PRRS Projects Yield Mixed Results
2. Establish PRRS status based on published categories: PRRS positive, PRRS stable or PRRS negative. Of the 116 active sites, 58 are of known PRRS status, with continued PRRS monitoring to assess disease control methods in place. Twenty sites are routinely monitored and committed to being PRRS negat...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | National Hog Farmer 2012-02 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | |
| container_title | National Hog Farmer |
| container_volume | |
| creator | Vansickle, Joe |
| description | 2. Establish PRRS status based on published categories: PRRS positive, PRRS stable or PRRS negative. Of the 116 active sites, 58 are of known PRRS status, with continued PRRS monitoring to assess disease control methods in place. Twenty sites are routinely monitored and committed to being PRRS negative. These sites fund their own PRRS testing. The other sites and unknown status sites rely on funding from PRRS CAP or other funding from the U.S. Department of Agriculture to support PRRS testing. "The project directors would like to discover why producers have a particular mindset toward PRRS and how to manage it," explains project leader Dyneah Classen, DVM, Carthage (IL) Veterinary Service, Ltd. "There are producers who individually prefer to control and eliminate the virus from their herds and would like to see regional elimination. There are producers who choose to live PRRS positive and ignore the cost. And there are producers who choose not to participate in PRRS control/elimination programs." |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_927579062</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2607295821</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_reports_9275790623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0MjQz1DW3sDBgYeA0MDAy17U0MTHnYOAqLs4yMDCwsDQw5mRQDAgKClYIKMrPSk0uKVaIzEzNSVHwzaxITVEISi0uzSkp5mFgTUvMKU7lhdLcDIpuriHOHroFRfmFpanFJfFFqQX5RSXF8ZZG5qbmlgZmRsbEqAEA_F4tGQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>927579062</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>PRRS Projects Yield Mixed Results</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Vansickle, Joe</creator><creatorcontrib>Vansickle, Joe</creatorcontrib><description>2. Establish PRRS status based on published categories: PRRS positive, PRRS stable or PRRS negative. Of the 116 active sites, 58 are of known PRRS status, with continued PRRS monitoring to assess disease control methods in place. Twenty sites are routinely monitored and committed to being PRRS negative. These sites fund their own PRRS testing. The other sites and unknown status sites rely on funding from PRRS CAP or other funding from the U.S. Department of Agriculture to support PRRS testing. "The project directors would like to discover why producers have a particular mindset toward PRRS and how to manage it," explains project leader Dyneah Classen, DVM, Carthage (IL) Veterinary Service, Ltd. "There are producers who individually prefer to control and eliminate the virus from their herds and would like to see regional elimination. There are producers who choose to live PRRS positive and ignore the cost. And there are producers who choose not to participate in PRRS control/elimination programs."</description><identifier>ISSN: 0027-9447</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2161-7880</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Minneapolis: Informa</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Animal diseases ; Farm buildings ; Farms ; Funding ; Grass roots movement ; Hogs ; Population decline ; Risk assessment ; Viruses</subject><ispartof>National Hog Farmer, 2012-02</ispartof><rights>Copyright Penton Business Media, Inc. and Penton Media, Inc. Feb 1, 2012</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>312,776,780,787</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vansickle, Joe</creatorcontrib><title>PRRS Projects Yield Mixed Results</title><title>National Hog Farmer</title><description>2. Establish PRRS status based on published categories: PRRS positive, PRRS stable or PRRS negative. Of the 116 active sites, 58 are of known PRRS status, with continued PRRS monitoring to assess disease control methods in place. Twenty sites are routinely monitored and committed to being PRRS negative. These sites fund their own PRRS testing. The other sites and unknown status sites rely on funding from PRRS CAP or other funding from the U.S. Department of Agriculture to support PRRS testing. "The project directors would like to discover why producers have a particular mindset toward PRRS and how to manage it," explains project leader Dyneah Classen, DVM, Carthage (IL) Veterinary Service, Ltd. "There are producers who individually prefer to control and eliminate the virus from their herds and would like to see regional elimination. There are producers who choose to live PRRS positive and ignore the cost. And there are producers who choose not to participate in PRRS control/elimination programs."</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Animal diseases</subject><subject>Farm buildings</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Funding</subject><subject>Grass roots movement</subject><subject>Hogs</subject><subject>Population decline</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Viruses</subject><issn>0027-9447</issn><issn>2161-7880</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYuA0MjQz1DW3sDBgYeA0MDAy17U0MTHnYOAqLs4yMDCwsDQw5mRQDAgKClYIKMrPSk0uKVaIzEzNSVHwzaxITVEISi0uzSkp5mFgTUvMKU7lhdLcDIpuriHOHroFRfmFpanFJfFFqQX5RSXF8ZZG5qbmlgZmRsbEqAEA_F4tGQ</recordid><startdate>20120201</startdate><enddate>20120201</enddate><creator>Vansickle, Joe</creator><general>Informa</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>883</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0F</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120201</creationdate><title>PRRS Projects Yield Mixed Results</title><author>Vansickle, Joe</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_reports_9275790623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Animal diseases</topic><topic>Farm buildings</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Funding</topic><topic>Grass roots movement</topic><topic>Hogs</topic><topic>Population decline</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Viruses</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vansickle, Joe</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>National Hog Farmer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vansickle, Joe</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PRRS Projects Yield Mixed Results</atitle><jtitle>National Hog Farmer</jtitle><date>2012-02-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><issn>0027-9447</issn><eissn>2161-7880</eissn><abstract>2. Establish PRRS status based on published categories: PRRS positive, PRRS stable or PRRS negative. Of the 116 active sites, 58 are of known PRRS status, with continued PRRS monitoring to assess disease control methods in place. Twenty sites are routinely monitored and committed to being PRRS negative. These sites fund their own PRRS testing. The other sites and unknown status sites rely on funding from PRRS CAP or other funding from the U.S. Department of Agriculture to support PRRS testing. "The project directors would like to discover why producers have a particular mindset toward PRRS and how to manage it," explains project leader Dyneah Classen, DVM, Carthage (IL) Veterinary Service, Ltd. "There are producers who individually prefer to control and eliminate the virus from their herds and would like to see regional elimination. There are producers who choose to live PRRS positive and ignore the cost. And there are producers who choose not to participate in PRRS control/elimination programs."</abstract><cop>Minneapolis</cop><pub>Informa</pub></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0027-9447 |
| ispartof | National Hog Farmer, 2012-02 |
| issn | 0027-9447 2161-7880 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_reports_927579062 |
| source | Business Source Complete |
| subjects | Agriculture Animal diseases Farm buildings Farms Funding Grass roots movement Hogs Population decline Risk assessment Viruses |
| title | PRRS Projects Yield Mixed Results |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T17%3A00%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PRRS%20Projects%20Yield%20Mixed%20Results&rft.jtitle=National%20Hog%20Farmer&rft.au=Vansickle,%20Joe&rft.date=2012-02-01&rft.issn=0027-9447&rft.eissn=2161-7880&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2607295821%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=927579062&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |