A Price above Rubrics

Britain's universities are going through another period of reform, although in reality it might be better to describe current conditions as the latest stage of a permanent revolution that began some forty years ago. This time, however, there is a very real possibility that the new cost-cutting...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Academe 2011-09, Vol.97 (5), p.24-29
1. Verfasser: PEARS, IAIN
Format: Magazinearticle
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 29
container_issue 5
container_start_page 24
container_title Academe
container_volume 97
creator PEARS, IAIN
description Britain's universities are going through another period of reform, although in reality it might be better to describe current conditions as the latest stage of a permanent revolution that began some forty years ago. This time, however, there is a very real possibility that the new cost-cutting coalition government will inflict lasting and serious damage on one of the few international success stories in a country that no longer has much to boast about. The essence of the reforms is that the state will no longer pay for anything it deems inessential, and the old system of state grants--with tuition fees paid out of tax revenue--will finally be abolished. Students themselves will have to pay: the government will lend the money in the form of thirty-year loans, and the students will pay the university and then pay the money back to the government when they get jobs. Only courses that contribute to economic growth in an easily countable way will henceforth be subsidized by tax revenue. Equally, researchers in all areas will increasingly have to demonstrate "impact"--economic or social usefulness--in advance of getting any funding. The idea behind tuition fees is to introduce a market into higher education: the cost of courses should reflect demand, demand should be determined by the usefulness of a degree in securing future income, and courses should expand, contract, or disappear entirely as a result. Unfortunately, political considerations intervened within days of the proposals being made and destroyed whatever merit they may originally have possessed. Because of the peculiarities of Britain's experiment with coalition government--in which a center-right Conservative party is ruling in alliance with a much smaller center-left Liberal Democrat party--the proposals were modified to try to please both a conservative penchant for market forces and liberal requirements for social equity. The result is a program of total incoherence in which education is being sacrificed in the cause of political triangulation. Rather than set universities free, therefore, the new regime is one in which government will determine demand, supply, and what is taught and to whom. It will amount to the most centrally controlled education system in the Western world--effectively nationalization. And while the government is canceling its commitment to fund teaching, it has decided to maintain many of its direct grants to support research. Again, this decision provides a rationale for in
format Magazinearticle
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_894321621</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ943992</ericid><jstor_id>23024669</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23024669</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e172t-3ebeae9e8dca608afbd1fdef318b00a9f3f641fb941608f55fbe05d06eefcd7e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdj01LxDAQhoMoWFeP3hTqzUthJl9tjsuyrsqCInouSTuBLl1bk1bw3xtZ8eBchuF5eGfmiGUcNS8Ul-UxywANFNxIfcrOYtxBKlQqY5fL_Dl0DeXWDZ-Uv8wuTfGcnXjbR7r47Qv2drd-Xd0X26fNw2q5LQhLPhWCHFkyVLWN1VBZ71r0LXmBlQOwxguvJXpnJCbslfKOQLWgiXzTliQW7OaQO4bhY6Y41YHGIUyxrowUP_djcm7_OfsuNtT39p2GOdYICGmLkZDUq4NK6Yl6DN3ehq96_ZiyjOEJXx_wLk5D-ONcAJdaG_ENWFNXDg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><pqid>894321621</pqid></control><display><type>magazinearticle</type><title>A Price above Rubrics</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>PEARS, IAIN</creator><creatorcontrib>PEARS, IAIN</creatorcontrib><description>Britain's universities are going through another period of reform, although in reality it might be better to describe current conditions as the latest stage of a permanent revolution that began some forty years ago. This time, however, there is a very real possibility that the new cost-cutting coalition government will inflict lasting and serious damage on one of the few international success stories in a country that no longer has much to boast about. The essence of the reforms is that the state will no longer pay for anything it deems inessential, and the old system of state grants--with tuition fees paid out of tax revenue--will finally be abolished. Students themselves will have to pay: the government will lend the money in the form of thirty-year loans, and the students will pay the university and then pay the money back to the government when they get jobs. Only courses that contribute to economic growth in an easily countable way will henceforth be subsidized by tax revenue. Equally, researchers in all areas will increasingly have to demonstrate "impact"--economic or social usefulness--in advance of getting any funding. The idea behind tuition fees is to introduce a market into higher education: the cost of courses should reflect demand, demand should be determined by the usefulness of a degree in securing future income, and courses should expand, contract, or disappear entirely as a result. Unfortunately, political considerations intervened within days of the proposals being made and destroyed whatever merit they may originally have possessed. Because of the peculiarities of Britain's experiment with coalition government--in which a center-right Conservative party is ruling in alliance with a much smaller center-left Liberal Democrat party--the proposals were modified to try to please both a conservative penchant for market forces and liberal requirements for social equity. The result is a program of total incoherence in which education is being sacrificed in the cause of political triangulation. Rather than set universities free, therefore, the new regime is one in which government will determine demand, supply, and what is taught and to whom. It will amount to the most centrally controlled education system in the Western world--effectively nationalization. And while the government is canceling its commitment to fund teaching, it has decided to maintain many of its direct grants to support research. Again, this decision provides a rationale for increased interference: the government will make sure that the money is spent efficiently and that research meets national "strategic goals."</description><identifier>ISSN: 0190-2946</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2162-5247</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ACDWAT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: American Association of University Professors</publisher><subject>Admission Criteria ; Applied Linguistics ; Coalition governments ; College students ; Colleges ; Colleges and universities ; Councils ; Dropout Rate ; Economic development ; Economic Factors ; Economic Progress ; Educational Change ; Educational Finance ; Educational policy ; Educational research ; Fees ; Fees &amp; charges ; Foreign Countries ; Funding ; GNP ; Government ; Government (Administrative Body) ; Government Role ; Grants ; Great Britain ; Gross National Product ; Higher education ; Humanities ; Income ; Loans ; Machine Tools ; Managerialism ; Money ; Paying for College ; Physics ; Politics of Education ; Prices ; Research grants ; Research universities ; Revenue ; State Aid ; Student Loan Programs ; Success ; Taxes ; Teaching ; Tuition ; United Kingdom ; Universities</subject><ispartof>Academe, 2011-09, Vol.97 (5), p.24-29</ispartof><rights>2011 American Association of University Professors</rights><rights>Copyright American Association of University Professors Sep/Oct 2011</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23024669$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23024669$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>312,780,784,791,803,27864,58016,58249</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ943992$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>PEARS, IAIN</creatorcontrib><title>A Price above Rubrics</title><title>Academe</title><description>Britain's universities are going through another period of reform, although in reality it might be better to describe current conditions as the latest stage of a permanent revolution that began some forty years ago. This time, however, there is a very real possibility that the new cost-cutting coalition government will inflict lasting and serious damage on one of the few international success stories in a country that no longer has much to boast about. The essence of the reforms is that the state will no longer pay for anything it deems inessential, and the old system of state grants--with tuition fees paid out of tax revenue--will finally be abolished. Students themselves will have to pay: the government will lend the money in the form of thirty-year loans, and the students will pay the university and then pay the money back to the government when they get jobs. Only courses that contribute to economic growth in an easily countable way will henceforth be subsidized by tax revenue. Equally, researchers in all areas will increasingly have to demonstrate "impact"--economic or social usefulness--in advance of getting any funding. The idea behind tuition fees is to introduce a market into higher education: the cost of courses should reflect demand, demand should be determined by the usefulness of a degree in securing future income, and courses should expand, contract, or disappear entirely as a result. Unfortunately, political considerations intervened within days of the proposals being made and destroyed whatever merit they may originally have possessed. Because of the peculiarities of Britain's experiment with coalition government--in which a center-right Conservative party is ruling in alliance with a much smaller center-left Liberal Democrat party--the proposals were modified to try to please both a conservative penchant for market forces and liberal requirements for social equity. The result is a program of total incoherence in which education is being sacrificed in the cause of political triangulation. Rather than set universities free, therefore, the new regime is one in which government will determine demand, supply, and what is taught and to whom. It will amount to the most centrally controlled education system in the Western world--effectively nationalization. And while the government is canceling its commitment to fund teaching, it has decided to maintain many of its direct grants to support research. Again, this decision provides a rationale for increased interference: the government will make sure that the money is spent efficiently and that research meets national "strategic goals."</description><subject>Admission Criteria</subject><subject>Applied Linguistics</subject><subject>Coalition governments</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Colleges</subject><subject>Colleges and universities</subject><subject>Councils</subject><subject>Dropout Rate</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Economic Factors</subject><subject>Economic Progress</subject><subject>Educational Change</subject><subject>Educational Finance</subject><subject>Educational policy</subject><subject>Educational research</subject><subject>Fees</subject><subject>Fees &amp; charges</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Funding</subject><subject>GNP</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>Government (Administrative Body)</subject><subject>Government Role</subject><subject>Grants</subject><subject>Great Britain</subject><subject>Gross National Product</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Humanities</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Loans</subject><subject>Machine Tools</subject><subject>Managerialism</subject><subject>Money</subject><subject>Paying for College</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Politics of Education</subject><subject>Prices</subject><subject>Research grants</subject><subject>Research universities</subject><subject>Revenue</subject><subject>State Aid</subject><subject>Student Loan Programs</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>Taxes</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Tuition</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>Universities</subject><issn>0190-2946</issn><issn>2162-5247</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdj01LxDAQhoMoWFeP3hTqzUthJl9tjsuyrsqCInouSTuBLl1bk1bw3xtZ8eBchuF5eGfmiGUcNS8Ul-UxywANFNxIfcrOYtxBKlQqY5fL_Dl0DeXWDZ-Uv8wuTfGcnXjbR7r47Qv2drd-Xd0X26fNw2q5LQhLPhWCHFkyVLWN1VBZ71r0LXmBlQOwxguvJXpnJCbslfKOQLWgiXzTliQW7OaQO4bhY6Y41YHGIUyxrowUP_djcm7_OfsuNtT39p2GOdYICGmLkZDUq4NK6Yl6DN3ehq96_ZiyjOEJXx_wLk5D-ONcAJdaG_ENWFNXDg</recordid><startdate>201109</startdate><enddate>201109</enddate><creator>PEARS, IAIN</creator><general>American Association of University Professors</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201109</creationdate><title>A Price above Rubrics</title><author>PEARS, IAIN</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e172t-3ebeae9e8dca608afbd1fdef318b00a9f3f641fb941608f55fbe05d06eefcd7e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><prefilter>magazinearticle</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Admission Criteria</topic><topic>Applied Linguistics</topic><topic>Coalition governments</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Colleges</topic><topic>Colleges and universities</topic><topic>Councils</topic><topic>Dropout Rate</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Economic Factors</topic><topic>Economic Progress</topic><topic>Educational Change</topic><topic>Educational Finance</topic><topic>Educational policy</topic><topic>Educational research</topic><topic>Fees</topic><topic>Fees &amp; charges</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Funding</topic><topic>GNP</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>Government (Administrative Body)</topic><topic>Government Role</topic><topic>Grants</topic><topic>Great Britain</topic><topic>Gross National Product</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Humanities</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Loans</topic><topic>Machine Tools</topic><topic>Managerialism</topic><topic>Money</topic><topic>Paying for College</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Politics of Education</topic><topic>Prices</topic><topic>Research grants</topic><topic>Research universities</topic><topic>Revenue</topic><topic>State Aid</topic><topic>Student Loan Programs</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>Taxes</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Tuition</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>Universities</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>PEARS, IAIN</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Art, Design &amp; Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Arts &amp; Humanities Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Academe</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>PEARS, IAIN</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ943992</ericid><atitle>A Price above Rubrics</atitle><jtitle>Academe</jtitle><date>2011-09</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>97</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>24</spage><epage>29</epage><pages>24-29</pages><issn>0190-2946</issn><eissn>2162-5247</eissn><coden>ACDWAT</coden><abstract>Britain's universities are going through another period of reform, although in reality it might be better to describe current conditions as the latest stage of a permanent revolution that began some forty years ago. This time, however, there is a very real possibility that the new cost-cutting coalition government will inflict lasting and serious damage on one of the few international success stories in a country that no longer has much to boast about. The essence of the reforms is that the state will no longer pay for anything it deems inessential, and the old system of state grants--with tuition fees paid out of tax revenue--will finally be abolished. Students themselves will have to pay: the government will lend the money in the form of thirty-year loans, and the students will pay the university and then pay the money back to the government when they get jobs. Only courses that contribute to economic growth in an easily countable way will henceforth be subsidized by tax revenue. Equally, researchers in all areas will increasingly have to demonstrate "impact"--economic or social usefulness--in advance of getting any funding. The idea behind tuition fees is to introduce a market into higher education: the cost of courses should reflect demand, demand should be determined by the usefulness of a degree in securing future income, and courses should expand, contract, or disappear entirely as a result. Unfortunately, political considerations intervened within days of the proposals being made and destroyed whatever merit they may originally have possessed. Because of the peculiarities of Britain's experiment with coalition government--in which a center-right Conservative party is ruling in alliance with a much smaller center-left Liberal Democrat party--the proposals were modified to try to please both a conservative penchant for market forces and liberal requirements for social equity. The result is a program of total incoherence in which education is being sacrificed in the cause of political triangulation. Rather than set universities free, therefore, the new regime is one in which government will determine demand, supply, and what is taught and to whom. It will amount to the most centrally controlled education system in the Western world--effectively nationalization. And while the government is canceling its commitment to fund teaching, it has decided to maintain many of its direct grants to support research. Again, this decision provides a rationale for increased interference: the government will make sure that the money is spent efficiently and that research meets national "strategic goals."</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>American Association of University Professors</pub><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0190-2946
ispartof Academe, 2011-09, Vol.97 (5), p.24-29
issn 0190-2946
2162-5247
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_reports_894321621
source PAIS Index; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; EBSCOhost Education Source
subjects Admission Criteria
Applied Linguistics
Coalition governments
College students
Colleges
Colleges and universities
Councils
Dropout Rate
Economic development
Economic Factors
Economic Progress
Educational Change
Educational Finance
Educational policy
Educational research
Fees
Fees & charges
Foreign Countries
Funding
GNP
Government
Government (Administrative Body)
Government Role
Grants
Great Britain
Gross National Product
Higher education
Humanities
Income
Loans
Machine Tools
Managerialism
Money
Paying for College
Physics
Politics of Education
Prices
Research grants
Research universities
Revenue
State Aid
Student Loan Programs
Success
Taxes
Teaching
Tuition
United Kingdom
Universities
title A Price above Rubrics
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T15%3A56%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Price%20above%20Rubrics&rft.jtitle=Academe&rft.au=PEARS,%20IAIN&rft.date=2011-09&rft.volume=97&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=24&rft.epage=29&rft.pages=24-29&rft.issn=0190-2946&rft.eissn=2162-5247&rft.coden=ACDWAT&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E23024669%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=894321621&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ943992&rft_jstor_id=23024669&rfr_iscdi=true