Software Transactions and Uniformity: Accommodating Codes Under the Code
The issue has emerged of whether there is a need to achieve uniformity in the law of software contracting. The question of adequate uniformity is considered against the backdrop of rapid technological, commercial, and legal changes. The past year's court decisions show disarray as to how the de...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Business lawyer 1991-08, Vol.46 (4), p.1825-1853 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1853 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1825 |
container_title | The Business lawyer |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Ritter, Jeffrey B. |
description | The issue has emerged of whether there is a need to achieve uniformity in the law of software contracting. The question of adequate uniformity is considered against the backdrop of rapid technological, commercial, and legal changes. The past year's court decisions show disarray as to how the determination is made of whether software products are "goods" under Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) Article 2. In instances where customers purchase computer systems from resellers, the customer can be left without direct recourse against the manufacturer. Courts have recently recognized that a customer has certain rights against a vendor who uses remote access to disable or remove a software program because of nonpayment by the customer. Cases illustrate how difficult it can be to accommodate the realities of software testing and acceptance with existing UCC concepts of delivery and acceptance. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_228403759</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40687267</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40687267</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j161t-c3ce64232d7e182d4b723cd601807c24a9ff856e595469449c6558c55ae6521a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdjs1KAzEYRYMoOFYfQYi4Hki-_Lsrg1qh4MJ2PcQkozM4k5qkSN_eoXXl6nK4h8s9QxVQyWuqmT5HFSFE1VIbc4much5mpKBZhVZvsSs_NgW8SXbK1pU-ThnbyePt1HcxjX05POClc3Eco7elnz5wE33Ic-9DwuUzHPkaXXT2K4ebv1yg7dPjplnV69fnl2a5rgcqaakdc0FyYOBVoBo8f1fAnJeEaqIccGu6TgsZhBFcGs6Nk0JoJ4QNUgC1bIHuTru7FL_3IZc2hV1MJbcAmhOmhJmd-3_OEPdpmm-1lBFNtQBDZuv2ZA25xNTuUj_adGg5kVqBVOwXQ-9cvw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1308185290</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Software Transactions and Uniformity: Accommodating Codes Under the Code</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Ritter, Jeffrey B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ritter, Jeffrey B.</creatorcontrib><description>The issue has emerged of whether there is a need to achieve uniformity in the law of software contracting. The question of adequate uniformity is considered against the backdrop of rapid technological, commercial, and legal changes. The past year's court decisions show disarray as to how the determination is made of whether software products are "goods" under Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) Article 2. In instances where customers purchase computer systems from resellers, the customer can be left without direct recourse against the manufacturer. Courts have recently recognized that a customer has certain rights against a vendor who uses remote access to disable or remove a software program because of nonpayment by the customer. Cases illustrate how difficult it can be to accommodate the realities of software testing and acceptance with existing UCC concepts of delivery and acceptance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-6899</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2164-1838</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago, Ill: Section of Business Law of the American Bar Association</publisher><subject>Business ; Commercial regulation ; Computer software ; Computer systems ; Contracts ; Customers ; Disclaimers ; Litigation ; Manycompanies ; Marketing strategies ; Software ; Software industry ; State court decisions ; Uniform Commercial Code ; Uniform Commercial Code-US ; Uniformity ; Vendors</subject><ispartof>The Business lawyer, 1991-08, Vol.46 (4), p.1825-1853</ispartof><rights>1991 American Bar Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Bar Association, Section of Business Law Aug 1991</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40687267$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40687267$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,805,27878,58026,58259</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ritter, Jeffrey B.</creatorcontrib><title>Software Transactions and Uniformity: Accommodating Codes Under the Code</title><title>The Business lawyer</title><description>The issue has emerged of whether there is a need to achieve uniformity in the law of software contracting. The question of adequate uniformity is considered against the backdrop of rapid technological, commercial, and legal changes. The past year's court decisions show disarray as to how the determination is made of whether software products are "goods" under Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) Article 2. In instances where customers purchase computer systems from resellers, the customer can be left without direct recourse against the manufacturer. Courts have recently recognized that a customer has certain rights against a vendor who uses remote access to disable or remove a software program because of nonpayment by the customer. Cases illustrate how difficult it can be to accommodate the realities of software testing and acceptance with existing UCC concepts of delivery and acceptance.</description><subject>Business</subject><subject>Commercial regulation</subject><subject>Computer software</subject><subject>Computer systems</subject><subject>Contracts</subject><subject>Customers</subject><subject>Disclaimers</subject><subject>Litigation</subject><subject>Manycompanies</subject><subject>Marketing strategies</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Software industry</subject><subject>State court decisions</subject><subject>Uniform Commercial Code</subject><subject>Uniform Commercial Code-US</subject><subject>Uniformity</subject><subject>Vendors</subject><issn>0007-6899</issn><issn>2164-1838</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNpdjs1KAzEYRYMoOFYfQYi4Hki-_Lsrg1qh4MJ2PcQkozM4k5qkSN_eoXXl6nK4h8s9QxVQyWuqmT5HFSFE1VIbc4much5mpKBZhVZvsSs_NgW8SXbK1pU-ThnbyePt1HcxjX05POClc3Eco7elnz5wE33Ic-9DwuUzHPkaXXT2K4ebv1yg7dPjplnV69fnl2a5rgcqaakdc0FyYOBVoBo8f1fAnJeEaqIccGu6TgsZhBFcGs6Nk0JoJ4QNUgC1bIHuTru7FL_3IZc2hV1MJbcAmhOmhJmd-3_OEPdpmm-1lBFNtQBDZuv2ZA25xNTuUj_adGg5kVqBVOwXQ-9cvw</recordid><startdate>19910801</startdate><enddate>19910801</enddate><creator>Ritter, Jeffrey B.</creator><general>Section of Business Law of the American Bar Association</general><general>Section on Corporation, Banking, and Mercantile Law, American Bar Association</general><general>American Bar Association</general><scope>IBDFT</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19910801</creationdate><title>Software Transactions and Uniformity: Accommodating Codes Under the Code</title><author>Ritter, Jeffrey B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j161t-c3ce64232d7e182d4b723cd601807c24a9ff856e595469449c6558c55ae6521a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><topic>Business</topic><topic>Commercial regulation</topic><topic>Computer software</topic><topic>Computer systems</topic><topic>Contracts</topic><topic>Customers</topic><topic>Disclaimers</topic><topic>Litigation</topic><topic>Manycompanies</topic><topic>Marketing strategies</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Software industry</topic><topic>State court decisions</topic><topic>Uniform Commercial Code</topic><topic>Uniform Commercial Code-US</topic><topic>Uniformity</topic><topic>Vendors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ritter, Jeffrey B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 27</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>The Business lawyer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ritter, Jeffrey B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Software Transactions and Uniformity: Accommodating Codes Under the Code</atitle><jtitle>The Business lawyer</jtitle><date>1991-08-01</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1825</spage><epage>1853</epage><pages>1825-1853</pages><issn>0007-6899</issn><eissn>2164-1838</eissn><abstract>The issue has emerged of whether there is a need to achieve uniformity in the law of software contracting. The question of adequate uniformity is considered against the backdrop of rapid technological, commercial, and legal changes. The past year's court decisions show disarray as to how the determination is made of whether software products are "goods" under Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) Article 2. In instances where customers purchase computer systems from resellers, the customer can be left without direct recourse against the manufacturer. Courts have recently recognized that a customer has certain rights against a vendor who uses remote access to disable or remove a software program because of nonpayment by the customer. Cases illustrate how difficult it can be to accommodate the realities of software testing and acceptance with existing UCC concepts of delivery and acceptance.</abstract><cop>Chicago, Ill</cop><pub>Section of Business Law of the American Bar Association</pub><tpages>29</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-6899 |
ispartof | The Business lawyer, 1991-08, Vol.46 (4), p.1825-1853 |
issn | 0007-6899 2164-1838 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_reports_228403759 |
source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Periodicals Index Online; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Business Commercial regulation Computer software Computer systems Contracts Customers Disclaimers Litigation Manycompanies Marketing strategies Software Software industry State court decisions Uniform Commercial Code Uniform Commercial Code-US Uniformity Vendors |
title | Software Transactions and Uniformity: Accommodating Codes Under the Code |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-01T23%3A58%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Software%20Transactions%20and%20Uniformity:%20Accommodating%20Codes%20Under%20the%20Code&rft.jtitle=The%20Business%20lawyer&rft.au=Ritter,%20Jeffrey%20B.&rft.date=1991-08-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1825&rft.epage=1853&rft.pages=1825-1853&rft.issn=0007-6899&rft.eissn=2164-1838&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40687267%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1308185290&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=40687267&rfr_iscdi=true |