A Better Way to Gauge Profitability
Return-on-equity (ROE) is the correct profit metric to evaluate the performance of a business. However, the primary emphasis on financial ratio analysis must be on operating performance. The "advanced" version of the DuPont model remedies the original model's failure to cleanly separa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Accountancy 2008-08, Vol.206 (2), p.38 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Magazinearticle |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 38 |
container_title | Journal of Accountancy |
container_volume | 206 |
creator | Burns, David C Sale, J Timothy Stephan, Jens A |
description | Return-on-equity (ROE) is the correct profit metric to evaluate the performance of a business. However, the primary emphasis on financial ratio analysis must be on operating performance. The "advanced" version of the DuPont model remedies the original model's failure to cleanly separate the effects of operating and financing decisions. It introduces the concept of return on net operating assets (RNOA) as the core measure of operating performance and clearly separates the effects of leverage and operating decisions. The advanced model does not change the result of the ROE calculation. However, the elements underlying the ROE ratio are different and provide a clean separation of operating and financing decisions. RNOA is effectively insulated from financing decisions. Changing the amount of debt does not affect the operating assets or the profit before interest expense and, therefore, does not affect RNOA. It also permits straightforward computation of the impact on ROE of alternative financing decisions. Changes in the interest rate affect the spread, while changes in the amount of debt affect financial leverage in a transparent manner. |
format | Magazinearticle |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_206783499</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1529958931</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g809-e6e5570bd5146565854c2e2fc8fee5a291ed4658a94692cf9e3020e71736c4383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotzE1LQkEUgOFBCrpZ_2Gi9cCZ73OWJmWCoAuhpYzXM3JDuDozLvz3BbV6Fw-8E9Fpcl5BNHQnOgCjFTqHD-Kx1m8AsBFjJ15n8o1b4yK_0k22US7S9chyU8Y8tLQfTkO7PYn7nE6Vn_87FduP9-38U63Wi-V8tlJHBFIc2PsI-4PXLvjg0bvesMk9ZmafDGk-_AImcoFMn4ktGOCoow29s2in4uVvey7j5cq17Qqfx9LqzkCIaB2R_QGpsjkW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><pqid>206783499</pqid></control><display><type>magazinearticle</type><title>A Better Way to Gauge Profitability</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Burns, David C ; Sale, J Timothy ; Stephan, Jens A</creator><creatorcontrib>Burns, David C ; Sale, J Timothy ; Stephan, Jens A</creatorcontrib><description>Return-on-equity (ROE) is the correct profit metric to evaluate the performance of a business. However, the primary emphasis on financial ratio analysis must be on operating performance. The "advanced" version of the DuPont model remedies the original model's failure to cleanly separate the effects of operating and financing decisions. It introduces the concept of return on net operating assets (RNOA) as the core measure of operating performance and clearly separates the effects of leverage and operating decisions. The advanced model does not change the result of the ROE calculation. However, the elements underlying the ROE ratio are different and provide a clean separation of operating and financing decisions. RNOA is effectively insulated from financing decisions. Changing the amount of debt does not affect the operating assets or the profit before interest expense and, therefore, does not affect RNOA. It also permits straightforward computation of the impact on ROE of alternative financing decisions. Changes in the interest rate affect the spread, while changes in the amount of debt affect financial leverage in a transparent manner.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8448</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1945-0729</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JACYAD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: American Institute of Certified Public Accountants</publisher><subject>Auditing procedures ; Balance sheets ; Capital structure ; Cost control ; Equity ; Financial analysis ; Financial leverage ; Financial ratios ; Financial statements ; Interest rates ; Inventory ; Net income ; Profitability ; Profits ; Public accountants ; Ratios ; Retailing industry ; Return on assets ; Return on equity</subject><ispartof>Journal of Accountancy, 2008-08, Vol.206 (2), p.38</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Aug 2008</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>312,780,784,791</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Burns, David C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sale, J Timothy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stephan, Jens A</creatorcontrib><title>A Better Way to Gauge Profitability</title><title>Journal of Accountancy</title><description>Return-on-equity (ROE) is the correct profit metric to evaluate the performance of a business. However, the primary emphasis on financial ratio analysis must be on operating performance. The "advanced" version of the DuPont model remedies the original model's failure to cleanly separate the effects of operating and financing decisions. It introduces the concept of return on net operating assets (RNOA) as the core measure of operating performance and clearly separates the effects of leverage and operating decisions. The advanced model does not change the result of the ROE calculation. However, the elements underlying the ROE ratio are different and provide a clean separation of operating and financing decisions. RNOA is effectively insulated from financing decisions. Changing the amount of debt does not affect the operating assets or the profit before interest expense and, therefore, does not affect RNOA. It also permits straightforward computation of the impact on ROE of alternative financing decisions. Changes in the interest rate affect the spread, while changes in the amount of debt affect financial leverage in a transparent manner.</description><subject>Auditing procedures</subject><subject>Balance sheets</subject><subject>Capital structure</subject><subject>Cost control</subject><subject>Equity</subject><subject>Financial analysis</subject><subject>Financial leverage</subject><subject>Financial ratios</subject><subject>Financial statements</subject><subject>Interest rates</subject><subject>Inventory</subject><subject>Net income</subject><subject>Profitability</subject><subject>Profits</subject><subject>Public accountants</subject><subject>Ratios</subject><subject>Retailing industry</subject><subject>Return on assets</subject><subject>Return on equity</subject><issn>0021-8448</issn><issn>1945-0729</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNotzE1LQkEUgOFBCrpZ_2Gi9cCZ73OWJmWCoAuhpYzXM3JDuDozLvz3BbV6Fw-8E9Fpcl5BNHQnOgCjFTqHD-Kx1m8AsBFjJ15n8o1b4yK_0k22US7S9chyU8Y8tLQfTkO7PYn7nE6Vn_87FduP9-38U63Wi-V8tlJHBFIc2PsI-4PXLvjg0bvesMk9ZmafDGk-_AImcoFMn4ktGOCoow29s2in4uVvey7j5cq17Qqfx9LqzkCIaB2R_QGpsjkW</recordid><startdate>20080801</startdate><enddate>20080801</enddate><creator>Burns, David C</creator><creator>Sale, J Timothy</creator><creator>Stephan, Jens A</creator><general>American Institute of Certified Public Accountants</general><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4S-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X1</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8A9</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRAZJ</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080801</creationdate><title>A Better Way to Gauge Profitability</title><author>Burns, David C ; Sale, J Timothy ; Stephan, Jens A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g809-e6e5570bd5146565854c2e2fc8fee5a291ed4658a94692cf9e3020e71736c4383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><prefilter>magazinearticle</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Auditing procedures</topic><topic>Balance sheets</topic><topic>Capital structure</topic><topic>Cost control</topic><topic>Equity</topic><topic>Financial analysis</topic><topic>Financial leverage</topic><topic>Financial ratios</topic><topic>Financial statements</topic><topic>Interest rates</topic><topic>Inventory</topic><topic>Net income</topic><topic>Profitability</topic><topic>Profits</topic><topic>Public accountants</topic><topic>Ratios</topic><topic>Retailing industry</topic><topic>Return on assets</topic><topic>Return on equity</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Burns, David C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sale, J Timothy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stephan, Jens A</creatorcontrib><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>BPIR.com Limited</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Accounting & Tax Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Accounting & Tax Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of Accountancy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Burns, David C</au><au>Sale, J Timothy</au><au>Stephan, Jens A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Better Way to Gauge Profitability</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Accountancy</jtitle><date>2008-08-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>206</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>38</spage><pages>38-</pages><issn>0021-8448</issn><eissn>1945-0729</eissn><coden>JACYAD</coden><abstract>Return-on-equity (ROE) is the correct profit metric to evaluate the performance of a business. However, the primary emphasis on financial ratio analysis must be on operating performance. The "advanced" version of the DuPont model remedies the original model's failure to cleanly separate the effects of operating and financing decisions. It introduces the concept of return on net operating assets (RNOA) as the core measure of operating performance and clearly separates the effects of leverage and operating decisions. The advanced model does not change the result of the ROE calculation. However, the elements underlying the ROE ratio are different and provide a clean separation of operating and financing decisions. RNOA is effectively insulated from financing decisions. Changing the amount of debt does not affect the operating assets or the profit before interest expense and, therefore, does not affect RNOA. It also permits straightforward computation of the impact on ROE of alternative financing decisions. Changes in the interest rate affect the spread, while changes in the amount of debt affect financial leverage in a transparent manner.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>American Institute of Certified Public Accountants</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8448 |
ispartof | Journal of Accountancy, 2008-08, Vol.206 (2), p.38 |
issn | 0021-8448 1945-0729 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_reports_206783499 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Auditing procedures Balance sheets Capital structure Cost control Equity Financial analysis Financial leverage Financial ratios Financial statements Interest rates Inventory Net income Profitability Profits Public accountants Ratios Retailing industry Return on assets Return on equity |
title | A Better Way to Gauge Profitability |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T23%3A35%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Better%20Way%20to%20Gauge%20Profitability&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Accountancy&rft.au=Burns,%20David%20C&rft.date=2008-08-01&rft.volume=206&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=38&rft.pages=38-&rft.issn=0021-8448&rft.eissn=1945-0729&rft.coden=JACYAD&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1529958931%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=206783499&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |