Comparison of methods to assess pigment dispersion
Figure 14 shows the G* curves for the one-, two-, three-, five-, and the nine-pass DPP red BO inks. The results are consistent but this method cannot distinguish the one- and two-pass inks or the five- and nine-pass inks. These results here also indicate that the greatest change was going from the t...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | JCT, Journal of Coatings Technology Journal of Coatings Technology, 2001-12, Vol.73 (923), p.61-70 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 70 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 923 |
| container_start_page | 61 |
| container_title | JCT, Journal of Coatings Technology |
| container_volume | 73 |
| creator | VAN, Sang T VELAMAKANNI, Bhaskar V ADKINS, Ronald R |
| description | Figure 14 shows the G* curves for the one-, two-, three-, five-, and the nine-pass DPP red BO inks. The results are consistent but this method cannot distinguish the one- and two-pass inks or the five- and nine-pass inks. These results here also indicate that the greatest change was going from the two-- pass to the three-pass inks. The other test method that would indicate this for the DPP red BO pigment would be the fineness of grind measurement (Figure 5). |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/BF02720135 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_212090227</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>98946780</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-ba25ead7598e31f53775a0e32c79d536616ef633a8b65bd02721d57bdc6567703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkEFLw0AQhRdRsFYv_oJ48CJEZ2eY3eSoxapQ8KLgLWyyG4002bgTD_57W1ro6V2-9_F4Sl1quNUA9u5hCWgRNPGRmqE2RV5o_jhWMyCj88JaOlVnIt8AgEw0U7iI_ehSJ3HIYpv1YfqKXrIpZk4kiGRj99mHYcp8J2NI0sXhXJ20bi3hYp9z9b58fFs856vXp5fF_SpvCHHKa4ccnLdcFoF0y2QtOwiEjS09kzHahNYQuaI2XPvtbu3Z1r4xbKwFmqurnXdM8ec3yFSlMMY0SYUaoQREu2FudkyTokgKbTWmrnfpr9JQbR-pDo9s4Ou90Enj1m1yQ9PJoUFUMmmmf5OdXes</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>212090227</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of methods to assess pigment dispersion</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>VAN, Sang T ; VELAMAKANNI, Bhaskar V ; ADKINS, Ronald R</creator><creatorcontrib>VAN, Sang T ; VELAMAKANNI, Bhaskar V ; ADKINS, Ronald R</creatorcontrib><description>Figure 14 shows the G* curves for the one-, two-, three-, five-, and the nine-pass DPP red BO inks. The results are consistent but this method cannot distinguish the one- and two-pass inks or the five- and nine-pass inks. These results here also indicate that the greatest change was going from the two-- pass to the three-pass inks. The other test method that would indicate this for the DPP red BO pigment would be the fineness of grind measurement (Figure 5).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-8773</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-815X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF02720135</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCTEDL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Blue Bell, PA: Federation of Societies for Coatings Technology</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Coatings. Paints, varnishes and inks ; Exact sciences and technology ; Experiments ; Gauges ; Light ; Manufacturing ; Methods ; Microscopy ; Particle size ; Pigments ; Polymer industry, paints, wood ; Printing industry ; Protective coatings ; R&D ; Research & development ; Rheology ; Screen printing ; Spectrum analysis ; Studies ; Viscosity</subject><ispartof>JCT, Journal of Coatings Technology, 2001-12, Vol.73 (923), p.61-70</ispartof><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Federation of Societies for Coatings Technology Dec 2001</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-ba25ead7598e31f53775a0e32c79d536616ef633a8b65bd02721d57bdc6567703</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-ba25ead7598e31f53775a0e32c79d536616ef633a8b65bd02721d57bdc6567703</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,312,314,776,780,785,786,787,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=13395315$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>VAN, Sang T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VELAMAKANNI, Bhaskar V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ADKINS, Ronald R</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of methods to assess pigment dispersion</title><title>JCT, Journal of Coatings Technology</title><description>Figure 14 shows the G* curves for the one-, two-, three-, five-, and the nine-pass DPP red BO inks. The results are consistent but this method cannot distinguish the one- and two-pass inks or the five- and nine-pass inks. These results here also indicate that the greatest change was going from the two-- pass to the three-pass inks. The other test method that would indicate this for the DPP red BO pigment would be the fineness of grind measurement (Figure 5).</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Coatings. Paints, varnishes and inks</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Gauges</subject><subject>Light</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Microscopy</subject><subject>Particle size</subject><subject>Pigments</subject><subject>Polymer industry, paints, wood</subject><subject>Printing industry</subject><subject>Protective coatings</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><subject>Rheology</subject><subject>Screen printing</subject><subject>Spectrum analysis</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Viscosity</subject><issn>0361-8773</issn><issn>2168-815X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkEFLw0AQhRdRsFYv_oJ48CJEZ2eY3eSoxapQ8KLgLWyyG4002bgTD_57W1ro6V2-9_F4Sl1quNUA9u5hCWgRNPGRmqE2RV5o_jhWMyCj88JaOlVnIt8AgEw0U7iI_ehSJ3HIYpv1YfqKXrIpZk4kiGRj99mHYcp8J2NI0sXhXJ20bi3hYp9z9b58fFs856vXp5fF_SpvCHHKa4ccnLdcFoF0y2QtOwiEjS09kzHahNYQuaI2XPvtbu3Z1r4xbKwFmqurnXdM8ec3yFSlMMY0SYUaoQREu2FudkyTokgKbTWmrnfpr9JQbR-pDo9s4Ou90Enj1m1yQ9PJoUFUMmmmf5OdXes</recordid><startdate>20011201</startdate><enddate>20011201</enddate><creator>VAN, Sang T</creator><creator>VELAMAKANNI, Bhaskar V</creator><creator>ADKINS, Ronald R</creator><general>Federation of Societies for Coatings Technology</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>883</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0F</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20011201</creationdate><title>Comparison of methods to assess pigment dispersion</title><author>VAN, Sang T ; VELAMAKANNI, Bhaskar V ; ADKINS, Ronald R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-ba25ead7598e31f53775a0e32c79d536616ef633a8b65bd02721d57bdc6567703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Coatings. Paints, varnishes and inks</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Gauges</topic><topic>Light</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Microscopy</topic><topic>Particle size</topic><topic>Pigments</topic><topic>Polymer industry, paints, wood</topic><topic>Printing industry</topic><topic>Protective coatings</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><topic>Rheology</topic><topic>Screen printing</topic><topic>Spectrum analysis</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Viscosity</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>VAN, Sang T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VELAMAKANNI, Bhaskar V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ADKINS, Ronald R</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>JCT, Journal of Coatings Technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>VAN, Sang T</au><au>VELAMAKANNI, Bhaskar V</au><au>ADKINS, Ronald R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of methods to assess pigment dispersion</atitle><jtitle>JCT, Journal of Coatings Technology</jtitle><date>2001-12-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>923</issue><spage>61</spage><epage>70</epage><pages>61-70</pages><issn>0361-8773</issn><eissn>2168-815X</eissn><coden>JCTEDL</coden><abstract>Figure 14 shows the G* curves for the one-, two-, three-, five-, and the nine-pass DPP red BO inks. The results are consistent but this method cannot distinguish the one- and two-pass inks or the five- and nine-pass inks. These results here also indicate that the greatest change was going from the two-- pass to the three-pass inks. The other test method that would indicate this for the DPP red BO pigment would be the fineness of grind measurement (Figure 5).</abstract><cop>Blue Bell, PA</cop><pub>Federation of Societies for Coatings Technology</pub><doi>10.1007/BF02720135</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0361-8773 |
| ispartof | JCT, Journal of Coatings Technology, 2001-12, Vol.73 (923), p.61-70 |
| issn | 0361-8773 2168-815X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_reports_212090227 |
| source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Applied sciences Coatings. Paints, varnishes and inks Exact sciences and technology Experiments Gauges Light Manufacturing Methods Microscopy Particle size Pigments Polymer industry, paints, wood Printing industry Protective coatings R&D Research & development Rheology Screen printing Spectrum analysis Studies Viscosity |
| title | Comparison of methods to assess pigment dispersion |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T00%3A27%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20methods%20to%20assess%20pigment%20dispersion&rft.jtitle=JCT,%20Journal%20of%20Coatings%20Technology&rft.au=VAN,%20Sang%20T&rft.date=2001-12-01&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=923&rft.spage=61&rft.epage=70&rft.pages=61-70&rft.issn=0361-8773&rft.eissn=2168-815X&rft.coden=JCTEDL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF02720135&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E98946780%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=212090227&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |