Decentralization, Aging Policy, and the Age of Clinton
This article examines the recent trends in decentralization and their implications for aging policy in the Clinton presidency. It first discusses a decade-long trend toward decentralizing policy and then examines some recent federal enactments that promote more discretion by stale and local policyma...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of aging & social policy 1994, Vol.6 (1-2), p.9-26 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 26 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1-2 |
| container_start_page | 9 |
| container_title | Journal of aging & social policy |
| container_volume | 6 |
| creator | Liebig, Phoebe S. |
| description | This article examines the recent trends in decentralization and their implications for aging policy in the Clinton presidency. It first discusses a decade-long trend toward decentralizing policy and then examines some recent federal enactments that promote more discretion by stale and local policymakers, suggesting that these may set the framework for aging policy during most of Clinton's first term. A basic premise of the discussion is, however, that the degree of flexibilily varies with the policy area being analyzed-housing, transportation, health and social services-and whether these are "old" (pre-1980s) or "new" (post-1980s) policies. It concludes with the suggestion that a dual-centered, shared federal-state solution may provide the best approach to the premier issue in aging policy today-long-term care. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1300/J031v06n01_02 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_10186862</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1761705026</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c273t-1611ddec7244f27d4b5cc6237168d10afbfce77de3715c0f407d9d49c843932d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0DtPHDEUBWArAoUFUqaNpkIpduBeP2dKtCQEhESKpLa8fhCjWRvsWdDy6zNoKYIUQXWvjj6d4hDyGeEYGcDJJTB8AJkANdAPZIaCixY6ijtkBl0v2p5T2CP7td4CYKeU-Ej2cPpkJ-mMyDNvfRqLGeKTGWNO8-b0Jqab5mceot3MG5NcM_7xU-qbHJrFENOY0yHZDWao_tPLPSC_v3_7tfjRXl2fXyxOr1pLFRtblIjOeaso54Eqx5fCWkmZQtk5BBOWwXqlnJ8SYSFwUK53vLcdZz2jjh2Qo23vXcn3a19HvYrV-mEwyed11UohCM77d6FEoQRDPsGvb0JUEhUIoHKi7ZbakmstPui7ElembDSCfh5fvxp_8l9eqtfLlXf_6O3aE-i2IKaQy8o85jI4PZrNkEsoJtlYNft_918Ebo-R</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1761705026</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Decentralization, Aging Policy, and the Age of Clinton</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Access via Taylor & Francis</source><creator>Liebig, Phoebe S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Liebig, Phoebe S.</creatorcontrib><description>This article examines the recent trends in decentralization and their implications for aging policy in the Clinton presidency. It first discusses a decade-long trend toward decentralizing policy and then examines some recent federal enactments that promote more discretion by stale and local policymakers, suggesting that these may set the framework for aging policy during most of Clinton's first term. A basic premise of the discussion is, however, that the degree of flexibilily varies with the policy area being analyzed-housing, transportation, health and social services-and whether these are "old" (pre-1980s) or "new" (post-1980s) policies. It concludes with the suggestion that a dual-centered, shared federal-state solution may provide the best approach to the premier issue in aging policy today-long-term care.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0895-9420</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-0821</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1300/J031v06n01_02</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10186862</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aging ; Decentralization ; Federal Government ; Health technology assessment ; Humans ; Needs Assessment - trends ; Policy Making ; Politics ; Public Policy ; Social Policy ; Social Work - trends ; United States ; United States of America</subject><ispartof>Journal of aging & social policy, 1994, Vol.6 (1-2), p.9-26</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 1994</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1300/J031v06n01_02$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1300/J031v06n01_02$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925,33775,59647,60436</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10186862$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liebig, Phoebe S.</creatorcontrib><title>Decentralization, Aging Policy, and the Age of Clinton</title><title>Journal of aging & social policy</title><addtitle>J Aging Soc Policy</addtitle><description>This article examines the recent trends in decentralization and their implications for aging policy in the Clinton presidency. It first discusses a decade-long trend toward decentralizing policy and then examines some recent federal enactments that promote more discretion by stale and local policymakers, suggesting that these may set the framework for aging policy during most of Clinton's first term. A basic premise of the discussion is, however, that the degree of flexibilily varies with the policy area being analyzed-housing, transportation, health and social services-and whether these are "old" (pre-1980s) or "new" (post-1980s) policies. It concludes with the suggestion that a dual-centered, shared federal-state solution may provide the best approach to the premier issue in aging policy today-long-term care.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Decentralization</subject><subject>Federal Government</subject><subject>Health technology assessment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Needs Assessment - trends</subject><subject>Policy Making</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Public Policy</subject><subject>Social Policy</subject><subject>Social Work - trends</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>United States of America</subject><issn>0895-9420</issn><issn>1545-0821</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0DtPHDEUBWArAoUFUqaNpkIpduBeP2dKtCQEhESKpLa8fhCjWRvsWdDy6zNoKYIUQXWvjj6d4hDyGeEYGcDJJTB8AJkANdAPZIaCixY6ijtkBl0v2p5T2CP7td4CYKeU-Ej2cPpkJ-mMyDNvfRqLGeKTGWNO8-b0Jqab5mceot3MG5NcM_7xU-qbHJrFENOY0yHZDWao_tPLPSC_v3_7tfjRXl2fXyxOr1pLFRtblIjOeaso54Eqx5fCWkmZQtk5BBOWwXqlnJ8SYSFwUK53vLcdZz2jjh2Qo23vXcn3a19HvYrV-mEwyed11UohCM77d6FEoQRDPsGvb0JUEhUIoHKi7ZbakmstPui7ElembDSCfh5fvxp_8l9eqtfLlXf_6O3aE-i2IKaQy8o85jI4PZrNkEsoJtlYNft_918Ebo-R</recordid><startdate>1994</startdate><enddate>1994</enddate><creator>Liebig, Phoebe S.</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1994</creationdate><title>Decentralization, Aging Policy, and the Age of Clinton</title><author>Liebig, Phoebe S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c273t-1611ddec7244f27d4b5cc6237168d10afbfce77de3715c0f407d9d49c843932d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Decentralization</topic><topic>Federal Government</topic><topic>Health technology assessment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Needs Assessment - trends</topic><topic>Policy Making</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Public Policy</topic><topic>Social Policy</topic><topic>Social Work - trends</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>United States of America</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liebig, Phoebe S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of aging & social policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liebig, Phoebe S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Decentralization, Aging Policy, and the Age of Clinton</atitle><jtitle>Journal of aging & social policy</jtitle><addtitle>J Aging Soc Policy</addtitle><date>1994</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>9</spage><epage>26</epage><pages>9-26</pages><issn>0895-9420</issn><eissn>1545-0821</eissn><abstract>This article examines the recent trends in decentralization and their implications for aging policy in the Clinton presidency. It first discusses a decade-long trend toward decentralizing policy and then examines some recent federal enactments that promote more discretion by stale and local policymakers, suggesting that these may set the framework for aging policy during most of Clinton's first term. A basic premise of the discussion is, however, that the degree of flexibilily varies with the policy area being analyzed-housing, transportation, health and social services-and whether these are "old" (pre-1980s) or "new" (post-1980s) policies. It concludes with the suggestion that a dual-centered, shared federal-state solution may provide the best approach to the premier issue in aging policy today-long-term care.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><pmid>10186862</pmid><doi>10.1300/J031v06n01_02</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0895-9420 |
| ispartof | Journal of aging & social policy, 1994, Vol.6 (1-2), p.9-26 |
| issn | 0895-9420 1545-0821 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_10186862 |
| source | MEDLINE; Sociological Abstracts; Access via Taylor & Francis |
| subjects | Aged Aging Decentralization Federal Government Health technology assessment Humans Needs Assessment - trends Policy Making Politics Public Policy Social Policy Social Work - trends United States United States of America |
| title | Decentralization, Aging Policy, and the Age of Clinton |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T21%3A43%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Decentralization,%20Aging%20Policy,%20and%20the%20Age%20of%20Clinton&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20aging%20&%20social%20policy&rft.au=Liebig,%20Phoebe%20S.&rft.date=1994&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=9&rft.epage=26&rft.pages=9-26&rft.issn=0895-9420&rft.eissn=1545-0821&rft_id=info:doi/10.1300/J031v06n01_02&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1761705026%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1761705026&rft_id=info:pmid/10186862&rfr_iscdi=true |