Patents give the DMCA needed teeth: salvaging copy protection in the post-Grokster era

The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) was enacted to help stem the tide of damage caused by computerized copying, including the provision of protection against circumvention of technological measures used by copyright owners to protect their works. For all its promise, however, the DMCA is sig...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Internet Law 2004-09, Vol.8 (3), p.15
Hauptverfasser: Katz, Ronald S, Becker, Robert D, Hayes, Steven M, Hansen, Shawn G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page 15
container_title Journal of Internet Law
container_volume 8
creator Katz, Ronald S
Becker, Robert D
Hayes, Steven M
Hansen, Shawn G
description The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) was enacted to help stem the tide of damage caused by computerized copying, including the provision of protection against circumvention of technological measures used by copyright owners to protect their works. For all its promise, however, the DMCA is significantly limited in its ability to protect copyright owners' rights, particularly in the post-Grokster era. Enter patent law, in which there is no right to fair use. A patent owner has the right to prevent anyone from using the patented technology without permission. Coupled with the DMCA provisions regarding technological measures to prevent unauthorized copying, patent protection for copy protection technologies provides a new and superior way to prevent or at least reduce illegal piracy. In this way, it is unnecessary to rely on technology for copy protection, which can be and almost always is defeated/circumvented in one way or another. This new legal strategy has been used effectively in Macrovision v 321 Studios, which will be discussed in this article.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_229348227</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A123676192</galeid><sourcerecordid>A123676192</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g1317-36c653c94a5d93a1b75cbe7092016d4fbffc6e972ec0929e7dbed1cd0a518e793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptz01LxDAQBuAeFFxX_0PEcyUfbdN4K6uuwooe1GtJk2k32k1qEhf89wbXi1DmMDA87zBzlC0IFkVOBS5OstMQ3jEmnNJ6kb09ywg2BjSYPaC4BXTzuGqQBdCgUQSI22sU5LiXg7EDUm76RpN3EVQ0ziJjfzOTCzFfe_cRIngEXp5lx70cA5z_9WX2enf7srrPN0_rh1WzyQfCCM9ZpaqSKVHIUgsmScdL1QHHgmJS6aLv-l5VIDgFlWYCuO5AE6WxLEkNXLBldnHYm276_IIQWw-T8zG0lApW1JTyZC4PZpAjtMb2LnqpdiaotiGUVbwigiaVz6gBbPpmdBZ6k8b__NWMT6VhZ9RM4Ad543ZN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>229348227</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patents give the DMCA needed teeth: salvaging copy protection in the post-Grokster era</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Katz, Ronald S ; Becker, Robert D ; Hayes, Steven M ; Hansen, Shawn G</creator><creatorcontrib>Katz, Ronald S ; Becker, Robert D ; Hayes, Steven M ; Hansen, Shawn G</creatorcontrib><description>The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) was enacted to help stem the tide of damage caused by computerized copying, including the provision of protection against circumvention of technological measures used by copyright owners to protect their works. For all its promise, however, the DMCA is significantly limited in its ability to protect copyright owners' rights, particularly in the post-Grokster era. Enter patent law, in which there is no right to fair use. A patent owner has the right to prevent anyone from using the patented technology without permission. Coupled with the DMCA provisions regarding technological measures to prevent unauthorized copying, patent protection for copy protection technologies provides a new and superior way to prevent or at least reduce illegal piracy. In this way, it is unnecessary to rely on technology for copy protection, which can be and almost always is defeated/circumvented in one way or another. This new legal strategy has been used effectively in Macrovision v 321 Studios, which will be discussed in this article.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1094-2904</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Aspen Publishers, Inc</publisher><subject>Cable telephony ; Computers ; Copyright ; Data encryption ; Digital broadcasting ; Digital Millennium Copyright Act 1998-US ; DVD recorders ; Fair use ; File sharing ; Infringement ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Licenses ; Licensing ; Loopholes ; Patent law ; Software ; Technology</subject><ispartof>Journal of Internet Law, 2004-09, Vol.8 (3), p.15</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2004 Aspen Publishers, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Aspen Publishers, Inc. Sep 2004</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>313,315,782,786,793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Katz, Ronald S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becker, Robert D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayes, Steven M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansen, Shawn G</creatorcontrib><title>Patents give the DMCA needed teeth: salvaging copy protection in the post-Grokster era</title><title>Journal of Internet Law</title><description>The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) was enacted to help stem the tide of damage caused by computerized copying, including the provision of protection against circumvention of technological measures used by copyright owners to protect their works. For all its promise, however, the DMCA is significantly limited in its ability to protect copyright owners' rights, particularly in the post-Grokster era. Enter patent law, in which there is no right to fair use. A patent owner has the right to prevent anyone from using the patented technology without permission. Coupled with the DMCA provisions regarding technological measures to prevent unauthorized copying, patent protection for copy protection technologies provides a new and superior way to prevent or at least reduce illegal piracy. In this way, it is unnecessary to rely on technology for copy protection, which can be and almost always is defeated/circumvented in one way or another. This new legal strategy has been used effectively in Macrovision v 321 Studios, which will be discussed in this article.</description><subject>Cable telephony</subject><subject>Computers</subject><subject>Copyright</subject><subject>Data encryption</subject><subject>Digital broadcasting</subject><subject>Digital Millennium Copyright Act 1998-US</subject><subject>DVD recorders</subject><subject>Fair use</subject><subject>File sharing</subject><subject>Infringement</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Licenses</subject><subject>Licensing</subject><subject>Loopholes</subject><subject>Patent law</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Technology</subject><issn>1094-2904</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptz01LxDAQBuAeFFxX_0PEcyUfbdN4K6uuwooe1GtJk2k32k1qEhf89wbXi1DmMDA87zBzlC0IFkVOBS5OstMQ3jEmnNJ6kb09ywg2BjSYPaC4BXTzuGqQBdCgUQSI22sU5LiXg7EDUm76RpN3EVQ0ziJjfzOTCzFfe_cRIngEXp5lx70cA5z_9WX2enf7srrPN0_rh1WzyQfCCM9ZpaqSKVHIUgsmScdL1QHHgmJS6aLv-l5VIDgFlWYCuO5AE6WxLEkNXLBldnHYm276_IIQWw-T8zG0lApW1JTyZC4PZpAjtMb2LnqpdiaotiGUVbwigiaVz6gBbPpmdBZ6k8b__NWMT6VhZ9RM4Ad543ZN</recordid><startdate>20040901</startdate><enddate>20040901</enddate><creator>Katz, Ronald S</creator><creator>Becker, Robert D</creator><creator>Hayes, Steven M</creator><creator>Hansen, Shawn G</creator><general>Aspen Publishers, Inc</general><scope>ILT</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040901</creationdate><title>Patents give the DMCA needed teeth: salvaging copy protection in the post-Grokster era</title><author>Katz, Ronald S ; Becker, Robert D ; Hayes, Steven M ; Hansen, Shawn G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g1317-36c653c94a5d93a1b75cbe7092016d4fbffc6e972ec0929e7dbed1cd0a518e793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Cable telephony</topic><topic>Computers</topic><topic>Copyright</topic><topic>Data encryption</topic><topic>Digital broadcasting</topic><topic>Digital Millennium Copyright Act 1998-US</topic><topic>DVD recorders</topic><topic>Fair use</topic><topic>File sharing</topic><topic>Infringement</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Licenses</topic><topic>Licensing</topic><topic>Loopholes</topic><topic>Patent law</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Technology</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Katz, Ronald S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becker, Robert D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayes, Steven M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansen, Shawn G</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale OneFile: LegalTrac</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of Internet Law</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Katz, Ronald S</au><au>Becker, Robert D</au><au>Hayes, Steven M</au><au>Hansen, Shawn G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patents give the DMCA needed teeth: salvaging copy protection in the post-Grokster era</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Internet Law</jtitle><date>2004-09-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>15</spage><pages>15-</pages><issn>1094-2904</issn><abstract>The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) was enacted to help stem the tide of damage caused by computerized copying, including the provision of protection against circumvention of technological measures used by copyright owners to protect their works. For all its promise, however, the DMCA is significantly limited in its ability to protect copyright owners' rights, particularly in the post-Grokster era. Enter patent law, in which there is no right to fair use. A patent owner has the right to prevent anyone from using the patented technology without permission. Coupled with the DMCA provisions regarding technological measures to prevent unauthorized copying, patent protection for copy protection technologies provides a new and superior way to prevent or at least reduce illegal piracy. In this way, it is unnecessary to rely on technology for copy protection, which can be and almost always is defeated/circumvented in one way or another. This new legal strategy has been used effectively in Macrovision v 321 Studios, which will be discussed in this article.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Aspen Publishers, Inc</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1094-2904
ispartof Journal of Internet Law, 2004-09, Vol.8 (3), p.15
issn 1094-2904
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_reports_229348227
source EBSCOhost Business Source Complete
subjects Cable telephony
Computers
Copyright
Data encryption
Digital broadcasting
Digital Millennium Copyright Act 1998-US
DVD recorders
Fair use
File sharing
Infringement
Laws, regulations and rules
Licenses
Licensing
Loopholes
Patent law
Software
Technology
title Patents give the DMCA needed teeth: salvaging copy protection in the post-Grokster era
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-03T13%3A45%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patents%20give%20the%20DMCA%20needed%20teeth:%20salvaging%20copy%20protection%20in%20the%20post-Grokster%20era&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Internet%20Law&rft.au=Katz,%20Ronald%20S&rft.date=2004-09-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=15&rft.pages=15-&rft.issn=1094-2904&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA123676192%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=229348227&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A123676192&rfr_iscdi=true