Goodbye to a Worn-Out Dichotomy: Law Enforcement, Social Work, and a Balanced Approach (A Survey of Federal Probation Officer Attitudes)
Previous Research Officer Attitudes In the past, probation and parole officer attitudes have typically been investigated as they relate to role orientation (Glaser, 1969; Klockars, 1972; Ohlin, Piven, and Papenfort 1956; O'Leary and Duffee, 1971; and Rowan, 1956), role conflict (Clear and Lates...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Federal Probation 2011-09, Vol.75 (2), p.7 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 7 |
| container_title | Federal Probation |
| container_volume | 75 |
| creator | Whetzel, Jay Paparozzi, Mario Alexander, Melissa Lowenkamp, Christopher T |
| description | Previous Research Officer Attitudes In the past, probation and parole officer attitudes have typically been investigated as they relate to role orientation (Glaser, 1969; Klockars, 1972; Ohlin, Piven, and Papenfort 1956; O'Leary and Duffee, 1971; and Rowan, 1956), role conflict (Clear and Latessa, 1993; Erwin and Bennett, 1987; Hardyman, 1988; and McCleary, 1978), goal orientation (Ross and Johnson, 1997), job stress (Whitehead and Lindquist, 1989), sources of role orientation (Clear and Latessa, 1993; Sluder and Reddington, 1993), and attitudes towards use and carrying of weapons (Sluder, Shearer, and Potts, 1991).\n Additionally, deputy chiefs and chiefs score a bit higher on the survey than do the other respondents, indicating more of a social work orientation. [...] these results are consistent with recent survey data from offenders (see Offender Survey article, this issue of Federal Probation), in which offenders had very favorable impressions of their officers, with 94 percent describing their officers as "firm but fair." |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_902184870</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2502932521</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p96t-84f5cdb1ef536b31f896a90e8855d9119c560ef754b68fb4b91df880c6997ea33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjl1LwzAYhYMoOKf_4fVOwUKyNG3iXZ3bFAYTNvBy5OMNq25NTVNl_8CfbUXPzXNznsM5ISMmhMgop_yUjChleabYRJ6Ti657o0OELEfkexGCM0eEFEDDa4hNtuoTPNZ2F1I4HO9hqb9g1vgQLR6wSXewDrbW-9_u-x3oxg3eg97rxqKDqm1j0HYHNxWs-_iJRwge5ugwDspLDEanOjSw8r62GKFKqU69w-72kpx5ve_w6p9jspnPNtOnbLlaPE-rZdaqImUy98I6w9ALXhjOvFSFVhSlFMIpxpQVBUVfitwU0pvcKOa8lNQWSpWoOR-T67_Z4edHj13aRmxDTN1W0QmTuSwp_wHubF2N</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>902184870</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Goodbye to a Worn-Out Dichotomy: Law Enforcement, Social Work, and a Balanced Approach (A Survey of Federal Probation Officer Attitudes)</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Whetzel, Jay ; Paparozzi, Mario ; Alexander, Melissa ; Lowenkamp, Christopher T</creator><creatorcontrib>Whetzel, Jay ; Paparozzi, Mario ; Alexander, Melissa ; Lowenkamp, Christopher T</creatorcontrib><description>Previous Research Officer Attitudes In the past, probation and parole officer attitudes have typically been investigated as they relate to role orientation (Glaser, 1969; Klockars, 1972; Ohlin, Piven, and Papenfort 1956; O'Leary and Duffee, 1971; and Rowan, 1956), role conflict (Clear and Latessa, 1993; Erwin and Bennett, 1987; Hardyman, 1988; and McCleary, 1978), goal orientation (Ross and Johnson, 1997), job stress (Whitehead and Lindquist, 1989), sources of role orientation (Clear and Latessa, 1993; Sluder and Reddington, 1993), and attitudes towards use and carrying of weapons (Sluder, Shearer, and Potts, 1991).\n Additionally, deputy chiefs and chiefs score a bit higher on the survey than do the other respondents, indicating more of a social work orientation. [...] these results are consistent with recent survey data from offenders (see Offender Survey article, this issue of Federal Probation), in which offenders had very favorable impressions of their officers, with 94 percent describing their officers as "firm but fair."</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-9128</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1555-0303</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Administrative Office of the United States Courts</publisher><subject>Attitudes ; Behavior ; Polls & surveys ; Public safety ; R&D ; Research & development ; Social workers ; Studies ; Supervision</subject><ispartof>Federal Probation, 2011-09, Vol.75 (2), p.7</ispartof><rights>Copyright Administrative Office of the United States Courts Sep 2011</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>312,780,784,791</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Whetzel, Jay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paparozzi, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexander, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lowenkamp, Christopher T</creatorcontrib><title>Goodbye to a Worn-Out Dichotomy: Law Enforcement, Social Work, and a Balanced Approach (A Survey of Federal Probation Officer Attitudes)</title><title>Federal Probation</title><description>Previous Research Officer Attitudes In the past, probation and parole officer attitudes have typically been investigated as they relate to role orientation (Glaser, 1969; Klockars, 1972; Ohlin, Piven, and Papenfort 1956; O'Leary and Duffee, 1971; and Rowan, 1956), role conflict (Clear and Latessa, 1993; Erwin and Bennett, 1987; Hardyman, 1988; and McCleary, 1978), goal orientation (Ross and Johnson, 1997), job stress (Whitehead and Lindquist, 1989), sources of role orientation (Clear and Latessa, 1993; Sluder and Reddington, 1993), and attitudes towards use and carrying of weapons (Sluder, Shearer, and Potts, 1991).\n Additionally, deputy chiefs and chiefs score a bit higher on the survey than do the other respondents, indicating more of a social work orientation. [...] these results are consistent with recent survey data from offenders (see Offender Survey article, this issue of Federal Probation), in which offenders had very favorable impressions of their officers, with 94 percent describing their officers as "firm but fair."</description><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Public safety</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><subject>Social workers</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Supervision</subject><issn>0014-9128</issn><issn>1555-0303</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNotjl1LwzAYhYMoOKf_4fVOwUKyNG3iXZ3bFAYTNvBy5OMNq25NTVNl_8CfbUXPzXNznsM5ISMmhMgop_yUjChleabYRJ6Ti657o0OELEfkexGCM0eEFEDDa4hNtuoTPNZ2F1I4HO9hqb9g1vgQLR6wSXewDrbW-9_u-x3oxg3eg97rxqKDqm1j0HYHNxWs-_iJRwge5ugwDspLDEanOjSw8r62GKFKqU69w-72kpx5ve_w6p9jspnPNtOnbLlaPE-rZdaqImUy98I6w9ALXhjOvFSFVhSlFMIpxpQVBUVfitwU0pvcKOa8lNQWSpWoOR-T67_Z4edHj13aRmxDTN1W0QmTuSwp_wHubF2N</recordid><startdate>20110901</startdate><enddate>20110901</enddate><creator>Whetzel, Jay</creator><creator>Paparozzi, Mario</creator><creator>Alexander, Melissa</creator><creator>Lowenkamp, Christopher T</creator><general>Administrative Office of the United States Courts</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110901</creationdate><title>Goodbye to a Worn-Out Dichotomy: Law Enforcement, Social Work, and a Balanced Approach (A Survey of Federal Probation Officer Attitudes)</title><author>Whetzel, Jay ; Paparozzi, Mario ; Alexander, Melissa ; Lowenkamp, Christopher T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p96t-84f5cdb1ef536b31f896a90e8855d9119c560ef754b68fb4b91df880c6997ea33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Public safety</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><topic>Social workers</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Supervision</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Whetzel, Jay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paparozzi, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexander, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lowenkamp, Christopher T</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Federal Probation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Whetzel, Jay</au><au>Paparozzi, Mario</au><au>Alexander, Melissa</au><au>Lowenkamp, Christopher T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Goodbye to a Worn-Out Dichotomy: Law Enforcement, Social Work, and a Balanced Approach (A Survey of Federal Probation Officer Attitudes)</atitle><jtitle>Federal Probation</jtitle><date>2011-09-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>7</spage><pages>7-</pages><issn>0014-9128</issn><eissn>1555-0303</eissn><abstract>Previous Research Officer Attitudes In the past, probation and parole officer attitudes have typically been investigated as they relate to role orientation (Glaser, 1969; Klockars, 1972; Ohlin, Piven, and Papenfort 1956; O'Leary and Duffee, 1971; and Rowan, 1956), role conflict (Clear and Latessa, 1993; Erwin and Bennett, 1987; Hardyman, 1988; and McCleary, 1978), goal orientation (Ross and Johnson, 1997), job stress (Whitehead and Lindquist, 1989), sources of role orientation (Clear and Latessa, 1993; Sluder and Reddington, 1993), and attitudes towards use and carrying of weapons (Sluder, Shearer, and Potts, 1991).\n Additionally, deputy chiefs and chiefs score a bit higher on the survey than do the other respondents, indicating more of a social work orientation. [...] these results are consistent with recent survey data from offenders (see Offender Survey article, this issue of Federal Probation), in which offenders had very favorable impressions of their officers, with 94 percent describing their officers as "firm but fair."</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Administrative Office of the United States Courts</pub></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0014-9128 |
| ispartof | Federal Probation, 2011-09, Vol.75 (2), p.7 |
| issn | 0014-9128 1555-0303 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_reports_902184870 |
| source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
| subjects | Attitudes Behavior Polls & surveys Public safety R&D Research & development Social workers Studies Supervision |
| title | Goodbye to a Worn-Out Dichotomy: Law Enforcement, Social Work, and a Balanced Approach (A Survey of Federal Probation Officer Attitudes) |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T07%3A10%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Goodbye%20to%20a%20Worn-Out%20Dichotomy:%20Law%20Enforcement,%20Social%20Work,%20and%20a%20Balanced%20Approach%20(A%20Survey%20of%20Federal%20Probation%20Officer%20Attitudes)&rft.jtitle=Federal%20Probation&rft.au=Whetzel,%20Jay&rft.date=2011-09-01&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=7&rft.pages=7-&rft.issn=0014-9128&rft.eissn=1555-0303&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2502932521%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=902184870&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |