The rational clinical examination. Is this patient allergic to penicillin? An evidence-based analysis of the likelihood of penicillin allergy

Clinicians frequently withhold antibiotics that contain penicillin based on patients' self-reported clinical history of an adverse reaction to penicillin and the clinicians' own misunderstandings about the characteristics of a true penicillin allergy. To determine the likelihood of true pe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association 2001-05, Vol.285 (19), p.2498
Hauptverfasser: Salkind, A R, Cuddy, P G, Foxworth, J W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 19
container_start_page 2498
container_title JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association
container_volume 285
creator Salkind, A R
Cuddy, P G
Foxworth, J W
description Clinicians frequently withhold antibiotics that contain penicillin based on patients' self-reported clinical history of an adverse reaction to penicillin and the clinicians' own misunderstandings about the characteristics of a true penicillin allergy. To determine the likelihood of true penicillin allergy with consideration of clinical history and to evaluate the diagnostic value added by appropriate skin testing. MEDLINE was searched for relevant English-language articles dated 1966 to October 2000. Bibliographies were searched to identify additional articles. We included original studies describing the precision of skin testing in diagnosis of penicillin allergy. We excluded studies that did not use both minor and major determinants, provide an explicit definition of penicillin allergy, or list the specific criteria necessary for a positive skin test result. Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Three authors independently reviewed and abstracted data from all articles and reached consensus about any discrepancies. Patients' self-reported history has low accuracy for diagnosis of true penicillin allergy. By evaluating studies comparing clinical history to the skin test for penicillin allergy among patients with and without a positive history for penicillin allergy, positive and negative likelihood ratios were calculated. History of penicillin allergy had a positive likelihood ratio of 1.9 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-2.5), while absence of history of penicillin allergy had a negative likelihood ratio of 0.5 (95% CI, 0.4-0.6). Only 10% to 20% of patients reporting a history of penicillin allergy are truly allergic when assessed by skin testing. Taking a detailed history of a patient's reaction to penicillin may allow clinicians to exclude true penicillin allergy, allowing these patients to receive penicillin. Patients with a concerning history of type I penicillin allergy who have a compelling need for a drug containing penicillin should undergo skin testing. Virtually all patients with a negative skin test result can take penicillin without serious sequelae.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_11368703</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>11368703</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p543-973416ea7701ae569ac58e3090519b93ec726d29d45609ef4f42a070c311bd013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkE1OwzAQRr0A0VK4ApoLBNmxE8crVFX8VKrEJvvKsSfE4DpRHBA5BHfG0CJmMzOf9N7iOyNLSlWVSVGJBbmM8ZWmYVxekAVjvKwk5UvyVXcIo55cH7QH411wJh34qQ8u_Ma3sI0wdS7CkH4ME2jvcXxxBqYeBkyA84m7g3UA_HAWg8Gs0REt6CSdY0L7NikQvHtD77q-tz_JP3tSzlfkvNU-4vVpr0j9cF9vnrLd8-N2s95lQyF4piQXrEQtJWUai1JpU1TIqaIFU43iaGRe2lxZUZRUYStakWsqqeGMNTZVsCI3R-3w3hzQ7ofRHfQ47_9q4d-VV19m</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The rational clinical examination. Is this patient allergic to penicillin? An evidence-based analysis of the likelihood of penicillin allergy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Medical Association Journals</source><creator>Salkind, A R ; Cuddy, P G ; Foxworth, J W</creator><creatorcontrib>Salkind, A R ; Cuddy, P G ; Foxworth, J W</creatorcontrib><description>Clinicians frequently withhold antibiotics that contain penicillin based on patients' self-reported clinical history of an adverse reaction to penicillin and the clinicians' own misunderstandings about the characteristics of a true penicillin allergy. To determine the likelihood of true penicillin allergy with consideration of clinical history and to evaluate the diagnostic value added by appropriate skin testing. MEDLINE was searched for relevant English-language articles dated 1966 to October 2000. Bibliographies were searched to identify additional articles. We included original studies describing the precision of skin testing in diagnosis of penicillin allergy. We excluded studies that did not use both minor and major determinants, provide an explicit definition of penicillin allergy, or list the specific criteria necessary for a positive skin test result. Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Three authors independently reviewed and abstracted data from all articles and reached consensus about any discrepancies. Patients' self-reported history has low accuracy for diagnosis of true penicillin allergy. By evaluating studies comparing clinical history to the skin test for penicillin allergy among patients with and without a positive history for penicillin allergy, positive and negative likelihood ratios were calculated. History of penicillin allergy had a positive likelihood ratio of 1.9 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-2.5), while absence of history of penicillin allergy had a negative likelihood ratio of 0.5 (95% CI, 0.4-0.6). Only 10% to 20% of patients reporting a history of penicillin allergy are truly allergic when assessed by skin testing. Taking a detailed history of a patient's reaction to penicillin may allow clinicians to exclude true penicillin allergy, allowing these patients to receive penicillin. Patients with a concerning history of type I penicillin allergy who have a compelling need for a drug containing penicillin should undergo skin testing. Virtually all patients with a negative skin test result can take penicillin without serious sequelae.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0098-7484</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11368703</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Cephalosporins - adverse effects ; Cephalosporins - immunology ; Decision Making ; Drug Hypersensitivity - diagnosis ; Humans ; Medical History Taking ; Penicillins - adverse effects ; Penicillins - immunology ; Penicillins - therapeutic use ; Probability ; Skin Tests</subject><ispartof>JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association, 2001-05, Vol.285 (19), p.2498</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11368703$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Salkind, A R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cuddy, P G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foxworth, J W</creatorcontrib><title>The rational clinical examination. Is this patient allergic to penicillin? An evidence-based analysis of the likelihood of penicillin allergy</title><title>JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association</title><addtitle>JAMA</addtitle><description>Clinicians frequently withhold antibiotics that contain penicillin based on patients' self-reported clinical history of an adverse reaction to penicillin and the clinicians' own misunderstandings about the characteristics of a true penicillin allergy. To determine the likelihood of true penicillin allergy with consideration of clinical history and to evaluate the diagnostic value added by appropriate skin testing. MEDLINE was searched for relevant English-language articles dated 1966 to October 2000. Bibliographies were searched to identify additional articles. We included original studies describing the precision of skin testing in diagnosis of penicillin allergy. We excluded studies that did not use both minor and major determinants, provide an explicit definition of penicillin allergy, or list the specific criteria necessary for a positive skin test result. Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Three authors independently reviewed and abstracted data from all articles and reached consensus about any discrepancies. Patients' self-reported history has low accuracy for diagnosis of true penicillin allergy. By evaluating studies comparing clinical history to the skin test for penicillin allergy among patients with and without a positive history for penicillin allergy, positive and negative likelihood ratios were calculated. History of penicillin allergy had a positive likelihood ratio of 1.9 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-2.5), while absence of history of penicillin allergy had a negative likelihood ratio of 0.5 (95% CI, 0.4-0.6). Only 10% to 20% of patients reporting a history of penicillin allergy are truly allergic when assessed by skin testing. Taking a detailed history of a patient's reaction to penicillin may allow clinicians to exclude true penicillin allergy, allowing these patients to receive penicillin. Patients with a concerning history of type I penicillin allergy who have a compelling need for a drug containing penicillin should undergo skin testing. Virtually all patients with a negative skin test result can take penicillin without serious sequelae.</description><subject>Cephalosporins - adverse effects</subject><subject>Cephalosporins - immunology</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Drug Hypersensitivity - diagnosis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical History Taking</subject><subject>Penicillins - adverse effects</subject><subject>Penicillins - immunology</subject><subject>Penicillins - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Skin Tests</subject><issn>0098-7484</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkE1OwzAQRr0A0VK4ApoLBNmxE8crVFX8VKrEJvvKsSfE4DpRHBA5BHfG0CJmMzOf9N7iOyNLSlWVSVGJBbmM8ZWmYVxekAVjvKwk5UvyVXcIo55cH7QH411wJh34qQ8u_Ma3sI0wdS7CkH4ME2jvcXxxBqYeBkyA84m7g3UA_HAWg8Gs0REt6CSdY0L7NikQvHtD77q-tz_JP3tSzlfkvNU-4vVpr0j9cF9vnrLd8-N2s95lQyF4piQXrEQtJWUai1JpU1TIqaIFU43iaGRe2lxZUZRUYStakWsqqeGMNTZVsCI3R-3w3hzQ7ofRHfQ47_9q4d-VV19m</recordid><startdate>20010516</startdate><enddate>20010516</enddate><creator>Salkind, A R</creator><creator>Cuddy, P G</creator><creator>Foxworth, J