Updating proficiency testing regulations

Bacteriology categories for which proficiency testing would be required, include: * Gram stain including bacterial morphology; direct bacterial antigen detection; * bacterial toxin detection; * antimicrobial susceptibility or resistance testing on select bacteria; * detection and identification of b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical Laboratory Observer 2019-09, Vol.51 (9), p.52-53
1. Verfasser: Stombler, Robin E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 53
container_issue 9
container_start_page 52
container_title Medical Laboratory Observer
container_volume 51
creator Stombler, Robin E
description Bacteriology categories for which proficiency testing would be required, include: * Gram stain including bacterial morphology; direct bacterial antigen detection; * bacterial toxin detection; * antimicrobial susceptibility or resistance testing on select bacteria; * detection and identification of bacteria (including detection of growth or no growth in culture media or identification of bacteria to the highest level that the laboratory reports results on patient specimens). Public comments on the proposed rule suggested that this grouping of microbiology needs to provide further details to labs. Better understanding the required coverage for organism sample types, specimen type, and test methods would assist labs in enrolling in annual proficiency testing programs. Given that the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services already has authority to "resolve technical, administrative, and scientific problems" that may arise with proficiency testing program operations, the proposed rule appears to overreach.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_2298749924</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2298749924</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_reports_22987499243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0MLUw0DU3MjHnYOAqLs4yAAILU0NOBo3QgpTEksy8dIWCovy0zOTM1LzkSoWS1GKwWFFqemkOUDo_r5iHgTUtMac4lRdKczMoubmGOHvoAvUVlgLVxxelFuQXlRTHGxlZWpibWFoamRgTpQgANwMvpg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2298749924</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Updating proficiency testing regulations</title><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Stombler, Robin E</creator><creatorcontrib>Stombler, Robin E</creatorcontrib><description>Bacteriology categories for which proficiency testing would be required, include: * Gram stain including bacterial morphology; direct bacterial antigen detection; * bacterial toxin detection; * antimicrobial susceptibility or resistance testing on select bacteria; * detection and identification of bacteria (including detection of growth or no growth in culture media or identification of bacteria to the highest level that the laboratory reports results on patient specimens). Public comments on the proposed rule suggested that this grouping of microbiology needs to provide further details to labs. Better understanding the required coverage for organism sample types, specimen type, and test methods would assist labs in enrolling in annual proficiency testing programs. Given that the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services already has authority to "resolve technical, administrative, and scientific problems" that may arise with proficiency testing program operations, the proposed rule appears to overreach.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0580-7247</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Nashville: Endeavor Business Media</publisher><subject>Antigens ; Bacteria ; Bacteriology ; Fungi ; Hemoglobin ; Identification ; Laboratories ; Nonprofit organizations ; Organisms ; Parasites ; Parasitology ; Tuberculosis ; Virology ; Yeast</subject><ispartof>Medical Laboratory Observer, 2019-09, Vol.51 (9), p.52-53</ispartof><rights>Copyright NP Communications, LLC Sep 2019</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>312,776,780,787</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stombler, Robin E</creatorcontrib><title>Updating proficiency testing regulations</title><title>Medical Laboratory Observer</title><description>Bacteriology categories for which proficiency testing would be required, include: * Gram stain including bacterial morphology; direct bacterial antigen detection; * bacterial toxin detection; * antimicrobial susceptibility or resistance testing on select bacteria; * detection and identification of bacteria (including detection of growth or no growth in culture media or identification of bacteria to the highest level that the laboratory reports results on patient specimens). Public comments on the proposed rule suggested that this grouping of microbiology needs to provide further details to labs. Better understanding the required coverage for organism sample types, specimen type, and test methods would assist labs in enrolling in annual proficiency testing programs. Given that the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services already has authority to "resolve technical, administrative, and scientific problems" that may arise with proficiency testing program operations, the proposed rule appears to overreach.</description><subject>Antigens</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Bacteriology</subject><subject>Fungi</subject><subject>Hemoglobin</subject><subject>Identification</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Nonprofit organizations</subject><subject>Organisms</subject><subject>Parasites</subject><subject>Parasitology</subject><subject>Tuberculosis</subject><subject>Virology</subject><subject>Yeast</subject><issn>0580-7247</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYeA0MLUw0DU3MjHnYOAqLs4yAAILU0NOBo3QgpTEksy8dIWCovy0zOTM1LzkSoWS1GKwWFFqemkOUDo_r5iHgTUtMac4lRdKczMoubmGOHvoAvUVlgLVxxelFuQXlRTHGxlZWpibWFoamRgTpQgANwMvpg</recordid><startdate>20190901</startdate><enddate>20190901</enddate><creator>Stombler, Robin E</creator><general>Endeavor Business Media</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190901</creationdate><title>Updating proficiency testing regulations</title><author>Stombler, Robin E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_reports_22987499243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Antigens</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Bacteriology</topic><topic>Fungi</topic><topic>Hemoglobin</topic><topic>Identification</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Nonprofit organizations</topic><topic>Organisms</topic><topic>Parasites</topic><topic>Parasitology</topic><topic>Tuberculosis</topic><topic>Virology</topic><topic>Yeast</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stombler, Robin E</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health Medical collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Medical Laboratory Observer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stombler, Robin E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Updating proficiency testing regulations</atitle><jtitle>Medical Laboratory Observer</jtitle><date>2019-09-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>52</spage><epage>53</epage><pages>52-53</pages><issn>0580-7247</issn><abstract>Bacteriology categories for which proficiency testing would be required, include: * Gram stain including bacterial morphology; direct bacterial antigen detection; * bacterial toxin detection; * antimicrobial susceptibility or resistance testing on select bacteria; * detection and identification of bacteria (including detection of growth or no growth in culture media or identification of bacteria to the highest level that the laboratory reports results on patient specimens). Public comments on the proposed rule suggested that this grouping of microbiology needs to provide further details to labs. Better understanding the required coverage for organism sample types, specimen type, and test methods would assist labs in enrolling in annual proficiency testing programs. Given that the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services already has authority to "resolve technical, administrative, and scientific problems" that may arise with proficiency testing program operations, the proposed rule appears to overreach.</abstract><cop>Nashville</cop><pub>Endeavor Business Media</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0580-7247
ispartof Medical Laboratory Observer, 2019-09, Vol.51 (9), p.52-53
issn 0580-7247
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_reports_2298749924
source EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Antigens
Bacteria
Bacteriology
Fungi
Hemoglobin
Identification
Laboratories
Nonprofit organizations
Organisms
Parasites
Parasitology
Tuberculosis
Virology
Yeast
title Updating proficiency testing regulations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T18%3A17%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Updating%20proficiency%20testing%20regulations&rft.jtitle=Medical%20Laboratory%20Observer&rft.au=Stombler,%20Robin%20E&rft.date=2019-09-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=52&rft.epage=53&rft.pages=52-53&rft.issn=0580-7247&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2298749924%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2298749924&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true