LTR 200440009 Underscores Need for Guidance Under Substantiality Test
The IRS, through Ltr. Rul. 200440009 and prior rulings, has provided de facto guidance on the substantiality test dealing with outbound stock reorganization. In connection with an outbound stock reorganization, the substantiality test is satisfied if the fair market value of the transferee foreign c...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Taxation of Global Transactions 2005-01, Vol.4 (4), p.73 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 73 |
container_title | Journal of Taxation of Global Transactions |
container_volume | 4 |
creator | Francl, Jason |
description | The IRS, through Ltr. Rul. 200440009 and prior rulings, has provided de facto guidance on the substantiality test dealing with outbound stock reorganization. In connection with an outbound stock reorganization, the substantiality test is satisfied if the fair market value of the transferee foreign corporation is at least equal to the fair market value of the US target. The structure of the regulations blunts the relevance of existing substantial compliance rulings. If an outbound stock reorganization technically fails the substantiality test, the parties must seek a substantial compliance ruling - or the transaction will not qualify for an exception to Section 367(a). The IRS could eliminate uncertainty, delay and expense by publishing guidance on the central substantiality issues. Additional guidance would permit tax advisors to issue opinions under circumstances that currently prompt a ruling request under Reg. 1.367(a)-3(c)(9). |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_204929881</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>892764711</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_reports_2049298813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0NDW21DU2NzTiYOAqLs4yMDCxNDM242Rw9QkJUjACck0MDAwsFULzUlKLipPzi1KLFfxSU1MU0vKLFNxLM1MS85JTIbIKwaVJxSWJeSWZiTmZJZUKIanFJTwMrGmJOcWpvFCam0HRzTXE2UO3oCi_sBSoIL4otSC_qKQ43ghosZGlhYWhMTFqAOA7NxQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>204929881</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>LTR 200440009 Underscores Need for Guidance Under Substantiality Test</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Francl, Jason</creator><creatorcontrib>Francl, Jason</creatorcontrib><description>The IRS, through Ltr. Rul. 200440009 and prior rulings, has provided de facto guidance on the substantiality test dealing with outbound stock reorganization. In connection with an outbound stock reorganization, the substantiality test is satisfied if the fair market value of the transferee foreign corporation is at least equal to the fair market value of the US target. The structure of the regulations blunts the relevance of existing substantial compliance rulings. If an outbound stock reorganization technically fails the substantiality test, the parties must seek a substantial compliance ruling - or the transaction will not qualify for an exception to Section 367(a). The IRS could eliminate uncertainty, delay and expense by publishing guidance on the central substantiality issues. Additional guidance would permit tax advisors to issue opinions under circumstances that currently prompt a ruling request under Reg. 1.367(a)-3(c)(9).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1539-3712</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Riverwoods: CCH INCORPORATED</publisher><subject>Acquisitions & mergers ; Business combinations ; Corporate tax planning ; Fair market value ; Internal Revenue Code ; International taxation ; Letter rulings ; Ltr. Rul. 200440009 ; Section 367(a) ; State court decisions ; Stock transfers</subject><ispartof>Journal of Taxation of Global Transactions, 2005-01, Vol.4 (4), p.73</ispartof><rights>Copyright CCH Inc Winter 2005</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>312,776,780,787</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Francl, Jason</creatorcontrib><title>LTR 200440009 Underscores Need for Guidance Under Substantiality Test</title><title>Journal of Taxation of Global Transactions</title><description>The IRS, through Ltr. Rul. 200440009 and prior rulings, has provided de facto guidance on the substantiality test dealing with outbound stock reorganization. In connection with an outbound stock reorganization, the substantiality test is satisfied if the fair market value of the transferee foreign corporation is at least equal to the fair market value of the US target. The structure of the regulations blunts the relevance of existing substantial compliance rulings. If an outbound stock reorganization technically fails the substantiality test, the parties must seek a substantial compliance ruling - or the transaction will not qualify for an exception to Section 367(a). The IRS could eliminate uncertainty, delay and expense by publishing guidance on the central substantiality issues. Additional guidance would permit tax advisors to issue opinions under circumstances that currently prompt a ruling request under Reg. 1.367(a)-3(c)(9).</description><subject>Acquisitions & mergers</subject><subject>Business combinations</subject><subject>Corporate tax planning</subject><subject>Fair market value</subject><subject>Internal Revenue Code</subject><subject>International taxation</subject><subject>Letter rulings</subject><subject>Ltr. Rul. 200440009</subject><subject>Section 367(a)</subject><subject>State court decisions</subject><subject>Stock transfers</subject><issn>1539-3712</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNpjYeA0NDW21DU2NzTiYOAqLs4yMDCxNDM242Rw9QkJUjACck0MDAwsFULzUlKLipPzi1KLFfxSU1MU0vKLFNxLM1MS85JTIbIKwaVJxSWJeSWZiTmZJZUKIanFJTwMrGmJOcWpvFCam0HRzTXE2UO3oCi_sBSoIL4otSC_qKQ43ghosZGlhYWhMTFqAOA7NxQ</recordid><startdate>20050101</startdate><enddate>20050101</enddate><creator>Francl, Jason</creator><general>CCH INCORPORATED</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20050101</creationdate><title>LTR 200440009 Underscores Need for Guidance Under Substantiality Test</title><author>Francl, Jason</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_reports_2049298813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Acquisitions & mergers</topic><topic>Business combinations</topic><topic>Corporate tax planning</topic><topic>Fair market value</topic><topic>Internal Revenue Code</topic><topic>International taxation</topic><topic>Letter rulings</topic><topic>Ltr. Rul. 200440009</topic><topic>Section 367(a)</topic><topic>State court decisions</topic><topic>Stock transfers</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Francl, Jason</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Journal of Taxation of Global Transactions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Francl, Jason</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>LTR 200440009 Underscores Need for Guidance Under Substantiality Test</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Taxation of Global Transactions</jtitle><date>2005-01-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>73</spage><pages>73-</pages><issn>1539-3712</issn><abstract>The IRS, through Ltr. Rul. 200440009 and prior rulings, has provided de facto guidance on the substantiality test dealing with outbound stock reorganization. In connection with an outbound stock reorganization, the substantiality test is satisfied if the fair market value of the transferee foreign corporation is at least equal to the fair market value of the US target. The structure of the regulations blunts the relevance of existing substantial compliance rulings. If an outbound stock reorganization technically fails the substantiality test, the parties must seek a substantial compliance ruling - or the transaction will not qualify for an exception to Section 367(a). The IRS could eliminate uncertainty, delay and expense by publishing guidance on the central substantiality issues. Additional guidance would permit tax advisors to issue opinions under circumstances that currently prompt a ruling request under Reg. 1.367(a)-3(c)(9).</abstract><cop>Riverwoods</cop><pub>CCH INCORPORATED</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1539-3712 |
ispartof | Journal of Taxation of Global Transactions, 2005-01, Vol.4 (4), p.73 |
issn | 1539-3712 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_reports_204929881 |
source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
subjects | Acquisitions & mergers Business combinations Corporate tax planning Fair market value Internal Revenue Code International taxation Letter rulings Ltr. Rul. 200440009 Section 367(a) State court decisions Stock transfers |
title | LTR 200440009 Underscores Need for Guidance Under Substantiality Test |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T08%3A22%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=LTR%20200440009%20Underscores%20Need%20for%20Guidance%20Under%20Substantiality%20Test&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Taxation%20of%20Global%20Transactions&rft.au=Francl,%20Jason&rft.date=2005-01-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=73&rft.pages=73-&rft.issn=1539-3712&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E892764711%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=204929881&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |