Signal to noise ratio based filter optimization in triple energy window scatter correction
Triple energy window (TEW) scatter correction estimates the contribution of scattered photons to the acquisition data by acquiring additional data through two narrow energy windows placed adjoined to the main (photopeak) energy window. The contribution is estimated by linear interpolation and then s...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Medical physics (Lancaster) 2000-08, Vol.27 (8), p.1955-1960 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1960 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1955 |
container_title | Medical physics (Lancaster) |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Blokland, Koos (J.) A. K. Winn, R. D. R. Pauwels, E. K. J. |
description | Triple energy window (TEW) scatter correction estimates the contribution of scattered photons to the acquisition data by acquiring additional data through two narrow energy windows placed adjoined to the main (photopeak) energy window. The contribution is estimated by linear interpolation and then subtracted. Noise amplification is reduced by filtering both the photopeak scintigram and the scatter estimate. We have studied the filter settings of each filter using a physical phantom filled with a
201
Tl
-solution
resulting in count densities comparable to clinical studies. The performance of order-8 Butterworth filters at different cut-off frequencies (CoFs) were compared based on signal to noise ratios (SNRs). The highest SNRs were obtained when the noisy scatter information was strongly filtered with the CoF less than or equal to 0.07 cycles/pixel (cpp). The best CoF for the filter of the photopeak image is object size dependent; smaller objects require a higher CoF. For objects with a size near the SPECT spatial resolution (∼15 mm) the optimal CoF is equal to 0.18 cpp. For larger objects (31.8 mm) the highest SNR was obtained with a CoF equal to 0.13 cpp. A CoF equal to 0.16 cpp is a good compromise for all objects with a diameter equal to the spatial resolution or larger. These results depend on the initial signal to noise ratio of the acquisition data and so on the count density. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1118/1.1287286 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_10984241</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72247231</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3896-f56c492abe94fd2214c4c8abbfac9943fe9e8360173bd2191c75a8f0dbaa549c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90E1LwzAcx_EgipvTg29AchIUOpM0fchRhk8wUVAvXkqa_jMiXVOTzjFfva0tMhA95ZBPfoQvQseUTCml6QWdUpYmLI130JjxJAw4I2IXjQkRPGCcRCN04P0bISQOI7KPRpSIlDNOx-j1ySwqWeLG4soaD9jJxlicSw8F1qZswGFbN2ZpPruLCpsKN87UJWCowC02eG2qwq6xV7LpsLLOgeroIdrTsvRwNJwT9HJ99Ty7DeYPN3ezy3mgwlTEgY5ixQWTOQiuC8YoV1ylMs-1VELwUIOANIwJTcK8YFRQlUQy1aTIpYy4UOEEnfa7tbPvK_BNtjReQVnKCuzKZwlrm7CQtvCsh8pZ7x3orHZmKd0moyTrQmY0G0K29mQYXeVLKLZkX64FQQ_WpoTN30vZ_eMweN57r0zznfLnzYd1W74u9H_491e_ADljmLg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72247231</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Signal to noise ratio based filter optimization in triple energy window scatter correction</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Blokland, Koos (J.) A. K. ; Winn, R. D. R. ; Pauwels, E. K. J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Blokland, Koos (J.) A. K. ; Winn, R. D. R. ; Pauwels, E. K. J.</creatorcontrib><description>Triple energy window (TEW) scatter correction estimates the contribution of scattered photons to the acquisition data by acquiring additional data through two narrow energy windows placed adjoined to the main (photopeak) energy window. The contribution is estimated by linear interpolation and then subtracted. Noise amplification is reduced by filtering both the photopeak scintigram and the scatter estimate. We have studied the filter settings of each filter using a physical phantom filled with a
201
Tl
-solution
resulting in count densities comparable to clinical studies. The performance of order-8 Butterworth filters at different cut-off frequencies (CoFs) were compared based on signal to noise ratios (SNRs). The highest SNRs were obtained when the noisy scatter information was strongly filtered with the CoF less than or equal to 0.07 cycles/pixel (cpp). The best CoF for the filter of the photopeak image is object size dependent; smaller objects require a higher CoF. For objects with a size near the SPECT spatial resolution (∼15 mm) the optimal CoF is equal to 0.18 cpp. For larger objects (31.8 mm) the highest SNR was obtained with a CoF equal to 0.13 cpp. A CoF equal to 0.16 cpp is a good compromise for all objects with a diameter equal to the spatial resolution or larger. These results depend on the initial signal to noise ratio of the acquisition data and so on the count density.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1118/1.1287286</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10984241</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MPHYA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Association of Physicists in Medicine</publisher><subject>Butterworth filters ; filters ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods ; interpolation ; Interpolation; curve fitting ; Medical imaging ; Models, Statistical ; Noise ; noise reduction ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Photon scattering ; Photons ; Physicists ; random noise ; scatter correction ; Scattering, Radiation ; single photon emission computed tomography ; Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) ; Spatial resolution ; SPECT ; Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon - methods ; triple energy window</subject><ispartof>Medical physics (Lancaster), 2000-08, Vol.27 (8), p.1955-1960</ispartof><rights>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><rights>2000 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3896-f56c492abe94fd2214c4c8abbfac9943fe9e8360173bd2191c75a8f0dbaa549c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3896-f56c492abe94fd2214c4c8abbfac9943fe9e8360173bd2191c75a8f0dbaa549c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1118%2F1.1287286$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1118%2F1.1287286$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10984241$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Blokland, Koos (J.) A. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winn, R. D. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pauwels, E. K. J.</creatorcontrib><title>Signal to noise ratio based filter optimization in triple energy window scatter correction</title><title>Medical physics (Lancaster)</title><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><description>Triple energy window (TEW) scatter correction estimates the contribution of scattered photons to the acquisition data by acquiring additional data through two narrow energy windows placed adjoined to the main (photopeak) energy window. The contribution is estimated by linear interpolation and then subtracted. Noise amplification is reduced by filtering both the photopeak scintigram and the scatter estimate. We have studied the filter settings of each filter using a physical phantom filled with a
201
Tl
-solution
resulting in count densities comparable to clinical studies. The performance of order-8 Butterworth filters at different cut-off frequencies (CoFs) were compared based on signal to noise ratios (SNRs). The highest SNRs were obtained when the noisy scatter information was strongly filtered with the CoF less than or equal to 0.07 cycles/pixel (cpp). The best CoF for the filter of the photopeak image is object size dependent; smaller objects require a higher CoF. For objects with a size near the SPECT spatial resolution (∼15 mm) the optimal CoF is equal to 0.18 cpp. For larger objects (31.8 mm) the highest SNR was obtained with a CoF equal to 0.13 cpp. A CoF equal to 0.16 cpp is a good compromise for all objects with a diameter equal to the spatial resolution or larger. These results depend on the initial signal to noise ratio of the acquisition data and so on the count density.</description><subject>Butterworth filters</subject><subject>filters</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>interpolation</subject><subject>Interpolation; curve fitting</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Noise</subject><subject>noise reduction</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Photon scattering</subject><subject>Photons</subject><subject>Physicists</subject><subject>random noise</subject><subject>scatter correction</subject><subject>Scattering, Radiation</subject><subject>single photon emission computed tomography</subject><subject>Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)</subject><subject>Spatial resolution</subject><subject>SPECT</subject><subject>Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon - methods</subject><subject>triple energy window</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp90E1LwzAcx_EgipvTg29AchIUOpM0fchRhk8wUVAvXkqa_jMiXVOTzjFfva0tMhA95ZBPfoQvQseUTCml6QWdUpYmLI130JjxJAw4I2IXjQkRPGCcRCN04P0bISQOI7KPRpSIlDNOx-j1ySwqWeLG4soaD9jJxlicSw8F1qZswGFbN2ZpPruLCpsKN87UJWCowC02eG2qwq6xV7LpsLLOgeroIdrTsvRwNJwT9HJ99Ty7DeYPN3ezy3mgwlTEgY5ixQWTOQiuC8YoV1ylMs-1VELwUIOANIwJTcK8YFRQlUQy1aTIpYy4UOEEnfa7tbPvK_BNtjReQVnKCuzKZwlrm7CQtvCsh8pZ7x3orHZmKd0moyTrQmY0G0K29mQYXeVLKLZkX64FQQ_WpoTN30vZ_eMweN57r0zznfLnzYd1W74u9H_491e_ADljmLg</recordid><startdate>200008</startdate><enddate>200008</enddate><creator>Blokland, Koos (J.) A. K.</creator><creator>Winn, R. D. R.</creator><creator>Pauwels, E. K. J.</creator><general>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200008</creationdate><title>Signal to noise ratio based filter optimization in triple energy window scatter correction</title><author>Blokland, Koos (J.) A. K. ; Winn, R. D. R. ; Pauwels, E. K. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3896-f56c492abe94fd2214c4c8abbfac9943fe9e8360173bd2191c75a8f0dbaa549c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Butterworth filters</topic><topic>filters</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>interpolation</topic><topic>Interpolation; curve fitting</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Noise</topic><topic>noise reduction</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Photon scattering</topic><topic>Photons</topic><topic>Physicists</topic><topic>random noise</topic><topic>scatter correction</topic><topic>Scattering, Radiation</topic><topic>single photon emission computed tomography</topic><topic>Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)</topic><topic>Spatial resolution</topic><topic>SPECT</topic><topic>Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon - methods</topic><topic>triple energy window</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Blokland, Koos (J.) A. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winn, R. D. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pauwels, E. K. J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Blokland, Koos (J.) A. K.</au><au>Winn, R. D. R.</au><au>Pauwels, E. K. J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Signal to noise ratio based filter optimization in triple energy window scatter correction</atitle><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><date>2000-08</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1955</spage><epage>1960</epage><pages>1955-1960</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><eissn>2473-4209</eissn><coden>MPHYA6</coden><abstract>Triple energy window (TEW) scatter correction estimates the contribution of scattered photons to the acquisition data by acquiring additional data through two narrow energy windows placed adjoined to the main (photopeak) energy window. The contribution is estimated by linear interpolation and then subtracted. Noise amplification is reduced by filtering both the photopeak scintigram and the scatter estimate. We have studied the filter settings of each filter using a physical phantom filled with a
201
Tl
-solution
resulting in count densities comparable to clinical studies. The performance of order-8 Butterworth filters at different cut-off frequencies (CoFs) were compared based on signal to noise ratios (SNRs). The highest SNRs were obtained when the noisy scatter information was strongly filtered with the CoF less than or equal to 0.07 cycles/pixel (cpp). The best CoF for the filter of the photopeak image is object size dependent; smaller objects require a higher CoF. For objects with a size near the SPECT spatial resolution (∼15 mm) the optimal CoF is equal to 0.18 cpp. For larger objects (31.8 mm) the highest SNR was obtained with a CoF equal to 0.13 cpp. A CoF equal to 0.16 cpp is a good compromise for all objects with a diameter equal to the spatial resolution or larger. These results depend on the initial signal to noise ratio of the acquisition data and so on the count density.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</pub><pmid>10984241</pmid><doi>10.1118/1.1287286</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0094-2405 |
ispartof | Medical physics (Lancaster), 2000-08, Vol.27 (8), p.1955-1960 |
issn | 0094-2405 2473-4209 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_10984241 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Butterworth filters filters Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods interpolation Interpolation curve fitting Medical imaging Models, Statistical Noise noise reduction Phantoms, Imaging Photon scattering Photons Physicists random noise scatter correction Scattering, Radiation single photon emission computed tomography Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) Spatial resolution SPECT Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon - methods triple energy window |
title | Signal to noise ratio based filter optimization in triple energy window scatter correction |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T02%3A14%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Signal%20to%20noise%20ratio%20based%20filter%20optimization%20in%20triple%20energy%20window%20scatter%20correction&rft.jtitle=Medical%20physics%20(Lancaster)&rft.au=Blokland,%20Koos%20(J.)%20A.%20K.&rft.date=2000-08&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1955&rft.epage=1960&rft.pages=1955-1960&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft.coden=MPHYA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118/1.1287286&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E72247231%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72247231&rft_id=info:pmid/10984241&rfr_iscdi=true |