USERRA May Require Employers to Provide Paid Military Leave, Circuit Court Rules

In White v. United Airlines, Inc.,1 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit held that the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994 ("USERRA") requires employers to provide short-term paid military leave, if they provide paid leave for comparable non-milit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Employee Benefit Plan Review 2021-06, Vol.75 (5), p.11-12
Hauptverfasser: Lander, Esther G, Kerdock, Anastasia Marie, Heise, Katherine I
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 12
container_issue 5
container_start_page 11
container_title Employee Benefit Plan Review
container_volume 75
creator Lander, Esther G
Kerdock, Anastasia Marie
Heise, Katherine I
description In White v. United Airlines, Inc.,1 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit held that the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994 ("USERRA") requires employers to provide short-term paid military leave, if they provide paid leave for comparable non-military absences, such as for jury duty or bereavement leave. USERRA is a federal law designed to encourage military service by reducing the negative impacts such service can have on civilian careers.2 At issue in White is a provision of USERRA that generally requires an employer to provide an employee who misses work due to military service with the same non-senioritybased "rights and benefits" as the employer provides to employees on comparable forms of non-military leaves of absence.3 USERRA defines "rights and benefits" as including: any advantage, profit, privilege, gain, status, account, or interest (other than wages or salary for work performed) that accrues by reason of an employment contract or agreement or an employer policy, plan, or practice and includes rights and benefits under a pension plan, a health plan, an employee stock ownership plan, insurance coverage and awards, bonuses, severance pay, supplemental unemployment benefits, vacations and the opportunity to select work hours or location of employment.4 Prior to the Seventh Circuit's decision in White, whether the "rights and benefits" protected by USERRA include paid leave was an open question, with district courts reaching opposite conclusions. While paid jury duty and sick leave policies are relatively common (and sometimes required by state or local law), paid military leave policies are much less common. [...]because leave policies are often applied across large swaths of the workforce, and because the interpretation of USERRA's "rights and benefits" provision is a common question of pure law, claims for paid military leave are a prime candidate for class action treatment.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_2629097025</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2629097025</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_reports_26290970253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNyk0LgjAYAOAdCrKP__DSOWEqTT2GGB0SZNVZRr7BYjF9twn--y79gE7P5VmwiPMki0XBixVbO_fmnIs8ERFrH7dayhM0agaJY9CEUH8GY2ckB95CS3bSPUKrdA-NNtormuGKasIDVJqeQXuobCAPMhh0W7Z8KeNw93PD9uf6Xl3igewY0PmOcLDkXZeKtORlztNj9lf6AqljPE4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2629097025</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>USERRA May Require Employers to Provide Paid Military Leave, Circuit Court Rules</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Lander, Esther G ; Kerdock, Anastasia Marie ; Heise, Katherine I</creator><creatorcontrib>Lander, Esther G ; Kerdock, Anastasia Marie ; Heise, Katherine I</creatorcontrib><description>In White v. United Airlines, Inc.,1 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit held that the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994 ("USERRA") requires employers to provide short-term paid military leave, if they provide paid leave for comparable non-military absences, such as for jury duty or bereavement leave. USERRA is a federal law designed to encourage military service by reducing the negative impacts such service can have on civilian careers.2 At issue in White is a provision of USERRA that generally requires an employer to provide an employee who misses work due to military service with the same non-senioritybased "rights and benefits" as the employer provides to employees on comparable forms of non-military leaves of absence.3 USERRA defines "rights and benefits" as including: any advantage, profit, privilege, gain, status, account, or interest (other than wages or salary for work performed) that accrues by reason of an employment contract or agreement or an employer policy, plan, or practice and includes rights and benefits under a pension plan, a health plan, an employee stock ownership plan, insurance coverage and awards, bonuses, severance pay, supplemental unemployment benefits, vacations and the opportunity to select work hours or location of employment.4 Prior to the Seventh Circuit's decision in White, whether the "rights and benefits" protected by USERRA include paid leave was an open question, with district courts reaching opposite conclusions. While paid jury duty and sick leave policies are relatively common (and sometimes required by state or local law), paid military leave policies are much less common. [...]because leave policies are often applied across large swaths of the workforce, and because the interpretation of USERRA's "rights and benefits" provision is a common question of pure law, claims for paid military leave are a prime candidate for class action treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-6808</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Aspen Publishers, Inc</publisher><subject>Airlines ; Employee stock ownership plans ; Employees ; Employers ; Employment discrimination ; ESOP ; Federal court decisions ; Leaves of absence ; Litigation ; Military reserves ; Military service ; Sick leave ; State court decisions</subject><ispartof>Employee Benefit Plan Review, 2021-06, Vol.75 (5), p.11-12</ispartof><rights>Copyright Aspen Publishers, Inc. Jun 2021</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>312,777,781,788</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lander, Esther G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerdock, Anastasia Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heise, Katherine I</creatorcontrib><title>USERRA May Require Employers to Provide Paid Military Leave, Circuit Court Rules</title><title>Employee Benefit Plan Review</title><description>In White v. United Airlines, Inc.,1 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit held that the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994 ("USERRA") requires employers to provide short-term paid military leave, if they provide paid leave for comparable non-military absences, such as for jury duty or bereavement leave. USERRA is a federal law designed to encourage military service by reducing the negative impacts such service can have on civilian careers.2 At issue in White is a provision of USERRA that generally requires an employer to provide an employee who misses work due to military service with the same non-senioritybased "rights and benefits" as the employer provides to employees on comparable forms of non-military leaves of absence.3 USERRA defines "rights and benefits" as including: any advantage, profit, privilege, gain, status, account, or interest (other than wages or salary for work performed) that accrues by reason of an employment contract or agreement or an employer policy, plan, or practice and includes rights and benefits under a pension plan, a health plan, an employee stock ownership plan, insurance coverage and awards, bonuses, severance pay, supplemental unemployment benefits, vacations and the opportunity to select work hours or location of employment.4 Prior to the Seventh Circuit's decision in White, whether the "rights and benefits" protected by USERRA include paid leave was an open question, with district courts reaching opposite conclusions. While paid jury duty and sick leave policies are relatively common (and sometimes required by state or local law), paid military leave policies are much less common. [...]because leave policies are often applied across large swaths of the workforce, and because the interpretation of USERRA's "rights and benefits" provision is a common question of pure law, claims for paid military leave are a prime candidate for class action treatment.</description><subject>Airlines</subject><subject>Employee stock ownership plans</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Employers</subject><subject>Employment discrimination</subject><subject>ESOP</subject><subject>Federal court decisions</subject><subject>Leaves of absence</subject><subject>Litigation</subject><subject>Military reserves</subject><subject>Military service</subject><subject>Sick leave</subject><subject>State court decisions</subject><issn>0013-6808</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNyk0LgjAYAOAdCrKP__DSOWEqTT2GGB0SZNVZRr7BYjF9twn--y79gE7P5VmwiPMki0XBixVbO_fmnIs8ERFrH7dayhM0agaJY9CEUH8GY2ckB95CS3bSPUKrdA-NNtormuGKasIDVJqeQXuobCAPMhh0W7Z8KeNw93PD9uf6Xl3igewY0PmOcLDkXZeKtORlztNj9lf6AqljPE4</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>Lander, Esther G</creator><creator>Kerdock, Anastasia Marie</creator><creator>Heise, Katherine I</creator><general>Aspen Publishers, Inc</general><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0F</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>USERRA May Require Employers to Provide Paid Military Leave, Circuit Court Rules</title><author>Lander, Esther G ; Kerdock, Anastasia Marie ; Heise, Katherine I</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_reports_26290970253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Airlines</topic><topic>Employee stock ownership plans</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Employers</topic><topic>Employment discrimination</topic><topic>ESOP</topic><topic>Federal court decisions</topic><topic>Leaves of absence</topic><topic>Litigation</topic><topic>Military reserves</topic><topic>Military service</topic><topic>Sick leave</topic><topic>State court decisions</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lander, Esther G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerdock, Anastasia Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heise, Katherine I</creatorcontrib><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade &amp; Industry</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Employee Benefit Plan Review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lander, Esther G</au><au>Kerdock, Anastasia Marie</au><au>Heise, Katherine I</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>USERRA May Require Employers to Provide Paid Military Leave, Circuit Court Rules</atitle><jtitle>Employee Benefit Plan Review</jtitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>11</spage><epage>12</epage><pages>11-12</pages><issn>0013-6808</issn><abstract>In White v. United Airlines, Inc.,1 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit held that the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994 ("USERRA") requires employers to provide short-term paid military leave, if they provide paid leave for comparable non-military absences, such as for jury duty or bereavement leave. USERRA is a federal law designed to encourage military service by reducing the negative impacts such service can have on civilian careers.2 At issue in White is a provision of USERRA that generally requires an employer to provide an employee who misses work due to military service with the same non-senioritybased "rights and benefits" as the employer provides to employees on comparable forms of non-military leaves of absence.3 USERRA defines "rights and benefits" as including: any advantage, profit, privilege, gain, status, account, or interest (other than wages or salary for work performed) that accrues by reason of an employment contract or agreement or an employer policy, plan, or practice and includes rights and benefits under a pension plan, a health plan, an employee stock ownership plan, insurance coverage and awards, bonuses, severance pay, supplemental unemployment benefits, vacations and the opportunity to select work hours or location of employment.4 Prior to the Seventh Circuit's decision in White, whether the "rights and benefits" protected by USERRA include paid leave was an open question, with district courts reaching opposite conclusions. While paid jury duty and sick leave policies are relatively common (and sometimes required by state or local law), paid military leave policies are much less common. [...]because leave policies are often applied across large swaths of the workforce, and because the interpretation of USERRA's "rights and benefits" provision is a common question of pure law, claims for paid military leave are a prime candidate for class action treatment.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Aspen Publishers, Inc</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0013-6808
ispartof Employee Benefit Plan Review, 2021-06, Vol.75 (5), p.11-12
issn 0013-6808
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_reports_2629097025
source Business Source Complete
subjects Airlines
Employee stock ownership plans
Employees
Employers
Employment discrimination
ESOP
Federal court decisions
Leaves of absence
Litigation
Military reserves
Military service
Sick leave
State court decisions
title USERRA May Require Employers to Provide Paid Military Leave, Circuit Court Rules
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T17%3A13%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=USERRA%20May%20Require%20Employers%20to%20Provide%20Paid%20Military%20Leave,%20Circuit%20Court%20Rules&rft.jtitle=Employee%20Benefit%20Plan%20Review&rft.au=Lander,%20Esther%20G&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=11&rft.epage=12&rft.pages=11-12&rft.issn=0013-6808&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2629097025%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2629097025&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true