The new science of networks

When the Internet and the World Wide Web ballooned in size during the 1990s, they provided the first very large networks that could be measured and analyzed via crawlers and worms in the same manner as the search engines do their job. Meanwhile, social networks-networks of relationships among people...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Business Communications Review 2003-06, Vol.33 (6), p.22
1. Verfasser: Herman, Jim
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 6
container_start_page 22
container_title Business Communications Review
container_volume 33
creator Herman, Jim
description When the Internet and the World Wide Web ballooned in size during the 1990s, they provided the first very large networks that could be measured and analyzed via crawlers and worms in the same manner as the search engines do their job. Meanwhile, social networks-networks of relationships among people-became accessible for study via large databases that documented collaboration in fields ranging from scientific publishing to movies. As the measurements started to come in of the distribution of router node sizes, website-linking statistics or social connections in Hollywood, the findings were totally unlike the predictions of random network theory in two fundamental ways. Small-World Networks First, real-world networks tend to be clustered rather than being a uniform distribution of links. Typically, they're small, densely interlinked clusters of nodes with relatively few links to other clusters. The second surprising attribute of real-world networks is a non-normal distribution of node sizes.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_224975464</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>355247441</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_reports_2249754643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0MDQz0jW2sDDlYOAqLs4yMDAwNLEw52SQDslIVchLLVcoTs5MzUtOVchPA3JLyvOLsot5GFjTEnOKU3mhNDeDoptriLOHbkFRfmFpanFJfFFqQX5RSXG8kZGJpbmpiZmJMTFqAOB1KVg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>224975464</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The new science of networks</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Herman, Jim</creator><creatorcontrib>Herman, Jim</creatorcontrib><description>When the Internet and the World Wide Web ballooned in size during the 1990s, they provided the first very large networks that could be measured and analyzed via crawlers and worms in the same manner as the search engines do their job. Meanwhile, social networks-networks of relationships among people-became accessible for study via large databases that documented collaboration in fields ranging from scientific publishing to movies. As the measurements started to come in of the distribution of router node sizes, website-linking statistics or social connections in Hollywood, the findings were totally unlike the predictions of random network theory in two fundamental ways. Small-World Networks First, real-world networks tend to be clustered rather than being a uniform distribution of links. Typically, they're small, densely interlinked clusters of nodes with relatively few links to other clusters. The second surprising attribute of real-world networks is a non-normal distribution of node sizes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0162-3885</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BCORBD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hinsdale: MultiMedia Healthcare Inc</publisher><subject>Collaboration ; Computer networks ; Infections ; Internet ; Network topologies ; Social networks ; Social research</subject><ispartof>Business Communications Review, 2003-06, Vol.33 (6), p.22</ispartof><rights>Copyright Business Communications Review Jun 2003</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>312,780,784,791</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Herman, Jim</creatorcontrib><title>The new science of networks</title><title>Business Communications Review</title><description>When the Internet and the World Wide Web ballooned in size during the 1990s, they provided the first very large networks that could be measured and analyzed via crawlers and worms in the same manner as the search engines do their job. Meanwhile, social networks-networks of relationships among people-became accessible for study via large databases that documented collaboration in fields ranging from scientific publishing to movies. As the measurements started to come in of the distribution of router node sizes, website-linking statistics or social connections in Hollywood, the findings were totally unlike the predictions of random network theory in two fundamental ways. Small-World Networks First, real-world networks tend to be clustered rather than being a uniform distribution of links. Typically, they're small, densely interlinked clusters of nodes with relatively few links to other clusters. The second surprising attribute of real-world networks is a non-normal distribution of node sizes.</description><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Computer networks</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Network topologies</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Social research</subject><issn>0162-3885</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYeA0MDQz0jW2sDDlYOAqLs4yMDAwNLEw52SQDslIVchLLVcoTs5MzUtOVchPA3JLyvOLsot5GFjTEnOKU3mhNDeDoptriLOHbkFRfmFpanFJfFFqQX5RSXG8kZGJpbmpiZmJMTFqAOB1KVg</recordid><startdate>20030601</startdate><enddate>20030601</enddate><creator>Herman, Jim</creator><general>MultiMedia Healthcare Inc</general><scope>0TR</scope><scope>0TS</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>883</scope><scope>88K</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>KK.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2T</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030601</creationdate><title>The new science of networks</title><author>Herman, Jim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_reports_2249754643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Computer networks</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Network topologies</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Social research</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Herman, Jim</creatorcontrib><collection>Engineering Basic PRO</collection><collection>Engineering Premium PRO</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade &amp; Industry (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Telecommunications (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>UBM Computer Full Text</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Telecommunications Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Business Communications Review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Herman, Jim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The new science of networks</atitle><jtitle>Business Communications Review</jtitle><date>2003-06-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>22</spage><pages>22-</pages><issn>0162-3885</issn><coden>BCORBD</coden><abstract>When the Internet and the World Wide Web ballooned in size during the 1990s, they provided the first very large networks that could be measured and analyzed via crawlers and worms in the same manner as the search engines do their job. Meanwhile, social networks-networks of relationships among people-became accessible for study via large databases that documented collaboration in fields ranging from scientific publishing to movies. As the measurements started to come in of the distribution of router node sizes, website-linking statistics or social connections in Hollywood, the findings were totally unlike the predictions of random network theory in two fundamental ways. Small-World Networks First, real-world networks tend to be clustered rather than being a uniform distribution of links. Typically, they're small, densely interlinked clusters of nodes with relatively few links to other clusters. The second surprising attribute of real-world networks is a non-normal distribution of node sizes.</abstract><cop>Hinsdale</cop><pub>MultiMedia Healthcare Inc</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0162-3885
ispartof Business Communications Review, 2003-06, Vol.33 (6), p.22
issn 0162-3885
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_reports_224975464
source EBSCOhost Business Source Complete
subjects Collaboration
Computer networks
Infections
Internet
Network topologies
Social networks
Social research
title The new science of networks
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T22%3A47%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20new%20science%20of%20networks&rft.jtitle=Business%20Communications%20Review&rft.au=Herman,%20Jim&rft.date=2003-06-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=22&rft.pages=22-&rft.issn=0162-3885&rft.coden=BCORBD&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E355247441%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=224975464&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true