The electric resistivity of human tissues (100 Hz-10 MHz): a meta-analysis of review studies

The electric resistivity of various human tissues has been reported in many studies, but on comparison large differences appear between these studies. The aim of this study was to investigate systematically the resistivities of human tissues as published in review studies (100 Hz-10 MHz). A data set...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physiological measurement 1999-11, Vol.20 (4), p.R1-R10
Hauptverfasser: Faes, T J C, Meij, H A van der, Munck, J C de, Heethaar, R M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page R10
container_issue 4
container_start_page R1
container_title Physiological measurement
container_volume 20
creator Faes, T J C
Meij, H A van der
Munck, J C de
Heethaar, R M
description The electric resistivity of various human tissues has been reported in many studies, but on comparison large differences appear between these studies. The aim of this study was to investigate systematically the resistivities of human tissues as published in review studies (100 Hz-10 MHz). A data set of 103 resistivities for 21 different human tissues was compiled from six review studies. For each kind of tissue the mean and its 95% confidence interval were calculated. Moreover, an analysis of covariance showed that the calculated means were not statistically different for most tissues, namely skeletal (171 omega cm) and cardiac (175 omega cm) muscle, kidney (211 omega cm), liver (342 omega cm), lung (157 omega cm) and spleen (405 omega cm), with bone (> 17,583 omega cm), fat (3,850 omega cm) and, most likely, the stratum corneum of the skin having higher resistivities. The insignificance of differences between various tissue means could imply an equality of their resistivities, or, alternatively, could be the result of the large confidence intervals which obscured real existing differences. In either case, however, the large 95% confidence intervals reflected large uncertainties in our knowledge of resistivities of human tissues. Applications based on these resistivities in bioimpedance methods, EEG and EKG, should be developed and evaluated with these uncertainties in mind.
doi_str_mv 10.1088/0967-3334/20/4/201
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_10593226</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69342972</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-16376399300a85805096f62f472e23e7c0c7f8777b93c48755fa8710d924cb953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFLwzAUxoMobk7_AQ-Sk7hD3UvSNok3GeqEiZd5E0KWpizSrrVpJ9tfb0vHEAZe3ju83_e9jw-hawL3BISYgIx5wBgLJxQm3SAnaEhYTII44vIUDQ_AAF14_wVAiKDRORoQiCSjNB6iz8XKYptZU1fO4Mp652u3cfUWFyleNble49p531iP7wgAnu0CAvhtths_YI1zW-tAr3W2bXWdorIbZ3-wr5vEWX-JzlKdeXu13yP08fy0mM6C-fvL6_RxHpiQ8TogMeMxk5IBaBEJiNrcaUzTkFNLmeUGDE8F53wpmQkFj6JUC04gkTQ0SxmxEbrtfcuq-G6j1ip33tgs02tbNF7FkoVUctqCtAdNVXhf2VSVlct1tVUEVNep6ipTXWWKguoGaUU3e_dmmdvkj6QvsQXGPeCK8nA9NlJlkrZscMz-8_wXbU-I-A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69342972</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The electric resistivity of human tissues (100 Hz-10 MHz): a meta-analysis of review studies</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>IOP Publishing Journals</source><source>Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals - HEAL-Link</source><creator>Faes, T J C ; Meij, H A van der ; Munck, J C de ; Heethaar, R M</creator><creatorcontrib>Faes, T J C ; Meij, H A van der ; Munck, J C de ; Heethaar, R M</creatorcontrib><description>The electric resistivity of various human tissues has been reported in many studies, but on comparison large differences appear between these studies. The aim of this study was to investigate systematically the resistivities of human tissues as published in review studies (100 Hz-10 MHz). A data set of 103 resistivities for 21 different human tissues was compiled from six review studies. For each kind of tissue the mean and its 95% confidence interval were calculated. Moreover, an analysis of covariance showed that the calculated means were not statistically different for most tissues, namely skeletal (171 omega cm) and cardiac (175 omega cm) muscle, kidney (211 omega cm), liver (342 omega cm), lung (157 omega cm) and spleen (405 omega cm), with bone (&gt; 17,583 omega cm), fat (3,850 omega cm) and, most likely, the stratum corneum of the skin having higher resistivities. The insignificance of differences between various tissue means could imply an equality of their resistivities, or, alternatively, could be the result of the large confidence intervals which obscured real existing differences. In either case, however, the large 95% confidence intervals reflected large uncertainties in our knowledge of resistivities of human tissues. Applications based on these resistivities in bioimpedance methods, EEG and EKG, should be developed and evaluated with these uncertainties in mind.