NCLB Seen as Largely Ineffective, PDK-Gallup Poll Finds
Some organizations questioned the results of the poll and suggested that PDK, a professional educators' organization that they believe is ideologically aligned with teachers' unions, was trying to preserve the status quo through the wording of its survey questions. The Milton and Rose D. F...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Education Week 2006-08, Vol.26 (1), p.7-7 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 7 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 7 |
container_title | Education Week |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Greifner, Laura |
description | Some organizations questioned the results of the poll and suggested that PDK, a professional educators' organization that they believe is ideologically aligned with teachers' unions, was trying to preserve the status quo through the wording of its survey questions. The Milton and Rose D. Friedman Foundation, an Indianapolis-based foundation that advocates vouchers and other school choice programs, and the Washington-based Cato Institute, a think tank that promotes a free-market philosophy, argue that the wording misleads poll interpreters into thinking that the public opposes school choice. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_2347952565</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A163813815</galeid><sourcerecordid>A163813815</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g2665-99de131b1804a92e95dc77eb813ddf39fbe1d20b7d27d1e54ab7dcf358fda2443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0V9LwzAQAPAiCs7pd4i-CVaaf036OKurw7INpr6WtLmUSmxn04l-eyPzwYHCuIc7wu-OHHcQjHDCWCgppYfBKCJChIxQchycOPcSRZEgnIwCMU_zG7QCaJFyKFd9DfYTzVowBqqheYcrtLx9CDNl7WaNlp21aNq02p0GR0ZZB2c_eRw8Te8e0_swX2SzdJKHNYljHiaJBkxxiWXEVEIg4boSAkqJqdaGJqYErElUCk2ExsCZ8mVlKJdGK8IYHQcX27nrvnvbgBuKHtZdP7iCUCYSTnjMPTr_D_m9ueQce3O9NbWyUDSt6YZeVT40vDZV5xdu_PsEx9T_TeLvoZc7Dd4M8DHUauNcMVvN97eL5_3tTba3lVm-a8O_bOVPBjUU_irp4rf_AqrtoWg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>202758551</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>NCLB Seen as Largely Ineffective, PDK-Gallup Poll Finds</title><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Education Week</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Greifner, Laura</creator><creatorcontrib>Greifner, Laura</creatorcontrib><description>Some organizations questioned the results of the poll and suggested that PDK, a professional educators' organization that they believe is ideologically aligned with teachers' unions, was trying to preserve the status quo through the wording of its survey questions. The Milton and Rose D. Friedman Foundation, an Indianapolis-based foundation that advocates vouchers and other school choice programs, and the Washington-based Cato Institute, a think tank that promotes a free-market philosophy, argue that the wording misleads poll interpreters into thinking that the public opposes school choice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0277-4232</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-8333</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bethesda: Editorial Projects in Education, Inc</publisher><subject>Criticism and interpretation ; Education law ; Educational aspects ; Educational Change ; Educational organizations ; Educational vouchers ; Federal Legislation ; Polls & surveys ; Public opinion ; Public Schools ; School choice ; Works</subject><ispartof>Education Week, 2006-08, Vol.26 (1), p.7-7</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2006 Editorial Projects in Education, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Editorial Projects in Education, Inc. Aug 30, 2006</rights><rights>Copyright © Editorial Projects in Education</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>312,314,776,780,787,17057</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Greifner, Laura</creatorcontrib><title>NCLB Seen as Largely Ineffective, PDK-Gallup Poll Finds</title><title>Education Week</title><addtitle>Education Week</addtitle><description>Some organizations questioned the results of the poll and suggested that PDK, a professional educators' organization that they believe is ideologically aligned with teachers' unions, was trying to preserve the status quo through the wording of its survey questions. The Milton and Rose D. Friedman Foundation, an Indianapolis-based foundation that advocates vouchers and other school choice programs, and the Washington-based Cato Institute, a think tank that promotes a free-market philosophy, argue that the wording misleads poll interpreters into thinking that the public opposes school choice.</description><subject>Criticism and interpretation</subject><subject>Education law</subject><subject>Educational aspects</subject><subject>Educational Change</subject><subject>Educational organizations</subject><subject>Educational vouchers</subject><subject>Federal Legislation</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Public opinion</subject><subject>Public Schools</subject><subject>School choice</subject><subject>Works</subject><issn>0277-4232</issn><issn>1944-8333</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>HYQOX</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0V9LwzAQAPAiCs7pd4i-CVaaf036OKurw7INpr6WtLmUSmxn04l-eyPzwYHCuIc7wu-OHHcQjHDCWCgppYfBKCJChIxQchycOPcSRZEgnIwCMU_zG7QCaJFyKFd9DfYTzVowBqqheYcrtLx9CDNl7WaNlp21aNq02p0GR0ZZB2c_eRw8Te8e0_swX2SzdJKHNYljHiaJBkxxiWXEVEIg4boSAkqJqdaGJqYErElUCk2ExsCZ8mVlKJdGK8IYHQcX27nrvnvbgBuKHtZdP7iCUCYSTnjMPTr_D_m9ueQce3O9NbWyUDSt6YZeVT40vDZV5xdu_PsEx9T_TeLvoZc7Dd4M8DHUauNcMVvN97eL5_3tTba3lVm-a8O_bOVPBjUU_irp4rf_AqrtoWg</recordid><startdate>20060830</startdate><enddate>20060830</enddate><creator>Greifner, Laura</creator><general>Editorial Projects in Education, Inc</general><general>Editorial Projects in Education</general><scope>8GL</scope><scope>IBG</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0TT</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>KB~</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7QS</scope><scope>BJDKH</scope><scope>ELDFC</scope><scope>HYQOX</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060830</creationdate><title>NCLB Seen as Largely Ineffective, PDK-Gallup Poll Finds</title><author>Greifner, Laura</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g2665-99de131b1804a92e95dc77eb813ddf39fbe1d20b7d27d1e54ab7dcf358fda2443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Criticism and interpretation</topic><topic>Education law</topic><topic>Educational aspects</topic><topic>Educational Change</topic><topic>Educational organizations</topic><topic>Educational vouchers</topic><topic>Federal Legislation</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Public opinion</topic><topic>Public Schools</topic><topic>School choice</topic><topic>Works</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Greifner, Laura</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Biography</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>News PRO</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Newsstand Professional</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 51</collection><collection>Education Magazine Archive</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 00</collection><collection>ProQuest Historical Periodicals</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><jtitle>Education Week</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Greifner, Laura</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>NCLB Seen as Largely Ineffective, PDK-Gallup Poll Finds</atitle><jtitle>Education Week</jtitle><addtitle>Education Week</addtitle><date>2006-08-30</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>7</spage><epage>7</epage><pages>7-7</pages><issn>0277-4232</issn><eissn>1944-8333</eissn><abstract>Some organizations questioned the results of the poll and suggested that PDK, a professional educators' organization that they believe is ideologically aligned with teachers' unions, was trying to preserve the status quo through the wording of its survey questions. The Milton and Rose D. Friedman Foundation, an Indianapolis-based foundation that advocates vouchers and other school choice programs, and the Washington-based Cato Institute, a think tank that promotes a free-market philosophy, argue that the wording misleads poll interpreters into thinking that the public opposes school choice.</abstract><cop>Bethesda</cop><pub>Editorial Projects in Education, Inc</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0277-4232 |
ispartof | Education Week, 2006-08, Vol.26 (1), p.7-7 |
issn | 0277-4232 1944-8333 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_reports_2347952565 |
source | Periodicals Index Online; Education Week; Education Source |
subjects | Criticism and interpretation Education law Educational aspects Educational Change Educational organizations Educational vouchers Federal Legislation Polls & surveys Public opinion Public Schools School choice Works |
title | NCLB Seen as Largely Ineffective, PDK-Gallup Poll Finds |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T05%3A27%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=NCLB%20Seen%20as%20Largely%20Ineffective,%20PDK-Gallup%20Poll%20Finds&rft.jtitle=Education%20Week&rft.au=Greifner,%20Laura&rft.date=2006-08-30&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=7&rft.epage=7&rft.pages=7-7&rft.issn=0277-4232&rft.eissn=1944-8333&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA163813815%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=202758551&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A163813815&rfr_iscdi=true |