Case Study: Prevalence of horns and bruising in feedlot cattle at slaughter
Carcass bruising of finished cattle can be attributed to suboptimal cattle handling and has become an animal welfare concern. Bruised carcasses require excess trimming, leading to increased sanitation risk and loss in time, and can potentially decrease profits. The objective of this study was to eva...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Professional animal scientist 2017-02, Vol.33 (1), p.135-139 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Carcass bruising of finished cattle can be attributed to suboptimal cattle handling and has become an animal welfare concern. Bruised carcasses require excess trimming, leading to increased sanitation risk and loss in time, and can potentially decrease profits. The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the prevalence of horns and prevalence of bruising in lots of cattle at a commercial slaughter facility and to report size of horns and the anatomical location and severity of bruising on beef carcasses. Carcasses (n = 4,287) of feedlot cattle were observed at one commercial beef packing plant in southwest Kansas. Within lots of cattle, the percentage of cattle with horns averaged 7.7 ± 7.4% and ranged from 1.3 to 26.4%. Average single horn length was 11.1 cm and average distance from horn tip to horn tip was 39.6 cm. Of the carcasses evaluated, 55.2 ± 23.2% had one or more bruises and 25.6 ± 8.3% were severe (>15 cm), 35.6 ± 7.0% were moderate (5 to 15 cm), and 38.8 ± 12.5% were minor ( |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1080-7446 1525-318X |
DOI: | 10.15232/pas.2016-01551 |