W</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010516</creationdate><title>The rational clinical examination. Is this patient allergic to penicillin? An evidence-based analysis of the likelihood of penicillin allergy</title><author>Salkind, A R ; Cuddy, P G ; Foxworth, J W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p543-973416ea7701ae569ac58e3090519b93ec726d29d45609ef4f42a070c311bd013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Cephalosporins - adverse effects</topic><topic>Cephalosporins - immunology</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Drug Hypersensitivity - diagnosis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical History Taking</topic><topic>Penicillins - adverse effects</topic><topic>Penicillins - immunology</topic><topic>Penicillins - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Skin Tests</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Salkind, A R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cuddy, P G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foxworth, J W</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><jtitle>JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Salkind, A R</au><au>Cuddy, P G</au><au>Foxworth, J W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The rational clinical examination. Is this patient allergic to penicillin? An evidence-based analysis of the likelihood of penicillin allergy</atitle><jtitle>JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association</jtitle><addtitle>JAMA</addtitle><date>2001-05-16</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>285</volume><issue>19</issue><spage>2498</spage><pages>2498-</pages><issn>0098-7484</issn><abstract>Clinicians frequently withhold antibiotics that contain penicillin based on patients' self-reported clinical history of an adverse reaction to penicillin and the clinicians' own misunderstandings about the characteristics of a true penicillin allergy. To determine the likelihood of true penicillin allergy with consideration of clinical history and to evaluate the diagnostic value added by appropriate skin testing. MEDLINE was searched for relevant English-language articles dated 1966 to October 2000. Bibliographies were searched to identify additional articles. We included original studies describing the precision of skin testing in diagnosis of penicillin allergy. We excluded studies that did not use both minor and major determinants, provide an explicit definition of penicillin allergy, or list the specific criteria necessary for a positive skin test result. Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Three authors independently reviewed and abstracted data from all articles and reached consensus about any discrepancies. Patients' self-reported history has low accuracy for diagnosis of true penicillin allergy. By evaluating studies comparing clinical history to the skin test for penicillin allergy among patients with and without a positive history for penicillin allergy, positive and negative likelihood ratios were calculated. History of penicillin allergy had a positive likelihood ratio of 1.9 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-2.5), while absence of history of penicillin allergy had a negative likelihood ratio of 0.5 (95% CI, 0.4-0.6). Only 10% to 20% of patients reporting a history of penicillin allergy are truly allergic when assessed by skin testing. Taking a detailed history of a patient's reaction to penicillin may allow clinicians to exclude true penicillin allergy, allowing these patients to receive penicillin. Patients with a concerning history of type I penicillin allergy who have a compelling need for a drug containing penicillin should undergo skin testing. Virtually all patients with a negative skin test result can take penicillin without serious sequelae.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>11368703</pmid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0098-7484
ispartof JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association, 2001-05, Vol.285 (19), p.2498
issn 0098-7484
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_11368703
source MEDLINE; American Medical Association Journals
subjects Cephalosporins - adverse effects
Cephalosporins - immunology
Decision Making
Drug Hypersensitivity - diagnosis
Humans
Medical History Taking
Penicillins - adverse effects
Penicillins - immunology
Penicillins - therapeutic use
Probability
Skin Tests
title The rational clinical examination. Is this patient allergic to penicillin? An evidence-based analysis of the likelihood of penicillin allergy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T09%3A51%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20rational%20clinical%20examination.%20Is%20this%20patient%20allergic%20to%20penicillin?%20An%20evidence-based%20analysis%20of%20the%20likelihood%20of%20penicillin%20allergy&rft.jtitle=JAMA%20:%20the%20journal%20of%20the%20American%20Medical%20Association&rft.au=Salkind,%20A%20R&rft.date=2001-05-16&rft.volume=285&rft.issue=19&rft.spage=2498&rft.pages=2498-&rft.issn=0098-7484&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed%3E11368703%3C/pubmed%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/11368703&rfr_iscdi=true