Three Strategies for Modeling & Visualizing Groundwater Contamination
Geological modeling strategies are like snowflakes - no two are identical. Although this provides a level of job security, it also means that care must be taken to use the proper strategy based on the geological framework. To illustrate this point, this paper provides three different strategies and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Professional geologist (1979) 2022-10, Vol.59 (4), p.6-12 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 12 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 6 |
container_title | The Professional geologist (1979) |
container_volume | 59 |
creator | Reed, Jim |
description | Geological modeling strategies are like snowflakes - no two are identical. Although this provides a level of job security, it also means that care must be taken to use the proper strategy based on the geological framework. To illustrate this point, this paper provides three different strategies and associated case-studies for modeling and visualizing groundwater contamination. The first example involves a case-study in which historical well data was used to create annual models of a plume migrating through glacial outwash over a 34-year period. The second example involves contamination migrating through an epikarst environment into fractured carbonates sampled quarterly over a one-year period. The third example involves a single "snapshot" of a contaminant within a flood deposit. From the onset of each project, it was recognized that automation was the key to completion and to processing future data in a timely fashion (i.e., not reinventing the wheel when new data becomes available). |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_2830963338</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2830963338</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_reports_28309633383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNirEKwjAUADMoWLT_EBzcCmmDtZlL1cXJ4iqBvtZIzavvpQh-vRX8AG85Dm4mIpXtTKK2WboQMfNdTeQqNcZEoqpvBCDPgWyAzgHLFkmesIHe-U5u5MXxaHv3_taBcPTNazpJluiDfThvg0O_EvPW9gzxz0ux3ld1eUwGwucIHK4EA1Lga1ZoZXKtdaH_mj4T_jp1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2830963338</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Three Strategies for Modeling & Visualizing Groundwater Contamination</title><source>ProQuest Central Essentials</source><source>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</source><source>ProQuest Central Student</source><source>ProQuest Central Korea</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Reed, Jim</creator><creatorcontrib>Reed, Jim</creatorcontrib><description>Geological modeling strategies are like snowflakes - no two are identical. Although this provides a level of job security, it also means that care must be taken to use the proper strategy based on the geological framework. To illustrate this point, this paper provides three different strategies and associated case-studies for modeling and visualizing groundwater contamination. The first example involves a case-study in which historical well data was used to create annual models of a plume migrating through glacial outwash over a 34-year period. The second example involves contamination migrating through an epikarst environment into fractured carbonates sampled quarterly over a one-year period. The third example involves a single "snapshot" of a contaminant within a flood deposit. From the onset of each project, it was recognized that automation was the key to completion and to processing future data in a timely fashion (i.e., not reinventing the wheel when new data becomes available).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0279-0521</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Westminster: American Institute of Professional Geologists</publisher><subject>Automation ; Carbonates ; Contaminants ; Contamination ; Geology ; Glacial periods ; Groundwater pollution ; Modelling ; Outwash ; Water wells ; Well data</subject><ispartof>The Professional geologist (1979), 2022-10, Vol.59 (4), p.6-12</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Institute of Professional Geologists Oct-Dec 2022</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2830963338?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21508,21509,21510,21511,23253,33533,33701,33747,34008,34317,43659,43787,43805,43953,44067,64388,64393,72469</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Reed, Jim</creatorcontrib><title>Three Strategies for Modeling & Visualizing Groundwater Contamination</title><title>The Professional geologist (1979)</title><description>Geological modeling strategies are like snowflakes - no two are identical. Although this provides a level of job security, it also means that care must be taken to use the proper strategy based on the geological framework. To illustrate this point, this paper provides three different strategies and associated case-studies for modeling and visualizing groundwater contamination. The first example involves a case-study in which historical well data was used to create annual models of a plume migrating through glacial outwash over a 34-year period. The second example involves contamination migrating through an epikarst environment into fractured carbonates sampled quarterly over a one-year period. The third example involves a single "snapshot" of a contaminant within a flood deposit. From the onset of each project, it was recognized that automation was the key to completion and to processing future data in a timely fashion (i.e., not reinventing the wheel when new data becomes available).</description><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Carbonates</subject><subject>Contaminants</subject><subject>Contamination</subject><subject>Geology</subject><subject>Glacial periods</subject><subject>Groundwater pollution</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Outwash</subject><subject>Water wells</subject><subject>Well data</subject><issn>0279-0521</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNirEKwjAUADMoWLT_EBzcCmmDtZlL1cXJ4iqBvtZIzavvpQh-vRX8AG85Dm4mIpXtTKK2WboQMfNdTeQqNcZEoqpvBCDPgWyAzgHLFkmesIHe-U5u5MXxaHv3_taBcPTNazpJluiDfThvg0O_EvPW9gzxz0ux3ld1eUwGwucIHK4EA1Lga1ZoZXKtdaH_mj4T_jp1</recordid><startdate>20221001</startdate><enddate>20221001</enddate><creator>Reed, Jim</creator><general>American Institute of Professional Geologists</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221001</creationdate><title>Three Strategies for Modeling & Visualizing Groundwater Contamination</title><author>Reed, Jim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_reports_28309633383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Carbonates</topic><topic>Contaminants</topic><topic>Contamination</topic><topic>Geology</topic><topic>Glacial periods</topic><topic>Groundwater pollution</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Outwash</topic><topic>Water wells</topic><topic>Well data</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reed, Jim</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>The Professional geologist (1979)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reed, Jim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Three Strategies for Modeling & Visualizing Groundwater Contamination</atitle><jtitle>The Professional geologist (1979)</jtitle><date>2022-10-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>6</spage><epage>12</epage><pages>6-12</pages><issn>0279-0521</issn><abstract>Geological modeling strategies are like snowflakes - no two are identical. Although this provides a level of job security, it also means that care must be taken to use the proper strategy based on the geological framework. To illustrate this point, this paper provides three different strategies and associated case-studies for modeling and visualizing groundwater contamination. The first example involves a case-study in which historical well data was used to create annual models of a plume migrating through glacial outwash over a 34-year period. The second example involves contamination migrating through an epikarst environment into fractured carbonates sampled quarterly over a one-year period. The third example involves a single "snapshot" of a contaminant within a flood deposit. From the onset of each project, it was recognized that automation was the key to completion and to processing future data in a timely fashion (i.e., not reinventing the wheel when new data becomes available).</abstract><cop>Westminster</cop><pub>American Institute of Professional Geologists</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0279-0521 |
ispartof | The Professional geologist (1979), 2022-10, Vol.59 (4), p.6-12 |
issn | 0279-0521 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_reports_2830963338 |
source | ProQuest Central Essentials; ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition); ProQuest Central Student; ProQuest Central Korea; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; ProQuest Central |
subjects | Automation Carbonates Contaminants Contamination Geology Glacial periods Groundwater pollution Modelling Outwash Water wells Well data |
title | Three Strategies for Modeling & Visualizing Groundwater Contamination |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T04%3A57%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Three%20Strategies%20for%20Modeling%20&%20Visualizing%20Groundwater%20Contamination&rft.jtitle=The%20Professional%20geologist%20(1979)&rft.au=Reed,%20Jim&rft.date=2022-10-01&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=6&rft.epage=12&rft.pages=6-12&rft.issn=0279-0521&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2830963338%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2830963338&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |