Invertebrate responses to the management of genetically modified herbicide–tolerant and conventional spring crops. II. Within-field epigeal and aerial arthropods
The effects of the management of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant (GMHT) crops on the abundances of aerial and epigeal arthropods were assessed in 66 beet, 68 maize and 67 spring oilseed rape sites as part of the Farm Scale Evaluations of GMHT crops. Most higher taxa were insensitive to diffe...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences 2003-11, Vol.358 (1439), p.1863-1877 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1877 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1439 |
| container_start_page | 1863 |
| container_title | Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences |
| container_volume | 358 |
| creator | Haughton, A. J. Champion, G. T. Hawes, C. Heard, M. S. Brooks, D. R. Bohan, D. A. Clark, S. J. Dewar, A. M. Firbank, L. G. Osborne, J. L. Perry, J. N. Rothery, P. Roy, D. B. Scott, R. J. Woiwod, I. P. Birchall, C. Skellern, M. P. Walker, J. H. Baker, P. Browne, E. L. Dewar, A. J. G. Garner, B. H. Haylock, L. A. Horne, S. L. Mason, N. S. Sands, R. J. N. Walker, M. J. |
| description | The effects of the management of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant (GMHT) crops on the abundances of aerial and epigeal arthropods were assessed in 66 beet, 68 maize and 67 spring oilseed rape sites as part of the Farm Scale Evaluations of GMHT crops. Most higher taxa were insensitive to differences between GMHT and conventional weed management, but significant effects were found on the abundance of at least one group within each taxon studied. Numbers of butterflies in beet and spring oilseed rape and of Heteroptera and bees in beet were smaller under the relevant GMHT crop management, whereas the abundance of Collembola was consistently greater in all GMHT crops. Generally, these effects were specific to each crop type, reflected the phenology and ecology of the arthropod taxa, were indirect and related to herbicide management. These results apply generally to agriculture across Britain, and could be used in mathematical models to predict the possible long-term effects of the widespread adoption of GMHT technology. The results for bees and butterflies relate to foraging preferences and might or might not translate into effects on population densities, depending on whether adoption leads to forage reductions over large areas. These species, and the detritivore Collembola, may be useful indicator species for future studies of GMHT management. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1098/rstb.2003.1408 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_14561319</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3558305</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3558305</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c793t-916b07dbd8c698f93cc195a00671741f0fab9d1633e3567f791b691e8442a6103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ks2O0zAUhSMEYsrAlhVCXrFLsePEjjcIZsRPpUr8lWFpOclN45LGwXYLZcU78Ai8GU-C01SFCjGrWLrfPffcexJF9wmeEizyx9b5YppgTKckxfmNaEJSTuJEcHwzmmDBkjhPKTuL7ji3whiLjKe3ozOSZoxQIibRz1m3BeuhsMoDsuB60zlwyBvkG0Br1aklrKHzyNRoCR14Xaq23aG1qXStoUIN2EKXuoJf339404JVAVZdhUoTpDuvTada5HqruyUqrendFM1mU_RR-0Z3cdBoKwS9XkLAhj4FVg9P65tAm8rdjW7VqnVw7_A9jz68eL64fBXPX7-cXT6bxyUX1MeCsALzqqjykom8FrQsicgUxowTnpIa16oQFWGUAs0Yr7kgBRME8jRNFCOYnkdPRt1-U6yhKoN5q1oZnK-V3UmjtDytdLqRS7OVhAmacB4EHh0ErPm8AeflWrsS2lZ1YDZOEiFEzugwaTqC4R7OWaiPQwiWQ65yyFUOucoh19Dw8G9rf_BDkAFwI2DNLtzIlBr8Tq7MxobrO_nu_eIiTMdbmuWapFTIIEowwzlJ5Dfd7-cNgAyA1M5tQO6xUx__2qLXTf3vMg_GrpXzxh53oVmWU5yFcjyWtfPw9VhW9pNknPJMXuWpvMgWb95ezReSBv7pyDd62XzRFuSJm_3w8C_6ENp-u_1eJOQg600b4q3qIEGulTC7PoicNNPflg8b3w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19998630</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Invertebrate responses to the management of genetically modified herbicide–tolerant and conventional spring crops. II. Within-field epigeal and aerial arthropods</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Haughton, A. J. ; Champion, G. T. ; Hawes, C. ; Heard, M. S. ; Brooks, D. R. ; Bohan, D. A. ; Clark, S. J. ; Dewar, A. M. ; Firbank, L. G. ; Osborne, J. L. ; Perry, J. N. ; Rothery, P. ; Roy, D. B. ; Scott, R. J. ; Woiwod, I. P. ; Birchall, C. ; Skellern, M. P. ; Walker, J. H. ; Baker, P. ; Browne, E. L. ; Dewar, A. J. G. ; Garner, B. H. ; Haylock, L. A. ; Horne, S. L. ; Mason, N. S. ; Sands, R. J. N. ; Walker, M. J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Haughton, A. J. ; Champion, G. T. ; Hawes, C. ; Heard, M. S. ; Brooks, D. R. ; Bohan, D. A. ; Clark, S. J. ; Dewar, A. M. ; Firbank, L. G. ; Osborne, J. L. ; Perry, J. N. ; Rothery, P. ; Roy, D. B. ; Scott, R. J. ; Woiwod, I. P. ; Birchall, C. ; Skellern, M. P. ; Walker, J. H. ; Baker, P. ; Browne, E. L. ; Dewar, A. J. G. ; Garner, B. H. ; Haylock, L. A. ; Horne, S. L. ; Mason, N. S. ; Sands, R. J. N. ; Walker, M. J. ; The American Association for Research into Nervous and Mental Diseases</creatorcontrib><description>The effects of the management of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant (GMHT) crops on the abundances of aerial and epigeal arthropods were assessed in 66 beet, 68 maize and 67 spring oilseed rape sites as part of the Farm Scale Evaluations of GMHT crops. Most higher taxa were insensitive to differences between GMHT and conventional weed management, but significant effects were found on the abundance of at least one group within each taxon studied. Numbers of butterflies in beet and spring oilseed rape and of Heteroptera and bees in beet were smaller under the relevant GMHT crop management, whereas the abundance of Collembola was consistently greater in all GMHT crops. Generally, these effects were specific to each crop type, reflected the phenology and ecology of the arthropod taxa, were indirect and related to herbicide management. These results apply generally to agriculture across Britain, and could be used in mathematical models to predict the possible long-term effects of the widespread adoption of GMHT technology. The results for bees and butterflies relate to foraging preferences and might or might not translate into effects on population densities, depending on whether adoption leads to forage reductions over large areas. These species, and the detritivore Collembola, may be useful indicator species for future studies of GMHT management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-8436</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2970</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2003.1408</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14561319</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: The Royal Society</publisher><subject>Agriculture - methods ; Agro-Ecology ; Analysis of Variance ; Animals ; Araneae ; Arthropoda ; Arthropods ; Arthropods - physiology ; Beets ; Beta vulgaris - physiology ; Biodiversity ; Brassica napus - physiology ; Bumblebees ; Butterflies ; Carabidae ; Collembola ; Corn ; Crop management ; Environmental Impact ; Farm Scale Evaluations ; Food crops ; Hemiptera ; Herbicides ; Herbicides - metabolism ; Honey bees ; Invertebrata ; Invertebrate Biodiversity ; Oilseeds ; Plants, Genetically Modified - metabolism ; Plants, Genetically Modified - physiology ; United Kingdom ; Zea mays ; Zea mays - physiology</subject><ispartof>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences, 2003-11, Vol.358 (1439), p.1863-1877</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2003 The Royal Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c793t-916b07dbd8c698f93cc195a00671741f0fab9d1633e3567f791b691e8442a6103</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c793t-916b07dbd8c698f93cc195a00671741f0fab9d1633e3567f791b691e8442a6103</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3558305$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3558305$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,800,882,27905,27906,53772,53774,57998,58231</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14561319$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Haughton, A. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Champion, G. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawes, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heard, M. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brooks, D. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bohan, D. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, S. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dewar, A. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Firbank, L. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osborne, J. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perry, J. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rothery, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roy, D. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, R. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woiwod, I. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Birchall, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skellern, M. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, J. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Browne, E. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dewar, A. J. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garner, B. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haylock, L. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horne, S. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mason, N. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sands, R. J. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, M. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>The American Association for Research into Nervous and Mental Diseases</creatorcontrib><title>Invertebrate responses to the management of genetically modified herbicide–tolerant and conventional spring crops. II. Within-field epigeal and aerial arthropods</title><title>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences</title><addtitle>Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci</addtitle><description>The effects of the management of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant (GMHT) crops on the abundances of aerial and epigeal arthropods were assessed in 66 beet, 68 maize and 67 spring oilseed rape sites as part of the Farm Scale Evaluations of GMHT crops. Most higher taxa were insensitive to differences between GMHT and conventional weed management, but significant effects were found on the abundance of at least one group within each taxon studied. Numbers of butterflies in beet and spring oilseed rape and of Heteroptera and bees in beet were smaller under the relevant GMHT crop management, whereas the abundance of Collembola was consistently greater in all GMHT crops. Generally, these effects were specific to each crop type, reflected the phenology and ecology of the arthropod taxa, were indirect and related to herbicide management. These results apply generally to agriculture across Britain, and could be used in mathematical models to predict the possible long-term effects of the widespread adoption of GMHT technology. The results for bees and butterflies relate to foraging preferences and might or might not translate into effects on population densities, depending on whether adoption leads to forage reductions over large areas. These species, and the detritivore Collembola, may be useful indicator species for future studies of GMHT management.</description><subject>Agriculture - methods</subject><subject>Agro-Ecology</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Araneae</subject><subject>Arthropoda</subject><subject>Arthropods</subject><subject>Arthropods - physiology</subject><subject>Beets</subject><subject>Beta vulgaris - physiology</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Brassica napus - physiology</subject><subject>Bumblebees</subject><subject>Butterflies</subject><subject>Carabidae</subject><subject>Collembola</subject><subject>Corn</subject><subject>Crop management</subject><subject>Environmental Impact</subject><subject>Farm Scale Evaluations</subject><subject>Food crops</subject><subject>Hemiptera</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Herbicides - metabolism</subject><subject>Honey bees</subject><subject>Invertebrata</subject><subject>Invertebrate Biodiversity</subject><subject>Oilseeds</subject><subject>Plants, Genetically Modified - metabolism</subject><subject>Plants, Genetically Modified - physiology</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>Zea mays</subject><subject>Zea mays - physiology</subject><issn>0962-8436</issn><issn>1471-2970</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ks2O0zAUhSMEYsrAlhVCXrFLsePEjjcIZsRPpUr8lWFpOclN45LGwXYLZcU78Ai8GU-C01SFCjGrWLrfPffcexJF9wmeEizyx9b5YppgTKckxfmNaEJSTuJEcHwzmmDBkjhPKTuL7ji3whiLjKe3ozOSZoxQIibRz1m3BeuhsMoDsuB60zlwyBvkG0Br1aklrKHzyNRoCR14Xaq23aG1qXStoUIN2EKXuoJf339404JVAVZdhUoTpDuvTada5HqruyUqrendFM1mU_RR-0Z3cdBoKwS9XkLAhj4FVg9P65tAm8rdjW7VqnVw7_A9jz68eL64fBXPX7-cXT6bxyUX1MeCsALzqqjykom8FrQsicgUxowTnpIa16oQFWGUAs0Yr7kgBRME8jRNFCOYnkdPRt1-U6yhKoN5q1oZnK-V3UmjtDytdLqRS7OVhAmacB4EHh0ErPm8AeflWrsS2lZ1YDZOEiFEzugwaTqC4R7OWaiPQwiWQ65yyFUOucoh19Dw8G9rf_BDkAFwI2DNLtzIlBr8Tq7MxobrO_nu_eIiTMdbmuWapFTIIEowwzlJ5Dfd7-cNgAyA1M5tQO6xUx__2qLXTf3vMg_GrpXzxh53oVmWU5yFcjyWtfPw9VhW9pNknPJMXuWpvMgWb95ezReSBv7pyDd62XzRFuSJm_3w8C_6ENp-u_1eJOQg600b4q3qIEGulTC7PoicNNPflg8b3w</recordid><startdate>20031129</startdate><enddate>20031129</enddate><creator>Haughton, A. J.</creator><creator>Champion, G. T.