Maryland law: continuing support for investment companies
For many years Maryland has been one of the most popular jurisdictions in which to organize an investment company. A large number of open-end investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), have been incorporated in Maryland under the Maryland Gen...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Investment Lawyer 2004-09, Vol.11 (9), p.3 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 9 |
| container_start_page | 3 |
| container_title | The Investment Lawyer |
| container_volume | 11 |
| creator | Hanks, Jr., James J Carnell, Teresa B Leber, Michael A |
| description | For many years Maryland has been one of the most popular jurisdictions in which to organize an investment company. A large number of open-end investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), have been incorporated in Maryland under the Maryland General Corporation Law (MGCL). Additionally, numerous closed-end investment companies registered under the 1940 Act and closed-end investment companies that elect to be treated as business development companies under the 1940 Act have been incorporated in Maryland. One reason for the appeal of Maryland is that many provisions of the MGCL (beginning in the early years with the unrestricted redeemability of common shares) have been specifically tailored to address particular issues arising from the structure and operations of mutual funds and closed-end investment companies. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_225232608</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A123080257</galeid><sourcerecordid>A123080257</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g1038-b2149d59f91843593f4c1b0e1cbe47191d66b9f1f10e7d2fb0f1d875bfa3dfb23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptzs9KxDAQBvAcFFxX36E-QCWTNG3jbVn8Byte9FySZlIibVKTVvHtjazHZQ4Dw-8bvjOyAdqIshLALshlSh-UAhdMboh8UfFnVN4Uo_q-K_rgF-dX54cirfMc4lLYEAvnvzAtE_oli2lW3mG6IudWjQmv__eWvD_cv-2fysPr4_N-dygHoLwtNYNKGiGthLbiQnJb9aApQq-xakCCqWstLVig2BhmNbVg2kZoq7ixmvEtuTn-nWP4XHONLuJfsdQxJhhnNW2zKY9mUCN2ztuwRNUP6DGqMXi0Lp93wDhtKRNN9rcnfB6Dk-tPBH4BvxRhJw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>225232608</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Maryland law: continuing support for investment companies</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Hanks, Jr., James J ; Carnell, Teresa B ; Leber, Michael A</creator><creatorcontrib>Hanks, Jr., James J ; Carnell, Teresa B ; Leber, Michael A</creatorcontrib><description>For many years Maryland has been one of the most popular jurisdictions in which to organize an investment company. A large number of open-end investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), have been incorporated in Maryland under the Maryland General Corporation Law (MGCL). Additionally, numerous closed-end investment companies registered under the 1940 Act and closed-end investment companies that elect to be treated as business development companies under the 1940 Act have been incorporated in Maryland. One reason for the appeal of Maryland is that many provisions of the MGCL (beginning in the early years with the unrestricted redeemability of common shares) have been specifically tailored to address particular issues arising from the structure and operations of mutual funds and closed-end investment companies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1075-4512</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Englewood Cliffs: Aspen Publishers, Inc</publisher><subject>Acquisitions & mergers ; Amendments ; Boards of directors ; Business combinations ; Bylaws ; Charters ; Corporations ; Investment companies ; Nominations ; Power ; Provisions ; Regulation of financial institutions ; Securities ; Shareholder meetings ; Shareholder voting ; State court decisions ; State laws ; Stockholders ; Subtitles & subtitling</subject><ispartof>The Investment Lawyer, 2004-09, Vol.11 (9), p.3</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2004 Aspen Publishers, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Aspen Publishers, Inc. Sep 2004</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>312,314,777,781,788</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hanks, Jr., James J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carnell, Teresa B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leber, Michael A</creatorcontrib><title>Maryland law: continuing support for investment companies</title><title>The Investment Lawyer</title><description>For many years Maryland has been one of the most popular jurisdictions in which to organize an investment company. A large number of open-end investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), have been incorporated in Maryland under the Maryland General Corporation Law (MGCL). Additionally, numerous closed-end investment companies registered under the 1940 Act and closed-end investment companies that elect to be treated as business development companies under the 1940 Act have been incorporated in Maryland. One reason for the appeal of Maryland is that many provisions of the MGCL (beginning in the early years with the unrestricted redeemability of common shares) have been specifically tailored to address particular issues arising from the structure and operations of mutual funds and closed-end investment companies.</description><subject>Acquisitions & mergers</subject><subject>Amendments</subject><subject>Boards of directors</subject><subject>Business combinations</subject><subject>Bylaws</subject><subject>Charters</subject><subject>Corporations</subject><subject>Investment companies</subject><subject>Nominations</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Provisions</subject><subject>Regulation of financial institutions</subject><subject>Securities</subject><subject>Shareholder meetings</subject><subject>Shareholder voting</subject><subject>State court decisions</subject><subject>State laws</subject><subject>Stockholders</subject><subject>Subtitles & subtitling</subject><issn>1075-4512</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptzs9KxDAQBvAcFFxX36E-QCWTNG3jbVn8Byte9FySZlIibVKTVvHtjazHZQ4Dw-8bvjOyAdqIshLALshlSh-UAhdMboh8UfFnVN4Uo_q-K_rgF-dX54cirfMc4lLYEAvnvzAtE_oli2lW3mG6IudWjQmv__eWvD_cv-2fysPr4_N-dygHoLwtNYNKGiGthLbiQnJb9aApQq-xakCCqWstLVig2BhmNbVg2kZoq7ixmvEtuTn-nWP4XHONLuJfsdQxJhhnNW2zKY9mUCN2ztuwRNUP6DGqMXi0Lp93wDhtKRNN9rcnfB6Dk-tPBH4BvxRhJw</recordid><startdate>20040901</startdate><enddate>20040901</enddate><creator>Hanks, Jr., James J</creator><creator>Carnell, Teresa B</creator><creator>Leber, Michael A</creator><general>Aspen Publishers, Inc</general><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040901</creationdate><title>Maryland law: continuing support for investment companies</title><author>Hanks, Jr., James J ; Carnell, Teresa B ; Leber, Michael A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g1038-b2149d59f91843593f4c1b0e1cbe47191d66b9f1f10e7d2fb0f1d875bfa3dfb23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Acquisitions & mergers</topic><topic>Amendments</topic><topic>Boards of directors</topic><topic>Business combinations</topic><topic>Bylaws</topic><topic>Charters</topic><topic>Corporations</topic><topic>Investment companies</topic><topic>Nominations</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Provisions</topic><topic>Regulation of financial institutions</topic><topic>Securities</topic><topic>Shareholder meetings</topic><topic>Shareholder voting</topic><topic>State court decisions</topic><topic>State laws</topic><topic>Stockholders</topic><topic>Subtitles & subtitling</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hanks, Jr., James J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carnell, Teresa B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leber, Michael A</creatorcontrib><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The Investment Lawyer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hanks, Jr., James J</au><au>Carnell, Teresa B</au><au>Leber, Michael A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Maryland law: continuing support for investment companies</atitle><jtitle>The Investment Lawyer</jtitle><date>2004-09-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>3</spage><pages>3-</pages><issn>1075-4512</issn><abstract>For many years Maryland has been one of the most popular jurisdictions in which to organize an investment company. A large number of open-end investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), have been incorporated in Maryland under the Maryland General Corporation Law (MGCL). Additionally, numerous closed-end investment companies registered under the 1940 Act and closed-end investment companies that elect to be treated as business development companies under the 1940 Act have been incorporated in Maryland. One reason for the appeal of Maryland is that many provisions of the MGCL (beginning in the early years with the unrestricted redeemability of common shares) have been specifically tailored to address particular issues arising from the structure and operations of mutual funds and closed-end investment companies.</abstract><cop>Englewood Cliffs</cop><pub>Aspen Publishers, Inc</pub></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1075-4512 |
| ispartof | The Investment Lawyer, 2004-09, Vol.11 (9), p.3 |
| issn | 1075-4512 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_reports_225232608 |
| source | Business Source Complete |
| subjects | Acquisitions & mergers Amendments Boards of directors Business combinations Bylaws Charters Corporations Investment companies Nominations Power Provisions Regulation of financial institutions Securities Shareholder meetings Shareholder voting State court decisions State laws Stockholders Subtitles & subtitling |
| title | Maryland law: continuing support for investment companies |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T17%3A04%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Maryland%20law:%20continuing%20support%20for%20investment%20companies&rft.jtitle=The%20Investment%20Lawyer&rft.au=Hanks,%20Jr.,%20James%20J&rft.date=2004-09-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=3&rft.pages=3-&rft.issn=1075-4512&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA123080257%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=225232608&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A123080257&rfr_iscdi=true |