Joined Cases A. K. v. Krajowa Rada Sądownictwa (C-585/18) and CP (C-624/18), DO (C-625/18) v. Sąd Najwyższy (C.J.E.U.)

Joined Cases C-585/18, C-624/18, and C-625/18 concerning the independence of the Disciplinary Chamber of the Sąd Najwyższy (Polish Supreme Court) is the latest in a series of European Union (EU) Member States requesting the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) to rule on the independence of their judic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International legal materials 2020-06, Vol.59 (3), p.459-486
1. Verfasser: Grogan, Joelle
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 486
container_issue 3
container_start_page 459
container_title International legal materials
container_volume 59
creator Grogan, Joelle
description Joined Cases C-585/18, C-624/18, and C-625/18 concerning the independence of the Disciplinary Chamber of the Sąd Najwyższy (Polish Supreme Court) is the latest in a series of European Union (EU) Member States requesting the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) to rule on the independence of their judicial systems. While the organization of justice systems within Member States is a competence of Member States (and thus not for the EU to determine or decide), the CJEU has held that Member States are nevertheless required to comply with obligations under EU law to ensure effective judicial protection and, as a necessary corollary, judicial independence. The significance of the current case lies in the formulation by the CJEU of a “European” standard of judicial independence, and its finding that national judges may set aside the jurisdiction of courts found not to be independent against that standard and to disapply any national measure (in accordance with the principle of the primacy of EU law over national law) that gives jurisdiction to a non-independent court.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/ilm.2020.24
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_2418720743</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_ilm_2020_24</cupid><sourcerecordid>2418720743</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1013-fe860ee8e3d134063006e8bb43068e7eb397856421f1452ddadf5dd6b710fc2b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkMtOwzAQRS0EEqWw4gcsViCI61ccd1mF8igVRUDXkRM7KFGbFLulCnv-iiX8F47SJZsZzZ1zR5oLwCnBiGASDYrFElFMMaJ8D_TIkOFAhBHZBz3s1SCSdHgIjpwrMSacCtIDzaQuKqNhrJxxcITgA4IfvlpV1lsFn5VW8OXnS9fbqsjWXjmPg1CGAyIvoKq876lVBOWtcgWvZ93YAf5Q64WPqtw2v9_us_FbNEFjNEcXx-AgVwtnTna9D-Y349f4LpjObu_j0TTI_EssyI0U2BhpmCaMY8EwFkamKWdYSBOZlA0jGQpOSU54SLVWOg-1FmlEcJ7RlPXBWXd3Zev3jXHrxJpVbdcuoZzIiOKIMw9ddlBma-esyZOVLZbKNgnBSRtt4qNN2mi9y9PBjlbL1Bb6zSRlvbGVf-Nf_g-lVnLy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2418720743</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Joined Cases A. K. v. Krajowa Rada Sądownictwa (C-585/18) and CP (C-624/18), DO (C-625/18) v. Sąd Najwyższy (C.J.E.U.)</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Grogan, Joelle</creator><creatorcontrib>Grogan, Joelle</creatorcontrib><description>Joined Cases C-585/18, C-624/18, and C-625/18 concerning the independence of the Disciplinary Chamber of the Sąd Najwyższy (Polish Supreme Court) is the latest in a series of European Union (EU) Member States requesting the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) to rule on the independence of their judicial systems. While the organization of justice systems within Member States is a competence of Member States (and thus not for the EU to determine or decide), the CJEU has held that Member States are nevertheless required to comply with obligations under EU law to ensure effective judicial protection and, as a necessary corollary, judicial independence. The significance of the current case lies in the formulation by the CJEU of a “European” standard of judicial independence, and its finding that national judges may set aside the jurisdiction of courts found not to be independent against that standard and to disapply any national measure (in accordance with the principle of the primacy of EU law over national law) that gives jurisdiction to a non-independent court.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-7829</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1930-6571</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/ilm.2020.24</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Charters ; International Legal Documents ; Judges &amp; magistrates ; Judicial appointments ; Judiciary ; Jurisdiction ; Treaties</subject><ispartof>International legal materials, 2020-06, Vol.59 (3), p.459-486</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2020 by The American Society of International Law</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0020782920000248/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,27924,27925,55628</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Grogan, Joelle</creatorcontrib><title>Joined Cases A. K. v. Krajowa Rada Sądownictwa (C-585/18) and CP (C-624/18), DO (C-625/18) v. Sąd Najwyższy (C.J.E.U.)</title><title>International legal materials</title><addtitle>Int. leg. mater</addtitle><description>Joined Cases C-585/18, C-624/18, and C-625/18 concerning the independence of the Disciplinary Chamber of the Sąd Najwyższy (Polish Supreme Court) is the latest in a series of European Union (EU) Member States requesting the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) to rule on the independence of their judicial systems. While the organization of justice systems within Member States is a competence of Member States (and thus not for the EU to determine or decide), the CJEU has held that Member States are nevertheless required to comply with obligations under EU law to ensure effective judicial protection and, as a necessary corollary, judicial independence. The significance of the current case lies in the formulation by the CJEU of a “European” standard of judicial independence, and its finding that national judges may set aside the jurisdiction of courts found not to be independent against that standard and to disapply any national measure (in accordance with the principle of the primacy of EU law over national law) that gives jurisdiction to a non-independent court.</description><subject>Charters</subject><subject>International Legal Documents</subject><subject>Judges &amp; magistrates</subject><subject>Judicial appointments</subject><subject>Judiciary</subject><subject>Jurisdiction</subject><subject>Treaties</subject><issn>0020-7829</issn><issn>1930-6571</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkMtOwzAQRS0EEqWw4gcsViCI61ccd1mF8igVRUDXkRM7KFGbFLulCnv-iiX8F47SJZsZzZ1zR5oLwCnBiGASDYrFElFMMaJ8D_TIkOFAhBHZBz3s1SCSdHgIjpwrMSacCtIDzaQuKqNhrJxxcITgA4IfvlpV1lsFn5VW8OXnS9fbqsjWXjmPg1CGAyIvoKq876lVBOWtcgWvZ93YAf5Q64WPqtw2v9_us_FbNEFjNEcXx-AgVwtnTna9D-Y349f4LpjObu_j0TTI_EssyI0U2BhpmCaMY8EwFkamKWdYSBOZlA0jGQpOSU54SLVWOg-1FmlEcJ7RlPXBWXd3Zev3jXHrxJpVbdcuoZzIiOKIMw9ddlBma-esyZOVLZbKNgnBSRtt4qNN2mi9y9PBjlbL1Bb6zSRlvbGVf-Nf_g-lVnLy</recordid><startdate>202006</startdate><enddate>202006</enddate><creator>Grogan, Joelle</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202006</creationdate><title>Joined Cases A. K. v. Krajowa Rada Sądownictwa (C-585/18) and CP (C-624/18), DO (C-625/18) v. Sąd Najwyższy (C.J.E.U.)</title><author>Grogan, Joelle</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1013-fe860ee8e3d134063006e8bb43068e7eb397856421f1452ddadf5dd6b710fc2b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Charters</topic><topic>International Legal Documents</topic><topic>Judges &amp; magistrates</topic><topic>Judicial appointments</topic><topic>Judiciary</topic><topic>Jurisdiction</topic><topic>Treaties</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grogan, Joelle</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>International legal materials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grogan, Joelle</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Joined Cases A. K. v. Krajowa Rada Sądownictwa (C-585/18) and CP (C-624/18), DO (C-625/18) v. Sąd Najwyższy (C.J.E.U.)</atitle><jtitle>International legal materials</jtitle><addtitle>Int. leg. mater</addtitle><date>2020-06</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>459</spage><epage>486</epage><pages>459-486</pages><issn>0020-7829</issn><eissn>1930-6571</eissn><abstract>Joined Cases C-585/18, C-624/18, and C-625/18 concerning the independence of the Disciplinary Chamber of the Sąd Najwyższy (Polish Supreme Court) is the latest in a series of European Union (EU) Member States requesting the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) to rule on the independence of their judicial systems. While the organization of justice systems within Member States is a competence of Member States (and thus not for the EU to determine or decide), the CJEU has held that Member States are nevertheless required to comply with obligations under EU law to ensure effective judicial protection and, as a necessary corollary, judicial independence. The significance of the current case lies in the formulation by the CJEU of a “European” standard of judicial independence, and its finding that national judges may set aside the jurisdiction of courts found not to be independent against that standard and to disapply any national measure (in accordance with the principle of the primacy of EU law over national law) that gives jurisdiction to a non-independent court.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/ilm.2020.24</doi><tpages>28</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-7829
ispartof International legal materials, 2020-06, Vol.59 (3), p.459-486
issn 0020-7829
1930-6571
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_reports_2418720743
source HeinOnline Law Journal Library; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Charters
International Legal Documents
Judges & magistrates
Judicial appointments
Judiciary
Jurisdiction
Treaties
title Joined Cases A. K. v. Krajowa Rada Sądownictwa (C-585/18) and CP (C-624/18), DO (C-625/18) v. Sąd Najwyższy (C.J.E.U.)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T20%3A36%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Joined%20Cases%20A.%20K.%20v.%20Krajowa%20Rada%20S%C4%85downictwa%20(C-585/18)%20and%20CP%20(C-624/18),%20DO%20(C-625/18)%20v.%20S%C4%85d%20Najwy%C5%BCszy%20(C.J.E.U.)&rft.jtitle=International%20legal%20materials&rft.au=Grogan,%20Joelle&rft.date=2020-06&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=459&rft.epage=486&rft.pages=459-486&rft.issn=0020-7829&rft.eissn=1930-6571&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/ilm.2020.24&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2418720743%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2418720743&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_ilm_2020_24&rfr_iscdi=true