Betaine reduces the irritating effect of sodium lauryl sulfate on human oral mucosa in vivo

Our aim was to evaluate whether betaine has a protective effect during exposure of the human oral mucosa in vivo to sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) or cocoamidopropylbetaine (CAPB) as measured with a multifrequency electrical impedance spectrometer (EI). Both detergents were used at the concentration of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acta odontologica Scandinavica 2002, Vol.60 (5), p.306-310
Hauptverfasser: Rantanen, Irma, Nicander, Ingrid, Jutila, Kirsti, Ollmar, Stig, Tenovuo, Jorma, Söderling, Eva
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 310
container_issue 5
container_start_page 306
container_title Acta odontologica Scandinavica
container_volume 60
creator Rantanen, Irma
Nicander, Ingrid
Jutila, Kirsti
Ollmar, Stig
Tenovuo, Jorma
Söderling, Eva
description Our aim was to evaluate whether betaine has a protective effect during exposure of the human oral mucosa in vivo to sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) or cocoamidopropylbetaine (CAPB) as measured with a multifrequency electrical impedance spectrometer (EI). Both detergents were used at the concentration of 2.0% w/v with and without 4.0% w/v betaine in distilled water in 20 volunteers, and 0.5% and 1.0% w/v SLS combined with 4.0% w/v betaine in 5 volunteers. EI measurements were taken before application of the test solutions, after their removal, and every 15 min up to 45 min. Both 0.5% and 1% SLS solutions showed a significant reduction in 3 of the 4 indices, indicating mucosal irritation after the 15-min exposure (P < 0.05), whereas 2% SLS did so in all 4 indices (P < 0.001). Betaine had no effect on the detergent-induced decline with either the 2% or the 0.5% SLS solutions. However, when combined with the 1% SLS solution, betaine significantly (P < 0.05) reduced mucosal irritation by abolishing decreases in indices MIX (magnitude index) and IMIX (imaginary part index) and lowering it for PIX (phase index). The 2% CAPB solution showed a significant (P < 0.05) reduction in all 4 indices after the 15-min exposure, but the effect was significantly weaker than that of 2% SLS (P < 0.05). Betaine did not reduce the irritating effect of 2% CAPB. These findings can be used in the development of less irritating products for oral health care.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/00016350260248292
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_12418722</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>12418722</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c543t-8885ed6fde21c83ef30e10c30399dd5feaeb45d1cd4aa2ce6a9492062d7127b13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctO3DAUhq2qCKbTPkA3lR-gaX1JMo5gQ-kFJCQ2tJsurDP2MTEkMbId0Lw9RjMqqhCs7GN_32_rHEI-cvaFM8W-MsZ4KxsmWiZqJTrxhix4KSupGvaWLB7vqwKsDsi7lK5LWXeq2ycHXNRcrYRYkL_fMIOfkEa0s8FEc4_Ux-gzZD9dUXQOTabB0RSsn0c6wBw3A03z4CAjDRPt5xEmGiIMdJxNSED9RO_8XXhP9hwMCT_s1iX5_fPH5clpdX7x6-zk-LwyTS1zpZRq0LbOouBGSXSSIWdGMtl11jYOAdd1Y7mxNYAw2EJXd4K1wq64WK25XJJqm5vu8XZe69voR4gbHcDr3dFN2aFuilaeXJLPL_Lf_Z9jHeKVvsm9FrwTsuB8i5sYUoro_gmc6cc56GdzKM6nrVPyR7RPxq7xBTjaAn5yIY5wH-JgdYbNEKKLMBmftHwt__A_vUcYcm8gor4Oc5xKu1_53QOD16nZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Betaine reduces the irritating effect of sodium lauryl sulfate on human oral mucosa in vivo</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Medical Library - CRKN</source><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Journals Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Rantanen, Irma ; Nicander, Ingrid ; Jutila, Kirsti ; Ollmar, Stig ; Tenovuo, Jorma ; Söderling, Eva</creator><creatorcontrib>Rantanen, Irma ; Nicander, Ingrid ; Jutila, Kirsti ; Ollmar, Stig ; Tenovuo, Jorma ; Söderling, Eva</creatorcontrib><description>Our aim was to evaluate whether betaine has a protective effect during exposure of the human oral mucosa in vivo to sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) or cocoamidopropylbetaine (CAPB) as measured with a multifrequency electrical impedance spectrometer (EI). Both detergents were used at the concentration of 2.0% w/v with and without 4.0% w/v betaine in distilled water in 20 volunteers, and 0.5% and 1.0% w/v SLS combined with 4.0% w/v betaine in 5 volunteers. EI measurements were taken before application of the test solutions, after their removal, and every 15 min up to 45 min. Both 0.5% and 1% SLS solutions showed a significant reduction in 3 of the 4 indices, indicating mucosal irritation after the 15-min exposure (P &lt; 0.05), whereas 2% SLS did so in all 4 indices (P &lt; 0.001). Betaine had no effect on the detergent-induced decline with either the 2% or the 0.5% SLS solutions. However, when combined with the 1% SLS solution, betaine significantly (P &lt; 0.05) reduced mucosal irritation by abolishing decreases in indices MIX (magnitude index) and IMIX (imaginary part index) and lowering it for PIX (phase index). The 2% CAPB solution showed a significant (P &lt; 0.05) reduction in all 4 indices after the 15-min exposure, but the effect was significantly weaker than that of 2% SLS (P &lt; 0.05). Betaine did not reduce the irritating effect of 2% CAPB. These findings can be used in the development of less irritating products for oral health care.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-6357</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1502-3850</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1502-3850</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00016350260248292</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12418722</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Informa UK Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Analysis of Variance ; Betaine ; Betaine - adverse effects ; Betaine - analogs &amp; derivatives ; Betaine - therapeutic use ; Cocoamidopropylbetaine ; Detergents - adverse effects ; Double-Blind Method ; Electric Impedance ; Electrical Impedance ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Irritants - adverse effects ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Mouth Mucosa - drug effects ; Oral Mucosa ; Protective Agents - therapeutic use ; skin ; Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate - adverse effects ; Sodium Lauryl Sulfate ; Spectrum Analysis ; Statistics as Topic</subject><ispartof>Acta odontologica Scandinavica, 2002, Vol.60 (5), p.306-310</ispartof><rights>2002 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c543t-8885ed6fde21c83ef30e10c30399dd5feaeb45d1cd4aa2ce6a9492062d7127b13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c543t-8885ed6fde21c83ef30e10c30399dd5feaeb45d1cd4aa2ce6a9492062d7127b13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00016350260248292$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformahealthcare$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00016350260248292$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformahealthcare$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,4009,27902,27903,27904,59624,59730,60413,60519,61198,61233,61379,61414</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12418722$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-21923$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:1946080$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rantanen, Irma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicander, Ingrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jutila, Kirsti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ollmar, Stig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tenovuo, Jorma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Söderling, Eva</creatorcontrib><title>Betaine reduces the irritating effect of sodium lauryl sulfate on human oral mucosa in vivo</title><title>Acta odontologica Scandinavica</title><addtitle>Acta Odontol Scand</addtitle><description>Our aim was to evaluate whether betaine has a protective effect during exposure of the human oral mucosa in vivo to sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) or cocoamidopropylbetaine (CAPB) as measured with a multifrequency electrical impedance spectrometer (EI). Both detergents were used at the concentration of 2.0% w/v with and without 4.0% w/v betaine in distilled water in 20 volunteers, and 0.5% and 1.0% w/v SLS combined with 4.0% w/v betaine in 5 volunteers. EI measurements were taken before application of the test solutions, after their removal, and every 15 min up to 45 min. Both 0.5% and 1% SLS solutions showed a significant reduction in 3 of the 4 indices, indicating mucosal irritation after the 15-min exposure (P &lt; 0.05), whereas 2% SLS did so in all 4 indices (P &lt; 0.001). Betaine had no effect on the detergent-induced decline with either the 2% or the 0.5% SLS solutions. However, when combined with the 1% SLS solution, betaine significantly (P &lt; 0.05) reduced mucosal irritation by abolishing decreases in indices MIX (magnitude index) and IMIX (imaginary part index) and lowering it for PIX (phase index). The 2% CAPB solution showed a significant (P &lt; 0.05) reduction in all 4 indices after the 15-min exposure, but the effect was significantly weaker than that of 2% SLS (P &lt; 0.05). Betaine did not reduce the irritating effect of 2% CAPB. These findings can be used in the development of less irritating products for oral health care.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Betaine</subject><subject>Betaine - adverse effects</subject><subject>Betaine - analogs &amp; derivatives</subject><subject>Betaine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Cocoamidopropylbetaine</subject><subject>Detergents - adverse effects</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Electric Impedance</subject><subject>Electrical Impedance</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Irritants - adverse effects</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mouth Mucosa - drug effects</subject><subject>Oral Mucosa</subject><subject>Protective Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>skin</subject><subject>Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate - adverse effects</subject><subject>Sodium Lauryl Sulfate</subject><subject>Spectrum Analysis</subject><subject>Statistics as Topic</subject><issn>0001-6357</issn><issn>1502-3850</issn><issn>1502-3850</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctO3DAUhq2qCKbTPkA3lR-gaX1JMo5gQ-kFJCQ2tJsurDP2MTEkMbId0Lw9RjMqqhCs7GN_32_rHEI-cvaFM8W-MsZ4KxsmWiZqJTrxhix4KSupGvaWLB7vqwKsDsi7lK5LWXeq2ycHXNRcrYRYkL_fMIOfkEa0s8FEc4_Ux-gzZD9dUXQOTabB0RSsn0c6wBw3A03z4CAjDRPt5xEmGiIMdJxNSED9RO_8XXhP9hwMCT_s1iX5_fPH5clpdX7x6-zk-LwyTS1zpZRq0LbOouBGSXSSIWdGMtl11jYOAdd1Y7mxNYAw2EJXd4K1wq64WK25XJJqm5vu8XZe69voR4gbHcDr3dFN2aFuilaeXJLPL_Lf_Z9jHeKVvsm9FrwTsuB8i5sYUoro_gmc6cc56GdzKM6nrVPyR7RPxq7xBTjaAn5yIY5wH-JgdYbNEKKLMBmftHwt__A_vUcYcm8gor4Oc5xKu1_53QOD16nZ</recordid><startdate>2002</startdate><enddate>2002</enddate><creator>Rantanen, Irma</creator><creator>Nicander, Ingrid</creator><creator>Jutila, Kirsti</creator><creator>Ollmar, Stig</creator><creator>Tenovuo, Jorma</creator><creator>Söderling, Eva</creator><general>Informa UK Ltd</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D8V</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2002</creationdate><title>Betaine reduces the irritating effect of sodium lauryl sulfate on human oral mucosa in vivo</title><author>Rantanen, Irma ; Nicander, Ingrid ; Jutila, Kirsti ; Ollmar, Stig ; Tenovuo, Jorma ; Söderling, Eva</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c543t-8885ed6fde21c83ef30e10c30399dd5feaeb45d1cd4aa2ce6a9492062d7127b13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Betaine</topic><topic>Betaine - adverse effects</topic><topic>Betaine - analogs &amp; derivatives</topic><topic>Betaine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Cocoamidopropylbetaine</topic><topic>Detergents - adverse effects</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Electric Impedance</topic><topic>Electrical Impedance</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Irritants - adverse effects</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mouth Mucosa - drug effects</topic><topic>Oral Mucosa</topic><topic>Protective Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>skin</topic><topic>Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate - adverse effects</topic><topic>Sodium Lauryl Sulfate</topic><topic>Spectrum Analysis</topic><topic>Statistics as Topic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rantanen, Irma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicander, Ingrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jutila, Kirsti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ollmar, Stig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tenovuo, Jorma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Söderling, Eva</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan</collection><jtitle>Acta odontologica Scandinavica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rantanen, Irma</au><au>Nicander, Ingrid</au><au>Jutila, Kirsti</au><au>Ollmar, Stig</au><au>Tenovuo, Jorma</au><au>Söderling, Eva</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Betaine reduces the irritating effect of sodium lauryl sulfate on human oral mucosa in vivo</atitle><jtitle>Acta odontologica Scandinavica</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Odontol Scand</addtitle><date>2002</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>306</spage><epage>310</epage><pages>306-310</pages><issn>0001-6357</issn><issn>1502-3850</issn><eissn>1502-3850</eissn><abstract>Our aim was to evaluate whether betaine has a protective effect during exposure of the human oral mucosa in vivo to sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) or cocoamidopropylbetaine (CAPB) as measured with a multifrequency electrical impedance spectrometer (EI). Both detergents were used at the concentration of 2.0% w/v with and without 4.0% w/v betaine in distilled water in 20 volunteers, and 0.5% and 1.0% w/v SLS combined with 4.0% w/v betaine in 5 volunteers. EI measurements were taken before application of the test solutions, after their removal, and every 15 min up to 45 min. Both 0.5% and 1% SLS solutions showed a significant reduction in 3 of the 4 indices, indicating mucosal irritation after the 15-min exposure (P &lt; 0.05), whereas 2% SLS did so in all 4 indices (P &lt; 0.001). Betaine had no effect on the detergent-induced decline with either the 2% or the 0.5% SLS solutions. However, when combined with the 1% SLS solution, betaine significantly (P &lt; 0.05) reduced mucosal irritation by abolishing decreases in indices MIX (magnitude index) and IMIX (imaginary part index) and lowering it for PIX (phase index). The 2% CAPB solution showed a significant (P &lt; 0.05) reduction in all 4 indices after the 15-min exposure, but the effect was significantly weaker than that of 2% SLS (P &lt; 0.05). Betaine did not reduce the irritating effect of 2% CAPB. These findings can be used in the development of less irritating products for oral health care.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Informa UK Ltd</pub><pmid>12418722</pmid><doi>10.1080/00016350260248292</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-6357
ispartof Acta odontologica Scandinavica, 2002, Vol.60 (5), p.306-310
issn 0001-6357
1502-3850
1502-3850
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_12418722
source MEDLINE; Taylor & Francis Medical Library - CRKN; Taylor & Francis Journals Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Analysis of Variance
Betaine
Betaine - adverse effects
Betaine - analogs & derivatives
Betaine - therapeutic use
Cocoamidopropylbetaine
Detergents - adverse effects
Double-Blind Method
Electric Impedance
Electrical Impedance
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Irritants - adverse effects
Male
Middle Aged
Mouth Mucosa - drug effects
Oral Mucosa
Protective Agents - therapeutic use
skin
Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate - adverse effects
Sodium Lauryl Sulfate
Spectrum Analysis
Statistics as Topic
title Betaine reduces the irritating effect of sodium lauryl sulfate on human oral mucosa in vivo
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T08%3A24%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Betaine%20reduces%20the%20irritating%20effect%20of%20sodium%20lauryl%20sulfate%20on%20human%20oral%20mucosa%20in%20vivo&rft.jtitle=Acta%20odontologica%20Scandinavica&rft.au=Rantanen,%20Irma&rft.date=2002&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=306&rft.epage=310&rft.pages=306-310&rft.issn=0001-6357&rft.eissn=1502-3850&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00016350260248292&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_infor%3E12418722%3C/pubmed_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/12418722&rfr_iscdi=true