Cost pressures drive flue gas treatment into new and fertile regions
Cheaper fuels are being increasingly used by power producers worldwide in an effort to cut costs, placing pressure on flue gas cleaning system suppliers to meet market demands of low investment costs, low operation costs, and use of low cost fuels with alternative technologies. The high ash and sulf...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Modern power systems 2000-11, Vol.20 (11), p.33-35 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Magazinearticle |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 35 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 33 |
container_title | Modern power systems |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | SCHEUCH, F BISCHOFF, Lurgi Lentjes |
description | Cheaper fuels are being increasingly used by power producers worldwide in an effort to cut costs, placing pressure on flue gas cleaning system suppliers to meet market demands of low investment costs, low operation costs, and use of low cost fuels with alternative technologies. The high ash and sulfur content of cheaper fuels creates demand for optimization of existing electrostatic precipitators; demand is also mounting for baghouse technologies. Emerging low investment technologies include seawater scrubbing with forced in situ oxidation, combined semi-dry circulating fluidized bed scrubbers with low pressure pulse jet filters, and wet ammonia processes. |
format | Magazinearticle |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_236613015</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A69070375</galeid><sourcerecordid>A69070375</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g1225-40865a418bb72aba70dd27fc3576dccc0802d78d2150b214af009413d8cef3b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdz0tLAzEUhuFZKFir_yEiuHIg96TLUq9QcNP9kElOhsg0GZOM4r93pK7cnG_z8MI5a1aYStwqzfFFc1nKO8YEa0FXzcMulYqmDKXMy0Euh09AfpwBDaagmsHUI8SKQqwJRfhCJjrkIdcwAsowhBTLVXPuzVjg-m_XzeHp8bB7afdvz6-77b4dCKWi5VhLYTjRfa-o6Y3CzlHlLRNKOmst1pg6pR0lAveUcOMx3nDCnLbgWc_Wzc0pO-X0MUOpXYYp5Vo6yqQkDBOxmLt_5hiKhXE0EdJcOsKF4FryBd6f4GBG6EL0qWZjB4iQzZgi-OW_bis3WGGmfru3f11TrBl9NtGG0k05HE3-7jQjXGr2A5tQbb4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><pqid>14554864</pqid></control><display><type>magazinearticle</type><title>Cost pressures drive flue gas treatment into new and fertile regions</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>SCHEUCH, F ; BISCHOFF, Lurgi Lentjes</creator><creatorcontrib>SCHEUCH, F ; BISCHOFF, Lurgi Lentjes</creatorcontrib><description>Cheaper fuels are being increasingly used by power producers worldwide in an effort to cut costs, placing pressure on flue gas cleaning system suppliers to meet market demands of low investment costs, low operation costs, and use of low cost fuels with alternative technologies. The high ash and sulfur content of cheaper fuels creates demand for optimization of existing electrostatic precipitators; demand is also mounting for baghouse technologies. Emerging low investment technologies include seawater scrubbing with forced in situ oxidation, combined semi-dry circulating fluidized bed scrubbers with low pressure pulse jet filters, and wet ammonia processes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0260-7840</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MPSYDU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dartford: Wilmington</publisher><subject>Air pollution caused by fuel industries ; Ammonia ; Applied sciences ; Costs ; Electric power production ; Electric power-plants ; Electric utilities ; Energy ; Energy. Thermal use of fuels ; Exact sciences and technology ; Flue gas ; Flue gases ; Fuel and fuel systems ; Gases ; Landfill ; Management ; Outdoor air quality ; Pollution reduction ; Power plants ; Sulfur ; Technology</subject><ispartof>Modern power systems, 2000-11, Vol.20 (11), p.33-35</ispartof><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2000 NS Media Group Limited</rights><rights>Copyright Wilmington Publishing Ltd. Nov 2000</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780,784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=831468$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>SCHEUCH, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BISCHOFF, Lurgi Lentjes</creatorcontrib><title>Cost pressures drive flue gas treatment into new and fertile regions</title><title>Modern power systems</title><description>Cheaper fuels are being increasingly used by power producers worldwide in an effort to cut costs, placing pressure on flue gas cleaning system suppliers to meet market demands of low investment costs, low operation costs, and use of low cost fuels with alternative technologies. The high ash and sulfur content of cheaper fuels creates demand for optimization of existing electrostatic precipitators; demand is also mounting for baghouse technologies. Emerging low investment technologies include seawater scrubbing with forced in situ oxidation, combined semi-dry circulating fluidized bed scrubbers with low pressure pulse jet filters, and wet ammonia processes.</description><subject>Air pollution caused by fuel industries</subject><subject>Ammonia</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Electric power production</subject><subject>Electric power-plants</subject><subject>Electric utilities</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy. Thermal use of fuels</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Flue gas</subject><subject>Flue gases</subject><subject>Fuel and fuel systems</subject><subject>Gases</subject><subject>Landfill</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Outdoor air quality</subject><subject>Pollution reduction</subject><subject>Power plants</subject><subject>Sulfur</subject><subject>Technology</subject><issn>0260-7840</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><recordid>eNpdz0tLAzEUhuFZKFir_yEiuHIg96TLUq9QcNP9kElOhsg0GZOM4r93pK7cnG_z8MI5a1aYStwqzfFFc1nKO8YEa0FXzcMulYqmDKXMy0Euh09AfpwBDaagmsHUI8SKQqwJRfhCJjrkIdcwAsowhBTLVXPuzVjg-m_XzeHp8bB7afdvz6-77b4dCKWi5VhLYTjRfa-o6Y3CzlHlLRNKOmst1pg6pR0lAveUcOMx3nDCnLbgWc_Wzc0pO-X0MUOpXYYp5Vo6yqQkDBOxmLt_5hiKhXE0EdJcOsKF4FryBd6f4GBG6EL0qWZjB4iQzZgi-OW_bis3WGGmfru3f11TrBl9NtGG0k05HE3-7jQjXGr2A5tQbb4</recordid><startdate>20001101</startdate><enddate>20001101</enddate><creator>SCHEUCH, F</creator><creator>BISCHOFF, Lurgi Lentjes</creator><general>Wilmington</general><general>NS Media Group Limited</general><general>Progressive Media Markets Limited</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20001101</creationdate><title>Cost pressures drive flue gas treatment into new and fertile regions</title><author>SCHEUCH, F ; BISCHOFF, Lurgi Lentjes</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g1225-40865a418bb72aba70dd27fc3576dccc0802d78d2150b214af009413d8cef3b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><prefilter>magazinearticle</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Air pollution caused by fuel industries</topic><topic>Ammonia</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Electric power production</topic><topic>Electric power-plants</topic><topic>Electric utilities</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy. Thermal use of fuels</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Flue gas</topic><topic>Flue gases</topic><topic>Fuel and fuel systems</topic><topic>Gases</topic><topic>Landfill</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Outdoor air quality</topic><topic>Pollution reduction</topic><topic>Power plants</topic><topic>Sulfur</topic><topic>Technology</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SCHEUCH, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BISCHOFF, Lurgi Lentjes</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Modern power systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SCHEUCH, F</au><au>BISCHOFF, Lurgi Lentjes</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cost pressures drive flue gas treatment into new and fertile regions</atitle><jtitle>Modern power systems</jtitle><date>2000-11-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>33</spage><epage>35</epage><pages>33-35</pages><issn>0260-7840</issn><coden>MPSYDU</coden><abstract>Cheaper fuels are being increasingly used by power producers worldwide in an effort to cut costs, placing pressure on flue gas cleaning system suppliers to meet market demands of low investment costs, low operation costs, and use of low cost fuels with alternative technologies. The high ash and sulfur content of cheaper fuels creates demand for optimization of existing electrostatic precipitators; demand is also mounting for baghouse technologies. Emerging low investment technologies include seawater scrubbing with forced in situ oxidation, combined semi-dry circulating fluidized bed scrubbers with low pressure pulse jet filters, and wet ammonia processes.</abstract><cop>Dartford</cop><pub>Wilmington</pub><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0260-7840 |
ispartof | Modern power systems, 2000-11, Vol.20 (11), p.33-35 |
issn | 0260-7840 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_reports_236613015 |
source | Business Source Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Air pollution caused by fuel industries Ammonia Applied sciences Costs Electric power production Electric power-plants Electric utilities Energy Energy. Thermal use of fuels Exact sciences and technology Flue gas Flue gases Fuel and fuel systems Gases Landfill Management Outdoor air quality Pollution reduction Power plants Sulfur Technology |
title | Cost pressures drive flue gas treatment into new and fertile regions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T12%3A48%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cost%20pressures%20drive%20flue%20gas%20treatment%20into%20new%20and%20fertile%20regions&rft.jtitle=Modern%20power%20systems&rft.au=SCHEUCH,%20F&rft.date=2000-11-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=33&rft.epage=35&rft.pages=33-35&rft.issn=0260-7840&rft.coden=MPSYDU&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA69070375%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14554864&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A69070375&rfr_iscdi=true |