The grantor trust: Handmaiden to the IRS and servant to the taxpayer

The following is reviewed: 1. the methodologies used to achieve so-called grantor trust status deliberately, 2. the transactions which are currently in use to take advantage of that status, 3. the various lurking issues, some of which have surfaced but not been definitively resolved, and some which...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Taxes (Chicago, Ill.) Ill.), 1997-12, Vol.75 (12), p.706
Hauptverfasser: Kanter, Burton W, Legamaro, Michael J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 12
container_start_page 706
container_title Taxes (Chicago, Ill.)
container_volume 75
creator Kanter, Burton W
Legamaro, Michael J
description The following is reviewed: 1. the methodologies used to achieve so-called grantor trust status deliberately, 2. the transactions which are currently in use to take advantage of that status, 3. the various lurking issues, some of which have surfaced but not been definitively resolved, and some which have not yet surfaced, and 4. a description of the inconsistencies that exist even on the part of the IRS in its application of the concept. The statutory language requires the characterization to be made in all events in the case of transactional gain or loss passed to the grantor by determination of qualification of its receipt and tax character at the grantor level. To reach that result is not to change the integrity of the trust in any fashion or its independent status but, rather, simply to recognize that one cannot attribute to the grantor the tax incidents of the trust in a fair manner unless it is to be judged at the grantor level in terms of tax result where the substantive transaction is not modified but merely qualification for treatment is determined.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_206054095</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>25237864</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_reports_2060540953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNyrsOgkAQQNEtNBEf_zB-AMkACxFbH8FW6ckmjK8oizOD0b-XQnurm9ycgQkQLYYYLaKRGYtcETGzcR6YdXkmOLFr1DMod6JLKFxT392lpgbUg_Zgtz9AP0GInz39bXWv1r2Jp2Z4dDeh2bcTM99uylURtuwfHYlWTK1nlSrGDFOLeZr8Yz6ATDf9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>206054095</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The grantor trust: Handmaiden to the IRS and servant to the taxpayer</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Kanter, Burton W ; Legamaro, Michael J</creator><creatorcontrib>Kanter, Burton W ; Legamaro, Michael J</creatorcontrib><description>The following is reviewed: 1. the methodologies used to achieve so-called grantor trust status deliberately, 2. the transactions which are currently in use to take advantage of that status, 3. the various lurking issues, some of which have surfaced but not been definitively resolved, and some which have not yet surfaced, and 4. a description of the inconsistencies that exist even on the part of the IRS in its application of the concept. The statutory language requires the characterization to be made in all events in the case of transactional gain or loss passed to the grantor by determination of qualification of its receipt and tax character at the grantor level. To reach that result is not to change the integrity of the trust in any fashion or its independent status but, rather, simply to recognize that one cannot attribute to the grantor the tax incidents of the trust in a fair manner unless it is to be judged at the grantor level in terms of tax result where the substantive transaction is not modified but merely qualification for treatment is determined.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0040-0181</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Riverwoods: CCH INCORPORATED</publisher><subject>Beneficiaries ; Court decisions ; Estate taxes ; Foreign trusts ; Generation skipping tax ; Gift taxes ; Grantor trusts ; Income taxes ; Internal Revenue Code ; Net losses ; Section 675 ; Section 677 ; Section 679 ; Tax avoidance ; Taxation</subject><ispartof>Taxes (Chicago, Ill.), 1997-12, Vol.75 (12), p.706</ispartof><rights>Copyright Commerce Clearing House, Inc. Dec 1997</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kanter, Burton W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Legamaro, Michael J</creatorcontrib><title>The grantor trust: Handmaiden to the IRS and servant to the taxpayer</title><title>Taxes (Chicago, Ill.)</title><description>The following is reviewed: 1. the methodologies used to achieve so-called grantor trust status deliberately, 2. the transactions which are currently in use to take advantage of that status, 3. the various lurking issues, some of which have surfaced but not been definitively resolved, and some which have not yet surfaced, and 4. a description of the inconsistencies that exist even on the part of the IRS in its application of the concept. The statutory language requires the characterization to be made in all events in the case of transactional gain or loss passed to the grantor by determination of qualification of its receipt and tax character at the grantor level. To reach that result is not to change the integrity of the trust in any fashion or its independent status but, rather, simply to recognize that one cannot attribute to the grantor the tax incidents of the trust in a fair manner unless it is to be judged at the grantor level in terms of tax result where the substantive transaction is not modified but merely qualification for treatment is determined.</description><subject>Beneficiaries</subject><subject>Court decisions</subject><subject>Estate taxes</subject><subject>Foreign trusts</subject><subject>Generation skipping tax</subject><subject>Gift taxes</subject><subject>Grantor trusts</subject><subject>Income taxes</subject><subject>Internal Revenue Code</subject><subject>Net losses</subject><subject>Section 675</subject><subject>Section 677</subject><subject>Section 679</subject><subject>Tax avoidance</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><issn>0040-0181</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNyrsOgkAQQNEtNBEf_zB-AMkACxFbH8FW6ckmjK8oizOD0b-XQnurm9ycgQkQLYYYLaKRGYtcETGzcR6YdXkmOLFr1DMod6JLKFxT392lpgbUg_Zgtz9AP0GInz39bXWv1r2Jp2Z4dDeh2bcTM99uylURtuwfHYlWTK1nlSrGDFOLeZr8Yz6ATDf9</recordid><startdate>19971201</startdate><enddate>19971201</enddate><creator>Kanter, Burton W</creator><creator>Legamaro, Michael J</creator><general>CCH INCORPORATED</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X1</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8A9</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRAZJ</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19971201</creationdate><title>The grantor trust: Handmaiden to the IRS and servant to the taxpayer</title><author>Kanter, Burton W ; Legamaro, Michael J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_reports_2060540953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Beneficiaries</topic><topic>Court decisions</topic><topic>Estate taxes</topic><topic>Foreign trusts</topic><topic>Generation skipping tax</topic><topic>Gift taxes</topic><topic>Grantor trusts</topic><topic>Income taxes</topic><topic>Internal Revenue Code</topic><topic>Net losses</topic><topic>Section 675</topic><topic>Section 677</topic><topic>Section 679</topic><topic>Tax avoidance</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kanter, Burton W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Legamaro, Michael J</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Accounting &amp; Tax Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Accounting &amp; Tax Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax &amp; Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax &amp; Banking Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Taxes (Chicago, Ill.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kanter, Burton W</au><au>Legamaro, Michael J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The grantor trust: Handmaiden to the IRS and servant to the taxpayer</atitle><jtitle>Taxes (Chicago, Ill.)</jtitle><date>1997-12-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>706</spage><pages>706-</pages><issn>0040-0181</issn><abstract>The following is reviewed: 1. the methodologies used to achieve so-called grantor trust status deliberately, 2. the transactions which are currently in use to take advantage of that status, 3. the various lurking issues, some of which have surfaced but not been definitively resolved, and some which have not yet surfaced, and 4. a description of the inconsistencies that exist even on the part of the IRS in its application of the concept. The statutory language requires the characterization to be made in all events in the case of transactional gain or loss passed to the grantor by determination of qualification of its receipt and tax character at the grantor level. To reach that result is not to change the integrity of the trust in any fashion or its independent status but, rather, simply to recognize that one cannot attribute to the grantor the tax incidents of the trust in a fair manner unless it is to be judged at the grantor level in terms of tax result where the substantive transaction is not modified but merely qualification for treatment is determined.</abstract><cop>Riverwoods</cop><pub>CCH INCORPORATED</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0040-0181
ispartof Taxes (Chicago, Ill.), 1997-12, Vol.75 (12), p.706
issn 0040-0181
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_reports_206054095
source HeinOnline Law Journal Library
subjects Beneficiaries
Court decisions
Estate taxes
Foreign trusts
Generation skipping tax
Gift taxes
Grantor trusts
Income taxes
Internal Revenue Code
Net losses
Section 675
Section 677
Section 679
Tax avoidance
Taxation
title The grantor trust: Handmaiden to the IRS and servant to the taxpayer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T11%3A11%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20grantor%20trust:%20Handmaiden%20to%20the%20IRS%20and%20servant%20to%20the%20taxpayer&rft.jtitle=Taxes%20(Chicago,%20Ill.)&rft.au=Kanter,%20Burton%20W&rft.date=1997-12-01&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=706&rft.pages=706-&rft.issn=0040-0181&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E25237864%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=206054095&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true