The Feltex decision : A case of threadbare governance; Directors can take no comfort from the recent decision to dismiss all charges against five Feltex directors. The case shows the sad state of governance in too many New Zealand companies, writes expert Doug Matheson
The Feltex decision, as it may become known, is a distraction from what is really wrong with governance in New Zealand and many other parts of the world. It is, in effect, a real example of a board not performing its fundamental governance role and responsibilities. Unfortunately, the wider Feltex g...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | New Zealand Management 2010-09, p.63 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Magazinearticle |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 63 |
| container_title | New Zealand Management |
| container_volume | |
| creator | Matheson, Doug |
| description | The Feltex decision, as it may become known, is a distraction from what is really wrong with governance in New Zealand and many other parts of the world. It is, in effect, a real example of a board not performing its fundamental governance role and responsibilities. Unfortunately, the wider Feltex governance shortcomings have been sidetracked by the Auckland District Court decision to dismiss all Ministry of Economic Development-inspired charges taken under the Financial Reporting Act 1993 against five Feltex directors. And, of course, there are other similar cases pending against Lombard and Nuplex directors. |
| format | Magazinearticle |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_907107083</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A238939213</galeid><sourcerecordid>A238939213</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g1013-511a40060c8ba1766d6102fbe2670eae5e1522d48c8b0cf26e2ede91e510e5213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkE1z0zAQhg0DM7Sl_2G514wkx3YMp0w_oDMFLuXCJbOxX9sCRwpapSn_HiWFSS_SzurZd5_Ry-xE67rJi0arV4d6lpdF0bzJTkV-KmWM0ebkxfn9CLrBFPFIHVor1jv6QAtqWUC-pzgGcLfiABr8A4Jj1-IjXdmANvogCXQU-RfIeWr9uvchUh_8Ok2CEgQXj8nRU2dlbUWIp4nakcOAVA9snaQ5-3C0-b_hPe0dDz4y-p0cgoU7ksjx4HgUI7vf4WnN7g99xY5-gCd23d5sw85CLmgXbEw78bhBUr3y24G-cMoU795mr3ueBOf_7rPs-831_eXn_O7bp9vLxV0-aKWLvNSaZ0pVqp2vWNdV1VVamX4FU9UKjBK6NKabzdO7antTwaBDo1FqhdLo4ix795S7Cf73FhKXAZv0cbJsVK1VreZFYvInZuAJS-t6HwO3AxwCT96ht6m9MMW8KZoUmfiLZ_xqK9ZB0iF2GKMMvBV5jv8Fd_qthg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><pqid>907107083</pqid></control><display><type>magazinearticle</type><title>The Feltex decision : A case of threadbare governance; Directors can take no comfort from the recent decision to dismiss all charges against five Feltex directors. The case shows the sad state of governance in too many New Zealand companies, writes expert Doug Matheson</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Matheson, Doug</creator><creatorcontrib>Matheson, Doug</creatorcontrib><description>The Feltex decision, as it may become known, is a distraction from what is really wrong with governance in New Zealand and many other parts of the world. It is, in effect, a real example of a board not performing its fundamental governance role and responsibilities. Unfortunately, the wider Feltex governance shortcomings have been sidetracked by the Auckland District Court decision to dismiss all Ministry of Economic Development-inspired charges taken under the Financial Reporting Act 1993 against five Feltex directors. And, of course, there are other similar cases pending against Lombard and Nuplex directors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1174-5339</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1179-3910</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Auckland: Mediaweb Ltd</publisher><subject>Accounting ; Boards of directors ; Compliance ; Corporate governance ; Court decisions ; Directors ; Fiduciaries ; Financial reporting ; Responsibilities ; Stockholders ; Strategic management</subject><ispartof>New Zealand Management, 2010-09, p.63</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2010 Mediaweb Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright 2010 Mediaweb Ltd.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>312,780,784,791</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Matheson, Doug</creatorcontrib><title>The Feltex decision : A case of threadbare governance; Directors can take no comfort from the recent decision to dismiss all charges against five Feltex directors. The case shows the sad state of governance in too many New Zealand companies, writes expert Doug Matheson</title><title>New Zealand Management</title><description>The Feltex decision, as it may become known, is a distraction from what is really wrong with governance in New Zealand and many other parts of the world. It is, in effect, a real example of a board not performing its fundamental governance role and responsibilities. Unfortunately, the wider Feltex governance shortcomings have been sidetracked by the Auckland District Court decision to dismiss all Ministry of Economic Development-inspired charges taken under the Financial Reporting Act 1993 against five Feltex directors. And, of course, there are other similar cases pending against Lombard and Nuplex directors.</description><subject>Accounting</subject><subject>Boards of directors</subject><subject>Compliance</subject><subject>Corporate governance</subject><subject>Court decisions</subject><subject>Directors</subject><subject>Fiduciaries</subject><subject>Financial reporting</subject><subject>Responsibilities</subject><subject>Stockholders</subject><subject>Strategic management</subject><issn>1174-5339</issn><issn>1179-3910</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkE1z0zAQhg0DM7Sl_2G514wkx3YMp0w_oDMFLuXCJbOxX9sCRwpapSn_HiWFSS_SzurZd5_Ry-xE67rJi0arV4d6lpdF0bzJTkV-KmWM0ebkxfn9CLrBFPFIHVor1jv6QAtqWUC-pzgGcLfiABr8A4Jj1-IjXdmANvogCXQU-RfIeWr9uvchUh_8Ok2CEgQXj8nRU2dlbUWIp4nakcOAVA9snaQ5-3C0-b_hPe0dDz4y-p0cgoU7ksjx4HgUI7vf4WnN7g99xY5-gCd23d5sw85CLmgXbEw78bhBUr3y24G-cMoU795mr3ueBOf_7rPs-831_eXn_O7bp9vLxV0-aKWLvNSaZ0pVqp2vWNdV1VVamX4FU9UKjBK6NKabzdO7antTwaBDo1FqhdLo4ix795S7Cf73FhKXAZv0cbJsVK1VreZFYvInZuAJS-t6HwO3AxwCT96ht6m9MMW8KZoUmfiLZ_xqK9ZB0iF2GKMMvBV5jv8Fd_qthg</recordid><startdate>20100901</startdate><enddate>20100901</enddate><creator>Matheson, Doug</creator><general>Mediaweb Ltd</general><general>Adrenalin Publishing Ltd</general><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RO</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AI</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AXJJW</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FREBS</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100901</creationdate><title>The Feltex decision : A case of threadbare governance; Directors can take no comfort from the recent decision to dismiss all charges against five Feltex directors. The case shows the sad state of governance in too many New Zealand companies, writes expert Doug Matheson</title><author>Matheson, Doug</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g1013-511a40060c8ba1766d6102fbe2670eae5e1522d48c8b0cf26e2ede91e510e5213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><prefilter>magazinearticle</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Accounting</topic><topic>Boards of directors</topic><topic>Compliance</topic><topic>Corporate governance</topic><topic>Court decisions</topic><topic>Directors</topic><topic>Fiduciaries</topic><topic>Financial reporting</topic><topic>Responsibilities</topic><topic>Stockholders</topic><topic>Strategic management</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Matheson, Doug</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Asian Business Database</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Asian Business Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>New Zealand Management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Matheson, Doug</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Feltex decision : A case of threadbare governance; Directors can take no comfort from the recent decision to dismiss all charges against five Feltex directors. The case shows the sad state of governance in too many New Zealand companies, writes expert Doug Matheson</atitle><jtitle>New Zealand Management</jtitle><date>2010-09-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><spage>63</spage><pages>63-</pages><issn>1174-5339</issn><eissn>1179-3910</eissn><abstract>The Feltex decision, as it may become known, is a distraction from what is really wrong with governance in New Zealand and many other parts of the world. It is, in effect, a real example of a board not performing its fundamental governance role and responsibilities. Unfortunately, the wider Feltex governance shortcomings have been sidetracked by the Auckland District Court decision to dismiss all Ministry of Economic Development-inspired charges taken under the Financial Reporting Act 1993 against five Feltex directors. And, of course, there are other similar cases pending against Lombard and Nuplex directors.</abstract><cop>Auckland</cop><pub>Mediaweb Ltd</pub></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1174-5339 |
| ispartof | New Zealand Management, 2010-09, p.63 |
| issn | 1174-5339 1179-3910 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_reports_907107083 |
| source | EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
| subjects | Accounting Boards of directors Compliance Corporate governance Court decisions Directors Fiduciaries Financial reporting Responsibilities Stockholders Strategic management |
| title | The Feltex decision : A case of threadbare governance; Directors can take no comfort from the recent decision to dismiss all charges against five Feltex directors. The case shows the sad state of governance in too many New Zealand companies, writes expert Doug Matheson |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T12%3A10%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Feltex%20decision%20:%20A%20case%20of%20threadbare%20governance;%20Directors%20can%20take%20no%20comfort%20from%20the%20recent%20decision%20to%20dismiss%20all%20charges%20against%20five%20Feltex%20directors.%20The%20case%20shows%20the%20sad%20state%20of%20governance%20in%20too%20many%20New%20Zealand%20companies,%20writes%20expert%20Doug%20Matheson&rft.jtitle=New%20Zealand%20Management&rft.au=Matheson,%20Doug&rft.date=2010-09-01&rft.spage=63&rft.pages=63-&rft.issn=1174-5339&rft.eissn=1179-3910&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA238939213%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=907107083&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A238939213&rfr_iscdi=true |