A Rumination on Remuneration

[...]the statute applied only to a "kickback," "bribe," or "rebate of any fee or charge" that was in exchange for a prohibited referral.3 In 1977, Congress amended the AKS statute to cover (in the pertinent part) the offer or payment of "any remuneration (including...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Health Care Compliance 2023-07, Vol.25 (4), p.47-50
1. Verfasser: Smith, Callan J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 50
container_issue 4
container_start_page 47
container_title Journal of Health Care Compliance
container_volume 25
creator Smith, Callan J
description [...]the statute applied only to a "kickback," "bribe," or "rebate of any fee or charge" that was in exchange for a prohibited referral.3 In 1977, Congress amended the AKS statute to cover (in the pertinent part) the offer or payment of "any remuneration (including any kickback, bribe, or rebate) directly or indirectly, overtly or covertly, in cash or in kind to any person to induce such person" to refer FHCP patients or business to the payer.4 As noted above, the AKS does not define the term "remuneration," and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General (HHS-OIG), the lead enforcement agency with respect to the AKS, has never promulgated regulations defining the term "remuneration." Both physicians referred patients for surgery to the local hospital, which in-turn referred patients in need of ophthalmology services to the practice.10 The relationship between the two ophthalmologists turned sour when Dr. Martin discovered that (i) Dr. Hathaway was negotiating a merger with a larger practice, and (ii) the larger practice was not expected to keep Dr. Martin in its employ.11 Following her discovery, Dr. Martin turned to the local hospital (for whom her husband was the Director of Finance) and received a tentative offer of employment, subject to the hospital board's approval.12 At the time, the board was under the impression that because of the merger, Dr. Hathaway planned to move his surgeries elsewhere.13 Dr. Hathaway subsequently met with the hospital's CEO, however, and stated that he planned to continue business as usual; in fact, he stated, the merger might even result in an increase of surgery patients for the hospital.14 After some additional cajoling by Dr. Hathaway, the board met and voted not to hire Dr. Martin. The Court summarized the alleged kickback scheme as follows: the local hospital's "rejection of Dr. Martin's employment in return for Dr. Hathaway's commitment to continue sending local surgery referrals violated the [AKS]. Medicare and State Health Care Programs: Fraud and Abuse; OIG Anti-Kickback Provisions, 56 Fed.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_2848499440</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2848499440</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_reports_28484994403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0NDUy0LUwNjDmYOAqLs4yMDC0AIpwMsg4KgSV5mbmJZZk5ucpAFFQam5pXmoRmM_DwJqWmFOcyguluRmU3FxDnD10C4ryC0tTi0vii1IL8otKiuONLEwsTCwtTUwMjIlSBABplCpE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2848499440</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Rumination on Remuneration</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Smith, Callan J</creator><creatorcontrib>Smith, Callan J</creatorcontrib><description>[...]the statute applied only to a "kickback," "bribe," or "rebate of any fee or charge" that was in exchange for a prohibited referral.3 In 1977, Congress amended the AKS statute to cover (in the pertinent part) the offer or payment of "any remuneration (including any kickback, bribe, or rebate) directly or indirectly, overtly or covertly, in cash or in kind to any person to induce such person" to refer FHCP patients or business to the payer.4 As noted above, the AKS does not define the term "remuneration," and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General (HHS-OIG), the lead enforcement agency with respect to the AKS, has never promulgated regulations defining the term "remuneration." Both physicians referred patients for surgery to the local hospital, which in-turn referred patients in need of ophthalmology services to the practice.10 The relationship between the two ophthalmologists turned sour when Dr. Martin discovered that (i) Dr. Hathaway was negotiating a merger with a larger practice, and (ii) the larger practice was not expected to keep Dr. Martin in its employ.11 Following her discovery, Dr. Martin turned to the local hospital (for whom her husband was the Director of Finance) and received a tentative offer of employment, subject to the hospital board's approval.12 At the time, the board was under the impression that because of the merger, Dr. Hathaway planned to move his surgeries elsewhere.13 Dr. Hathaway subsequently met with the hospital's CEO, however, and stated that he planned to continue business as usual; in fact, he stated, the merger might even result in an increase of surgery patients for the hospital.14 After some additional cajoling by Dr. Hathaway, the board met and voted not to hire Dr. Martin. The Court summarized the alleged kickback scheme as follows: the local hospital's "rejection of Dr. Martin's employment in return for Dr. Hathaway's commitment to continue sending local surgery referrals violated the [AKS]. Medicare and State Health Care Programs: Fraud and Abuse; OIG Anti-Kickback Provisions, 56 Fed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1520-8303</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Frederick: Aspen Publishers, Inc</publisher><subject>Health care ; Hospitals ; Kickbacks ; Litigation ; Medical personnel ; Medical referrals ; Medicare ; Ophthalmology ; Patients ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Journal of Health Care Compliance, 2023-07, Vol.25 (4), p.47-50</ispartof><rights>Copyright Aspen Publishers, Inc. Jul/Aug 2023</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>312,780,784,791</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smith, Callan J</creatorcontrib><title>A Rumination on Remuneration</title><title>Journal of Health Care Compliance</title><description>[...]the statute applied only to a "kickback," "bribe," or "rebate of any fee or charge" that was in exchange for a prohibited referral.3 In 1977, Congress amended the AKS statute to cover (in the pertinent part) the offer or payment of "any remuneration (including any kickback, bribe, or rebate) directly or indirectly, overtly or covertly, in cash or in kind to any person to induce such person" to refer FHCP patients or business to the payer.4 As noted above, the AKS does not define the term "remuneration," and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General (HHS-OIG), the lead enforcement agency with respect to the AKS, has never promulgated regulations defining the term "remuneration." Both physicians referred patients for surgery to the local hospital, which in-turn referred patients in need of ophthalmology services to the practice.10 The relationship between the two ophthalmologists turned sour when Dr. Martin discovered that (i) Dr. Hathaway was negotiating a merger with a larger practice, and (ii) the larger practice was not expected to keep Dr. Martin in its employ.11 Following her discovery, Dr. Martin turned to the local hospital (for whom her husband was the Director of Finance) and received a tentative offer of employment, subject to the hospital board's approval.12 At the time, the board was under the impression that because of the merger, Dr. Hathaway planned to move his surgeries elsewhere.13 Dr. Hathaway subsequently met with the hospital's CEO, however, and stated that he planned to continue business as usual; in fact, he stated, the merger might even result in an increase of surgery patients for the hospital.14 After some additional cajoling by Dr. Hathaway, the board met and voted not to hire Dr. Martin. The Court summarized the alleged kickback scheme as follows: the local hospital's "rejection of Dr. Martin's employment in return for Dr. Hathaway's commitment to continue sending local surgery referrals violated the [AKS]. Medicare and State Health Care Programs: Fraud and Abuse; OIG Anti-Kickback Provisions, 56 Fed.</description><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Kickbacks</subject><subject>Litigation</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medical referrals</subject><subject>Medicare</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>1520-8303</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYeA0NDUy0LUwNjDmYOAqLs4yMDC0AIpwMsg4KgSV5mbmJZZk5ucpAFFQam5pXmoRmM_DwJqWmFOcyguluRmU3FxDnD10C4ryC0tTi0vii1IL8otKiuONLEwsTCwtTUwMjIlSBABplCpE</recordid><startdate>20230701</startdate><enddate>20230701</enddate><creator>Smith, Callan J</creator><general>Aspen Publishers, Inc</general><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230701</creationdate><title>A Rumination on Remuneration</title><author>Smith, Callan J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_reports_28484994403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Kickbacks</topic><topic>Litigation</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medical referrals</topic><topic>Medicare</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smith, Callan J</creatorcontrib><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of Health Care Compliance</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smith, Callan J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Rumination on Remuneration</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Health Care Compliance</jtitle><date>2023-07-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>47</spage><epage>50</epage><pages>47-50</pages><issn>1520-8303</issn><abstract>[...]the statute applied only to a "kickback," "bribe," or "rebate of any fee or charge" that was in exchange for a prohibited referral.3 In 1977, Congress amended the AKS statute to cover (in the pertinent part) the offer or payment of "any remuneration (including any kickback, bribe, or rebate) directly or indirectly, overtly or covertly, in cash or in kind to any person to induce such person" to refer FHCP patients or business to the payer.4 As noted above, the AKS does not define the term "remuneration," and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General (HHS-OIG), the lead enforcement agency with respect to the AKS, has never promulgated regulations defining the term "remuneration." Both physicians referred patients for surgery to the local hospital, which in-turn referred patients in need of ophthalmology services to the practice.10 The relationship between the two ophthalmologists turned sour when Dr. Martin discovered that (i) Dr. Hathaway was negotiating a merger with a larger practice, and (ii) the larger practice was not expected to keep Dr. Martin in its employ.11 Following her discovery, Dr. Martin turned to the local hospital (for whom her husband was the Director of Finance) and received a tentative offer of employment, subject to the hospital board's approval.12 At the time, the board was under the impression that because of the merger, Dr. Hathaway planned to move his surgeries elsewhere.13 Dr. Hathaway subsequently met with the hospital's CEO, however, and stated that he planned to continue business as usual; in fact, he stated, the merger might even result in an increase of surgery patients for the hospital.14 After some additional cajoling by Dr. Hathaway, the board met and voted not to hire Dr. Martin. The Court summarized the alleged kickback scheme as follows: the local hospital's "rejection of Dr. Martin's employment in return for Dr. Hathaway's commitment to continue sending local surgery referrals violated the [AKS]. Medicare and State Health Care Programs: Fraud and Abuse; OIG Anti-Kickback Provisions, 56 Fed.</abstract><cop>Frederick</cop><pub>Aspen Publishers, Inc</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1520-8303
ispartof Journal of Health Care Compliance, 2023-07, Vol.25 (4), p.47-50
issn 1520-8303
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_reports_2848499440
source Business Source Complete
subjects Health care
Hospitals
Kickbacks
Litigation
Medical personnel
Medical referrals
Medicare
Ophthalmology
Patients
Surgery
title A Rumination on Remuneration
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T15%3A59%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Rumination%20on%20Remuneration&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Health%20Care%20Compliance&rft.au=Smith,%20Callan%20J&rft.date=2023-07-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=47&rft.epage=50&rft.pages=47-50&rft.issn=1520-8303&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2848499440%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2848499440&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true