Utilizing the Homeland Investment Act in 2005
One of the more remarkable provisions in the American Jobs Creation Act is Section 422, Incentives to Reinvest Foreign Earnings in the United States, often referred to as the Homeland Reinvestment Act. The provision was drafted to encourage the repatriation of profits generated overseas and spur inv...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Taxation of Global Transactions 2005-01, Vol.4 (4), p.59 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 59 |
container_title | Journal of Taxation of Global Transactions |
container_volume | 4 |
creator | Urse, Michael F Fowler, Tadd A Collins, Martin J |
description | One of the more remarkable provisions in the American Jobs Creation Act is Section 422, Incentives to Reinvest Foreign Earnings in the United States, often referred to as the Homeland Reinvestment Act. The provision was drafted to encourage the repatriation of profits generated overseas and spur investment and job growth in the US. It is a temporary provision that allows the repatriation of certain foreign earnings to the US at a substantially reduced US tax rate. The downside for concluding incorrectly that a dividend is eligible for HIA is very substantial - up to a 35% tax on a dividend that in most cases would not have otherwise been paid. Companies should have already begun modeling their expected benefits, securing necessary financing and implementing strategies to realize HIA benefits efficiently, given the short time window. The legislative history clearly states that there will be no repeat performance. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_204950791</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>892764641</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_reports_2049507913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0NDW21DU2NzTiYOAqLs4yMDCxNDM242TQDS3JzMmsysxLVyjJSFXwyM9NzUnMS1HwzCtLLS7JTc0rUXBMLlHIzFMwMjAw5WFgTUvMKU7lhdLcDIpuriHOHroFRfmFpUAN8UWpBflFJcXxRkALTA3MLQ2NiVEDADPhLxg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>204950791</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Utilizing the Homeland Investment Act in 2005</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Urse, Michael F ; Fowler, Tadd A ; Collins, Martin J</creator><creatorcontrib>Urse, Michael F ; Fowler, Tadd A ; Collins, Martin J</creatorcontrib><description>One of the more remarkable provisions in the American Jobs Creation Act is Section 422, Incentives to Reinvest Foreign Earnings in the United States, often referred to as the Homeland Reinvestment Act. The provision was drafted to encourage the repatriation of profits generated overseas and spur investment and job growth in the US. It is a temporary provision that allows the repatriation of certain foreign earnings to the US at a substantially reduced US tax rate. The downside for concluding incorrectly that a dividend is eligible for HIA is very substantial - up to a 35% tax on a dividend that in most cases would not have otherwise been paid. Companies should have already begun modeling their expected benefits, securing necessary financing and implementing strategies to realize HIA benefits efficiently, given the short time window. The legislative history clearly states that there will be no repeat performance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1539-3712</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Riverwoods: CCH INCORPORATED</publisher><subject>American Jobs Creation Act 2004-US ; Corporate tax planning ; Dividend distributions ; Foreign source income ; Repatriation</subject><ispartof>Journal of Taxation of Global Transactions, 2005-01, Vol.4 (4), p.59</ispartof><rights>Copyright CCH Inc Winter 2005</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>312,776,780,787</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Urse, Michael F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fowler, Tadd A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, Martin J</creatorcontrib><title>Utilizing the Homeland Investment Act in 2005</title><title>Journal of Taxation of Global Transactions</title><description>One of the more remarkable provisions in the American Jobs Creation Act is Section 422, Incentives to Reinvest Foreign Earnings in the United States, often referred to as the Homeland Reinvestment Act. The provision was drafted to encourage the repatriation of profits generated overseas and spur investment and job growth in the US. It is a temporary provision that allows the repatriation of certain foreign earnings to the US at a substantially reduced US tax rate. The downside for concluding incorrectly that a dividend is eligible for HIA is very substantial - up to a 35% tax on a dividend that in most cases would not have otherwise been paid. Companies should have already begun modeling their expected benefits, securing necessary financing and implementing strategies to realize HIA benefits efficiently, given the short time window. The legislative history clearly states that there will be no repeat performance.</description><subject>American Jobs Creation Act 2004-US</subject><subject>Corporate tax planning</subject><subject>Dividend distributions</subject><subject>Foreign source income</subject><subject>Repatriation</subject><issn>1539-3712</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNpjYeA0NDW21DU2NzTiYOAqLs4yMDCxNDM242TQDS3JzMmsysxLVyjJSFXwyM9NzUnMS1HwzCtLLS7JTc0rUXBMLlHIzFMwMjAw5WFgTUvMKU7lhdLcDIpuriHOHroFRfmFpUAN8UWpBflFJcXxRkALTA3MLQ2NiVEDADPhLxg</recordid><startdate>20050101</startdate><enddate>20050101</enddate><creator>Urse, Michael F</creator><creator>Fowler, Tadd A</creator><creator>Collins, Martin J</creator><general>CCH INCORPORATED</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20050101</creationdate><title>Utilizing the Homeland Investment Act in 2005</title><author>Urse, Michael F ; Fowler, Tadd A ; Collins, Martin J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_reports_2049507913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>American Jobs Creation Act 2004-US</topic><topic>Corporate tax planning</topic><topic>Dividend distributions</topic><topic>Foreign source income</topic><topic>Repatriation</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Urse, Michael F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fowler, Tadd A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, Martin J</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Journal of Taxation of Global Transactions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Urse, Michael F</au><au>Fowler, Tadd A</au><au>Collins, Martin J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Utilizing the Homeland Investment Act in 2005</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Taxation of Global Transactions</jtitle><date>2005-01-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>59</spage><pages>59-</pages><issn>1539-3712</issn><abstract>One of the more remarkable provisions in the American Jobs Creation Act is Section 422, Incentives to Reinvest Foreign Earnings in the United States, often referred to as the Homeland Reinvestment Act. The provision was drafted to encourage the repatriation of profits generated overseas and spur investment and job growth in the US. It is a temporary provision that allows the repatriation of certain foreign earnings to the US at a substantially reduced US tax rate. The downside for concluding incorrectly that a dividend is eligible for HIA is very substantial - up to a 35% tax on a dividend that in most cases would not have otherwise been paid. Companies should have already begun modeling their expected benefits, securing necessary financing and implementing strategies to realize HIA benefits efficiently, given the short time window. The legislative history clearly states that there will be no repeat performance.</abstract><cop>Riverwoods</cop><pub>CCH INCORPORATED</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1539-3712 |
ispartof | Journal of Taxation of Global Transactions, 2005-01, Vol.4 (4), p.59 |
issn | 1539-3712 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_reports_204950791 |
source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
subjects | American Jobs Creation Act 2004-US Corporate tax planning Dividend distributions Foreign source income Repatriation |
title | Utilizing the Homeland Investment Act in 2005 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T19%3A34%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Utilizing%20the%20Homeland%20Investment%20Act%20in%202005&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Taxation%20of%20Global%20Transactions&rft.au=Urse,%20Michael%20F&rft.date=2005-01-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=59&rft.pages=59-&rft.issn=1539-3712&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E892764641%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=204950791&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |