Effects of spatial and nonspatial cognitive activity on postural stability

Is postural stability controlled automatically, or is it affected by concurrent cognitive activity? Are the effects influenced by the nature of the cognitive activity required, and do they increase in old age? To address these questions, 70 participants aged 20-79 years were asked to stand as still...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The British journal of psychology 2001-05, Vol.92 Part 2, p.319
Hauptverfasser: Maylor, Elizabeth A., Allison, Sue, Wing, Alan M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 319
container_title The British journal of psychology
container_volume 92 Part 2
creator Maylor, Elizabeth A.
Allison, Sue
Wing, Alan M.
description Is postural stability controlled automatically, or is it affected by concurrent cognitive activity? Are the effects influenced by the nature of the cognitive activity required, and do they increase in old age? To address these questions, 70 participants aged 20-79 years were asked to stand as still as possible on a force platform (postural control task) while performing (a) no cognitive task, (b) a spatial memory task, and (c) a nonspatial memory task. The memory tasks were also performed while seated as a comparison condition. Both spatial and nonspatial memory recall declined with increasing age but were unaffected by position (standing vs. seated). Postural stability declined with age; moreover, there was support for an earlier finding that age decline was greatest when performing the spatial memory task. Each recording period was split into two phases which, for the spatial and nonspatial memory tasks, corresponded to encoding and maintaining the stimuli. In comparison with no task, participants were more stable when encoding stimuli (particularly in the spatial task), but they were less stable when maintaining stimuli (particularly in the nonspatial task). The results suggest that postural stability can be affected by cognitive activity in complex ways, depending on the age of participants, the type of cognitive task (spatial vs. nonspatial), and the cognitive processing required (encoding vs. maintenance).
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_11802876</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>11802876</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-pubmed_primary_118028763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFjc0KgkAUhYcg0n5eIe4LCDNmqeswonV7uY4zMaEzg3cMfPtc5LrVxznfgbNiccqzLCnS8hyxLdGbcyHKvNywSIiCp0V-idmj0lrJQOA0kMdgsAO0LVhnlyjdy5pgPgpQzjBhAmfBOwrjMGsK2JhubvdsrbEjdfhxx4636nm9J35setXWfjA9DlO9nJ_-Dr6GLjr6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of spatial and nonspatial cognitive activity on postural stability</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Maylor, Elizabeth A. ; Allison, Sue ; Wing, Alan M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Maylor, Elizabeth A. ; Allison, Sue ; Wing, Alan M.</creatorcontrib><description>Is postural stability controlled automatically, or is it affected by concurrent cognitive activity? Are the effects influenced by the nature of the cognitive activity required, and do they increase in old age? To address these questions, 70 participants aged 20-79 years were asked to stand as still as possible on a force platform (postural control task) while performing (a) no cognitive task, (b) a spatial memory task, and (c) a nonspatial memory task. The memory tasks were also performed while seated as a comparison condition. Both spatial and nonspatial memory recall declined with increasing age but were unaffected by position (standing vs. seated). Postural stability declined with age; moreover, there was support for an earlier finding that age decline was greatest when performing the spatial memory task. Each recording period was split into two phases which, for the spatial and nonspatial memory tasks, corresponded to encoding and maintaining the stimuli. In comparison with no task, participants were more stable when encoding stimuli (particularly in the spatial task), but they were less stable when maintaining stimuli (particularly in the nonspatial task). The results suggest that postural stability can be affected by cognitive activity in complex ways, depending on the age of participants, the type of cognitive task (spatial vs. nonspatial), and the cognitive processing required (encoding vs. maintenance).</description><identifier>EISSN: 2044-8295</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11802876</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><ispartof>The British journal of psychology, 2001-05, Vol.92 Part 2, p.319</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11802876$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maylor, Elizabeth A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allison, Sue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wing, Alan M.</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of spatial and nonspatial cognitive activity on postural stability</title><title>The British journal of psychology</title><addtitle>Br J Psychol</addtitle><description>Is postural stability controlled automatically, or is it affected by concurrent cognitive activity? Are the effects influenced by the nature of the cognitive activity required, and do they increase in old age? To address these questions, 70 participants aged 20-79 years were asked to stand as still as possible on a force platform (postural control task) while performing (a) no cognitive task, (b) a spatial memory task, and (c) a nonspatial memory task. The memory tasks were also performed while seated as a comparison condition. Both spatial and nonspatial memory recall declined with increasing age but were unaffected by position (standing vs. seated). Postural stability declined with age; moreover, there was support for an earlier finding that age decline was greatest when performing the spatial memory task. Each recording period was split into two phases which, for the spatial and nonspatial memory tasks, corresponded to encoding and maintaining the stimuli. In comparison with no task, participants were more stable when encoding stimuli (particularly in the spatial task), but they were less stable when maintaining stimuli (particularly in the nonspatial task). The results suggest that postural stability can be affected by cognitive activity in complex ways, depending on the age of participants, the type of cognitive task (spatial vs. nonspatial), and the cognitive processing required (encoding vs. maintenance).</description><issn>2044-8295</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFjc0KgkAUhYcg0n5eIe4LCDNmqeswonV7uY4zMaEzg3cMfPtc5LrVxznfgbNiccqzLCnS8hyxLdGbcyHKvNywSIiCp0V-idmj0lrJQOA0kMdgsAO0LVhnlyjdy5pgPgpQzjBhAmfBOwrjMGsK2JhubvdsrbEjdfhxx4636nm9J35setXWfjA9DlO9nJ_-Dr6GLjr6</recordid><startdate>200105</startdate><enddate>200105</enddate><creator>Maylor, Elizabeth A.</creator><creator>Allison, Sue</creator><creator>Wing, Alan M.</creator><scope>NPM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200105</creationdate><title>Effects of spatial and nonspatial cognitive activity on postural stability</title><author>Maylor, Elizabeth A. ; Allison, Sue ; Wing, Alan M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-pubmed_primary_118028763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maylor, Elizabeth A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allison, Sue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wing, Alan M.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><jtitle>The British journal of psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maylor, Elizabeth A.</au><au>Allison, Sue</au><au>Wing, Alan M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of spatial and nonspatial cognitive activity on postural stability</atitle><jtitle>The British journal of psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Psychol</addtitle><date>2001-05</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>92 Part 2</volume><spage>319</spage><pages>319-</pages><eissn>2044-8295</eissn><abstract>Is postural stability controlled automatically, or is it affected by concurrent cognitive activity? Are the effects influenced by the nature of the cognitive activity required, and do they increase in old age? To address these questions, 70 participants aged 20-79 years were asked to stand as still as possible on a force platform (postural control task) while performing (a) no cognitive task, (b) a spatial memory task, and (c) a nonspatial memory task. The memory tasks were also performed while seated as a comparison condition. Both spatial and nonspatial memory recall declined with increasing age but were unaffected by position (standing vs. seated). Postural stability declined with age; moreover, there was support for an earlier finding that age decline was greatest when performing the spatial memory task. Each recording period was split into two phases which, for the spatial and nonspatial memory tasks, corresponded to encoding and maintaining the stimuli. In comparison with no task, participants were more stable when encoding stimuli (particularly in the spatial task), but they were less stable when maintaining stimuli (particularly in the nonspatial task). The results suggest that postural stability can be affected by cognitive activity in complex ways, depending on the age of participants, the type of cognitive task (spatial vs. nonspatial), and the cognitive processing required (encoding vs. maintenance).</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>11802876</pmid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2044-8295
ispartof The British journal of psychology, 2001-05, Vol.92 Part 2, p.319
issn 2044-8295
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_11802876
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Business Source Complete
title Effects of spatial and nonspatial cognitive activity on postural stability
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T09%3A19%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20spatial%20and%20nonspatial%20cognitive%20activity%20on%20postural%20stability&rft.jtitle=The%20British%20journal%20of%20psychology&rft.au=Maylor,%20Elizabeth%20A.&rft.date=2001-05&rft.volume=92%20Part%202&rft.spage=319&rft.pages=319-&rft.eissn=2044-8295&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed%3E11802876%3C/pubmed%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/11802876&rfr_iscdi=true