High Line
The High Line, a repurposed elevated railway in New York City, has become a symbol of neoliberalism and luxury development. The railway, once a commercial center for meat and produce shipping, was abandoned and slated for demolition in the 1990s. However, two local residents, Joshua David and Robert...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Architectural Review 2024-07, p.16-25 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 25 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 16 |
| container_title | The Architectural Review |
| container_volume | |
| creator | Lucas, Peter |
| description | The High Line, a repurposed elevated railway in New York City, has become a symbol of neoliberalism and luxury development. The railway, once a commercial center for meat and produce shipping, was abandoned and slated for demolition in the 1990s. However, two local residents, Joshua David and Robert Hammond, saw potential in the derelict rail line and founded the Friends of the High Line nonprofit organization. With the help of architects and designers, the High Line was transformed into a unique urban park, featuring gardens, art installations, and stunning views of the city. The park has attracted millions of visitors and stimulated billions of dollars in urban development. However, it has also faced criticism for contributing to gentrification and ecogentrification in the surrounding area. Despite its successes, the High Line raises questions about the role of public-private partnerships and the impact of neoliberalism on urban design. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_3088738790</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3088738790</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_reports_30887387903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0MDAw1rUwM4zgYOAqLs4Ccs2NDA04GTg9MtMzFHwy81J5GFjTEnOKU3mhNDeDkptriLOHbkFRfmFpanFJfFFqQX5RSXG8sYGFhbmxhbmlgTFRigDzFSLc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3088738790</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>High Line</title><source>Arts & Humanities Database</source><source>Arts Premium Collection</source><source>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</source><creator>Lucas, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>Lucas, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>The High Line, a repurposed elevated railway in New York City, has become a symbol of neoliberalism and luxury development. The railway, once a commercial center for meat and produce shipping, was abandoned and slated for demolition in the 1990s. However, two local residents, Joshua David and Robert Hammond, saw potential in the derelict rail line and founded the Friends of the High Line nonprofit organization. With the help of architects and designers, the High Line was transformed into a unique urban park, featuring gardens, art installations, and stunning views of the city. The park has attracted millions of visitors and stimulated billions of dollars in urban development. However, it has also faced criticism for contributing to gentrification and ecogentrification in the surrounding area. Despite its successes, the High Line raises questions about the role of public-private partnerships and the impact of neoliberalism on urban design.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-861X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Emap Limited</publisher><subject>Demolition ; Gentrification ; Neoliberalism ; Parks & recreation areas ; Public private partnerships ; Railroads ; Urban development ; Urban planning</subject><ispartof>The Architectural Review, 2024-07, p.16-25</ispartof><rights>Copyright Emap Limited Jul/Aug 2024</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3088738790?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>312,776,780,787,15306,16467,21467,33660,34754,36129,43749,44176,44356</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lucas, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>High Line</title><title>The Architectural Review</title><description>The High Line, a repurposed elevated railway in New York City, has become a symbol of neoliberalism and luxury development. The railway, once a commercial center for meat and produce shipping, was abandoned and slated for demolition in the 1990s. However, two local residents, Joshua David and Robert Hammond, saw potential in the derelict rail line and founded the Friends of the High Line nonprofit organization. With the help of architects and designers, the High Line was transformed into a unique urban park, featuring gardens, art installations, and stunning views of the city. The park has attracted millions of visitors and stimulated billions of dollars in urban development. However, it has also faced criticism for contributing to gentrification and ecogentrification in the surrounding area. Despite its successes, the High Line raises questions about the role of public-private partnerships and the impact of neoliberalism on urban design.</description><subject>Demolition</subject><subject>Gentrification</subject><subject>Neoliberalism</subject><subject>Parks & recreation areas</subject><subject>Public private partnerships</subject><subject>Railroads</subject><subject>Urban development</subject><subject>Urban planning</subject><issn>0003-861X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYeA0MDAw1rUwM4zgYOAqLs4Ccs2NDA04GTg9MtMzFHwy81J5GFjTEnOKU3mhNDeDkptriLOHbkFRfmFpanFJfFFqQX5RSXG8sYGFhbmxhbmlgTFRigDzFSLc</recordid><startdate>20240701</startdate><enddate>20240701</enddate><creator>Lucas, Peter</creator><general>Emap Limited</general><scope>0TT</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>F29</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>KB~</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240701</creationdate><title>High Line</title><author>Lucas, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_reports_30887387903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Demolition</topic><topic>Gentrification</topic><topic>Neoliberalism</topic><topic>Parks & recreation areas</topic><topic>Public private partnerships</topic><topic>Railroads</topic><topic>Urban development</topic><topic>Urban planning</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lucas, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>News PRO</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Design & Applied Arts Index (DAAI)</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Newsstand Professional</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The Architectural Review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lucas, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>High Line</atitle><jtitle>The Architectural Review</jtitle><date>2024-07-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><spage>16</spage><epage>25</epage><pages>16-25</pages><issn>0003-861X</issn><abstract>The High Line, a repurposed elevated railway in New York City, has become a symbol of neoliberalism and luxury development. The railway, once a commercial center for meat and produce shipping, was abandoned and slated for demolition in the 1990s. However, two local residents, Joshua David and Robert Hammond, saw potential in the derelict rail line and founded the Friends of the High Line nonprofit organization. With the help of architects and designers, the High Line was transformed into a unique urban park, featuring gardens, art installations, and stunning views of the city. The park has attracted millions of visitors and stimulated billions of dollars in urban development. However, it has also faced criticism for contributing to gentrification and ecogentrification in the surrounding area. Despite its successes, the High Line raises questions about the role of public-private partnerships and the impact of neoliberalism on urban design.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Emap Limited</pub></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0003-861X |
| ispartof | The Architectural Review, 2024-07, p.16-25 |
| issn | 0003-861X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_reports_3088738790 |
| source | Arts & Humanities Database; Arts Premium Collection; Art, Design & Architecture Collection |
| subjects | Demolition Gentrification Neoliberalism Parks & recreation areas Public private partnerships Railroads Urban development Urban planning |
| title | High Line |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T12%3A29%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=High%20Line&rft.jtitle=The%20Architectural%20Review&rft.au=Lucas,%20Peter&rft.date=2024-07-01&rft.spage=16&rft.epage=25&rft.pages=16-25&rft.issn=0003-861X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3088738790%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3088738790&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |