Rural Housing in the Crosshairs: How USDA Affordable Housing Is Targeted for Market Rate Conversion and What Advocates Can Do to Preserve It

For more than 80% of USDA units, rents and landlord-provided utility costs are set at 30% of the tenant's income, with those units receiving deep federal subsidies in the form of unit-based rental assistance, project-based Section 8 assistance or HUD vouchers. Because rents are based on the ten...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Affordable Housing & Community Development Law 2021-06, Vol.30 (1), p.77-92
Hauptverfasser: Owen, Kelly, Crain, Scott
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 92
container_issue 1
container_start_page 77
container_title Journal of Affordable Housing & Community Development Law
container_volume 30
creator Owen, Kelly
Crain, Scott
description For more than 80% of USDA units, rents and landlord-provided utility costs are set at 30% of the tenant's income, with those units receiving deep federal subsidies in the form of unit-based rental assistance, project-based Section 8 assistance or HUD vouchers. Because rents are based on the tenant's income-in contrast to rents in Low Income Housing Tax Credit units that do not receive other federal subsidies, which are based on area median income-USDA apartments are truly affordable for very-low-income people, such as those living on Supplemental Security Income (SSI), Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), and minimum-wage or seasonal work. A complex web of federal statutes, regulations, and guidance governs the prepayment process for USDA mortgages.10 Recognizing that the nation faced a substantial loss of available affordable housing and record numbers of homeless citizens, Congress enacted detailed legislation in 1987 and 1992 to preserve affordable housing, including USDA multifamily projects, starting with Title II of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1987, Pub. In response, USDA is required to offer financial incentives to the owner to stay in the program.13 Should the owner turn down the incentives, the owner may voluntarily offer the project for sale to a nonprofit or public body.14 Otherwise, the owner's right to prepay is governed by the result of a Civil Rights Impact Analysis (CRIA)15 conducted by USDA to determine two factors: (1) whether prepayment will materially affect housing opportunities of minorities in the development or community at large, and (2) whether an adequate supply of "safe, decent and affordable housing" exists in the market area, and sufficient actions have been taken to ensure that such rental housing will be made available to each tenant upon displacement. If USDA determines that the prepayment will have a material impact on minority housing opportunities, the owner is required to offer the property for sale, for a six-month term, to a nonprofit or public agency at its appraised market value.16 During that 180-day period, if a nonprofit or governmental agency makes a good-faith purchase offer for the property, the owner must accept that offer, and the property remains in the USDA program.17 An offer is considered bona fide if it is at the full appraised price and the party making the offer has identified a reasonably likely source of funding for the purchase.18 The owner must work with the nonprofit f
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_2583134498</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A731832165</galeid><jstor_id>27305435</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A731832165</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g1548-f912c218e87ff248df44cc3cf988936d7a2fed17610209a2472a2667bb4a00123</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0FFLwzAQB_AgCtbpRxCLPleSS9okj2PoJgwE0eeQpUmX0TY16R789gbmizDu4eD4_Q_uLlABpKEVpri-RAXBglUAjbhGNykdMAYpa1ygh49j1H25Ccfkx670YznvbbmKIaW99jHdoiun-2Tv_voCfb2-fK421fZ9_bZabquO1ExUThIwQIQV3DlgonWMGUONk0JI2rRcg7Mt4Q3BgKUGxkFD0_DdjmmMCdAFejztnWL4Pto0q2inEOekoBaUUMakyOjphDrdW-VHF-aozeCTUUtOiaD54jqr6ozq7GjzpWG0zufxP_98xudq7eDN2cD9KXBIc4hqin7Q8UcBz69mtKa_RHFsrQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2583134498</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rural Housing in the Crosshairs: How USDA Affordable Housing Is Targeted for Market Rate Conversion and What Advocates Can Do to Preserve It</title><source>ProQuest One Community College</source><source>ProQuest Central Essentials</source><source>Research Library</source><source>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</source><source>ProQuest Central Student</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</source><source>Research Library Prep</source><source>ProQuest Central Korea</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Owen, Kelly ; Crain, Scott</creator><creatorcontrib>Owen, Kelly ; Crain, Scott</creatorcontrib><description>For more than 80% of USDA units, rents and landlord-provided utility costs are set at 30% of the tenant's income, with those units receiving deep federal subsidies in the form of unit-based rental assistance, project-based Section 8 assistance or HUD vouchers. Because rents are based on the tenant's income-in contrast to rents in Low Income Housing Tax Credit units that do not receive other federal subsidies, which are based on area median income-USDA apartments are truly affordable for very-low-income people, such as those living on Supplemental Security Income (SSI), Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), and minimum-wage or seasonal work. A complex web of federal statutes, regulations, and guidance governs the prepayment process for USDA mortgages.10 Recognizing that the nation faced a substantial loss of available affordable housing and record numbers of homeless citizens, Congress enacted detailed legislation in 1987 and 1992 to preserve affordable housing, including USDA multifamily projects, starting with Title II of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1987, Pub. In response, USDA is required to offer financial incentives to the owner to stay in the program.13 Should the owner turn down the incentives, the owner may voluntarily offer the project for sale to a nonprofit or public body.14 Otherwise, the owner's right to prepay is governed by the result of a Civil Rights Impact Analysis (CRIA)15 conducted by USDA to determine two factors: (1) whether prepayment will materially affect housing opportunities of minorities in the development or community at large, and (2) whether an adequate supply of "safe, decent and affordable housing" exists in the market area, and sufficient actions have been taken to ensure that such rental housing will be made available to each tenant upon displacement. If USDA determines that the prepayment will have a material impact on minority housing opportunities, the owner is required to offer the property for sale, for a six-month term, to a nonprofit or public agency at its appraised market value.16 During that 180-day period, if a nonprofit or governmental agency makes a good-faith purchase offer for the property, the owner must accept that offer, and the property remains in the USDA program.17 An offer is considered bona fide if it is at the full appraised price and the party making the offer has identified a reasonably likely source of funding for the purchase.18 The owner must work with the nonprofit for up to an additional two-year period to complete the sale.19 If no purchase offer is made, or the sale is not consummated, the owner</description><identifier>ISSN: 1084-2268</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2163-0305</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: American Bar Association</publisher><subject>Affordable housing ; Civil rights ; Community development ; Farmworkers ; Finance ; Hispanic Americans ; Homelessness ; Households ; Housing, Rural ; Impact analysis ; Incentives ; Income ; Legislation ; Litigation ; Loans ; Low income groups ; Low income housing credit ; Market value ; Multiple dwellings ; Prepayments ; Public assistance programs ; Rents ; Rural areas ; Rural housing ; Security ; State court decisions ; Subsidies ; Taxation ; Tenants ; Vouchers</subject><ispartof>Journal of Affordable Housing &amp; Community Development Law, 2021-06, Vol.30 (1), p.77-92</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 American Bar Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Bar Association 2021</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2583134498?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>312,314,776,780,787,16352,16381,21488,21489,21490,21491,21492,23233,33433,33512,33680,33726,33987,34296,34316,36246,43595,43638,43766,43784,43932,44046,44052,44383,64365,64370,72216,72871,72872,72878</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Owen, Kelly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crain, Scott</creatorcontrib><title>Rural Housing in the Crosshairs: How USDA Affordable Housing Is Targeted for Market Rate Conversion and What Advocates Can Do to Preserve It</title><title>Journal of Affordable Housing &amp; Community Development Law</title><description>For more than 80% of USDA units, rents and landlord-provided utility costs are set at 30% of the tenant's income, with those units receiving deep federal subsidies in the form of unit-based rental assistance, project-based Section 8 assistance or HUD vouchers. Because rents are based on the tenant's income-in contrast to rents in Low Income Housing Tax Credit units that do not receive other federal subsidies, which are based on area median income-USDA apartments are truly affordable for very-low-income people, such as those living on Supplemental Security Income (SSI), Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), and minimum-wage or seasonal work. A complex web of federal statutes, regulations, and guidance governs the prepayment process for USDA mortgages.10 Recognizing that the nation faced a substantial loss of available affordable housing and record numbers of homeless citizens, Congress enacted detailed legislation in 1987 and 1992 to preserve affordable housing, including USDA multifamily projects, starting with Title II of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1987, Pub. In response, USDA is required to offer financial incentives to the owner to stay in the program.13 Should the owner turn down the incentives, the owner may voluntarily offer the project for sale to a nonprofit or public body.14 Otherwise, the owner's right to prepay is governed by the result of a Civil Rights Impact Analysis (CRIA)15 conducted by USDA to determine two factors: (1) whether prepayment will materially affect housing opportunities of minorities in the development or community at large, and (2) whether an adequate supply of "safe, decent and affordable housing" exists in the market area, and sufficient actions have been taken to ensure that such rental housing will be made available to each tenant upon displacement. If USDA determines that the prepayment will have a material impact on minority housing opportunities, the owner is required to offer the property for sale, for a six-month term, to a nonprofit or public agency at its appraised market value.16 During that 180-day period, if a nonprofit or governmental agency makes a good-faith purchase offer for the property, the owner must accept that offer, and the property remains in the USDA program.17 An offer is considered bona fide if it is at the full appraised price and the party making the offer has identified a reasonably likely source of funding for the purchase.18 The owner must work with the nonprofit for up to an additional two-year period to complete the sale.19 If no purchase offer is made, or the sale is not consummated, the owner</description><subject>Affordable housing</subject><subject>Civil rights</subject><subject>Community development</subject><subject>Farmworkers</subject><subject>Finance</subject><subject>Hispanic Americans</subject><subject>Homelessness</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Housing, Rural</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Litigation</subject><subject>Loans</subject><subject>Low income groups</subject><subject>Low income housing credit</subject><subject>Market value</subject><subject>Multiple dwellings</subject><subject>Prepayments</subject><subject>Public assistance programs</subject><subject>Rents</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Rural housing</subject><subject>Security</subject><subject>State court decisions</subject><subject>Subsidies</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><subject>Tenants</subject><subject>Vouchers</subject><issn>1084-2268</issn><issn>2163-0305</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpt0FFLwzAQB_AgCtbpRxCLPleSS9okj2PoJgwE0eeQpUmX0TY16R789gbmizDu4eD4_Q_uLlABpKEVpri-RAXBglUAjbhGNykdMAYpa1ygh49j1H25Ccfkx670YznvbbmKIaW99jHdoiun-2Tv_voCfb2-fK421fZ9_bZabquO1ExUThIwQIQV3DlgonWMGUONk0JI2rRcg7Mt4Q3BgKUGxkFD0_DdjmmMCdAFejztnWL4Pto0q2inEOekoBaUUMakyOjphDrdW-VHF-aozeCTUUtOiaD54jqr6ozq7GjzpWG0zufxP_98xudq7eDN2cD9KXBIc4hqin7Q8UcBz69mtKa_RHFsrQ</recordid><startdate>20210622</startdate><enddate>20210622</enddate><creator>Owen, Kelly</creator><creator>Crain, Scott</creator><general>American Bar Association</general><scope>ILT</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210622</creationdate><title>Rural Housing in the Crosshairs</title><author>Owen, Kelly ; Crain, Scott</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g1548-f912c218e87ff248df44cc3cf988936d7a2fed17610209a2472a2667bb4a00123</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Affordable housing</topic><topic>Civil rights</topic><topic>Community development</topic><topic>Farmworkers</topic><topic>Finance</topic><topic>Hispanic Americans</topic><topic>Homelessness</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Housing, Rural</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Litigation</topic><topic>Loans</topic><topic>Low income groups</topic><topic>Low income housing credit</topic><topic>Market value</topic><topic>Multiple dwellings</topic><topic>Prepayments</topic><topic>Public assistance programs</topic><topic>Rents</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Rural housing</topic><topic>Security</topic><topic>State court decisions</topic><topic>Subsidies</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><topic>Tenants</topic><topic>Vouchers</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Owen, Kelly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crain, Scott</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale OneFile: LegalTrac</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of Affordable Housing &amp; Community Development Law</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Owen, Kelly</au><au>Crain, Scott</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rural Housing in the Crosshairs: How USDA Affordable Housing Is Targeted for Market Rate Conversion and What Advocates Can Do to Preserve It</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Affordable Housing &amp; Community Development Law</jtitle><date>2021-06-22</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>77</spage><epage>92</epage><pages>77-92</pages><issn>1084-2268</issn><eissn>2163-0305</eissn><abstract>For more than 80% of USDA units, rents and landlord-provided utility costs are set at 30% of the tenant's income, with those units receiving deep federal subsidies in the form of unit-based rental assistance, project-based Section 8 assistance or HUD vouchers. Because rents are based on the tenant's income-in contrast to rents in Low Income Housing Tax Credit units that do not receive other federal subsidies, which are based on area median income-USDA apartments are truly affordable for very-low-income people, such as those living on Supplemental Security Income (SSI), Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), and minimum-wage or seasonal work. A complex web of federal statutes, regulations, and guidance governs the prepayment process for USDA mortgages.10 Recognizing that the nation faced a substantial loss of available affordable housing and record numbers of homeless citizens, Congress enacted detailed legislation in 1987 and 1992 to preserve affordable housing, including USDA multifamily projects, starting with Title II of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1987, Pub. In response, USDA is required to offer financial incentives to the owner to stay in the program.13 Should the owner turn down the incentives, the owner may voluntarily offer the project for sale to a nonprofit or public body.14 Otherwise, the owner's right to prepay is governed by the result of a Civil Rights Impact Analysis (CRIA)15 conducted by USDA to determine two factors: (1) whether prepayment will materially affect housing opportunities of minorities in the development or community at large, and (2) whether an adequate supply of "safe, decent and affordable housing" exists in the market area, and sufficient actions have been taken to ensure that such rental housing will be made available to each tenant upon displacement. If USDA determines that the prepayment will have a material impact on minority housing opportunities, the owner is required to offer the property for sale, for a six-month term, to a nonprofit or public agency at its appraised market value.16 During that 180-day period, if a nonprofit or governmental agency makes a good-faith purchase offer for the property, the owner must accept that offer, and the property remains in the USDA program.17 An offer is considered bona fide if it is at the full appraised price and the party making the offer has identified a reasonably likely source of funding for the purchase.18 The owner must work with the nonprofit for up to an additional two-year period to complete the sale.19 If no purchase offer is made, or the sale is not consummated, the owner</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>American Bar Association</pub><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1084-2268
ispartof Journal of Affordable Housing & Community Development Law, 2021-06, Vol.30 (1), p.77-92
issn 1084-2268
2163-0305
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_reports_2583134498
source ProQuest One Community College; ProQuest Central Essentials; Research Library; ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition); ProQuest Central Student; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Research Library (Alumni Edition); Research Library Prep; ProQuest Central Korea; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; ProQuest Central
subjects Affordable housing
Civil rights
Community development
Farmworkers
Finance
Hispanic Americans
Homelessness
Households
Housing, Rural
Impact analysis
Incentives
Income
Legislation
Litigation
Loans
Low income groups
Low income housing credit
Market value
Multiple dwellings
Prepayments
Public assistance programs
Rents
Rural areas
Rural housing
Security
State court decisions
Subsidies
Taxation
Tenants
Vouchers
title Rural Housing in the Crosshairs: How USDA Affordable Housing Is Targeted for Market Rate Conversion and What Advocates Can Do to Preserve It
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T11%3A25%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rural%20Housing%20in%20the%20Crosshairs:%20How%20USDA%20Affordable%20Housing%20Is%20Targeted%20for%20Market%20Rate%20Conversion%20and%20What%20Advocates%20Can%20Do%20to%20Preserve%20It&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Affordable%20Housing%20&%20Community%20Development%20Law&rft.au=Owen,%20Kelly&rft.date=2021-06-22&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=77&rft.epage=92&rft.pages=77-92&rft.issn=1084-2268&rft.eissn=2163-0305&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA731832165%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2583134498&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A731832165&rft_jstor_id=27305435&rfr_iscdi=true