</creator><creator>Hawes, C.</creator><creator>Heard, M. S.</creator><creator>Brooks, D. R.</creator><creator>Bohan, D. A.</creator><creator>Clark, S. J.</creator><creator>Dewar, A. M.</creator><creator>Firbank, L. G.</creator><creator>Osborne, J. L.</creator><creator>Perry, J. N.</creator><creator>Rothery, P.</creator><creator>Roy, D. B.</creator><creator>Scott, R. J.</creator><creator>Woiwod, I. P.</creator><creator>Birchall, C.</creator><creator>Skellern, M. P.</creator><creator>Walker, J. H.</creator><creator>Baker, P.</creator><creator>Browne, E. L.</creator><creator>Dewar, A. J. G.</creator><creator>Garner, B. H.</creator><creator>Haylock, L. A.</creator><creator>Horne, S. L.</creator><creator>Mason, N. S.</creator><creator>Sands, R. J. N.</creator><creator>Walker, M. J.</creator><general>The Royal Society</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20031129</creationdate><title>Invertebrate responses to the management of genetically modified herbicide–tolerant and conventional spring crops. II. Within-field epigeal and aerial arthropods</title><author>Haughton, A. J. ; Champion, G. T. ; Hawes, C. ; Heard, M. S. ; Brooks, D. R. ; Bohan, D. A. ; Clark, S. J. ; Dewar, A. M. ; Firbank, L. G. ; Osborne, J. L. ; Perry, J. N. ; Rothery, P. ; Roy, D. B. ; Scott, R. J. ; Woiwod, I. P. ; Birchall, C. ; Skellern, M. P. ; Walker, J. H. ; Baker, P. ; Browne, E. L. ; Dewar, A. J. G. ; Garner, B. H. ; Haylock, L. A. ; Horne, S. L. ; Mason, N. S. ; Sands, R. J. N. ; Walker, M. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c793t-916b07dbd8c698f93cc195a00671741f0fab9d1633e3567f791b691e8442a6103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Agriculture - methods</topic><topic>Agro-Ecology</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Araneae</topic><topic>Arthropoda</topic><topic>Arthropods</topic><topic>Arthropods - physiology</topic><topic>Beets</topic><topic>Beta vulgaris - physiology</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Brassica napus - physiology</topic><topic>Bumblebees</topic><topic>Butterflies</topic><topic>Carabidae</topic><topic>Collembola</topic><topic>Corn</topic><topic>Crop management</topic><topic>Environmental Impact</topic><topic>Farm Scale Evaluations</topic><topic>Food crops</topic><topic>Hemiptera</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Herbicides - metabolism</topic><topic>Honey bees</topic><topic>Invertebrata</topic><topic>Invertebrate Biodiversity</topic><topic>Oilseeds</topic><topic>Plants, Genetically Modified - metabolism</topic><topic>Plants, Genetically Modified - physiology</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>Zea mays</topic><topic>Zea mays - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Haughton, A. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Champion, G. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawes, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heard, M. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brooks, D. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bohan, D. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, S. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dewar, A. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Firbank, L. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osborne, J. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perry, J. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rothery, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roy, D. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, R. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woiwod, I. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Birchall, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skellern, M. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, J. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Browne, E. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dewar, A. J. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garner, B. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haylock, L. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horne, S. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mason, N. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sands, R. J. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, M. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>The American Association for Research into Nervous and Mental Diseases</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Haughton, A. J.</au><au>Champion, G. T.</au><au>Hawes, C.</au><au>Heard, M. S.</au><au>Brooks, D. R.</au><au>Bohan, D. A.</au><au>Clark, S. J.</au><au>Dewar, A. M.</au><au>Firbank, L. G.</au><au>Osborne, J. L.</au><au>Perry, J. N.</au><au>Rothery, P.</au><au>Roy, D. B.</au><au>Scott, R. J.</au><au>Woiwod, I. P.</au><au>Birchall, C.</au><au>Skellern, M. P.</au><au>Walker, J. H.</au><au>Baker, P.</au><au>Browne, E. L.</au><au>Dewar, A. J. G.</au><au>Garner, B. H.</au><au>Haylock, L. A.</au><au>Horne, S. L.</au><au>Mason, N. S.</au><au>Sands, R. J. N.</au><au>Walker, M. J.</au><aucorp>The American Association for Research into Nervous and Mental Diseases</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Invertebrate responses to the management of genetically modified herbicide–tolerant and conventional spring crops. II. Within-field epigeal and aerial arthropods</atitle><jtitle>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci</addtitle><date>2003-11-29</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>358</volume><issue>1439</issue><spage>1863</spage><epage>1877</epage><pages>1863-1877</pages><issn>0962-8436</issn><eissn>1471-2970</eissn><abstract>The effects of the management of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant (GMHT) crops on the abundances of aerial and epigeal arthropods were assessed in 66 beet, 68 maize and 67 spring oilseed rape sites as part of the Farm Scale Evaluations of GMHT crops. Most higher taxa were insensitive to differences between GMHT and conventional weed management, but significant effects were found on the abundance of at least one group within each taxon studied. Numbers of butterflies in beet and spring oilseed rape and of Heteroptera and bees in beet were smaller under the relevant GMHT crop management, whereas the abundance of Collembola was consistently greater in all GMHT crops. Generally, these effects were specific to each crop type, reflected the phenology and ecology of the arthropod taxa, were indirect and related to herbicide management. These results apply generally to agriculture across Britain, and could be used in mathematical models to predict the possible long-term effects of the widespread adoption of GMHT technology. The results for bees and butterflies relate to foraging preferences and might or might not translate into effects on population densities, depending on whether adoption leads to forage reductions over large areas. These species, and the detritivore Collembola, may be useful indicator species for future studies of GMHT management.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>The Royal Society</pub><pmid>14561319</pmid><doi>10.1098/rstb.2003.1408</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0962-8436 |
| ispartof | Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences, 2003-11, Vol.358 (1439), p.1863-1877 |
| issn | 0962-8436 1471-2970 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_14561319 |
| source | MEDLINE; Jstor Complete Legacy; PubMed Central |
| subjects | Agriculture - methods Agro-Ecology Analysis of Variance Animals Araneae Arthropoda Arthropods Arthropods - physiology Beets Beta vulgaris - physiology Biodiversity Brassica napus - physiology Bumblebees Butterflies Carabidae Collembola Corn Crop management Environmental Impact Farm Scale Evaluations Food crops Hemiptera Herbicides Herbicides - metabolism Honey bees Invertebrata Invertebrate Biodiversity Oilseeds Plants, Genetically Modified - metabolism Plants, Genetically Modified - physiology United Kingdom Zea mays Zea mays - physiology |
| title | Invertebrate responses to the management of genetically modified herbicide–tolerant and conventional spring crops. II. Within-field epigeal and aerial arthropods |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T02%3A25%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Invertebrate%20responses%20to%20the%20management%20of%20genetically%20modified%20herbicide%E2%80%93tolerant%20and%20conventional%20spring%20crops.%20II.%20Within-field%20epigeal%20and%20aerial%20arthropods&rft.jtitle=Philosophical%20transactions%20of%20the%20Royal%20Society%20of%20London.%20Series%20B.%20Biological%20sciences&rft.au=Haughton,%20A.%20J.&rft.aucorp=The%20American%20Association%20for%20Research%20into%20Nervous%20and%20Mental%20Diseases&rft.date=2003-11-29&rft.volume=358&rft.issue=1439&rft.spage=1863&rft.epage=1877&rft.pages=1863-1877&rft.issn=0962-8436&rft.eissn=1471-2970&rft_id=info:doi/10.1098/rstb.2003.1408&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E3558305%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19998630&rft_id=info:pmid/14561319&rft_jstor_id=3558305&rfr_iscdi=true |