Cost pressures drive flue gas treatment into new and fertile regions

Cheaper fuels are being increasingly used by power producers worldwide in an effort to cut costs, placing pressure on flue gas cleaning system suppliers to meet market demands of low investment costs, low operation costs, and use of low cost fuels with alternative technologies. The high ash and sulf...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Modern power systems 2000-11, Vol.20 (11), p.33-35
Hauptverfasser: SCHEUCH, F, BISCHOFF, Lurgi Lentjes
Format: Magazinearticle
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 35
container_issue 11
container_start_page 33
container_title Modern power systems
container_volume 20
creator SCHEUCH, F
BISCHOFF, Lurgi Lentjes
description Cheaper fuels are being increasingly used by power producers worldwide in an effort to cut costs, placing pressure on flue gas cleaning system suppliers to meet market demands of low investment costs, low operation costs, and use of low cost fuels with alternative technologies. The high ash and sulfur content of cheaper fuels creates demand for optimization of existing electrostatic precipitators; demand is also mounting for baghouse technologies. Emerging low investment technologies include seawater scrubbing with forced in situ oxidation, combined semi-dry circulating fluidized bed scrubbers with low pressure pulse jet filters, and wet ammonia processes.
format Magazinearticle
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_236613015</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A69070375</galeid><sourcerecordid>A69070375</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g1225-40865a418bb72aba70dd27fc3576dccc0802d78d2150b214af009413d8cef3b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdz0tLAzEUhuFZKFir_yEiuHIg96TLUq9QcNP9kElOhsg0GZOM4r93pK7cnG_z8MI5a1aYStwqzfFFc1nKO8YEa0FXzcMulYqmDKXMy0Euh09AfpwBDaagmsHUI8SKQqwJRfhCJjrkIdcwAsowhBTLVXPuzVjg-m_XzeHp8bB7afdvz6-77b4dCKWi5VhLYTjRfa-o6Y3CzlHlLRNKOmst1pg6pR0lAveUcOMx3nDCnLbgWc_Wzc0pO-X0MUOpXYYp5Vo6yqQkDBOxmLt_5hiKhXE0EdJcOsKF4FryBd6f4GBG6EL0qWZjB4iQzZgi-OW_bis3WGGmfru3f11TrBl9NtGG0k05HE3-7jQjXGr2A5tQbb4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><pqid>14554864</pqid></control><display><type>magazinearticle</type><title>Cost pressures drive flue gas treatment into new and fertile regions</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>SCHEUCH, F ; BISCHOFF, Lurgi Lentjes</creator><creatorcontrib>SCHEUCH, F ; BISCHOFF, Lurgi Lentjes</creatorcontrib><description>Cheaper fuels are being increasingly used by power producers worldwide in an effort to cut costs, placing pressure on flue gas cleaning system suppliers to meet market demands of low investment costs, low operation costs, and use of low cost fuels with alternative technologies. The high ash and sulfur content of cheaper fuels creates demand for optimization of existing electrostatic precipitators; demand is also mounting for baghouse technologies. Emerging low investment technologies include seawater scrubbing with forced in situ oxidation, combined semi-dry circulating fluidized bed scrubbers with low pressure pulse jet filters, and wet ammonia processes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0260-7840</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MPSYDU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dartford: Wilmington</publisher><subject>Air pollution caused by fuel industries ; Ammonia ; Applied sciences ; Costs ; Electric power production ; Electric power-plants ; Electric utilities ; Energy ; Energy. Thermal use of fuels ; Exact sciences and technology ; Flue gas ; Flue gases ; Fuel and fuel systems ; Gases ; Landfill ; Management ; Outdoor air quality ; Pollution reduction ; Power plants ; Sulfur ; Technology</subject><ispartof>Modern power systems, 2000-11, Vol.20 (11), p.33-35</ispartof><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2000 NS Media Group Limited</rights><rights>Copyright Wilmington Publishing Ltd. Nov 2000</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780,784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=831468$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>SCHEUCH, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BISCHOFF, Lurgi Lentjes</creatorcontrib><title>Cost pressures drive flue gas treatment into new and fertile regions</title><title>Modern power systems</title><description>Cheaper fuels are being increasingly used by power producers worldwide in an effort to cut costs, placing pressure on flue gas cleaning system suppliers to meet market demands of low investment costs, low operation costs, and use of low cost fuels with alternative technologies. The high ash and sulfur content of cheaper fuels creates demand for optimization of existing electrostatic precipitators; demand is also mounting for baghouse technologies. Emerging low investment technologies include seawater scrubbing with forced in situ oxidation, combined semi-dry circulating fluidized bed scrubbers with low pressure pulse jet filters, and wet ammonia processes.</description><subject>Air pollution caused by fuel industries</subject><subject>Ammonia</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Electric power production</subject><subject>Electric power-plants</subject><subject>Electric utilities</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy. Thermal use of fuels</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Flue gas</subject><subject>Flue gases</subject><subject>Fuel and fuel systems</subject><subject>Gases</subject><subject>Landfill</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Outdoor air quality</subject><subject>Pollution reduction</subject><subject>Power plants</subject><subject>Sulfur</subject><subject>Technology</subject><issn>0260-7840</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><recordid>eNpdz0tLAzEUhuFZKFir_yEiuHIg96TLUq9QcNP9kElOhsg0GZOM4r93pK7cnG_z8MI5a1aYStwqzfFFc1nKO8YEa0FXzcMulYqmDKXMy0Euh09AfpwBDaagmsHUI8SKQqwJRfhCJjrkIdcwAsowhBTLVXPuzVjg-m_XzeHp8bB7afdvz6-77b4dCKWi5VhLYTjRfa-o6Y3CzlHlLRNKOmst1pg6pR0lAveUcOMx3nDCnLbgWc_Wzc0pO-X0MUOpXYYp5Vo6yqQkDBOxmLt_5hiKhXE0EdJcOsKF4FryBd6f4GBG6EL0qWZjB4iQzZgi-OW_bis3WGGmfru3f11TrBl9NtGG0k05HE3-7jQjXGr2A5tQbb4</recordid><startdate>20001101</startdate><enddate>20001101</enddate><creator>SCHEUCH, F</creator><creator>BISCHOFF, Lurgi Lentjes</creator><general>Wilmington</general><general>NS Media Group Limited</general><general>Progressive Media Markets Limited</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20001101</creationdate><title>Cost pressures drive flue gas treatment into new and fertile regions</title><author>SCHEUCH, F ; BISCHOFF, Lurgi Lentjes</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g1225-40865a418bb72aba70dd27fc3576dccc0802d78d2150b214af009413d8cef3b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><prefilter>magazinearticle</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Air pollution caused by fuel industries</topic><topic>Ammonia</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Electric power production</topic><topic>Electric power-plants</topic><topic>Electric utilities</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy. Thermal use of fuels</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Flue gas</topic><topic>Flue gases</topic><topic>Fuel and fuel systems</topic><topic>Gases</topic><topic>Landfill</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Outdoor air quality</topic><topic>Pollution reduction</topic><topic>Power plants</topic><topic>Sulfur</topic><topic>Technology</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SCHEUCH, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BISCHOFF, Lurgi Lentjes</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Modern power systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SCHEUCH, F</au><au>BISCHOFF, Lurgi Lentjes</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cost pressures drive flue gas treatment into new and fertile regions</atitle><jtitle>Modern power systems</jtitle><date>2000-11-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>33</spage><epage>35</epage><pages>33-35</pages><issn>0260-7840</issn><coden>MPSYDU</coden><abstract>Cheaper fuels are being increasingly used by power producers worldwide in an effort to cut costs, placing pressure on flue gas cleaning system suppliers to meet market demands of low investment costs, low operation costs, and use of low cost fuels with alternative technologies. The high ash and sulfur content of cheaper fuels creates demand for optimization of existing electrostatic precipitators; demand is also mounting for baghouse technologies. Emerging low investment technologies include seawater scrubbing with forced in situ oxidation, combined semi-dry circulating fluidized bed scrubbers with low pressure pulse jet filters, and wet ammonia processes.</abstract><cop>Dartford</cop><pub>Wilmington</pub><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0260-7840
ispartof Modern power systems, 2000-11, Vol.20 (11), p.33-35
issn 0260-7840
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_reports_236613015
source Business Source Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Air pollution caused by fuel industries
Ammonia
Applied sciences
Costs
Electric power production
Electric power-plants
Electric utilities
Energy
Energy. Thermal use of fuels
Exact sciences and technology
Flue gas
Flue gases
Fuel and fuel systems
Gases
Landfill
Management
Outdoor air quality
Pollution reduction
Power plants
Sulfur
Technology
title Cost pressures drive flue gas treatment into new and fertile regions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T12%3A48%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cost%20pressures%20drive%20flue%20gas%20treatment%20into%20new%20and%20fertile%20regions&rft.jtitle=Modern%20power%20systems&rft.au=SCHEUCH,%20F&rft.date=2000-11-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=33&rft.epage=35&rft.pages=33-35&rft.issn=0260-7840&rft.coden=MPSYDU&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA69070375%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14554864&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A69070375&rfr_iscdi=true