Great Power Use of Lawfare: Is the Joint Force Prepared?

The joint force is in a period of introspection, realizing, after 2 decades of counterinsurgency operations, that it has lost its monopoly on power. When military professionals and scholars discuss the ways the character of war has changed, they focus most on the blurring of traditional elements of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Joint Force Quarterly : JFQ 2022-10 (107), p.15-20
1. Verfasser: Schiffman, Stephen R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 20
container_issue 107
container_start_page 15
container_title Joint Force Quarterly : JFQ
container_volume
creator Schiffman, Stephen R
description The joint force is in a period of introspection, realizing, after 2 decades of counterinsurgency operations, that it has lost its monopoly on power. When military professionals and scholars discuss the ways the character of war has changed, they focus most on the blurring of traditional elements of conflict--that is, the gray zone. US adversaries have become increasingly adept over the past quarter- century at achieving their goals in a manner that is deliberately designed to remain below the threshold of conventional military conflict and open interstate war. One such method, the use of lawfare, involves using law as a weapon to achieve a particular objective. The application of law as a means and method of war is not new. However, in today's era of Great Power competition, Russia and China expertly combine lawfare with information operations, while the US Government, possessing substantial capacity, has no overarching lawfare strategy. Here, Schiffman offers a primer on the topic of lawfare, discusses its use by Russia, China, and the US, and finally, reviews ways in which senior leaders must respond with changes to the organization of legal capabilities.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_2733424505</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A726103308</galeid><sourcerecordid>A726103308</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g1325-f3ae1e508d73c8b179f2fb9a73826327f8cb4e66cddeee20970fd270f8fd18ee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptzl9LwzAQAPAiCs7pdwj6XLkmzZ_6ImO4OSm4B_dc0uRSK1szk8q-voH5IpTA3XH3uyMX2azgvMqFBHqZapCQg6jodXYT4xcAMMH4LFPrgHokW3_CQHYRiXek1ienAz6RTSTjJ5I33w8jWflgkGwDHtPMPt9mV07vI9795Xm2W718LF_z-n29WS7qvCsY5bljGgvkoKxkRrWFrBx1baUlU1QwKp0ybYlCGGsRkUIlwVmagnK2UIhsnt2f7x6D__7BODbpBz6MsaGSsZKWHHhCD2fU6T02_eD8GLQ59NE0C0lFAYyBSiqfUB0OGPTeD-j61P7nHyd8ehYPvZlY-AX54Wxt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2733424505</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Great Power Use of Lawfare: Is the Joint Force Prepared?</title><source>U.S. Government Documents</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Schiffman, Stephen R</creator><creatorcontrib>Schiffman, Stephen R</creatorcontrib><description>The joint force is in a period of introspection, realizing, after 2 decades of counterinsurgency operations, that it has lost its monopoly on power. When military professionals and scholars discuss the ways the character of war has changed, they focus most on the blurring of traditional elements of conflict--that is, the gray zone. US adversaries have become increasingly adept over the past quarter- century at achieving their goals in a manner that is deliberately designed to remain below the threshold of conventional military conflict and open interstate war. One such method, the use of lawfare, involves using law as a weapon to achieve a particular objective. The application of law as a means and method of war is not new. However, in today's era of Great Power competition, Russia and China expertly combine lawfare with information operations, while the US Government, possessing substantial capacity, has no overarching lawfare strategy. Here, Schiffman offers a primer on the topic of lawfare, discusses its use by Russia, China, and the US, and finally, reviews ways in which senior leaders must respond with changes to the organization of legal capabilities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1070-0692</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1559-6702</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: National Defense University</publisher><subject>Blurring ; Evaluation ; False information ; Great powers ; Information warfare ; International law ; Legislation ; Military art and science ; Military policy ; Politics ; Presidents ; Self defense ; Treaties ; War</subject><ispartof>Joint Force Quarterly : JFQ, 2022-10 (107), p.15-20</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 National Defense University</rights><rights>Copyright National Defense University Fourth Quarter 2022</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>312,314,780,784,791</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schiffman, Stephen R</creatorcontrib><title>Great Power Use of Lawfare: Is the Joint Force Prepared?</title><title>Joint Force Quarterly : JFQ</title><description>The joint force is in a period of introspection, realizing, after 2 decades of counterinsurgency operations, that it has lost its monopoly on power. When military professionals and scholars discuss the ways the character of war has changed, they focus most on the blurring of traditional elements of conflict--that is, the gray zone. US adversaries have become increasingly adept over the past quarter- century at achieving their goals in a manner that is deliberately designed to remain below the threshold of conventional military conflict and open interstate war. One such method, the use of lawfare, involves using law as a weapon to achieve a particular objective. The application of law as a means and method of war is not new. However, in today's era of Great Power competition, Russia and China expertly combine lawfare with information operations, while the US Government, possessing substantial capacity, has no overarching lawfare strategy. Here, Schiffman offers a primer on the topic of lawfare, discusses its use by Russia, China, and the US, and finally, reviews ways in which senior leaders must respond with changes to the organization of legal capabilities.</description><subject>Blurring</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>False information</subject><subject>Great powers</subject><subject>Information warfare</subject><subject>International law</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Military art and science</subject><subject>Military policy</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Presidents</subject><subject>Self defense</subject><subject>Treaties</subject><subject>War</subject><issn>1070-0692</issn><issn>1559-6702</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptzl9LwzAQAPAiCs7pdwj6XLkmzZ_6ImO4OSm4B_dc0uRSK1szk8q-voH5IpTA3XH3uyMX2azgvMqFBHqZapCQg6jodXYT4xcAMMH4LFPrgHokW3_CQHYRiXek1ienAz6RTSTjJ5I33w8jWflgkGwDHtPMPt9mV07vI9795Xm2W718LF_z-n29WS7qvCsY5bljGgvkoKxkRrWFrBx1baUlU1QwKp0ybYlCGGsRkUIlwVmagnK2UIhsnt2f7x6D__7BODbpBz6MsaGSsZKWHHhCD2fU6T02_eD8GLQ59NE0C0lFAYyBSiqfUB0OGPTeD-j61P7nHyd8ehYPvZlY-AX54Wxt</recordid><startdate>20221001</startdate><enddate>20221001</enddate><creator>Schiffman, Stephen R</creator><general>National Defense University</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221001</creationdate><title>Great Power Use of Lawfare: Is the Joint Force Prepared?</title><author>Schiffman, Stephen R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g1325-f3ae1e508d73c8b179f2fb9a73826327f8cb4e66cddeee20970fd270f8fd18ee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Blurring</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>False information</topic><topic>Great powers</topic><topic>Information warfare</topic><topic>International law</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Military art and science</topic><topic>Military policy</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Presidents</topic><topic>Self defense</topic><topic>Treaties</topic><topic>War</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schiffman, Stephen R</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Joint Force Quarterly : JFQ</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schiffman, Stephen R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Great Power Use of Lawfare: Is the Joint Force Prepared?</atitle><jtitle>Joint Force Quarterly : JFQ</jtitle><date>2022-10-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><issue>107</issue><spage>15</spage><epage>20</epage><pages>15-20</pages><issn>1070-0692</issn><eissn>1559-6702</eissn><abstract>The joint force is in a period of introspection, realizing, after 2 decades of counterinsurgency operations, that it has lost its monopoly on power. When military professionals and scholars discuss the ways the character of war has changed, they focus most on the blurring of traditional elements of conflict--that is, the gray zone. US adversaries have become increasingly adept over the past quarter- century at achieving their goals in a manner that is deliberately designed to remain below the threshold of conventional military conflict and open interstate war. One such method, the use of lawfare, involves using law as a weapon to achieve a particular objective. The application of law as a means and method of war is not new. However, in today's era of Great Power competition, Russia and China expertly combine lawfare with information operations, while the US Government, possessing substantial capacity, has no overarching lawfare strategy. Here, Schiffman offers a primer on the topic of lawfare, discusses its use by Russia, China, and the US, and finally, reviews ways in which senior leaders must respond with changes to the organization of legal capabilities.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>National Defense University</pub><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1070-0692
ispartof Joint Force Quarterly : JFQ, 2022-10 (107), p.15-20
issn 1070-0692
1559-6702
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_reports_2733424505
source U.S. Government Documents; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Free E- Journals
subjects Blurring
Evaluation
False information
Great powers
Information warfare
International law
Legislation
Military art and science
Military policy
Politics
Presidents
Self defense
Treaties
War
title Great Power Use of Lawfare: Is the Joint Force Prepared?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T14%3A19%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Great%20Power%20Use%20of%20Lawfare:%20Is%20the%20Joint%20Force%20Prepared?&rft.jtitle=Joint%20Force%20Quarterly%20:%20JFQ&rft.au=Schiffman,%20Stephen%20R&rft.date=2022-10-01&rft.issue=107&rft.spage=15&rft.epage=20&rft.pages=15-20&rft.issn=1070-0692&rft.eissn=1559-6702&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA726103308%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2733424505&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A726103308&rfr_iscdi=true