A Tax Executive's Guide to Spin-offs: 10 Things You Won't See in Section 355
Speak With Directors and Officers First; Spins Are No Time for Loose Talk The corporation's directors and officers are likely aware that a spin is an effective way to distribute an operating business to the public with no federal income tax at either the corporate or the shareholder level and t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Tax Executive 2019-11, Vol.71 (6), p.23-30 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 30 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 23 |
container_title | Tax Executive |
container_volume | 71 |
creator | Bailey, David B |
description | Speak With Directors and Officers First; Spins Are No Time for Loose Talk The corporation's directors and officers are likely aware that a spin is an effective way to distribute an operating business to the public with no federal income tax at either the corporate or the shareholder level and that the company should obtain a PLR from the Internal Revenue Service and a tax opinion from a reputable firm confirming the spin's tax-free status. DEVICE TEST This test, dating back to the Gregory v. Helvering case, denies tax-free treatment for a spin that is actually a device to distribute earnings and profits to shareholders.1 The regulations spell out a number of factors that weigh in favor of a transaction's being considered a device and a number of non-device factors weighing against it.2 It is not necessary to educate the board and officers on all of these factors. BUSINESS PURPOSE The directors and officers of Distributing likely discussed a number of corporate business purposes before voting to approve the spin: the desire for each of Businesses A and B to have managers who are more focused on each business, the desire to avoid competition for capital within the company between Businesses A and B, and the desire for Business B to be able to do acquisitions using its own stock as currency. [...]as the PLR and tax opinion begin to take form, tax will need to verify that all the representations made in those documents are valid and supportable. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_2353669830</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2353669830</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_reports_23536698303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNyr0OgjAQAOAOmog_73BxYSI5qSXgZgzq4AaJcSIED60xLXKt4fF18AGcvuUbiQBxjRFirCZiyvxAxAwxDcRpC2U9QD5Q451-U8hw8PpK4CwUnTaRbVvewAqhvGtzY7hYD2drQgcFEWjzpXHaGpBKzcW4rZ9Mi58zsdzn5e4Ydb19eWJX9dTZ3nEVSyWTJEslyr_SB76NONk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2353669830</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Tax Executive's Guide to Spin-offs: 10 Things You Won't See in Section 355</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Bailey, David B</creator><creatorcontrib>Bailey, David B</creatorcontrib><description>Speak With Directors and Officers First; Spins Are No Time for Loose Talk The corporation's directors and officers are likely aware that a spin is an effective way to distribute an operating business to the public with no federal income tax at either the corporate or the shareholder level and that the company should obtain a PLR from the Internal Revenue Service and a tax opinion from a reputable firm confirming the spin's tax-free status. DEVICE TEST This test, dating back to the Gregory v. Helvering case, denies tax-free treatment for a spin that is actually a device to distribute earnings and profits to shareholders.1 The regulations spell out a number of factors that weigh in favor of a transaction's being considered a device and a number of non-device factors weighing against it.2 It is not necessary to educate the board and officers on all of these factors. BUSINESS PURPOSE The directors and officers of Distributing likely discussed a number of corporate business purposes before voting to approve the spin: the desire for each of Businesses A and B to have managers who are more focused on each business, the desire to avoid competition for capital within the company between Businesses A and B, and the desire for Business B to be able to do acquisitions using its own stock as currency. [...]as the PLR and tax opinion begin to take form, tax will need to verify that all the representations made in those documents are valid and supportable.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0040-0025</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Tax Executives Institute, Inc</publisher><subject>Directors ; Employees ; Enterprise resource planning ; Statutes of limitations ; Stockholders</subject><ispartof>Tax Executive, 2019-11, Vol.71 (6), p.23-30</ispartof><rights>Copyright Tax Executives Institute, Inc. Nov/Dec 2019</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>312,780,784,791</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bailey, David B</creatorcontrib><title>A Tax Executive's Guide to Spin-offs: 10 Things You Won't See in Section 355</title><title>Tax Executive</title><description>Speak With Directors and Officers First; Spins Are No Time for Loose Talk The corporation's directors and officers are likely aware that a spin is an effective way to distribute an operating business to the public with no federal income tax at either the corporate or the shareholder level and that the company should obtain a PLR from the Internal Revenue Service and a tax opinion from a reputable firm confirming the spin's tax-free status. DEVICE TEST This test, dating back to the Gregory v. Helvering case, denies tax-free treatment for a spin that is actually a device to distribute earnings and profits to shareholders.1 The regulations spell out a number of factors that weigh in favor of a transaction's being considered a device and a number of non-device factors weighing against it.2 It is not necessary to educate the board and officers on all of these factors. BUSINESS PURPOSE The directors and officers of Distributing likely discussed a number of corporate business purposes before voting to approve the spin: the desire for each of Businesses A and B to have managers who are more focused on each business, the desire to avoid competition for capital within the company between Businesses A and B, and the desire for Business B to be able to do acquisitions using its own stock as currency. [...]as the PLR and tax opinion begin to take form, tax will need to verify that all the representations made in those documents are valid and supportable.</description><subject>Directors</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Enterprise resource planning</subject><subject>Statutes of limitations</subject><subject>Stockholders</subject><issn>0040-0025</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNyr0OgjAQAOAOmog_73BxYSI5qSXgZgzq4AaJcSIED60xLXKt4fF18AGcvuUbiQBxjRFirCZiyvxAxAwxDcRpC2U9QD5Q451-U8hw8PpK4CwUnTaRbVvewAqhvGtzY7hYD2drQgcFEWjzpXHaGpBKzcW4rZ9Mi58zsdzn5e4Ydb19eWJX9dTZ3nEVSyWTJEslyr_SB76NONk</recordid><startdate>20191101</startdate><enddate>20191101</enddate><creator>Bailey, David B</creator><general>Tax Executives Institute, Inc</general><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4S-</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X1</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>8A9</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRAZJ</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191101</creationdate><title>A Tax Executive's Guide to Spin-offs: 10 Things You Won't See in Section 355</title><author>Bailey, David B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_reports_23536698303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Directors</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Enterprise resource planning</topic><topic>Statutes of limitations</topic><topic>Stockholders</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bailey, David B</creatorcontrib><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>BPIR.com Limited</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Accounting & Tax Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Accounting & Tax Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Tax Executive</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bailey, David B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Tax Executive's Guide to Spin-offs: 10 Things You Won't See in Section 355</atitle><jtitle>Tax Executive</jtitle><date>2019-11-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>23</spage><epage>30</epage><pages>23-30</pages><issn>0040-0025</issn><abstract>Speak With Directors and Officers First; Spins Are No Time for Loose Talk The corporation's directors and officers are likely aware that a spin is an effective way to distribute an operating business to the public with no federal income tax at either the corporate or the shareholder level and that the company should obtain a PLR from the Internal Revenue Service and a tax opinion from a reputable firm confirming the spin's tax-free status. DEVICE TEST This test, dating back to the Gregory v. Helvering case, denies tax-free treatment for a spin that is actually a device to distribute earnings and profits to shareholders.1 The regulations spell out a number of factors that weigh in favor of a transaction's being considered a device and a number of non-device factors weighing against it.2 It is not necessary to educate the board and officers on all of these factors. BUSINESS PURPOSE The directors and officers of Distributing likely discussed a number of corporate business purposes before voting to approve the spin: the desire for each of Businesses A and B to have managers who are more focused on each business, the desire to avoid competition for capital within the company between Businesses A and B, and the desire for Business B to be able to do acquisitions using its own stock as currency. [...]as the PLR and tax opinion begin to take form, tax will need to verify that all the representations made in those documents are valid and supportable.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Tax Executives Institute, Inc</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0040-0025 |
ispartof | Tax Executive, 2019-11, Vol.71 (6), p.23-30 |
issn | 0040-0025 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_reports_2353669830 |
source | Business Source Complete |
subjects | Directors Employees Enterprise resource planning Statutes of limitations Stockholders |
title | A Tax Executive's Guide to Spin-offs: 10 Things You Won't See in Section 355 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T06%3A03%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Tax%20Executive's%20Guide%20to%20Spin-offs:%2010%20Things%20You%20Won't%20See%20in%20Section%20355&rft.jtitle=Tax%20Executive&rft.au=Bailey,%20David%20B&rft.date=2019-11-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=23&rft.epage=30&rft.pages=23-30&rft.issn=0040-0025&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2353669830%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2353669830&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |