Operational note indoor low-volume spray trials: handheld equipment evaluation
Four handheld aerosol-mist generators and 1 thermal fog generator were evaluated initially for their ability to deliver low flow rates (< or = 5 ml/min) of resmethrin insecticide. Two generators, the London Fog Eliminator and Clarke Pl, were then selected from that group to conduct a treatment of...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association 2002-09, Vol.18 (3), p.232 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 232 |
| container_title | Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association |
| container_volume | 18 |
| creator | Brown, J R Williams, D C Gwinn, T A Presley, S H Beavers, G M |
| description | Four handheld aerosol-mist generators and 1 thermal fog generator were evaluated initially for their ability to deliver low flow rates (< or = 5 ml/min) of resmethrin insecticide. Two generators, the London Fog Eliminator and Clarke Pl, were then selected from that group to conduct a treatment of a block of 16 residences (4 x 4 grid) vs. direct treatment of individual residences to determine the most efficacious method of treating a group of small dwellings or a village. Data are presented on droplet density, volume median diameter, and mortality of caged mosquitoes treated with the P1 and Eliminator in residences treated as a group; and mortality for caged Aedes aegypti L. in residences treated individually with the P1 at various flow control settings and spray-on times. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_12322948</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>12322948</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p548-cd523dd488548b0ee03dd5b8e72ec7eb2889bd60470591657be4fe842723c0293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1j8tKAzEYRrNQbK2-guQFAplcJok7Kd6g2E0X7koy-UsjmSRmZip9ewcvq48DHwfOBVpqJVtiVPO-QNfD8EEpk1KKK7RoGGfMCL1Eb9sC1Y4hJxtxyiPgkHzOFcf8RU45Tj3goVR7xmMNNg73-GiTP0L0GD6nUHpII4aTjdOP5AZdHuYX3P7tCu2eHnfrF7LZPr-uHzakSKFJ5yXj3gutZ3IUgM4knQbFoFPgmNbG-ZYKRaVpWqkciANowRTjHWWGr9Ddr7ZMrge_LzX0tp73_138G3TsScI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Operational note indoor low-volume spray trials: handheld equipment evaluation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Allen Press Miscellaneous</source><creator>Brown, J R ; Williams, D C ; Gwinn, T A ; Presley, S H ; Beavers, G M</creator><creatorcontrib>Brown, J R ; Williams, D C ; Gwinn, T A ; Presley, S H ; Beavers, G M</creatorcontrib><description>Four handheld aerosol-mist generators and 1 thermal fog generator were evaluated initially for their ability to deliver low flow rates (< or = 5 ml/min) of resmethrin insecticide. Two generators, the London Fog Eliminator and Clarke Pl, were then selected from that group to conduct a treatment of a block of 16 residences (4 x 4 grid) vs. direct treatment of individual residences to determine the most efficacious method of treating a group of small dwellings or a village. Data are presented on droplet density, volume median diameter, and mortality of caged mosquitoes treated with the P1 and Eliminator in residences treated as a group; and mortality for caged Aedes aegypti L. in residences treated individually with the P1 at various flow control settings and spray-on times.</description><identifier>ISSN: 8756-971X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12322948</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Aedes ; Aerosols ; Animals ; Female ; Housing ; Insecticides - administration & dosage ; Mosquito Control - instrumentation ; Pyrethrins - administration & dosage</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association, 2002-09, Vol.18 (3), p.232</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12322948$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brown, J R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, D C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gwinn, T A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Presley, S H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beavers, G M</creatorcontrib><title>Operational note indoor low-volume spray trials: handheld equipment evaluation</title><title>Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association</title><addtitle>J Am Mosq Control Assoc</addtitle><description>Four handheld aerosol-mist generators and 1 thermal fog generator were evaluated initially for their ability to deliver low flow rates (< or = 5 ml/min) of resmethrin insecticide. Two generators, the London Fog Eliminator and Clarke Pl, were then selected from that group to conduct a treatment of a block of 16 residences (4 x 4 grid) vs. direct treatment of individual residences to determine the most efficacious method of treating a group of small dwellings or a village. Data are presented on droplet density, volume median diameter, and mortality of caged mosquitoes treated with the P1 and Eliminator in residences treated as a group; and mortality for caged Aedes aegypti L. in residences treated individually with the P1 at various flow control settings and spray-on times.</description><subject>Aedes</subject><subject>Aerosols</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Housing</subject><subject>Insecticides - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Mosquito Control - instrumentation</subject><subject>Pyrethrins - administration & dosage</subject><issn>8756-971X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1j8tKAzEYRrNQbK2-guQFAplcJok7Kd6g2E0X7koy-UsjmSRmZip9ewcvq48DHwfOBVpqJVtiVPO-QNfD8EEpk1KKK7RoGGfMCL1Eb9sC1Y4hJxtxyiPgkHzOFcf8RU45Tj3goVR7xmMNNg73-GiTP0L0GD6nUHpII4aTjdOP5AZdHuYX3P7tCu2eHnfrF7LZPr-uHzakSKFJ5yXj3gutZ3IUgM4knQbFoFPgmNbG-ZYKRaVpWqkciANowRTjHWWGr9Ddr7ZMrge_LzX0tp73_138G3TsScI</recordid><startdate>200209</startdate><enddate>200209</enddate><creator>Brown, J R</creator><creator>Williams, D C</creator><creator>Gwinn, T A</creator><creator>Presley, S H</creator><creator>Beavers, G M</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200209</creationdate><title>Operational note indoor low-volume spray trials: handheld equipment evaluation</title><author>Brown, J R ; Williams, D C ; Gwinn, T A ; Presley, S H ; Beavers, G M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p548-cd523dd488548b0ee03dd5b8e72ec7eb2889bd60470591657be4fe842723c0293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Aedes</topic><topic>Aerosols</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Housing</topic><topic>Insecticides - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Mosquito Control - instrumentation</topic><topic>Pyrethrins - administration & dosage</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brown, J R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, D C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gwinn, T A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Presley, S H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beavers, G M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brown, J R</au><au>Williams, D C</au><au>Gwinn, T A</au><au>Presley, S H</au><au>Beavers, G M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Operational note indoor low-volume spray trials: handheld equipment evaluation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Mosq Control Assoc</addtitle><date>2002-09</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>232</spage><pages>232-</pages><issn>8756-971X</issn><abstract>Four handheld aerosol-mist generators and 1 thermal fog generator were evaluated initially for their ability to deliver low flow rates (< or = 5 ml/min) of resmethrin insecticide. Two generators, the London Fog Eliminator and Clarke Pl, were then selected from that group to conduct a treatment of a block of 16 residences (4 x 4 grid) vs. direct treatment of individual residences to determine the most efficacious method of treating a group of small dwellings or a village. Data are presented on droplet density, volume median diameter, and mortality of caged mosquitoes treated with the P1 and Eliminator in residences treated as a group; and mortality for caged Aedes aegypti L. in residences treated individually with the P1 at various flow control settings and spray-on times.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>12322948</pmid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 8756-971X |
| ispartof | Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association, 2002-09, Vol.18 (3), p.232 |
| issn | 8756-971X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_12322948 |
| source | MEDLINE; Allen Press Miscellaneous |
| subjects | Aedes Aerosols Animals Female Housing Insecticides - administration & dosage Mosquito Control - instrumentation Pyrethrins - administration & dosage |
| title | Operational note indoor low-volume spray trials: handheld equipment evaluation |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T00%3A53%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Operational%20note%20indoor%20low-volume%20spray%20trials:%20handheld%20equipment%20evaluation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Mosquito%20Control%20Association&rft.au=Brown,%20J%20R&rft.date=2002-09&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=232&rft.pages=232-&rft.issn=8756-971X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed%3E12322948%3C/pubmed%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/12322948&rfr_iscdi=true |