The New Proposed Contract Manufacturing Regulations Under Subpart F

New Proposed Regulations from the IRS attempt to walk a very difficult line between upholding the policy behind the manufacturing exception and the branch rule crafted by the framers of Subpart F in 1962 versus promoting the competitiveness of US multinationals doing global business in a much more s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Corporate Business Taxation Monthly 2009-01, Vol.10 (4), p.37
1. Verfasser: Kaywood, Sam K
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 4
container_start_page 37
container_title Corporate Business Taxation Monthly
container_volume 10
creator Kaywood, Sam K
description New Proposed Regulations from the IRS attempt to walk a very difficult line between upholding the policy behind the manufacturing exception and the branch rule crafted by the framers of Subpart F in 1962 versus promoting the competitiveness of US multinationals doing global business in a much more sophisticated commercial environment than existed in 1962. The IRS and the Treasury have made a very admirable attempt to craft regulations that are helpful to US multinationals doing business in a more complicated international environment, while at the same time giving appropriate deference to the original intent of Subpart F, which was to disallow deferral where the selling or purchasing function was artificially separated from the manufacturing functions without adding appreciable value. While improvements can be made, if these Regulations are finalized roughly as proposed, it would put a great deal of pressure on the government and tax advisors alike to administer and enforce these Regulations properly in an area that is fraught with factual fluidity. As indicated, a streamlined pre-filing procedure would require focus on the factual and legal issues early to arrive at fair results, avoiding what would otherwise give rise to endless disputes and litigation.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_222330078</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1712423481</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_reports_2223300783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNyk0OgjAQQOEuNBF_7jAegKQWUVgTiRuNUVyTKgNiSFtn2nh9XXgAV-9bvJGIVqnK4lTl64mYMj-lVPkml5EoqgfCEd9wIussYwOFNZ703cNBm9B-Eag3HZyxC4P2vTUMV9MgwSXcnCYP5VyMWz0wLn6diWW5q4p97Mi-ArKvCZ0lz7VSKkmk3GbJP88HkCM4LQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>222330078</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The New Proposed Contract Manufacturing Regulations Under Subpart F</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Kaywood, Sam K</creator><creatorcontrib>Kaywood, Sam K</creatorcontrib><description>New Proposed Regulations from the IRS attempt to walk a very difficult line between upholding the policy behind the manufacturing exception and the branch rule crafted by the framers of Subpart F in 1962 versus promoting the competitiveness of US multinationals doing global business in a much more sophisticated commercial environment than existed in 1962. The IRS and the Treasury have made a very admirable attempt to craft regulations that are helpful to US multinationals doing business in a more complicated international environment, while at the same time giving appropriate deference to the original intent of Subpart F, which was to disallow deferral where the selling or purchasing function was artificially separated from the manufacturing functions without adding appreciable value. While improvements can be made, if these Regulations are finalized roughly as proposed, it would put a great deal of pressure on the government and tax advisors alike to administer and enforce these Regulations properly in an area that is fraught with factual fluidity. As indicated, a streamlined pre-filing procedure would require focus on the factual and legal issues early to arrive at fair results, avoiding what would otherwise give rise to endless disputes and litigation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1528-5294</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Riverwoods: CCH INCORPORATED</publisher><subject>Congressional committees ; Consumption ; Controlled foreign corporations ; Corporate profits ; Incorporation ; Jurisdiction ; Manufacturing ; Multinational corporations ; Packaging ; Personal holding companies ; Personal property ; Proposals ; Purchasing ; Sales ; Tax regulations</subject><ispartof>Corporate Business Taxation Monthly, 2009-01, Vol.10 (4), p.37</ispartof><rights>Copyright CCH INCORPORATED Jan 2009</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>312,776,780,787</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kaywood, Sam K</creatorcontrib><title>The New Proposed Contract Manufacturing Regulations Under Subpart F</title><title>Corporate Business Taxation Monthly</title><description>New Proposed Regulations from the IRS attempt to walk a very difficult line between upholding the policy behind the manufacturing exception and the branch rule crafted by the framers of Subpart F in 1962 versus promoting the competitiveness of US multinationals doing global business in a much more sophisticated commercial environment than existed in 1962. The IRS and the Treasury have made a very admirable attempt to craft regulations that are helpful to US multinationals doing business in a more complicated international environment, while at the same time giving appropriate deference to the original intent of Subpart F, which was to disallow deferral where the selling or purchasing function was artificially separated from the manufacturing functions without adding appreciable value. While improvements can be made, if these Regulations are finalized roughly as proposed, it would put a great deal of pressure on the government and tax advisors alike to administer and enforce these Regulations properly in an area that is fraught with factual fluidity. As indicated, a streamlined pre-filing procedure would require focus on the factual and legal issues early to arrive at fair results, avoiding what would otherwise give rise to endless disputes and litigation.</description><subject>Congressional committees</subject><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>Controlled foreign corporations</subject><subject>Corporate profits</subject><subject>Incorporation</subject><subject>Jurisdiction</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Multinational corporations</subject><subject>Packaging</subject><subject>Personal holding companies</subject><subject>Personal property</subject><subject>Proposals</subject><subject>Purchasing</subject><subject>Sales</subject><subject>Tax regulations</subject><issn>1528-5294</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNyk0OgjAQQOEuNBF_7jAegKQWUVgTiRuNUVyTKgNiSFtn2nh9XXgAV-9bvJGIVqnK4lTl64mYMj-lVPkml5EoqgfCEd9wIussYwOFNZ703cNBm9B-Eag3HZyxC4P2vTUMV9MgwSXcnCYP5VyMWz0wLn6diWW5q4p97Mi-ArKvCZ0lz7VSKkmk3GbJP88HkCM4LQ</recordid><startdate>20090101</startdate><enddate>20090101</enddate><creator>Kaywood, Sam K</creator><general>CCH INCORPORATED</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X1</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8A9</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRAZJ</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090101</creationdate><title>The New Proposed Contract Manufacturing Regulations Under Subpart F</title><author>Kaywood, Sam K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_reports_2223300783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Congressional committees</topic><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>Controlled foreign corporations</topic><topic>Corporate profits</topic><topic>Incorporation</topic><topic>Jurisdiction</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Multinational corporations</topic><topic>Packaging</topic><topic>Personal holding companies</topic><topic>Personal property</topic><topic>Proposals</topic><topic>Purchasing</topic><topic>Sales</topic><topic>Tax regulations</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kaywood, Sam K</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Accounting &amp; Tax Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Accounting &amp; Tax Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax &amp; Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax &amp; Banking Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Corporate Business Taxation Monthly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kaywood, Sam K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The New Proposed Contract Manufacturing Regulations Under Subpart F</atitle><jtitle>Corporate Business Taxation Monthly</jtitle><date>2009-01-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>37</spage><pages>37-</pages><issn>1528-5294</issn><abstract>New Proposed Regulations from the IRS attempt to walk a very difficult line between upholding the policy behind the manufacturing exception and the branch rule crafted by the framers of Subpart F in 1962 versus promoting the competitiveness of US multinationals doing global business in a much more sophisticated commercial environment than existed in 1962. The IRS and the Treasury have made a very admirable attempt to craft regulations that are helpful to US multinationals doing business in a more complicated international environment, while at the same time giving appropriate deference to the original intent of Subpart F, which was to disallow deferral where the selling or purchasing function was artificially separated from the manufacturing functions without adding appreciable value. While improvements can be made, if these Regulations are finalized roughly as proposed, it would put a great deal of pressure on the government and tax advisors alike to administer and enforce these Regulations properly in an area that is fraught with factual fluidity. As indicated, a streamlined pre-filing procedure would require focus on the factual and legal issues early to arrive at fair results, avoiding what would otherwise give rise to endless disputes and litigation.</abstract><cop>Riverwoods</cop><pub>CCH INCORPORATED</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1528-5294
ispartof Corporate Business Taxation Monthly, 2009-01, Vol.10 (4), p.37
issn 1528-5294
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_reports_222330078
source HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Business Source Complete
subjects Congressional committees
Consumption
Controlled foreign corporations
Corporate profits
Incorporation
Jurisdiction
Manufacturing
Multinational corporations
Packaging
Personal holding companies
Personal property
Proposals
Purchasing
Sales
Tax regulations
title The New Proposed Contract Manufacturing Regulations Under Subpart F
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T12%3A08%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20New%20Proposed%20Contract%20Manufacturing%20Regulations%20Under%20Subpart%20F&rft.jtitle=Corporate%20Business%20Taxation%20Monthly&rft.au=Kaywood,%20Sam%20K&rft.date=2009-01-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=37&rft.pages=37-&rft.issn=1528-5294&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1712423481%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=222330078&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true