Special Report of the TriBar Opinion Committee: The Remedies Opinion—Deciding When to Include Exceptions and Assumptions
The TriBar Opinion Committee's report on Third-Party "Closing" Opinions ("1998 TriBar Report") describes customary practice in preparing and interpreting third-party closing opinions. This report augments the analysis of the remedies opinion contained in that report. The rem...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Business Lawyer 2004-08, Vol.59 (4), p.1483-1504 |
|---|---|
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1504 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 1483 |
| container_title | The Business Lawyer |
| container_volume | 59 |
| description | The TriBar Opinion Committee's report on Third-Party "Closing" Opinions ("1998 TriBar Report") describes customary practice in preparing and interpreting third-party closing opinions. This report augments the analysis of the remedies opinion contained in that report. The remedies opinion addresses the enforceability of each of the undertakings of the opinion giver's client (the "Company") in the agreement between the Company and the opinion recipient. These undertakings include affirmative and negative covenants of the Company and the remedies specified in the agreement for breaches by the Company of its contractual obligations. They also include provisions for interpreting and administering the agreement and resolving disputes under it. The meaning of the remedies opinion is based on the customary practice of lawyers who regularly give, and lawyers who regularly advise clients regarding opinions of the kind involved. By amplifying the meaning of abbreviated opinion language, customary practice provides the framework for preparing and interpreting the opinion. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_228449209</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A128972111</galeid><jstor_id>40688245</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A128972111</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g306t-53656c59c7512d54d492dfc2ec73c22cae2542ce08aaf595bf461e24c1e0441c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkMFKxDAQhosouK4-ghDxXGnSpE29reuqCwvCuuKxxHTazdImNcmCevIhfEKfxGD1ICxzGGb-7_9hZi8aEZzRGPOU70ejJEnyOONFcRgdObcJIyY8HUXvDz1IJVq0hN5Yj0yN_BrQyqorYdF9r7QyGk1N1ynvAS7RKqhL6KBS4P70r4_P65BSKd2gpzVo5A2aa9luK0CzVwm9D5BDQldo4ty2G-bj6KAWrYOT3z6OHm9mq-ldvLi_nU8ni7hJk8zHLM1YJlkhc4ZJxWhFC1LVkoDMU0mIFEAYJRISLkTNCvZc0wwDoRJDQimW6Tg6G3J7a1624Hxpf251JSGchrSkCMz5wDSihVLp2ngrZKecLCfhUUVOMMaBindQDWiwojUaahXW__iLHXyoCjoldxpOB8PGeWPL3qpO2LeSJhnnhLL0G2OJj5c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>228449209</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Special Report of the TriBar Opinion Committee: The Remedies Opinion—Deciding When to Include Exceptions and Assumptions</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><description>The TriBar Opinion Committee's report on Third-Party "Closing" Opinions ("1998 TriBar Report") describes customary practice in preparing and interpreting third-party closing opinions. This report augments the analysis of the remedies opinion contained in that report. The remedies opinion addresses the enforceability of each of the undertakings of the opinion giver's client (the "Company") in the agreement between the Company and the opinion recipient. These undertakings include affirmative and negative covenants of the Company and the remedies specified in the agreement for breaches by the Company of its contractual obligations. They also include provisions for interpreting and administering the agreement and resolving disputes under it. The meaning of the remedies opinion is based on the customary practice of lawyers who regularly give, and lawyers who regularly advise clients regarding opinions of the kind involved. By amplifying the meaning of abbreviated opinion language, customary practice provides the framework for preparing and interpreting the opinion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-6899</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2164-1838</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: Section of Business Law of the American Bar Association</publisher><subject>Agreements ; Attorneys ; Bankruptcy ; Client relationships ; Commercial law ; Contract law ; Contract provisions ; Contracts ; Governing laws clause ; Interest rates ; Jurisdiction ; Law ; Lawyer client communication ; Legal research ; Legal services ; Liability ; Principles ; Provisions ; Restatements of the law ; State court decisions ; Statutory law ; Third parties (Law) ; Third party ; Usury</subject><ispartof>The Business Lawyer, 2004-08, Vol.59 (4), p.1483-1504</ispartof><rights>2004 American Bar Association</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2004 American Bar Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Bar Association, Section of Business Law Aug 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40688245$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40688245$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>312,314,776,780,787,799,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><title>Special Report of the TriBar Opinion Committee: The Remedies Opinion—Deciding When to Include Exceptions and Assumptions</title><title>The Business Lawyer</title><description>The TriBar Opinion Committee's report on Third-Party "Closing" Opinions ("1998 TriBar Report") describes customary practice in preparing and interpreting third-party closing opinions. This report augments the analysis of the remedies opinion contained in that report. The remedies opinion addresses the enforceability of each of the undertakings of the opinion giver's client (the "Company") in the agreement between the Company and the opinion recipient. These undertakings include affirmative and negative covenants of the Company and the remedies specified in the agreement for breaches by the Company of its contractual obligations. They also include provisions for interpreting and administering the agreement and resolving disputes under it. The meaning of the remedies opinion is based on the customary practice of lawyers who regularly give, and lawyers who regularly advise clients regarding opinions of the kind involved. By amplifying the meaning of abbreviated opinion language, customary practice provides the framework for preparing and interpreting the opinion.</description><subject>Agreements</subject><subject>Attorneys</subject><subject>Bankruptcy</subject><subject>Client relationships</subject><subject>Commercial law</subject><subject>Contract law</subject><subject>Contract provisions</subject><subject>Contracts</subject><subject>Governing laws clause</subject><subject>Interest rates</subject><subject>Jurisdiction</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Lawyer client communication</subject><subject>Legal research</subject><subject>Legal services</subject><subject>Liability</subject><subject>Principles</subject><subject>Provisions</subject><subject>Restatements of the law</subject><subject>State court decisions</subject><subject>Statutory law</subject><subject>Third parties (Law)</subject><subject>Third party</subject><subject>Usury</subject><issn>0007-6899</issn><issn>2164-1838</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkMFKxDAQhosouK4-ghDxXGnSpE29reuqCwvCuuKxxHTazdImNcmCevIhfEKfxGD1ICxzGGb-7_9hZi8aEZzRGPOU70ejJEnyOONFcRgdObcJIyY8HUXvDz1IJVq0hN5Yj0yN_BrQyqorYdF9r7QyGk1N1ynvAS7RKqhL6KBS4P70r4_P65BSKd2gpzVo5A2aa9luK0CzVwm9D5BDQldo4ty2G-bj6KAWrYOT3z6OHm9mq-ldvLi_nU8ni7hJk8zHLM1YJlkhc4ZJxWhFC1LVkoDMU0mIFEAYJRISLkTNCvZc0wwDoRJDQimW6Tg6G3J7a1624Hxpf251JSGchrSkCMz5wDSihVLp2ngrZKecLCfhUUVOMMaBindQDWiwojUaahXW__iLHXyoCjoldxpOB8PGeWPL3qpO2LeSJhnnhLL0G2OJj5c</recordid><startdate>20040801</startdate><enddate>20040801</enddate><general>Section of Business Law of the American Bar Association</general><general>American Bar Association</general><scope>ILT</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>885</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRAZJ</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1F</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040801</creationdate><title>Special Report of the TriBar Opinion Committee: The Remedies Opinion—Deciding When to Include Exceptions and Assumptions</title></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g306t-53656c59c7512d54d492dfc2ec73c22cae2542ce08aaf595bf461e24c1e0441c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Agreements</topic><topic>Attorneys</topic><topic>Bankruptcy</topic><topic>Client relationships</topic><topic>Commercial law</topic><topic>Contract law</topic><topic>Contract provisions</topic><topic>Contracts</topic><topic>Governing laws clause</topic><topic>Interest rates</topic><topic>Jurisdiction</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Lawyer client communication</topic><topic>Legal research</topic><topic>Legal services</topic><topic>Liability</topic><topic>Principles</topic><topic>Provisions</topic><topic>Restatements of the law</topic><topic>State court decisions</topic><topic>Statutory law</topic><topic>Third parties (Law)</topic><topic>Third party</topic><topic>Usury</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><collection>Gale OneFile: LegalTrac</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Banking Information Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Banking Information Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The Business Lawyer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Special Report of the TriBar Opinion Committee: The Remedies Opinion—Deciding When to Include Exceptions and Assumptions</atitle><jtitle>The Business Lawyer</jtitle><date>2004-08-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1483</spage><epage>1504</epage><pages>1483-1504</pages><issn>0007-6899</issn><eissn>2164-1838</eissn><abstract>The TriBar Opinion Committee's report on Third-Party "Closing" Opinions ("1998 TriBar Report") describes customary practice in preparing and interpreting third-party closing opinions. This report augments the analysis of the remedies opinion contained in that report. The remedies opinion addresses the enforceability of each of the undertakings of the opinion giver's client (the "Company") in the agreement between the Company and the opinion recipient. These undertakings include affirmative and negative covenants of the Company and the remedies specified in the agreement for breaches by the Company of its contractual obligations. They also include provisions for interpreting and administering the agreement and resolving disputes under it. The meaning of the remedies opinion is based on the customary practice of lawyers who regularly give, and lawyers who regularly advise clients regarding opinions of the kind involved. By amplifying the meaning of abbreviated opinion language, customary practice provides the framework for preparing and interpreting the opinion.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>Section of Business Law of the American Bar Association</pub><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0007-6899 |
| ispartof | The Business Lawyer, 2004-08, Vol.59 (4), p.1483-1504 |
| issn | 0007-6899 2164-1838 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_reports_228449209 |
| source | Jstor Complete Legacy; HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
| subjects | Agreements Attorneys Bankruptcy Client relationships Commercial law Contract law Contract provisions Contracts Governing laws clause Interest rates Jurisdiction Law Lawyer client communication Legal research Legal services Liability Principles Provisions Restatements of the law State court decisions Statutory law Third parties (Law) Third party Usury |
| title | Special Report of the TriBar Opinion Committee: The Remedies Opinion—Deciding When to Include Exceptions and Assumptions |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T05%3A23%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Special%20Report%20of%20the%20TriBar%20Opinion%20Committee:%20The%20Remedies%20Opinion%E2%80%94Deciding%20When%20to%20Include%20Exceptions%20and%20Assumptions&rft.jtitle=The%20Business%20Lawyer&rft.date=2004-08-01&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1483&rft.epage=1504&rft.pages=1483-1504&rft.issn=0007-6899&rft.eissn=2164-1838&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA128972111%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=228449209&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A128972111&rft_jstor_id=40688245&rfr_iscdi=true |