Limited Time Period in Which to Assert Arbitration Claims Upheld by U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and Brett Bonfanti

Limited Time Period in Which to Assert Arbitration Claims Upheld by U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and Brett Bonfanti

The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) typically requires plaintiffs to file a charge with the EEOC within 300 days of the alleged discrimination, so individuals who signed the agreement had 300 days to submit demands for arbitration to IBM. [...]the "piggybacking rule" is a waiva...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Employee Benefit Plan Review 2023-11, Vol.77 (9), p.9-11
Hauptverfasser: Barry, John P, Chan, Celine J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Agreements
Employees
Government agencies
Waivers
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 11
container_issue 9
container_start_page 9
container_title Employee Benefit Plan Review
container_volume 77
creator Barry, John P
Chan, Celine J
description The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) typically requires plaintiffs to file a charge with the EEOC within 300 days of the alleged discrimination, so individuals who signed the agreement had 300 days to submit demands for arbitration to IBM. [...]the "piggybacking rule" is a waivable, non-substantive right under the ADEA. [...]IBM appears to have decided not to require the terminated employees to waive ADEA claims in exchange for certain severance benefits. For such waivers to be enforceable, employers must adhere to the requirements of the ADEA including the Older Workers Benefit Protection Act that amended the ADEA.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_2887643107</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2887643107</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_reports_28876431073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNi71Ow0AQBq8AKeHnHT7RJzpjZLt1LBAFBVISpYwu9lreyL479tYFNS-OCx6AaqaYuTFra7N8U1S2Wpm7lK7W2qLMirX5-eCJlToceCJ8knDowB6ngdsBGlCnRKKo5cIqTjl4NKPjKeEYBxo7XL5x3O63aMK8dKFHHSO5MaEPAh0Ie2qD79CwtDMr3OI7IVXsgu-dV34wt_0y0OMf783T2-uhed9ECV8zJT0LxSCazs9VVRYveWbL_F_RL5heTmA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2887643107</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Limited Time Period in Which to Assert Arbitration Claims Upheld by U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and Brett Bonfanti</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Barry, John P ; Chan, Celine J</creator><creatorcontrib>Barry, John P ; Chan, Celine J</creatorcontrib><description>The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) typically requires plaintiffs to file a charge with the EEOC within 300 days of the alleged discrimination, so individuals who signed the agreement had 300 days to submit demands for arbitration to IBM. [...]the "piggybacking rule" is a waivable, non-substantive right under the ADEA. [...]IBM appears to have decided not to require the terminated employees to waive ADEA claims in exchange for certain severance benefits. For such waivers to be enforceable, employers must adhere to the requirements of the ADEA including the Older Workers Benefit Protection Act that amended the ADEA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-6808</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Aspen Publishers, Inc</publisher><subject>Agreements ; Employees ; Government agencies ; Waivers</subject><ispartof>Employee Benefit Plan Review, 2023-11, Vol.77 (9), p.9-11</ispartof><rights>Copyright Aspen Publishers, Inc. Nov/Dec 2023</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>312,776,780,787</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Barry, John P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Celine J</creatorcontrib><title>Limited Time Period in Which to Assert Arbitration Claims Upheld by U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and Brett Bonfanti</title><title>Employee Benefit Plan Review</title><description>The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) typically requires plaintiffs to file a charge with the EEOC within 300 days of the alleged discrimination, so individuals who signed the agreement had 300 days to submit demands for arbitration to IBM. [...]the "piggybacking rule" is a waivable, non-substantive right under the ADEA. [...]IBM appears to have decided not to require the terminated employees to waive ADEA claims in exchange for certain severance benefits. For such waivers to be enforceable, employers must adhere to the requirements of the ADEA including the Older Workers Benefit Protection Act that amended the ADEA.</description><subject>Agreements</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Government agencies</subject><subject>Waivers</subject><issn>0013-6808</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNi71Ow0AQBq8AKeHnHT7RJzpjZLt1LBAFBVISpYwu9lreyL479tYFNS-OCx6AaqaYuTFra7N8U1S2Wpm7lK7W2qLMirX5-eCJlToceCJ8knDowB6ngdsBGlCnRKKo5cIqTjl4NKPjKeEYBxo7XL5x3O63aMK8dKFHHSO5MaEPAh0Ie2qD79CwtDMr3OI7IVXsgu-dV34wt_0y0OMf783T2-uhed9ECV8zJT0LxSCazs9VVRYveWbL_F_RL5heTmA</recordid><startdate>20231101</startdate><enddate>20231101</enddate><creator>Barry, John P</creator><creator>Chan, Celine J</creator><general>Aspen Publishers, Inc</general><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0F</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231101</creationdate><title>Limited Time Period in Which to Assert Arbitration Claims Upheld by U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and Brett Bonfanti</title><author>Barry, John P ; Chan, Celine J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_reports_28876431073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Agreements</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Government agencies</topic><topic>Waivers</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barry, John P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Celine J</creatorcontrib><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Employee Benefit Plan Review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barry, John P</au><au>Chan, Celine J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Limited Time Period in Which to Assert Arbitration Claims Upheld by U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and Brett Bonfanti</atitle><jtitle>Employee Benefit Plan Review</jtitle><date>2023-11-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>9</spage><epage>11</epage><pages>9-11</pages><issn>0013-6808</issn><abstract>The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) typically requires plaintiffs to file a charge with the EEOC within 300 days of the alleged discrimination, so individuals who signed the agreement had 300 days to submit demands for arbitration to IBM. [...]the "piggybacking rule" is a waivable, non-substantive right under the ADEA. [...]IBM appears to have decided not to require the terminated employees to waive ADEA claims in exchange for certain severance benefits. For such waivers to be enforceable, employers must adhere to the requirements of the ADEA including the Older Workers Benefit Protection Act that amended the ADEA.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Aspen Publishers, Inc</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0013-6808
ispartof Employee Benefit Plan Review, 2023-11, Vol.77 (9), p.9-11
issn 0013-6808
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_reports_2887643107
source Business Source Complete
subjects Agreements
Employees
Government agencies
Waivers
title Limited Time Period in Which to Assert Arbitration Claims Upheld by U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and Brett Bonfanti
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T19%3A06%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Limited%20Time%20Period%20in%20Which%20to%20Assert%20Arbitration%20Claims%20Upheld%20by%20U.S.%20Court%20of%20Appeals%20for%20the%20Second%20Circuit%20and%20Brett%20Bonfanti&rft.jtitle=Employee%20Benefit%20Plan%20Review&rft.au=Barry,%20John%20P&rft.date=2023-11-01&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=9&rft.epage=11&rft.pages=9-11&rft.issn=0013-6808&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2887643107%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2887643107&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true