Washington Expands Statute Covering Noncompetition Covenants
Washington State Governor Jay Inslee has signed into law a bill amending (and expanding) an existing Washington statute governing the enforceability of noncompetition covenants. At a high level, the amendment: * Expands the statute's coverage by: ° Including within the definition of "nonco...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Employee Relations Law Journal 2024-10, Vol.50 (2), p.42-46 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 46 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 42 |
container_title | Employee Relations Law Journal |
container_volume | 50 |
creator | Barry, John P Chan, Celine J Bonfanti, Brett |
description | Washington State Governor Jay Inslee has signed into law a bill amending (and expanding) an existing Washington statute governing the enforceability of noncompetition covenants. At a high level, the amendment: * Expands the statute's coverage by: ° Including within the definition of "noncompetition covenant" covenants restricting an employee's ability to accept or transact business with a customer. ° Limiting the statute's exemption of customer nonsolicitation covenants only to those nonsolicitation covenants restricting the solicitation of "current" customers. ° Limiting the statute's exemption for noncompetition covenants entered into upon the sale of a business only to those covenants entered into when the restricted individual purchases, sells, acquires, or disposes of an interest representing 1% or more of the business. * Allows individuals "aggrieved" by a noncompetition covenant to which they were not a party (such as, potentially, a restricted employee's new employer) to assert a private right of action under the statute. * Provides employees who signed a noncompetition covenant prior to the statute's effective date a private right of action if an employer attempts to enforce the covenant or even "explicitly leverage[s]" the covenant. * Requires employers to provide new hires the terms of a noncompetition covenant in writing prior to an employee's written or verbal acceptance of an offer of employment. * Strengthens choice of law and forum selection restrictions, closing loopholes that allowed for the application of non-Washington law or the laying of non-Washington venue in litigation between employers and Washington-based employees in certain circumstances. OVERVIEW OF WASHINGTON'S EXISTING NON-COMPETE STATUTE As relevant to the amendments, Revised Code of Washington Chapter 49.62 currently provides that a noncompetition covenant is void and unenforceable unless: * An employee's compensation from the employer reflected on box one of the employee's W-2 from the year prior to termination of employment or enforcement (whichever is earlier) of a noncompetition covenant (Earnings) exceeds the statutory threshold. The amended statute, however, broadens the reach of its coverage in three ways: * The statute now explicitly covers "an agreement that directly or indirectly prohibits the acceptance or transaction of business with a customer." [...]while a covenant not to solicit customers is still exempted from coverage, a covenant that prohibits an individ |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_3090979623</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3090979623</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_reports_30909796233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0MLC00LWwsLTgYOAqLs4yMDA0NjE342SwCU8szsjMSy_Jz1NwrShIzEspVgguSSwpLUlVcM4vSy0Cyin45ecl5-cWpJZklmQC1YHE8xLzSop5GFjTEnOKU3mhNDeDkptriLOHbkFRfmFpanFJfFFqQX5RSXG8sYGlgaW5pZmRsTFRigDGfTcj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3090979623</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Washington Expands Statute Covering Noncompetition Covenants</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Barry, John P ; Chan, Celine J ; Bonfanti, Brett</creator><creatorcontrib>Barry, John P ; Chan, Celine J ; Bonfanti, Brett</creatorcontrib><description>Washington State Governor Jay Inslee has signed into law a bill amending (and expanding) an existing Washington statute governing the enforceability of noncompetition covenants. At a high level, the amendment: * Expands the statute's coverage by: ° Including within the definition of "noncompetition covenant" covenants restricting an employee's ability to accept or transact business with a customer. ° Limiting the statute's exemption of customer nonsolicitation covenants only to those nonsolicitation covenants restricting the solicitation of "current" customers. ° Limiting the statute's exemption for noncompetition covenants entered into upon the sale of a business only to those covenants entered into when the restricted individual purchases, sells, acquires, or disposes of an interest representing 1% or more of the business. * Allows individuals "aggrieved" by a noncompetition covenant to which they were not a party (such as, potentially, a restricted employee's new employer) to assert a private right of action under the statute. * Provides employees who signed a noncompetition covenant prior to the statute's effective date a private right of action if an employer attempts to enforce the covenant or even "explicitly leverage[s]" the covenant. * Requires employers to provide new hires the terms of a noncompetition covenant in writing prior to an employee's written or verbal acceptance of an offer of employment. * Strengthens choice of law and forum selection restrictions, closing loopholes that allowed for the application of non-Washington law or the laying of non-Washington venue in litigation between employers and Washington-based employees in certain circumstances. OVERVIEW OF WASHINGTON'S EXISTING NON-COMPETE STATUTE As relevant to the amendments, Revised Code of Washington Chapter 49.62 currently provides that a noncompetition covenant is void and unenforceable unless: * An employee's compensation from the employer reflected on box one of the employee's W-2 from the year prior to termination of employment or enforcement (whichever is earlier) of a noncompetition covenant (Earnings) exceeds the statutory threshold. The amended statute, however, broadens the reach of its coverage in three ways: * The statute now explicitly covers "an agreement that directly or indirectly prohibits the acceptance or transaction of business with a customer." [...]while a covenant not to solicit customers is still exempted from coverage, a covenant that prohibits an individual from servicing a customer – even if the customer was not "solicited" by the employee – would fall within the statute's reach.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0098-8898</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Aspen Publishers, Inc</publisher><subject>Amendments ; Customers ; Disclosure ; Earnings ; Employers ; Employment ; Independent contractors ; New employees ; Noncompetition agreements ; Restrictive covenants ; Sale of a business ; State laws ; Wages & salaries ; Writing</subject><ispartof>Employee Relations Law Journal, 2024-10, Vol.50 (2), p.42-46</ispartof><rights>Copyright Aspen Publishers, Inc. Autumn 2024</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>312,776,780,787</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Barry, John P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Celine J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonfanti, Brett</creatorcontrib><title>Washington Expands Statute Covering Noncompetition Covenants</title><title>Employee Relations Law Journal</title><description>Washington State Governor Jay Inslee has signed into law a bill amending (and expanding) an existing Washington statute governing the enforceability of noncompetition covenants. At a high level, the amendment: * Expands the statute's coverage by: ° Including within the definition of "noncompetition covenant" covenants restricting an employee's ability to accept or transact business with a customer. ° Limiting the statute's exemption of customer nonsolicitation covenants only to those nonsolicitation covenants restricting the solicitation of "current" customers. ° Limiting the statute's exemption for noncompetition covenants entered into upon the sale of a business only to those covenants entered into when the restricted individual purchases, sells, acquires, or disposes of an interest representing 1% or more of the business. * Allows individuals "aggrieved" by a noncompetition covenant to which they were not a party (such as, potentially, a restricted employee's new employer) to assert a private right of action under the statute. * Provides employees who signed a noncompetition covenant prior to the statute's effective date a private right of action if an employer attempts to enforce the covenant or even "explicitly leverage[s]" the covenant. * Requires employers to provide new hires the terms of a noncompetition covenant in writing prior to an employee's written or verbal acceptance of an offer of employment. * Strengthens choice of law and forum selection restrictions, closing loopholes that allowed for the application of non-Washington law or the laying of non-Washington venue in litigation between employers and Washington-based employees in certain circumstances. OVERVIEW OF WASHINGTON'S EXISTING NON-COMPETE STATUTE As relevant to the amendments, Revised Code of Washington Chapter 49.62 currently provides that a noncompetition covenant is void and unenforceable unless: * An employee's compensation from the employer reflected on box one of the employee's W-2 from the year prior to termination of employment or enforcement (whichever is earlier) of a noncompetition covenant (Earnings) exceeds the statutory threshold. The amended statute, however, broadens the reach of its coverage in three ways: * The statute now explicitly covers "an agreement that directly or indirectly prohibits the acceptance or transaction of business with a customer." [...]while a covenant not to solicit customers is still exempted from coverage, a covenant that prohibits an individual from servicing a customer – even if the customer was not "solicited" by the employee – would fall within the statute's reach.</description><subject>Amendments</subject><subject>Customers</subject><subject>Disclosure</subject><subject>Earnings</subject><subject>Employers</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Independent contractors</subject><subject>New employees</subject><subject>Noncompetition agreements</subject><subject>Restrictive covenants</subject><subject>Sale of a business</subject><subject>State laws</subject><subject>Wages & salaries</subject><subject>Writing</subject><issn>0098-8898</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYeA0MLC00LWwsLTgYOAqLs4yMDA0NjE342SwCU8szsjMSy_Jz1NwrShIzEspVgguSSwpLUlVcM4vSy0Cyin45ecl5-cWpJZklmQC1YHE8xLzSop5GFjTEnOKU3mhNDeDkptriLOHbkFRfmFpanFJfFFqQX5RSXG8sYGlgaW5pZmRsTFRigDGfTcj</recordid><startdate>20241001</startdate><enddate>20241001</enddate><creator>Barry, John P</creator><creator>Chan, Celine J</creator><creator>Bonfanti, Brett</creator><general>Aspen Publishers, Inc</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0F</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20241001</creationdate><title>Washington Expands Statute Covering Noncompetition Covenants</title><author>Barry, John P ; Chan, Celine J ; Bonfanti, Brett</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_reports_30909796233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Amendments</topic><topic>Customers</topic><topic>Disclosure</topic><topic>Earnings</topic><topic>Employers</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Independent contractors</topic><topic>New employees</topic><topic>Noncompetition agreements</topic><topic>Restrictive covenants</topic><topic>Sale of a business</topic><topic>State laws</topic><topic>Wages & salaries</topic><topic>Writing</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barry, John P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Celine J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonfanti, Brett</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM global</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Employee Relations Law Journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barry, John P</au><au>Chan, Celine J</au><au>Bonfanti, Brett</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Washington Expands Statute Covering Noncompetition Covenants</atitle><jtitle>Employee Relations Law Journal</jtitle><date>2024-10-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>42</spage><epage>46</epage><pages>42-46</pages><issn>0098-8898</issn><abstract>Washington State Governor Jay Inslee has signed into law a bill amending (and expanding) an existing Washington statute governing the enforceability of noncompetition covenants. At a high level, the amendment: * Expands the statute's coverage by: ° Including within the definition of "noncompetition covenant" covenants restricting an employee's ability to accept or transact business with a customer. ° Limiting the statute's exemption of customer nonsolicitation covenants only to those nonsolicitation covenants restricting the solicitation of "current" customers. ° Limiting the statute's exemption for noncompetition covenants entered into upon the sale of a business only to those covenants entered into when the restricted individual purchases, sells, acquires, or disposes of an interest representing 1% or more of the business. * Allows individuals "aggrieved" by a noncompetition covenant to which they were not a party (such as, potentially, a restricted employee's new employer) to assert a private right of action under the statute. * Provides employees who signed a noncompetition covenant prior to the statute's effective date a private right of action if an employer attempts to enforce the covenant or even "explicitly leverage[s]" the covenant. * Requires employers to provide new hires the terms of a noncompetition covenant in writing prior to an employee's written or verbal acceptance of an offer of employment. * Strengthens choice of law and forum selection restrictions, closing loopholes that allowed for the application of non-Washington law or the laying of non-Washington venue in litigation between employers and Washington-based employees in certain circumstances. OVERVIEW OF WASHINGTON'S EXISTING NON-COMPETE STATUTE As relevant to the amendments, Revised Code of Washington Chapter 49.62 currently provides that a noncompetition covenant is void and unenforceable unless: * An employee's compensation from the employer reflected on box one of the employee's W-2 from the year prior to termination of employment or enforcement (whichever is earlier) of a noncompetition covenant (Earnings) exceeds the statutory threshold. The amended statute, however, broadens the reach of its coverage in three ways: * The statute now explicitly covers "an agreement that directly or indirectly prohibits the acceptance or transaction of business with a customer." [...]while a covenant not to solicit customers is still exempted from coverage, a covenant that prohibits an individual from servicing a customer – even if the customer was not "solicited" by the employee – would fall within the statute's reach.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Aspen Publishers, Inc</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0098-8898 |
ispartof | Employee Relations Law Journal, 2024-10, Vol.50 (2), p.42-46 |
issn | 0098-8898 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_reports_3090979623 |
source | Business Source Complete |
subjects | Amendments Customers Disclosure Earnings Employers Employment Independent contractors New employees Noncompetition agreements Restrictive covenants Sale of a business State laws Wages & salaries Writing |
title | Washington Expands Statute Covering Noncompetition Covenants |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T19%3A45%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Washington%20Expands%20Statute%20Covering%20Noncompetition%20Covenants&rft.jtitle=Employee%20Relations%20Law%20Journal&rft.au=Barry,%20John%20P&rft.date=2024-10-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=42&rft.epage=46&rft.pages=42-46&rft.issn=0098-8898&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3090979623%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3090979623&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |