THE PEOPLE PUZZLE
You do not hear many senior executives of pharmaceutical, biotech, and medical-device companies complaining about the impending "war for talent" that was a common refrain five or so years ago. In many areas within life sciences companies, there is no shortage of talent. But talent scarcity...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Pharmaceutical Executive 2007-09, Vol.27 (9), p.115 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 9 |
| container_start_page | 115 |
| container_title | Pharmaceutical Executive |
| container_volume | 27 |
| creator | Day, J Kevin |
| description | You do not hear many senior executives of pharmaceutical, biotech, and medical-device companies complaining about the impending "war for talent" that was a common refrain five or so years ago. In many areas within life sciences companies, there is no shortage of talent. But talent scarcity is only one issue. The other is cost. Employee churn can be an expensive proposition, with serious bottom-line implications. According to a chief career officer at the HR solutions provider Adecco, writing in April on forbes.com, a company of 40,000 full-time employees will likely save $140 million annually by reducing annual turnover from 40 percent to 15%. Whether driven by scarcity, cost, or just the ongoing need to engage the best and brightest, smart executives in life sciences companies are attacking the issue at both ends. They are looking for new ways to attract winners, keep them motivated, and build loyalty for the long term. Creating market buzz about your company can be an effective method of gaining access to talent. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_216430386</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1347632191</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_reports_2164303863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0MjQ10DU3No1gYeA0MDK31DUzNTfgYOAqLs4yMDAwMTG14GQQDPFwVQhw9Q_wAVKhUVE-rjwMrGmJOcWpvFCam0HRzTXE2UO3oCi_sDS1uCS-KLUgv6ikON7I0MzE2MDYwsyYGDUAjWYl7g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>216430386</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>THE PEOPLE PUZZLE</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Day, J Kevin</creator><creatorcontrib>Day, J Kevin</creatorcontrib><description>You do not hear many senior executives of pharmaceutical, biotech, and medical-device companies complaining about the impending "war for talent" that was a common refrain five or so years ago. In many areas within life sciences companies, there is no shortage of talent. But talent scarcity is only one issue. The other is cost. Employee churn can be an expensive proposition, with serious bottom-line implications. According to a chief career officer at the HR solutions provider Adecco, writing in April on forbes.com, a company of 40,000 full-time employees will likely save $140 million annually by reducing annual turnover from 40 percent to 15%. Whether driven by scarcity, cost, or just the ongoing need to engage the best and brightest, smart executives in life sciences companies are attacking the issue at both ends. They are looking for new ways to attract winners, keep them motivated, and build loyalty for the long term. Creating market buzz about your company can be an effective method of gaining access to talent.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0279-6570</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2150-735X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Monmouth Junction: MultiMedia Healthcare Inc</publisher><subject>Employee turnover ; Employees ; Executives ; Human resources ; Internet ; Life sciences ; Pharmaceutical industry ; Pharmaceuticals ; Shortages ; Teams ; Teamwork</subject><ispartof>Pharmaceutical Executive, 2007-09, Vol.27 (9), p.115</ispartof><rights>Copyright Advanstar Communications, Inc. Sep 2007</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>312,780,784,791</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Day, J Kevin</creatorcontrib><title>THE PEOPLE PUZZLE</title><title>Pharmaceutical Executive</title><description>You do not hear many senior executives of pharmaceutical, biotech, and medical-device companies complaining about the impending "war for talent" that was a common refrain five or so years ago. In many areas within life sciences companies, there is no shortage of talent. But talent scarcity is only one issue. The other is cost. Employee churn can be an expensive proposition, with serious bottom-line implications. According to a chief career officer at the HR solutions provider Adecco, writing in April on forbes.com, a company of 40,000 full-time employees will likely save $140 million annually by reducing annual turnover from 40 percent to 15%. Whether driven by scarcity, cost, or just the ongoing need to engage the best and brightest, smart executives in life sciences companies are attacking the issue at both ends. They are looking for new ways to attract winners, keep them motivated, and build loyalty for the long term. Creating market buzz about your company can be an effective method of gaining access to talent.</description><subject>Employee turnover</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Executives</subject><subject>Human resources</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Life sciences</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical industry</subject><subject>Pharmaceuticals</subject><subject>Shortages</subject><subject>Teams</subject><subject>Teamwork</subject><issn>0279-6570</issn><issn>2150-735X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYuA0MjQ10DU3No1gYeA0MDK31DUzNTfgYOAqLs4yMDAwMTG14GQQDPFwVQhw9Q_wAVKhUVE-rjwMrGmJOcWpvFCam0HRzTXE2UO3oCi_sDS1uCS-KLUgv6ikON7I0MzE2MDYwsyYGDUAjWYl7g</recordid><startdate>20070901</startdate><enddate>20070901</enddate><creator>Day, J Kevin</creator><general>MultiMedia Healthcare Inc</general><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>883</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0F</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070901</creationdate><title>THE PEOPLE PUZZLE</title><author>Day, J Kevin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_reports_2164303863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Employee turnover</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Executives</topic><topic>Human resources</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Life sciences</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical industry</topic><topic>Pharmaceuticals</topic><topic>Shortages</topic><topic>Teams</topic><topic>Teamwork</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Day, J Kevin</creatorcontrib><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Pharmaceutical Executive</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Day, J Kevin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>THE PEOPLE PUZZLE</atitle><jtitle>Pharmaceutical Executive</jtitle><date>2007-09-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>115</spage><pages>115-</pages><issn>0279-6570</issn><eissn>2150-735X</eissn><abstract>You do not hear many senior executives of pharmaceutical, biotech, and medical-device companies complaining about the impending "war for talent" that was a common refrain five or so years ago. In many areas within life sciences companies, there is no shortage of talent. But talent scarcity is only one issue. The other is cost. Employee churn can be an expensive proposition, with serious bottom-line implications. According to a chief career officer at the HR solutions provider Adecco, writing in April on forbes.com, a company of 40,000 full-time employees will likely save $140 million annually by reducing annual turnover from 40 percent to 15%. Whether driven by scarcity, cost, or just the ongoing need to engage the best and brightest, smart executives in life sciences companies are attacking the issue at both ends. They are looking for new ways to attract winners, keep them motivated, and build loyalty for the long term. Creating market buzz about your company can be an effective method of gaining access to talent.</abstract><cop>Monmouth Junction</cop><pub>MultiMedia Healthcare Inc</pub></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0279-6570 |
| ispartof | Pharmaceutical Executive, 2007-09, Vol.27 (9), p.115 |
| issn | 0279-6570 2150-735X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_reports_216430386 |
| source | Business Source Complete |
| subjects | Employee turnover Employees Executives Human resources Internet Life sciences Pharmaceutical industry Pharmaceuticals Shortages Teams Teamwork |
| title | THE PEOPLE PUZZLE |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T16%3A53%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=THE%20PEOPLE%20PUZZLE&rft.jtitle=Pharmaceutical%20Executive&rft.au=Day,%20J%20Kevin&rft.date=2007-09-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=115&rft.pages=115-&rft.issn=0279-6570&rft.eissn=2150-735X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1347632191%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=216430386&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |