Successful Motions Practice
[...]be consistent throughout your motion. [...]trial counsel routinely request the court to order the criminal investigation command (CID) to turn over documents to the defense counsel, but the judge generally does not have the authority to order a third party to do anything-the judge will instead...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Army Lawyer 2023-01 (1), p.62-74 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 74 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 62 |
container_title | The Army Lawyer |
container_volume | |
creator | Adams, Alyssa S Cook, J Harper Pritchard, Charles L "Jack" Shuck, Robert L Smith, Tyesha L Murdough, Robert E Pond, Tiffany D |
description | [...]be consistent throughout your motion. [...]trial counsel routinely request the court to order the criminal investigation command (CID) to turn over documents to the defense counsel, but the judge generally does not have the authority to order a third party to do anything-the judge will instead order the trial counsel to make CID turn over the documents. [...]it will provide you (and the judge) structure for the rest of your motion (and the judge's ruling). [...]consider a motion to suppress an accused's statement to civilian law enforcement that involves issues of voluntariness: whether civilian law enforcement should have informed the suspect of the rights in Article 31(b), Uniform Code of Military Justice9 (nexus between civilian and military law enforcement investigations?) and Miranda rights (custodial interrogation?); whether later searches or statements were fruit of the poisonous tree; and whether suppression is an appropriate remedy. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_2934208778</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2934208778</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_reports_29342087783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0NDU10bU0MDRkYeA0MDYz0TU0sjDnYOAqLs4yMDAwNzUy52SQDi5NTk4tLk4rzVHwzS_JzM8rVggoSkwuyUxO5WFgTUvMKU7lhdLcDEpuriHOHroFRfmFpanFJfFFqQX5RSXF8UaWxiZGBhbm5hbGRCkCAG2MK_Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2934208778</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Successful Motions Practice</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>U.S. Government Documents</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Adams, Alyssa S ; Cook, J Harper ; Pritchard, Charles L "Jack" ; Shuck, Robert L ; Smith, Tyesha L ; Murdough, Robert E ; Pond, Tiffany D</creator><creatorcontrib>Adams, Alyssa S ; Cook, J Harper ; Pritchard, Charles L "Jack" ; Shuck, Robert L ; Smith, Tyesha L ; Murdough, Robert E ; Pond, Tiffany D</creatorcontrib><description>[...]be consistent throughout your motion. [...]trial counsel routinely request the court to order the criminal investigation command (CID) to turn over documents to the defense counsel, but the judge generally does not have the authority to order a third party to do anything-the judge will instead order the trial counsel to make CID turn over the documents. [...]it will provide you (and the judge) structure for the rest of your motion (and the judge's ruling). [...]consider a motion to suppress an accused's statement to civilian law enforcement that involves issues of voluntariness: whether civilian law enforcement should have informed the suspect of the rights in Article 31(b), Uniform Code of Military Justice9 (nexus between civilian and military law enforcement investigations?) and Miranda rights (custodial interrogation?); whether later searches or statements were fruit of the poisonous tree; and whether suppression is an appropriate remedy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0364-1287</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1554-9011</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Charlottesville: Superintendent of Documents</publisher><subject>Court hearings & proceedings ; Courts martial ; Documents ; Evidence ; Interrogation ; Judges & magistrates ; Law enforcement ; Success ; Trials</subject><ispartof>The Army Lawyer, 2023-01 (1), p.62-74</ispartof><rights>Copyright Superintendent of Documents 2023</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>312,780,784,791</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Adams, Alyssa S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook, J Harper</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pritchard, Charles L "Jack"</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shuck, Robert L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Tyesha L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murdough, Robert E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pond, Tiffany D</creatorcontrib><title>Successful Motions Practice</title><title>The Army Lawyer</title><description>[...]be consistent throughout your motion. [...]trial counsel routinely request the court to order the criminal investigation command (CID) to turn over documents to the defense counsel, but the judge generally does not have the authority to order a third party to do anything-the judge will instead order the trial counsel to make CID turn over the documents. [...]it will provide you (and the judge) structure for the rest of your motion (and the judge's ruling). [...]consider a motion to suppress an accused's statement to civilian law enforcement that involves issues of voluntariness: whether civilian law enforcement should have informed the suspect of the rights in Article 31(b), Uniform Code of Military Justice9 (nexus between civilian and military law enforcement investigations?) and Miranda rights (custodial interrogation?); whether later searches or statements were fruit of the poisonous tree; and whether suppression is an appropriate remedy.</description><subject>Court hearings & proceedings</subject><subject>Courts martial</subject><subject>Documents</subject><subject>Evidence</subject><subject>Interrogation</subject><subject>Judges & magistrates</subject><subject>Law enforcement</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>Trials</subject><issn>0364-1287</issn><issn>1554-9011</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYuA0NDU10bU0MDRkYeA0MDYz0TU0sjDnYOAqLs4yMDAwNzUy52SQDi5NTk4tLk4rzVHwzS_JzM8rVggoSkwuyUxO5WFgTUvMKU7lhdLcDEpuriHOHroFRfmFpanFJfFFqQX5RSXF8UaWxiZGBhbm5hbGRCkCAG2MK_Y</recordid><startdate>20230101</startdate><enddate>20230101</enddate><creator>Adams, Alyssa S</creator><creator>Cook, J Harper</creator><creator>Pritchard, Charles L "Jack"</creator><creator>Shuck, Robert L</creator><creator>Smith, Tyesha L</creator><creator>Murdough, Robert E</creator><creator>Pond, Tiffany D</creator><general>Superintendent of Documents</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230101</creationdate><title>Successful Motions Practice</title><author>Adams, Alyssa S ; Cook, J Harper ; Pritchard, Charles L "Jack" ; Shuck, Robert L ; Smith, Tyesha L ; Murdough, Robert E ; Pond, Tiffany D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_reports_29342087783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Court hearings & proceedings</topic><topic>Courts martial</topic><topic>Documents</topic><topic>Evidence</topic><topic>Interrogation</topic><topic>Judges & magistrates</topic><topic>Law enforcement</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>Trials</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Adams, Alyssa S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook, J Harper</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pritchard, Charles L "Jack"</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shuck, Robert L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Tyesha L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murdough, Robert E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pond, Tiffany D</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The Army Lawyer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Adams, Alyssa S</au><au>Cook, J Harper</au><au>Pritchard, Charles L "Jack"</au><au>Shuck, Robert L</au><au>Smith, Tyesha L</au><au>Murdough, Robert E</au><au>Pond, Tiffany D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Successful Motions Practice</atitle><jtitle>The Army Lawyer</jtitle><date>2023-01-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><issue>1</issue><spage>62</spage><epage>74</epage><pages>62-74</pages><issn>0364-1287</issn><eissn>1554-9011</eissn><abstract>[...]be consistent throughout your motion. [...]trial counsel routinely request the court to order the criminal investigation command (CID) to turn over documents to the defense counsel, but the judge generally does not have the authority to order a third party to do anything-the judge will instead order the trial counsel to make CID turn over the documents. [...]it will provide you (and the judge) structure for the rest of your motion (and the judge's ruling). [...]consider a motion to suppress an accused's statement to civilian law enforcement that involves issues of voluntariness: whether civilian law enforcement should have informed the suspect of the rights in Article 31(b), Uniform Code of Military Justice9 (nexus between civilian and military law enforcement investigations?) and Miranda rights (custodial interrogation?); whether later searches or statements were fruit of the poisonous tree; and whether suppression is an appropriate remedy.</abstract><cop>Charlottesville</cop><pub>Superintendent of Documents</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0364-1287 |
ispartof | The Army Lawyer, 2023-01 (1), p.62-74 |
issn | 0364-1287 1554-9011 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_reports_2934208778 |
source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library; U.S. Government Documents; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Court hearings & proceedings Courts martial Documents Evidence Interrogation Judges & magistrates Law enforcement Success Trials |
title | Successful Motions Practice |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T19%3A50%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Successful%20Motions%20Practice&rft.jtitle=The%20Army%20Lawyer&rft.au=Adams,%20Alyssa%20S&rft.date=2023-01-01&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=62&rft.epage=74&rft.pages=62-74&rft.issn=0364-1287&rft.eissn=1554-9011&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2934208778%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2934208778&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |