics of visits to physicians during which hormone therapy was prescribed. RESULTS Annual hormone therapy prescriptions increased from 58 million in 1995 to 90 million in 1999, representing approximately 15 million women per year, then remained stable through June 2002. Adoption of new oral estrogen/progestin combinations, primarily Prempro, accounted for most of this growth. Obstetrician/gynecologists provided more than 70% of hormone therapy prescriptions, and more than one third of patients were older than 60 years. Following the publication of trial results in July 2002, hormone therapy prescriptions declined in successive months. Relative to January-June 2002, prescriptions from January-June 2003 declined by 66% for Prempro and 33% for Premarin. Small increases were observed in vaginal formulations and in new prescriptions for low-dose Premarin. If prescription rates observed through July 2003 remain stable, a decline to 57 million prescriptions for 2003, similar to the rate in 1995, is projected. CONCLUSIONS Clinical practice responded rapidly to recent evidence of harms associated with hormone therapy. Since July 2002, many patients have discontinued hormone therapy or are tapering to lower doses.
doi_str_mv 10.1001/jama.291.1.47
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_14709575</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ama_id>197940</ama_id><sourcerecordid>14709575</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a255t-d0b2ac4e60537b6a83ad9f800e04d1e9c4f16922b8fdc3d061dcbe7a2481f6b93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkEFLAzEQhYMotlaPHrxILh53TTbJJvFWSrVCUZH2KGU2yeKWbrJstkL_vYEqncsb3nzzYAahW0pySgh93EILeaFpTnMuz9CYCqYyJrQ6R2NCtMokV3yErmLcklSUyUs0olwSLaQYo683GJrgYYfX0eFQ448Qh9b50ME-JncR-jZ4h1ffrofu8ISn3u-Tv-qdtxGDt_jTxS74tD2E1BvnBzz_aazzxl2jixp20d386QStn-er2SJbvr-8zqbLDAohhsySqgDDXUkEk1UJioHVtSLEEW6p04bXtNRFUanaGmZJSa2pnISCK1qXlWYTdH_M7fZV6-ym65sW-sPm_84EPPwBEA3s6h68aeKJE5wLTsrE3R259NXTVEvNCfsFYihqoA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>National Use of Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy: Annual Trends and Response to Recent Evidence</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Medical Association Journals</source><creator>Hersh, Adam L ; Stefanick, Marcia L ; Stafford, Randall S</creator><creatorcontrib>Hersh, Adam L ; Stefanick, Marcia L ; Stafford, Randall S</creatorcontrib><description>CONTEXT Postmenopausal hormone therapy use increased dramatically during the past 2 decades because of a prevailing belief in its health benefits. Recent evidence from randomized trials published in July 2002 demonstrated adverse cardiovascular disease events and other risks with hormone therapy in the form of oral estrogen combined with progestin. OBJECTIVE To describe patterns of hormone therapy use from 1995 until July 2003, including the impact of recent evidence. DESIGN, SETTING, AND POPULATION Two databases were used to describe national trends in hormone therapy use from January 1995 to July 2003. The National Prescription Audit database provided data on the number of hormone therapy prescriptions filled by retail pharmacies and the National Disease and Therapeutic Index database provided data on patient visits to office-based physicians during which hormone therapy was prescribed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Annual number of hormone therapy prescriptions and characteristics of visits to physicians during which hormone therapy was prescribed. RESULTS Annual hormone therapy prescriptions increased from 58 million in 1995 to 90 million in 1999, representing approximately 15 million women per year, then remained stable through June 2002. Adoption of new oral estrogen/progestin combinations, primarily Prempro, accounted for most of this growth. Obstetrician/gynecologists provided more than 70% of hormone therapy prescriptions, and more than one third of patients were older than 60 years. Following the publication of trial results in July 2002, hormone therapy prescriptions declined in successive months. Relative to January-June 2002, prescriptions from January-June 2003 declined by 66% for Prempro and 33% for Premarin. Small increases were observed in vaginal formulations and in new prescriptions for low-dose Premarin. If prescription rates observed through July 2003 remain stable, a decline to 57 million prescriptions for 2003, similar to the rate in 1995, is projected. CONCLUSIONS Clinical practice responded rapidly to recent evidence of harms associated with hormone therapy. Since July 2002, many patients have discontinued hormone therapy or are tapering to lower doses.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0098-7484</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-3598</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1001/jama.291.1.47</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14709575</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago, IL: American Medical Association</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Drug Prescriptions - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Drug Utilization - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Drug Utilization - trends ; Estrogen Replacement Therapy - adverse effects ; Estrogen Replacement Therapy - trends ; Estrogen Replacement Therapy - utilization ; Estrogens - therapeutic use ; Evidence-Based Medicine ; Female ; Hormones. Endocrine system ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Office Visits - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Office Visits - trends ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Practice Patterns, Physicians' - trends ; Progestins - therapeutic use ; Risk ; United States - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association, 2004-01, Vol.291 (1), p.47-53</ispartof><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/articlepdf/10.1001/jama.291.1.47$$EPDF$$P50$$Gama$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/10.1001/jama.291.1.47$$EHTML$$P50$$Gama$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>64,314,777,781,3327,27905,27906,76238,76241</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=15445406$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14709575$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hersh, Adam L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stefanick, Marcia L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stafford, Randall S</creatorcontrib><title>National Use of Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy: Annual Trends and Response to Recent Evidence</title><title>JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association</title><addtitle>JAMA</addtitle><description>CONTEXT Postmenopausal hormone therapy use increased dramatically during the past 2 decades because of a prevailing belief in its health benefits. Recent evidence from randomized trials published in July 2002 demonstrated adverse cardiovascular disease events and other risks with hormone therapy in the form of oral estrogen combined with progestin. OBJECTIVE To describe patterns of hormone therapy use from 1995 until July 2003, including the impact of recent evidence. DESIGN, SETTING, AND POPULATION Two databases were used to describe national trends in hormone therapy use from January 1995 to July 2003. The National Prescription Audit database provided data on the number of hormone therapy prescriptions filled by retail pharmacies and the National Disease and Therapeutic Index database provided data on patient visits to office-based physicians during which hormone therapy was prescribed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Annual number of hormone therapy prescriptions and characteristics of visits to physicians during which hormone therapy was prescribed. RESULTS Annual hormone therapy prescriptions increased from 58 million in 1995 to 90 million in 1999, representing approximately 15 million women per year, then remained stable through June 2002. Adoption of new oral estrogen/progestin combinations, primarily Prempro, accounted for most of this growth. Obstetrician/gynecologists provided more than 70% of hormone therapy prescriptions, and more than one third of patients were older than 60 years. Following the publication of trial results in July 2002, hormone therapy prescriptions declined in successive months. Relative to January-June 2002, prescriptions from January-June 2003 declined by 66% for Prempro and 33% for Premarin. Small increases were observed in vaginal formulations and in new prescriptions for low-dose Premarin. If prescription rates observed through July 2003 remain stable, a decline to 57 million prescriptions for 2003, similar to the rate in 1995, is projected. CONCLUSIONS Clinical practice responded rapidly to recent evidence of harms associated with hormone therapy. Since July 2002, many patients have discontinued hormone therapy or are tapering to lower doses.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Drug Prescriptions - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Drug Utilization - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Drug Utilization - trends</subject><subject>Estrogen Replacement Therapy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Estrogen Replacement Therapy - trends</subject><subject>Estrogen Replacement Therapy - utilization</subject><subject>Estrogens - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Medicine</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hormones. Endocrine system</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Office Visits - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Office Visits - trends</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - trends</subject><subject>Progestins - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><issn>0098-7484</issn><issn>1538-3598</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkEFLAzEQhYMotlaPHrxILh53TTbJJvFWSrVCUZH2KGU2yeKWbrJstkL_vYEqncsb3nzzYAahW0pySgh93EILeaFpTnMuz9CYCqYyJrQ6R2NCtMokV3yErmLcklSUyUs0olwSLaQYo683GJrgYYfX0eFQ448Qh9b50ME-JncR-jZ4h1ffrofu8ISn3u-Tv-qdtxGDt_jTxS74tD2E1BvnBzz_aazzxl2jixp20d386QStn-er2SJbvr-8zqbLDAohhsySqgDDXUkEk1UJioHVtSLEEW6p04bXtNRFUanaGmZJSa2pnISCK1qXlWYTdH_M7fZV6-ym65sW-sPm_84EPPwBEA3s6h68aeKJE5wLTsrE3R259NXTVEvNCfsFYihqoA</recordid><startdate>20040107</startdate><enddate>20040107</enddate><creator>Hersh, Adam L</creator><creator>Stefanick, Marcia L</creator><creator>Stafford, Randall S</creator><general>American Medical Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040107</creationdate><title>National Use of Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy: Annual Trends and Response to Recent Evidence</title><author>Hersh, Adam L ; Stefanick, Marcia L ; Stafford, Randall S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a255t-d0b2ac4e60537b6a83ad9f800e04d1e9c4f16922b8fdc3d061dcbe7a2481f6b93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Drug Prescriptions - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Drug Utilization - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Drug Utilization - trends</topic><topic>Estrogen Replacement Therapy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Estrogen Replacement Therapy - trends</topic><topic>Estrogen Replacement Therapy - utilization</topic><topic>Estrogens - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Medicine</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hormones. Endocrine system</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Office Visits - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Office Visits - trends</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - trends</topic><topic>Progestins - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hersh, Adam L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stefanick, Marcia L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stafford, Randall S</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><jtitle>JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hersh, Adam L</au><au>Stefanick, Marcia L</au><au>Stafford, Randall S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>National Use of Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy: Annual Trends and Response to Recent Evidence</atitle><jtitle>JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association</jtitle><addtitle>JAMA</addtitle><date>2004-01-07</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>291</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>47</spage><epage>53</epage><pages>47-53</pages><issn>0098-7484</issn><eissn>1538-3598</eissn><abstract>CONTEXT Postmenopausal hormone therapy use increased dramatically during the past 2 decades because of a prevailing belief in its health benefits. Recent evidence from randomized trials published in July 2002 demonstrated adverse cardiovascular disease events and other risks with hormone therapy in the form of oral estrogen combined with progestin. OBJECTIVE To describe patterns of hormone therapy use from 1995 until July 2003, including the impact of recent evidence. DESIGN, SETTING, AND POPULATION Two databases were used to describe national trends in hormone therapy use from January 1995 to July 2003. The National Prescription Audit database provided data on the number of hormone therapy prescriptions filled by retail pharmacies and the National Disease and Therapeutic Index database provided data on patient visits to office-based physicians during which hormone therapy was prescribed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Annual number of hormone therapy prescriptions and characteristics of visits to physicians during which hormone therapy was prescribed. RESULTS Annual hormone therapy prescriptions increased from 58 million in 1995 to 90 million in 1999, representing approximately 15 million women per year, then remained stable through June 2002. Adoption of new oral estrogen/progestin combinations, primarily Prempro, accounted for most of this growth. Obstetrician/gynecologists provided more than 70% of hormone therapy prescriptions, and more than one third of patients were older than 60 years. Following the publication of trial results in July 2002, hormone therapy prescriptions declined in successive months. Relative to January-June 2002, prescriptions from January-June 2003 declined by 66% for Prempro and 33% for Premarin. Small increases were observed in vaginal formulations and in new prescriptions for low-dose Premarin. If prescription rates observed through July 2003 remain stable, a decline to 57 million prescriptions for 2003, similar to the rate in 1995, is projected. CONCLUSIONS Clinical practice responded rapidly to recent evidence of harms associated with hormone therapy. Since July 2002, many patients have discontinued hormone therapy or are tapering to lower doses.</abstract><cop>Chicago, IL</cop><pub>American Medical Association</pub><pmid>14709575</pmid><doi>10.1001/jama.291.1.47</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0098-7484
ispartof JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association, 2004-01, Vol.291 (1), p.47-53
issn 0098-7484
1538-3598
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_14709575
source MEDLINE; American Medical Association Journals
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Drug Prescriptions - statistics & numerical data
Drug Utilization - statistics & numerical data
Drug Utilization - trends
Estrogen Replacement Therapy - adverse effects
Estrogen Replacement Therapy - trends
Estrogen Replacement Therapy - utilization
Estrogens - therapeutic use
Evidence-Based Medicine
Female
Hormones. Endocrine system
Humans
Medical sciences
Office Visits - statistics & numerical data
Office Visits - trends
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics & numerical data
Practice Patterns, Physicians' - trends
Progestins - therapeutic use
Risk
United States - epidemiology
title National Use of Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy: Annual Trends and Response to Recent Evidence
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T09%3A27%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=National%20Use%20of%20Postmenopausal%20Hormone%20Therapy:%20Annual%20Trends%20and%20Response%20to%20Recent%20Evidence&rft.jtitle=JAMA%20:%20the%20journal%20of%20the%20American%20Medical%20Association&rft.au=Hersh,%20Adam%20L&rft.date=2004-01-07&rft.volume=291&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=47&rft.epage=53&rft.pages=47-53&rft.issn=0098-7484&rft.eissn=1538-3598&rft_id=info:doi/10.1001/jama.291.1.47&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_pasca%3E14709575%3C/pubmed_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/14709575&rft_ama_id=197940&rfr_iscdi=true