Consolidation beckons as providers count cost of MPF
The Mandatory Provident Fund (MPF) has experienced all the problems usually associated with such a large-scale government policy initiative - systems failures, bureaucratic confusion and a reluctance on the part of employers to comply. To compound these difficulties, the slump in equity markets mean...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Global Investor 2002-06 (153), p.4 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 153 |
container_start_page | 4 |
container_title | Global Investor |
container_volume | |
creator | Sills, Ben |
description | The Mandatory Provident Fund (MPF) has experienced all the problems usually associated with such a large-scale government policy initiative - systems failures, bureaucratic confusion and a reluctance on the part of employers to comply. To compound these difficulties, the slump in equity markets meant that for many investors their first experience of the MPF was a sobering one. For those players committed to the game, acquisitions look like the best way to build market share. While smaller companies that are not happy with their service providers are already switching, life is more complicated for bigger firms. They went through a lot of pain to get their MPF providers in place back in 2000 and they are reluctant to dismantle their administrative systems. Instead of switching, some are offering a second service provider. But in the next year or so they will begin reviewing their service providers. When that happens, big changes are expected. The leading providers are already planning their marketing strategy for 2003. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_229587913</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>140356071</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_reports_2295879133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0sDQ11DU2MzDhYOAqLs4yMDA0MjA242Qwcc7PK87PyUxJLMnMz1NISk3OBgooJBYrFBTll2WmpBYVKyTnl-aVAMniEoX8NAXfADceBta0xJziVF4ozc2g6OYa4uyhC9RTWJpaXBJflFqQX1RSHG9kZGlqYW5paGxMjBoAHiYyug</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>229587913</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Consolidation beckons as providers count cost of MPF</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Sills, Ben</creator><creatorcontrib>Sills, Ben</creatorcontrib><description>The Mandatory Provident Fund (MPF) has experienced all the problems usually associated with such a large-scale government policy initiative - systems failures, bureaucratic confusion and a reluctance on the part of employers to comply. To compound these difficulties, the slump in equity markets meant that for many investors their first experience of the MPF was a sobering one. For those players committed to the game, acquisitions look like the best way to build market share. While smaller companies that are not happy with their service providers are already switching, life is more complicated for bigger firms. They went through a lot of pain to get their MPF providers in place back in 2000 and they are reluctant to dismantle their administrative systems. Instead of switching, some are offering a second service provider. But in the next year or so they will begin reviewing their service providers. When that happens, big changes are expected. The leading providers are already planning their marketing strategy for 2003.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0951-3604</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC</publisher><subject>Competition ; Consolidation ; Equity ; Equity funds ; Investment advisors ; Investment policy ; Investments ; Investors ; Market strategy ; Marketing ; Pension funds</subject><ispartof>Global Investor, 2002-06 (153), p.4</ispartof><rights>Copyright Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC Jun 2002</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>312,776,780,787</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sills, Ben</creatorcontrib><title>Consolidation beckons as providers count cost of MPF</title><title>Global Investor</title><description>The Mandatory Provident Fund (MPF) has experienced all the problems usually associated with such a large-scale government policy initiative - systems failures, bureaucratic confusion and a reluctance on the part of employers to comply. To compound these difficulties, the slump in equity markets meant that for many investors their first experience of the MPF was a sobering one. For those players committed to the game, acquisitions look like the best way to build market share. While smaller companies that are not happy with their service providers are already switching, life is more complicated for bigger firms. They went through a lot of pain to get their MPF providers in place back in 2000 and they are reluctant to dismantle their administrative systems. Instead of switching, some are offering a second service provider. But in the next year or so they will begin reviewing their service providers. When that happens, big changes are expected. The leading providers are already planning their marketing strategy for 2003.</description><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Consolidation</subject><subject>Equity</subject><subject>Equity funds</subject><subject>Investment advisors</subject><subject>Investment policy</subject><subject>Investments</subject><subject>Investors</subject><subject>Market strategy</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Pension funds</subject><issn>0951-3604</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYeA0sDQ11DU2MzDhYOAqLs4yMDA0MjA242Qwcc7PK87PyUxJLMnMz1NISk3OBgooJBYrFBTll2WmpBYVKyTnl-aVAMniEoX8NAXfADceBta0xJziVF4ozc2g6OYa4uyhC9RTWJpaXBJflFqQX1RSHG9kZGlqYW5paGxMjBoAHiYyug</recordid><startdate>20020601</startdate><enddate>20020601</enddate><creator>Sills, Ben</creator><general>Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC</general><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X1</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>AXJJW</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0F</scope><scope>M0Q</scope><scope>M1F</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020601</creationdate><title>Consolidation beckons as providers count cost of MPF</title><author>Sills, Ben</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_reports_2295879133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Consolidation</topic><topic>Equity</topic><topic>Equity funds</topic><topic>Investment advisors</topic><topic>Investment policy</topic><topic>Investments</topic><topic>Investors</topic><topic>Market strategy</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Pension funds</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sills, Ben</creatorcontrib><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Accounting & Tax Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry</collection><collection>European Business Database</collection><collection>Banking Information Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Global Investor</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sills, Ben</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Consolidation beckons as providers count cost of MPF</atitle><jtitle>Global Investor</jtitle><date>2002-06-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><issue>153</issue><spage>4</spage><pages>4-</pages><issn>0951-3604</issn><abstract>The Mandatory Provident Fund (MPF) has experienced all the problems usually associated with such a large-scale government policy initiative - systems failures, bureaucratic confusion and a reluctance on the part of employers to comply. To compound these difficulties, the slump in equity markets meant that for many investors their first experience of the MPF was a sobering one. For those players committed to the game, acquisitions look like the best way to build market share. While smaller companies that are not happy with their service providers are already switching, life is more complicated for bigger firms. They went through a lot of pain to get their MPF providers in place back in 2000 and they are reluctant to dismantle their administrative systems. Instead of switching, some are offering a second service provider. But in the next year or so they will begin reviewing their service providers. When that happens, big changes are expected. The leading providers are already planning their marketing strategy for 2003.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0951-3604 |
ispartof | Global Investor, 2002-06 (153), p.4 |
issn | 0951-3604 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_reports_229587913 |
source | Business Source Complete |
subjects | Competition Consolidation Equity Equity funds Investment advisors Investment policy Investments Investors Market strategy Marketing Pension funds |
title | Consolidation beckons as providers count cost of MPF |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T06%3A21%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Consolidation%20beckons%20as%20providers%20count%20cost%20of%20MPF&rft.jtitle=Global%20Investor&rft.au=Sills,%20Ben&rft.date=2002-06-01&rft.issue=153&rft.spage=4&rft.pages=4-&rft.issn=0951-3604&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E140356071%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=229587913&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |