New York: The Other Shoe Drops in Bausch & Lomb
New York's Corporate Franchise Tax provides generally that entire net income (ENI) "shall not include: income, gains and losses from subsidiary capital. A subsidiary is any corporation of which over 50 percent of the number of voting shares is owned by the taxpayer corporation. New York co...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Corporate Business Taxation Monthly 2008-08, Vol.9 (11), p.43 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 43 |
container_title | Corporate Business Taxation Monthly |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Lee, Carolyn Joy Rimkunas, Dennis |
description | New York's Corporate Franchise Tax provides generally that entire net income (ENI) "shall not include: income, gains and losses from subsidiary capital. A subsidiary is any corporation of which over 50 percent of the number of voting shares is owned by the taxpayer corporation. New York corporate taxpayers and their advisors have operated, for decades, under the assumption that gains from the sale of subsidiaries are not taxable and losses are not deductible. Turns out, this is not the law. In December of 2007, the New York Tax Appeals Tribunal, in Bausch & Lomb, allowed a parent corporation to deduct a loss on the sale of its subsidiary's stock, because the parent and the subsidiary filed on a combined basis. This decision not only overturned the long-standing position of the New York State Department of Taxation and Finance (the "Department"), it came as a major surprise to many. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_222326268</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1516465441</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_reports_2223262683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0NDWy0DU1sjThYOAqLs4yMDCyNLM04GTQ90stV4jML8q2UgjJSFXwL8lILVIIzshPVXApyi8oVsjMU3BKLC1OzlBQU_DJz03iYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMim6uIc4eugVF-YWlqcUl8UWpBflFJcXxRkZGxkZmRmYWxsSoAQA1Ky8K</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>222326268</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>New York: The Other Shoe Drops in Bausch & Lomb</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Lee, Carolyn Joy ; Rimkunas, Dennis</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, Carolyn Joy ; Rimkunas, Dennis</creatorcontrib><description>New York's Corporate Franchise Tax provides generally that entire net income (ENI) "shall not include: income, gains and losses from subsidiary capital. A subsidiary is any corporation of which over 50 percent of the number of voting shares is owned by the taxpayer corporation. New York corporate taxpayers and their advisors have operated, for decades, under the assumption that gains from the sale of subsidiaries are not taxable and losses are not deductible. Turns out, this is not the law. In December of 2007, the New York Tax Appeals Tribunal, in Bausch & Lomb, allowed a parent corporation to deduct a loss on the sale of its subsidiary's stock, because the parent and the subsidiary filed on a combined basis. This decision not only overturned the long-standing position of the New York State Department of Taxation and Finance (the "Department"), it came as a major surprise to many.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1528-5294</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Riverwoods: CCH INCORPORATED</publisher><subject>Business income ; Capital assets ; Capital losses ; Corporate income tax ; Investments ; Losses ; Sales ; State court decisions ; State taxes ; Stock transfers ; Subsidiaries ; Tax deductions ; Taxation</subject><ispartof>Corporate Business Taxation Monthly, 2008-08, Vol.9 (11), p.43</ispartof><rights>Copyright CCH INCORPORATED Aug 2008</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>312,780,784,791</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, Carolyn Joy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rimkunas, Dennis</creatorcontrib><title>New York: The Other Shoe Drops in Bausch & Lomb</title><title>Corporate Business Taxation Monthly</title><description>New York's Corporate Franchise Tax provides generally that entire net income (ENI) "shall not include: income, gains and losses from subsidiary capital. A subsidiary is any corporation of which over 50 percent of the number of voting shares is owned by the taxpayer corporation. New York corporate taxpayers and their advisors have operated, for decades, under the assumption that gains from the sale of subsidiaries are not taxable and losses are not deductible. Turns out, this is not the law. In December of 2007, the New York Tax Appeals Tribunal, in Bausch & Lomb, allowed a parent corporation to deduct a loss on the sale of its subsidiary's stock, because the parent and the subsidiary filed on a combined basis. This decision not only overturned the long-standing position of the New York State Department of Taxation and Finance (the "Department"), it came as a major surprise to many.</description><subject>Business income</subject><subject>Capital assets</subject><subject>Capital losses</subject><subject>Corporate income tax</subject><subject>Investments</subject><subject>Losses</subject><subject>Sales</subject><subject>State court decisions</subject><subject>State taxes</subject><subject>Stock transfers</subject><subject>Subsidiaries</subject><subject>Tax deductions</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><issn>1528-5294</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYeA0NDWy0DU1sjThYOAqLs4yMDCyNLM04GTQ90stV4jML8q2UgjJSFXwL8lILVIIzshPVXApyi8oVsjMU3BKLC1OzlBQU_DJz03iYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMim6uIc4eugVF-YWlqcUl8UWpBflFJcXxRkZGxkZmRmYWxsSoAQA1Ky8K</recordid><startdate>20080801</startdate><enddate>20080801</enddate><creator>Lee, Carolyn Joy</creator><creator>Rimkunas, Dennis</creator><general>CCH INCORPORATED</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X1</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8A9</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRAZJ</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080801</creationdate><title>New York: The Other Shoe Drops in Bausch & Lomb</title><author>Lee, Carolyn Joy ; Rimkunas, Dennis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_reports_2223262683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Business income</topic><topic>Capital assets</topic><topic>Capital losses</topic><topic>Corporate income tax</topic><topic>Investments</topic><topic>Losses</topic><topic>Sales</topic><topic>State court decisions</topic><topic>State taxes</topic><topic>Stock transfers</topic><topic>Subsidiaries</topic><topic>Tax deductions</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Carolyn Joy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rimkunas, Dennis</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Accounting & Tax Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Accounting & Tax Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Corporate Business Taxation Monthly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Carolyn Joy</au><au>Rimkunas, Dennis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>New York: The Other Shoe Drops in Bausch & Lomb</atitle><jtitle>Corporate Business Taxation Monthly</jtitle><date>2008-08-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>43</spage><pages>43-</pages><issn>1528-5294</issn><abstract>New York's Corporate Franchise Tax provides generally that entire net income (ENI) "shall not include: income, gains and losses from subsidiary capital. A subsidiary is any corporation of which over 50 percent of the number of voting shares is owned by the taxpayer corporation. New York corporate taxpayers and their advisors have operated, for decades, under the assumption that gains from the sale of subsidiaries are not taxable and losses are not deductible. Turns out, this is not the law. In December of 2007, the New York Tax Appeals Tribunal, in Bausch & Lomb, allowed a parent corporation to deduct a loss on the sale of its subsidiary's stock, because the parent and the subsidiary filed on a combined basis. This decision not only overturned the long-standing position of the New York State Department of Taxation and Finance (the "Department"), it came as a major surprise to many.</abstract><cop>Riverwoods</cop><pub>CCH INCORPORATED</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1528-5294 |
ispartof | Corporate Business Taxation Monthly, 2008-08, Vol.9 (11), p.43 |
issn | 1528-5294 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_reports_222326268 |
source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | Business income Capital assets Capital losses Corporate income tax Investments Losses Sales State court decisions State taxes Stock transfers Subsidiaries Tax deductions Taxation |
title | New York: The Other Shoe Drops in Bausch & Lomb |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T21%3A47%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=New%20York:%20The%20Other%20Shoe%20Drops%20in%20Bausch%20&%20Lomb&rft.jtitle=Corporate%20Business%20Taxation%20Monthly&rft.au=Lee,%20Carolyn%20Joy&rft.date=2008-08-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=43&rft.pages=43-&rft.issn=1528-5294&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1516465441%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=222326268&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |