ANTECEDENTS OF MARKET ORIENTATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION: EMPIRICAL RESULTS FROM FOUR KEY INFORMANT PERSPECTIVES

This study examines the possible impact of selected antecedents (interdepartmental conflict, university administration emphasis, reward system) on individual components (customer orientation, competitor orientation, interfunctional coordination) of market orientation toward students within higher ed...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Global journal of management and marketing 2022-06, Vol.6 (1), p.43-65
Hauptverfasser: Hammond, Kevin L, Webster, Robert L, Hammond, Nathan L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 65
container_issue 1
container_start_page 43
container_title Global journal of management and marketing
container_volume 6
creator Hammond, Kevin L
Webster, Robert L
Hammond, Nathan L
description This study examines the possible impact of selected antecedents (interdepartmental conflict, university administration emphasis, reward system) on individual components (customer orientation, competitor orientation, interfunctional coordination) of market orientation toward students within higher education. Prior research is extended and the variable relationships are examined from four different department chair perspectives (accounting chairs, marketing chairs, males, females). Intelligence is gathered from survey research using existing scales reworded and validated for higher education. Research objectives and hypotheses are formed and hypotheses are tested using regression analyses to examine the variable relationships for each group of respondents. Regression results support all hypotheses, with one or more of the selected antecedents shown to significantly impact each of the three market orientation components within each of the four groups that were examined. Regression results were different for each group of key informants. Results have implications within higher education but also add to existing theory (Kohli and Jaworski 1990), and support concerns by Phillips (1981) and others regarding attentiveness in future research to key informant characteristics such as title and gender.
doi_str_mv 10.47177/GJMM.06.01.2022.043
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_2830976921</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A713879463</galeid><sourcerecordid>A713879463</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1953-23d5fca84dd93854825e8f4b42c1d26e4a27e424e35473839f17f59b60e09113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkU9vgjAchsmyJTPOb7BDszus_6B0N4JFmSKm4LKdGoRiWFRccYd9-6EuO5kefs2b93kvj2U9IuhQhhh7nrwmiQM9ByIHQ4wdSMmNNcAuozakrn_7_6fv99ao6z4hhBgiQjgZWLtgkYtQjMUiz0AagSSQM5GDVMZ9EuRxugDxAkzjyVRIIMar8Jy9AJEsYxmHwRxIka3mPRzJNAFRupJgJj56KEpl0o-DpZDZUoR5_CayB-uuLradHv3doZVHIg-n9jydnMbsEnGX2JhUbl0WPq0qTnyX-tjVfk3XFJeowp6mBWaaYqqJSxnxCa8Rq12-9qCGHCEytJ4uswfTfn3r7qiMPrTm2CnsE8iZx_GpZF9Km2KrVbOv26Mpyo3ea1Ns272umz4OGCI-49Qjfd-50u9fpXdNeRWgF6A0bdcZXauDaXaF-VEIqrM6dVKnoKcgUid1qldHfgHi-oDa</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2830976921</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>ANTECEDENTS OF MARKET ORIENTATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION: EMPIRICAL RESULTS FROM FOUR KEY INFORMANT PERSPECTIVES</title><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Hammond, Kevin L ; Webster, Robert L ; Hammond, Nathan L</creator><creatorcontrib>Hammond, Kevin L ; Webster, Robert L ; Hammond, Nathan L</creatorcontrib><description>This study examines the possible impact of selected antecedents (interdepartmental conflict, university administration emphasis, reward system) on individual components (customer orientation, competitor orientation, interfunctional coordination) of market orientation toward students within higher education. Prior research is extended and the variable relationships are examined from four different department chair perspectives (accounting chairs, marketing chairs, males, females). Intelligence is gathered from survey research using existing scales reworded and validated for higher education. Research objectives and hypotheses are formed and hypotheses are tested using regression analyses to examine the variable relationships for each group of respondents. Regression results support all hypotheses, with one or more of the selected antecedents shown to significantly impact each of the three market orientation components within each of the four groups that were examined. Regression results were different for each group of key informants. Results have implications within higher education but also add to existing theory (Kohli and Jaworski 1990), and support concerns by Phillips (1981) and others regarding attentiveness in future research to key informant characteristics such as title and gender.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2574-044X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2574-0458</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.47177/GJMM.06.01.2022.043</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Clarksville: Institute for Global Business Research</publisher><subject>Business schools ; Competition ; Competitive advantage ; Education, Higher ; Gender ; Higher education ; Hypotheses ; Marketing ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Students ; Surveys ; Variables</subject><ispartof>Global journal of management and marketing, 2022-06, Vol.6 (1), p.43-65</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Institute for Global Business Research</rights><rights>2022. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2830976921?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21506,27922,27923,33745,43803,64386,64391,72239</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hammond, Kevin L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Webster, Robert L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammond, Nathan L</creatorcontrib><title>ANTECEDENTS OF MARKET ORIENTATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION: EMPIRICAL RESULTS FROM FOUR KEY INFORMANT PERSPECTIVES</title><title>Global journal of management and marketing</title><description>This study examines the possible impact of selected antecedents (interdepartmental conflict, university administration emphasis, reward system) on individual components (customer orientation, competitor orientation, interfunctional coordination) of market orientation toward students within higher education. Prior research is extended and the variable relationships are examined from four different department chair perspectives (accounting chairs, marketing chairs, males, females). Intelligence is gathered from survey research using existing scales reworded and validated for higher education. Research objectives and hypotheses are formed and hypotheses are tested using regression analyses to examine the variable relationships for each group of respondents. Regression results support all hypotheses, with one or more of the selected antecedents shown to significantly impact each of the three market orientation components within each of the four groups that were examined. Regression results were different for each group of key informants. Results have implications within higher education but also add to existing theory (Kohli and Jaworski 1990), and support concerns by Phillips (1981) and others regarding attentiveness in future research to key informant characteristics such as title and gender.</description><subject>Business schools</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Competitive advantage</subject><subject>Education, Higher</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Variables</subject><issn>2574-044X</issn><issn>2574-0458</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNptkU9vgjAchsmyJTPOb7BDszus_6B0N4JFmSKm4LKdGoRiWFRccYd9-6EuO5kefs2b93kvj2U9IuhQhhh7nrwmiQM9ByIHQ4wdSMmNNcAuozakrn_7_6fv99ao6z4hhBgiQjgZWLtgkYtQjMUiz0AagSSQM5GDVMZ9EuRxugDxAkzjyVRIIMar8Jy9AJEsYxmHwRxIka3mPRzJNAFRupJgJj56KEpl0o-DpZDZUoR5_CayB-uuLradHv3doZVHIg-n9jydnMbsEnGX2JhUbl0WPq0qTnyX-tjVfk3XFJeowp6mBWaaYqqJSxnxCa8Rq12-9qCGHCEytJ4uswfTfn3r7qiMPrTm2CnsE8iZx_GpZF9Km2KrVbOv26Mpyo3ea1Ns272umz4OGCI-49Qjfd-50u9fpXdNeRWgF6A0bdcZXauDaXaF-VEIqrM6dVKnoKcgUid1qldHfgHi-oDa</recordid><startdate>20220622</startdate><enddate>20220622</enddate><creator>Hammond, Kevin L</creator><creator>Webster, Robert L</creator><creator>Hammond, Nathan L</creator><general>Institute for Global Business Research</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220622</creationdate><title>ANTECEDENTS OF MARKET ORIENTATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION: EMPIRICAL RESULTS FROM FOUR KEY INFORMANT PERSPECTIVES</title><author>Hammond, Kevin L ; Webster, Robert L ; Hammond, Nathan L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1953-23d5fca84dd93854825e8f4b42c1d26e4a27e424e35473839f17f59b60e09113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Business schools</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Competitive advantage</topic><topic>Education, Higher</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Variables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hammond, Kevin L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Webster, Robert L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammond, Nathan L</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Global journal of management and marketing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hammond, Kevin L</au><au>Webster, Robert L</au><au>Hammond, Nathan L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>ANTECEDENTS OF MARKET ORIENTATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION: EMPIRICAL RESULTS FROM FOUR KEY INFORMANT PERSPECTIVES</atitle><jtitle>Global journal of management and marketing</jtitle><date>2022-06-22</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>43</spage><epage>65</epage><pages>43-65</pages><issn>2574-044X</issn><eissn>2574-0458</eissn><abstract>This study examines the possible impact of selected antecedents (interdepartmental conflict, university administration emphasis, reward system) on individual components (customer orientation, competitor orientation, interfunctional coordination) of market orientation toward students within higher education. Prior research is extended and the variable relationships are examined from four different department chair perspectives (accounting chairs, marketing chairs, males, females). Intelligence is gathered from survey research using existing scales reworded and validated for higher education. Research objectives and hypotheses are formed and hypotheses are tested using regression analyses to examine the variable relationships for each group of respondents. Regression results support all hypotheses, with one or more of the selected antecedents shown to significantly impact each of the three market orientation components within each of the four groups that were examined. Regression results were different for each group of key informants. Results have implications within higher education but also add to existing theory (Kohli and Jaworski 1990), and support concerns by Phillips (1981) and others regarding attentiveness in future research to key informant characteristics such as title and gender.</abstract><cop>Clarksville</cop><pub>Institute for Global Business Research</pub><doi>10.47177/GJMM.06.01.2022.043</doi><tpages>23</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2574-044X
ispartof Global journal of management and marketing, 2022-06, Vol.6 (1), p.43-65
issn 2574-044X
2574-0458
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_reports_2830976921
source ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; ProQuest Central
subjects Business schools
Competition
Competitive advantage
Education, Higher
Gender
Higher education
Hypotheses
Marketing
Polls & surveys
Students
Surveys
Variables
title ANTECEDENTS OF MARKET ORIENTATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION: EMPIRICAL RESULTS FROM FOUR KEY INFORMANT PERSPECTIVES
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T02%3A33%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=ANTECEDENTS%20OF%20MARKET%20ORIENTATION%20IN%20HIGHER%20EDUCATION:%20EMPIRICAL%20RESULTS%20FROM%20FOUR%20KEY%20INFORMANT%20PERSPECTIVES&rft.jtitle=Global%20journal%20of%20management%20and%20marketing&rft.au=Hammond,%20Kevin%20L&rft.date=2022-06-22&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=43&rft.epage=65&rft.pages=43-65&rft.issn=2574-044X&rft.eissn=2574-0458&rft_id=info:doi/10.47177/GJMM.06.01.2022.043&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA713879463%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2830976921&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A713879463&rfr_iscdi=true