At the Intersection Of Regulation and Bankruptcy: FCC v. Nextwave
Last Term, in FCC v. NextWave Personal Communications, Inc. ("Next-Wave"), the Supreme Court held that the Federal Communications Commission could not revoke wireless communications licenses held by a debtor-in-possession under the Bankruptcy Code, following that debtor's failure to m...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Business Lawyer 2003-11, Vol.59 (1), p.1-22 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 22 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | The Business Lawyer |
container_volume | 59 |
creator | Perlstein, William J. Bamberger, Kenneth A. |
description | Last Term, in FCC v. NextWave Personal Communications, Inc. ("Next-Wave"), the Supreme Court held that the Federal Communications Commission could not revoke wireless communications licenses held by a debtor-in-possession under the Bankruptcy Code, following that debtor's failure to make timely payments owed for their purchase. The Code, the Court held, prevented the agency from canceling licenses issued pursuant to its administrative authority, notwithstanding the licensee's violation of a "full and timely payment" requirement established by agency regulation. The decision is significant in its particulars: the holding concerned the allocation of valuable licenses to use wireless spectrum. Yet the case also has much broader ramifications for the treatment of government agencies in bankruptcy proceedings. Specifically, the Court's opinion signals three related principles that may impose significant limitations on the power of administrative agencies participating in bankruptcy proceedings. First, agencies are subject to the strictures of the Bankruptcy Code, even when they act in a regulatory capacity; second, bankruptcy law may prohibit the enforcement of a wide array of license conditions; and third, the Bankruptcy Code trumps agency licensing rules. At the same time, however, the opinion leaves in place lower court decisions limiting bankruptcy jurisdiction over administrative action. This Article describes the factual and procedural history of Next Wave's dispute with the FCC, and engages in a preliminary assessment of the case's broader implications for administrative agencies. Thus, it seeks to explore some of the consequences of the Court's decision for the treatment of government creditors in bankruptcy proceedings and for the jurisdiction of the bankruptcy courts over administrative matters. Finally, it explores the options remaining for government entities structuring licensing procedures in an attempt to comport with the NextWave decision's holdings. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_228462061</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A112797806</galeid><jstor_id>40688188</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A112797806</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g306t-4829e0c25bf8ccfcca4178fdef546a9f57ac7fae9f0d6b4cafedf7ec62c72b63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptjFFLwzAcxIMoOKcfQYj43JGkWZL6VovTwXAgey9Z-k_t7NKaZOq-vdX5Iox7OO743Z2gEaOCJ1Sl6hSNCCEyESrLztFFCJshUqbSEcrziOMr4LmL4AOY2HQOLy1-gXrX6t-kXYXvtXvzuz6a_R2eFQX-mOBn-Iqf-gMu0ZnVbYCrPx-j1exhVTwli-XjvMgXSZ0SEROuWAbEsOnaKmOsMZpTqWwFdsqFzuxUaiOthsySSqy50RYqK8EIZiRbi3SMbg63ve_edxBi6aHvfAwlY4oLRgQdmNsDU-sWysbZLnpttk0wZU4pk5lU5OcpOULV4MDrtnNgm6H-x0-O8IMq2Dbm6OD6MNiE2Pmy981W-33JiVCKKpV-A0pdetI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>228462061</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>At the Intersection Of Regulation and Bankruptcy: FCC v. Nextwave</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Perlstein, William J. ; Bamberger, Kenneth A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Perlstein, William J. ; Bamberger, Kenneth A.</creatorcontrib><description>Last Term, in FCC v. NextWave Personal Communications, Inc. ("Next-Wave"), the Supreme Court held that the Federal Communications Commission could not revoke wireless communications licenses held by a debtor-in-possession under the Bankruptcy Code, following that debtor's failure to make timely payments owed for their purchase. The Code, the Court held, prevented the agency from canceling licenses issued pursuant to its administrative authority, notwithstanding the licensee's violation of a "full and timely payment" requirement established by agency regulation. The decision is significant in its particulars: the holding concerned the allocation of valuable licenses to use wireless spectrum. Yet the case also has much broader ramifications for the treatment of government agencies in bankruptcy proceedings. Specifically, the Court's opinion signals three related principles that may impose significant limitations on the power of administrative agencies participating in bankruptcy proceedings. First, agencies are subject to the strictures of the Bankruptcy Code, even when they act in a regulatory capacity; second, bankruptcy law may prohibit the enforcement of a wide array of license conditions; and third, the Bankruptcy Code trumps agency licensing rules. At the same time, however, the opinion leaves in place lower court decisions limiting bankruptcy jurisdiction over administrative action. This Article describes the factual and procedural history of Next Wave's dispute with the FCC, and engages in a preliminary assessment of the case's broader implications for administrative agencies. Thus, it seeks to explore some of the consequences of the Court's decision for the treatment of government creditors in bankruptcy proceedings and for the jurisdiction of the bankruptcy courts over administrative matters. Finally, it explores the options remaining for government entities structuring licensing procedures in an attempt to comport with the NextWave decision's holdings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-6899</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2164-1838</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: Section of Business Law of the American Bar Association</publisher><subject>Administrative agencies ; Auctions ; Banking regulation ; Bankruptcy Code ; Bankruptcy courts ; Bankruptcy discharges ; Bankruptcy law ; Bankruptcy laws ; Bids ; Commercial law ; Commercial regulation ; Debtors ; Federal court decisions ; Federal courts ; Financial regulation ; Government agencies ; Installment payments ; Interpretation and construction ; Jurisdiction ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Licenses ; Licensing ; Mobile communication systems ; Payments ; Regulation ; Small business ; Spectrum allocation ; State court decisions ; Supreme Court decisions ; Wireless carriers ; Wireless communication systems</subject><ispartof>The Business Lawyer, 2003-11, Vol.59 (1), p.1-22</ispartof><rights>2003 American Bar Association</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2003 American Bar Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Bar Association, Section of Business Law Nov 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40688188$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40688188$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>312,314,780,784,791,803,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Perlstein, William J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bamberger, Kenneth A.</creatorcontrib><title>At the Intersection Of Regulation and Bankruptcy: FCC v. Nextwave</title><title>The Business Lawyer</title><description>Last Term, in FCC v. NextWave Personal Communications, Inc. ("Next-Wave"), the Supreme Court held that the Federal Communications Commission could not revoke wireless communications licenses held by a debtor-in-possession under the Bankruptcy Code, following that debtor's failure to make timely payments owed for their purchase. The Code, the Court held, prevented the agency from canceling licenses issued pursuant to its administrative authority, notwithstanding the licensee's violation of a "full and timely payment" requirement established by agency regulation. The decision is significant in its particulars: the holding concerned the allocation of valuable licenses to use wireless spectrum. Yet the case also has much broader ramifications for the treatment of government agencies in bankruptcy proceedings. Specifically, the Court's opinion signals three related principles that may impose significant limitations on the power of administrative agencies participating in bankruptcy proceedings. First, agencies are subject to the strictures of the Bankruptcy Code, even when they act in a regulatory capacity; second, bankruptcy law may prohibit the enforcement of a wide array of license conditions; and third, the Bankruptcy Code trumps agency licensing rules. At the same time, however, the opinion leaves in place lower court decisions limiting bankruptcy jurisdiction over administrative action. This Article describes the factual and procedural history of Next Wave's dispute with the FCC, and engages in a preliminary assessment of the case's broader implications for administrative agencies. Thus, it seeks to explore some of the consequences of the Court's decision for the treatment of government creditors in bankruptcy proceedings and for the jurisdiction of the bankruptcy courts over administrative matters. Finally, it explores the options remaining for government entities structuring licensing procedures in an attempt to comport with the NextWave decision's holdings.</description><subject>Administrative agencies</subject><subject>Auctions</subject><subject>Banking regulation</subject><subject>Bankruptcy Code</subject><subject>Bankruptcy courts</subject><subject>Bankruptcy discharges</subject><subject>Bankruptcy law</subject><subject>Bankruptcy laws</subject><subject>Bids</subject><subject>Commercial law</subject><subject>Commercial regulation</subject><subject>Debtors</subject><subject>Federal court decisions</subject><subject>Federal courts</subject><subject>Financial regulation</subject><subject>Government agencies</subject><subject>Installment payments</subject><subject>Interpretation and construction</subject><subject>Jurisdiction</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Licenses</subject><subject>Licensing</subject><subject>Mobile communication systems</subject><subject>Payments</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Small business</subject><subject>Spectrum allocation</subject><subject>State court decisions</subject><subject>Supreme Court decisions</subject><subject>Wireless carriers</subject><subject>Wireless communication systems</subject><issn>0007-6899</issn><issn>2164-1838</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptjFFLwzAcxIMoOKcfQYj43JGkWZL6VovTwXAgey9Z-k_t7NKaZOq-vdX5Iox7OO743Z2gEaOCJ1Sl6hSNCCEyESrLztFFCJshUqbSEcrziOMr4LmL4AOY2HQOLy1-gXrX6t-kXYXvtXvzuz6a_R2eFQX-mOBn-Iqf-gMu0ZnVbYCrPx-j1exhVTwli-XjvMgXSZ0SEROuWAbEsOnaKmOsMZpTqWwFdsqFzuxUaiOthsySSqy50RYqK8EIZiRbi3SMbg63ve_edxBi6aHvfAwlY4oLRgQdmNsDU-sWysbZLnpttk0wZU4pk5lU5OcpOULV4MDrtnNgm6H-x0-O8IMq2Dbm6OD6MNiE2Pmy981W-33JiVCKKpV-A0pdetI</recordid><startdate>20031101</startdate><enddate>20031101</enddate><creator>Perlstein, William J.</creator><creator>Bamberger, Kenneth A.</creator><general>Section of Business Law of the American Bar Association</general><general>American Bar Association</general><scope>ILT</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X5</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>885</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRAZJ</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1F</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20031101</creationdate><title>At the Intersection Of Regulation and Bankruptcy: FCC v. Nextwave</title><author>Perlstein, William J. ; Bamberger, Kenneth A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g306t-4829e0c25bf8ccfcca4178fdef546a9f57ac7fae9f0d6b4cafedf7ec62c72b63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Administrative agencies</topic><topic>Auctions</topic><topic>Banking regulation</topic><topic>Bankruptcy Code</topic><topic>Bankruptcy courts</topic><topic>Bankruptcy discharges</topic><topic>Bankruptcy law</topic><topic>Bankruptcy laws</topic><topic>Bids</topic><topic>Commercial law</topic><topic>Commercial regulation</topic><topic>Debtors</topic><topic>Federal court decisions</topic><topic>Federal courts</topic><topic>Financial regulation</topic><topic>Government agencies</topic><topic>Installment payments</topic><topic>Interpretation and construction</topic><topic>Jurisdiction</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Licenses</topic><topic>Licensing</topic><topic>Mobile communication systems</topic><topic>Payments</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Small business</topic><topic>Spectrum allocation</topic><topic>State court decisions</topic><topic>Supreme Court decisions</topic><topic>Wireless carriers</topic><topic>Wireless communication systems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Perlstein, William J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bamberger, Kenneth A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale OneFile: LegalTrac</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Entrepreneurship Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Banking Information Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Banking Information Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The Business Lawyer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Perlstein, William J.</au><au>Bamberger, Kenneth A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>At the Intersection Of Regulation and Bankruptcy: FCC v. Nextwave</atitle><jtitle>The Business Lawyer</jtitle><date>2003-11-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>22</epage><pages>1-22</pages><issn>0007-6899</issn><eissn>2164-1838</eissn><abstract>Last Term, in FCC v. NextWave Personal Communications, Inc. ("Next-Wave"), the Supreme Court held that the Federal Communications Commission could not revoke wireless communications licenses held by a debtor-in-possession under the Bankruptcy Code, following that debtor's failure to make timely payments owed for their purchase. The Code, the Court held, prevented the agency from canceling licenses issued pursuant to its administrative authority, notwithstanding the licensee's violation of a "full and timely payment" requirement established by agency regulation. The decision is significant in its particulars: the holding concerned the allocation of valuable licenses to use wireless spectrum. Yet the case also has much broader ramifications for the treatment of government agencies in bankruptcy proceedings. Specifically, the Court's opinion signals three related principles that may impose significant limitations on the power of administrative agencies participating in bankruptcy proceedings. First, agencies are subject to the strictures of the Bankruptcy Code, even when they act in a regulatory capacity; second, bankruptcy law may prohibit the enforcement of a wide array of license conditions; and third, the Bankruptcy Code trumps agency licensing rules. At the same time, however, the opinion leaves in place lower court decisions limiting bankruptcy jurisdiction over administrative action. This Article describes the factual and procedural history of Next Wave's dispute with the FCC, and engages in a preliminary assessment of the case's broader implications for administrative agencies. Thus, it seeks to explore some of the consequences of the Court's decision for the treatment of government creditors in bankruptcy proceedings and for the jurisdiction of the bankruptcy courts over administrative matters. Finally, it explores the options remaining for government entities structuring licensing procedures in an attempt to comport with the NextWave decision's holdings.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>Section of Business Law of the American Bar Association</pub><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-6899 |
ispartof | The Business Lawyer, 2003-11, Vol.59 (1), p.1-22 |
issn | 0007-6899 2164-1838 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_reports_228462061 |
source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Administrative agencies Auctions Banking regulation Bankruptcy Code Bankruptcy courts Bankruptcy discharges Bankruptcy law Bankruptcy laws Bids Commercial law Commercial regulation Debtors Federal court decisions Federal courts Financial regulation Government agencies Installment payments Interpretation and construction Jurisdiction Laws, regulations and rules Licenses Licensing Mobile communication systems Payments Regulation Small business Spectrum allocation State court decisions Supreme Court decisions Wireless carriers Wireless communication systems |
title | At the Intersection Of Regulation and Bankruptcy: FCC v. Nextwave |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T09%3A39%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=At%20the%20Intersection%20Of%20Regulation%20and%20Bankruptcy:%20FCC%20v.%20Nextwave&rft.jtitle=The%20Business%20Lawyer&rft.au=Perlstein,%20William%20J.&rft.date=2003-11-01&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=22&rft.pages=1-22&rft.issn=0007-6899&rft.eissn=2164-1838&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA112797806%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=228462061&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A112797806&rft_jstor_id=40688188&rfr_iscdi=true |