Reforming derivative taxation
In the absence of comprehensive reform, it is impossible to tax financial derivatives in a manner that meets any accepted benchmark of an effective and efficient capital income tax. There is no doubt that the existing patchwork of rules for the taxation of derivatives is full of holes. Most knowledg...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Corporate Business Taxation Monthly 2012-01, Vol.13 (4), p.31 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 31 |
container_title | Corporate Business Taxation Monthly |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Raskolnikov, Alex |
description | In the absence of comprehensive reform, it is impossible to tax financial derivatives in a manner that meets any accepted benchmark of an effective and efficient capital income tax. There is no doubt that the existing patchwork of rules for the taxation of derivatives is full of holes. Most knowledgeable observers would agree that derivatives-based tax reduction strategies lead to serious revenue losses and endless wasteful efforts by sophisticated taxpayers and their advisors to stay one step ahead of the regulators. Beyond this general statement, however, little can be said with any confidence. This is because while any study of taxpayer responses to tax rules and their changes is difficult, the difficulty increases by orders of magnitude when the focus turns to derivatives. A fundamental reform of derivatives taxation is important, but it is hardly the only important fundamental reform worth considering and being considered. Other reforms, if undertaken, will affect the need to resolve the problems with taxing financial products in a variety of ways. Some reforms will make fixing the taxation of derivatives even more urgent, some will make it less essential, and some will have uncertain effects, as the following discussion explains. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_923304690</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A331599641</galeid><sourcerecordid>A331599641</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g1680-87ad7a5bf34ecdb554fbf4e02eece9e326b2aa706066626018414c284486fd03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptzl9LwzAQAPA8KDinH0GY-Golzb82j2OoEwaC7L2k7SVG2nTm2uHHNzAfJpSDu-P43XEXZJFLVmaSaXFFrhG_KGVaabogdx9gh9j74FYtRH80oz_CajQ_qRnCDbm0pkO4_atLsn953m-22e799W2z3mUuVyXNysK0hZG15QKatpZS2NoKoAygAQ2cqZoZU1BFlVJM0bwUuWhYKUSpbEv5ktyfzh7i8D0BjlWEwxBHrDTjnIr0aTIPJ-NMB5UPdhijaXqPTbXmPJdaK5Enlc0oBwGi6YYA1qfxP_8041O00PtmduHxbKGe0AfAlNC7zxGdmRDP-S_p_XDZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>923304690</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reforming derivative taxation</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Raskolnikov, Alex</creator><creatorcontrib>Raskolnikov, Alex</creatorcontrib><description>In the absence of comprehensive reform, it is impossible to tax financial derivatives in a manner that meets any accepted benchmark of an effective and efficient capital income tax. There is no doubt that the existing patchwork of rules for the taxation of derivatives is full of holes. Most knowledgeable observers would agree that derivatives-based tax reduction strategies lead to serious revenue losses and endless wasteful efforts by sophisticated taxpayers and their advisors to stay one step ahead of the regulators. Beyond this general statement, however, little can be said with any confidence. This is because while any study of taxpayer responses to tax rules and their changes is difficult, the difficulty increases by orders of magnitude when the focus turns to derivatives. A fundamental reform of derivatives taxation is important, but it is hardly the only important fundamental reform worth considering and being considered. Other reforms, if undertaken, will affect the need to resolve the problems with taxing financial products in a variety of ways. Some reforms will make fixing the taxation of derivatives even more urgent, some will make it less essential, and some will have uncertain effects, as the following discussion explains.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1528-5294</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Riverwoods: CCH, Inc</publisher><subject>Benchmarks ; Congressional committees ; Derivatives ; Derivatives (Financial instruments) ; Equity ; Financial instruments ; Income taxes ; Political aspects ; Public finance ; Put & call options ; Securities regulations ; Symmetry ; Tax planning ; Tax reform ; Tax returns ; Taxation</subject><ispartof>Corporate Business Taxation Monthly, 2012-01, Vol.13 (4), p.31</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 CCH, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright CCH INCORPORATED Jan 2012</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>312,314,780,784,791</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Raskolnikov, Alex</creatorcontrib><title>Reforming derivative taxation</title><title>Corporate Business Taxation Monthly</title><description>In the absence of comprehensive reform, it is impossible to tax financial derivatives in a manner that meets any accepted benchmark of an effective and efficient capital income tax. There is no doubt that the existing patchwork of rules for the taxation of derivatives is full of holes. Most knowledgeable observers would agree that derivatives-based tax reduction strategies lead to serious revenue losses and endless wasteful efforts by sophisticated taxpayers and their advisors to stay one step ahead of the regulators. Beyond this general statement, however, little can be said with any confidence. This is because while any study of taxpayer responses to tax rules and their changes is difficult, the difficulty increases by orders of magnitude when the focus turns to derivatives. A fundamental reform of derivatives taxation is important, but it is hardly the only important fundamental reform worth considering and being considered. Other reforms, if undertaken, will affect the need to resolve the problems with taxing financial products in a variety of ways. Some reforms will make fixing the taxation of derivatives even more urgent, some will make it less essential, and some will have uncertain effects, as the following discussion explains.</description><subject>Benchmarks</subject><subject>Congressional committees</subject><subject>Derivatives</subject><subject>Derivatives (Financial instruments)</subject><subject>Equity</subject><subject>Financial instruments</subject><subject>Income taxes</subject><subject>Political aspects</subject><subject>Public finance</subject><subject>Put & call options</subject><subject>Securities regulations</subject><subject>Symmetry</subject><subject>Tax planning</subject><subject>Tax reform</subject><subject>Tax returns</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><issn>1528-5294</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNptzl9LwzAQAPA8KDinH0GY-Golzb82j2OoEwaC7L2k7SVG2nTm2uHHNzAfJpSDu-P43XEXZJFLVmaSaXFFrhG_KGVaabogdx9gh9j74FYtRH80oz_CajQ_qRnCDbm0pkO4_atLsn953m-22e799W2z3mUuVyXNysK0hZG15QKatpZS2NoKoAygAQ2cqZoZU1BFlVJM0bwUuWhYKUSpbEv5ktyfzh7i8D0BjlWEwxBHrDTjnIr0aTIPJ-NMB5UPdhijaXqPTbXmPJdaK5Enlc0oBwGi6YYA1qfxP_8041O00PtmduHxbKGe0AfAlNC7zxGdmRDP-S_p_XDZ</recordid><startdate>20120101</startdate><enddate>20120101</enddate><creator>Raskolnikov, Alex</creator><general>CCH, Inc</general><general>CCH INCORPORATED</general><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>ILT</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X1</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8A9</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRAZJ</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120101</creationdate><title>Reforming derivative taxation</title><author>Raskolnikov, Alex</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g1680-87ad7a5bf34ecdb554fbf4e02eece9e326b2aa706066626018414c284486fd03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Benchmarks</topic><topic>Congressional committees</topic><topic>Derivatives</topic><topic>Derivatives (Financial instruments)</topic><topic>Equity</topic><topic>Financial instruments</topic><topic>Income taxes</topic><topic>Political aspects</topic><topic>Public finance</topic><topic>Put & call options</topic><topic>Securities regulations</topic><topic>Symmetry</topic><topic>Tax planning</topic><topic>Tax reform</topic><topic>Tax returns</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Raskolnikov, Alex</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>Gale OneFile: LegalTrac</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Accounting & Tax Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Accounting & Tax Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Corporate Business Taxation Monthly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Raskolnikov, Alex</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reforming derivative taxation</atitle><jtitle>Corporate Business Taxation Monthly</jtitle><date>2012-01-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>31</spage><pages>31-</pages><issn>1528-5294</issn><abstract>In the absence of comprehensive reform, it is impossible to tax financial derivatives in a manner that meets any accepted benchmark of an effective and efficient capital income tax. There is no doubt that the existing patchwork of rules for the taxation of derivatives is full of holes. Most knowledgeable observers would agree that derivatives-based tax reduction strategies lead to serious revenue losses and endless wasteful efforts by sophisticated taxpayers and their advisors to stay one step ahead of the regulators. Beyond this general statement, however, little can be said with any confidence. This is because while any study of taxpayer responses to tax rules and their changes is difficult, the difficulty increases by orders of magnitude when the focus turns to derivatives. A fundamental reform of derivatives taxation is important, but it is hardly the only important fundamental reform worth considering and being considered. Other reforms, if undertaken, will affect the need to resolve the problems with taxing financial products in a variety of ways. Some reforms will make fixing the taxation of derivatives even more urgent, some will make it less essential, and some will have uncertain effects, as the following discussion explains.</abstract><cop>Riverwoods</cop><pub>CCH, Inc</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1528-5294 |
ispartof | Corporate Business Taxation Monthly, 2012-01, Vol.13 (4), p.31 |
issn | 1528-5294 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_reports_923304690 |
source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
subjects | Benchmarks Congressional committees Derivatives Derivatives (Financial instruments) Equity Financial instruments Income taxes Political aspects Public finance Put & call options Securities regulations Symmetry Tax planning Tax reform Tax returns Taxation |
title | Reforming derivative taxation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T01%3A10%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reforming%20derivative%20taxation&rft.jtitle=Corporate%20Business%20Taxation%20Monthly&rft.au=Raskolnikov,%20Alex&rft.date=2012-01-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=31&rft.pages=31-&rft.issn=1528-5294&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA331599641%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=923304690&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A331599641&rfr_iscdi=true |