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0967-3334</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1361-6579</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/20/4/201</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10593226</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Body Water - metabolism ; Cardiography, Impedance ; Electric Impedance ; Heart - physiology ; Humans ; Kidney - physiology ; Liver - physiology ; Lung - physiology ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology ; Spleen - physiology</subject><ispartof>Physiological measurement, 1999-11, Vol.20 (4), p.R1-R10</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-16376399300a85805096f62f472e23e7c0c7f8777b93c48755fa8710d924cb953</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-16376399300a85805096f62f472e23e7c0c7f8777b93c48755fa8710d924cb953</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0967-3334/20/4/201/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$H</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,53830,53910</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10593226$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Faes, T J C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meij, H A van der</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munck, J C de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heethaar, R M</creatorcontrib><title>The electric resistivity of human tissues (100 Hz-10 MHz): a meta-analysis of review studies</title><title>Physiological measurement</title><addtitle>Physiol Meas</addtitle><description>The electric resistivity of various human tissues has been reported in many studies, but on comparison large differences appear between these studies. The aim of this study was to investigate systematically the resistivities of human tissues as published in review studies (100 Hz-10 MHz). A data set of 103 resistivities for 21 different human tissues was compiled from six review studies. For each kind of tissue the mean and its 95% confidence interval were calculated. Moreover, an analysis of covariance showed that the calculated means were not statistically different for most tissues, namely skeletal (171 omega cm) and cardiac (175 omega cm) muscle, kidney (211 omega cm), liver (342 omega cm), lung (157 omega cm) and spleen (405 omega cm), with bone (&gt; 17,583 omega cm), fat (3,850 omega cm) and, most likely, the stratum corneum of the skin having higher resistivities. The insignificance of differences between various tissue means could imply an equality of their resistivities, or, alternatively, could be the result of the large confidence intervals which obscured real existing differences. In either case, however, the large 95% confidence intervals reflected large uncertainties in our knowledge of resistivities of human tissues. Applications based on these resistivities in bioimpedance methods, EEG and EKG, should be developed and evaluated with these uncertainties in mind.</description><subject>Body Water - metabolism</subject><subject>Cardiography, Impedance</subject><subject>Electric Impedance</subject><subject>Heart - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidney - physiology</subject><subject>Liver - physiology</subject><subject>Lung - physiology</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</subject><subject>Spleen - physiology</subject><issn>0967-3334</issn><issn>1361-6579</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMFLwzAUxoMobk7_AQ-Sk7hD3UvSNok3GeqEiZd5E0KWpizSrrVpJ9tfb0vHEAZe3ju83_e9jw-hawL3BISYgIx5wBgLJxQm3SAnaEhYTII44vIUDQ_AAF14_wVAiKDRORoQiCSjNB6iz8XKYptZU1fO4Mp652u3cfUWFyleNble49p531iP7wgAnu0CAvhtths_YI1zW-tAr3W2bXWdorIbZ3-wr5vEWX-JzlKdeXu13yP08fy0mM6C-fvL6_RxHpiQ8TogMeMxk5IBaBEJiNrcaUzTkFNLmeUGDE8F53wpmQkFj6JUC04gkTQ0SxmxEbrtfcuq-G6j1ip33tgs02tbNF7FkoVUctqCtAdNVXhf2VSVlct1tVUEVNep6ipTXWWKguoGaUU3e_dmmdvkj6QvsQXGPeCK8nA9NlJlkrZscMz-8_wXbU-I-A</recordid><startdate>19991101</startdate><enddate>19991101</enddate><creator>Faes, T J C</creator><creator>Meij, H A van der</creator><creator>Munck, J C de</creator><creator>Heethaar, R M</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19991101</creationdate><title>The electric resistivity of human tissues (100 Hz-10 MHz): a meta-analysis of review studies</title><author>Faes, T J C ; Meij, H A van der ; Munck, J C de ; Heethaar, R M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-16376399300a85805096f62f472e23e7c0c7f8777b93c48755fa8710d924cb953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Body Water - metabolism</topic><topic>Cardiography, Impedance</topic><topic>Electric Impedance</topic><topic>Heart - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidney - physiology</topic><topic>Liver - physiology</topic><topic>Lung - physiology</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</topic><topic>Spleen - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Faes, T J C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meij, H A van der</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munck, J C de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heethaar, R M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Physiological measurement</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Faes, T J C</au><au>Meij, H A van der</au><au>Munck, J C de</au><au>Heethaar, R M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The electric resistivity of human tissues (100 Hz-10 MHz): a meta-analysis of review studies</atitle><jtitle>Physiological measurement</jtitle><addtitle>Physiol Meas</addtitle><date>1999-11-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>R1</spage><epage>R10</epage><pages>R1-R10</pages><issn>0967-3334</issn><eissn>1361-6579</eissn><abstract>The electric resistivity of various human tissues has been reported in many studies, but on comparison large differences appear between these studies. The aim of this study was to investigate systematically the resistivities of human tissues as published in review studies (100 Hz-10 MHz). A data set of 103 resistivities for 21 different human tissues was compiled from six review studies. For each kind of tissue the mean and its 95% confidence interval were calculated. Moreover, an analysis of covariance showed that the calculated means were not statistically different for most tissues, namely skeletal (171 omega cm) and cardiac (175 omega cm) muscle, kidney (211 omega cm), liver (342 omega cm), lung (157 omega cm) and spleen (405 omega cm), with bone (&gt; 17,583 omega cm), fat (3,850 omega cm) and, most likely, the stratum corneum of the skin having higher resistivities. The insignificance of differences between various tissue means could imply an equality of their resistivities, or, alternatively, could be the result of the large confidence intervals which obscured real existing differences. In either case, however, the large 95% confidence intervals reflected large uncertainties in our knowledge of resistivities of human tissues. Applications based on these resistivities in bioimpedance methods, EEG and EKG, should be developed and evaluated with these uncertainties in mind.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><pmid>10593226</pmid><doi>10.1088/0967-3334/20/4/201</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0967-3334
ispartof Physiological measurement, 1999-11, Vol.20 (4), p.R1-R10
issn 0967-3334
1361-6579
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_10593226
source MEDLINE; IOP Publishing Journals; Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals - HEAL-Link
subjects Body Water - metabolism
Cardiography, Impedance
Electric Impedance
Heart - physiology
Humans
Kidney - physiology
Liver - physiology
Lung - physiology
Muscle, Skeletal - physiology
Spleen - physiology
title The electric resistivity of human tissues (100 Hz-10 MHz): a meta-analysis of review studies
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T00%3A16%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20electric%20resistivity%20of%20human%20tissues%20(100%20Hz-10%20MHz):%20a%20meta-analysis%20of%20review%20studies&rft.jtitle=Physiological%20measurement&rft.au=Faes,%20T%20J%20C&rft.date=1999-11-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=R1&rft.epage=R10&rft.pages=R1-R10&rft.issn=0967-3334&rft.eissn=1361-6579&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/0967-3334/20/4/201&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E69342972%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69342972&rft_id=info:pmid/10593226&rfr_iscdi=true